Common Weakness Enumeration
CWE-345
DiscouragedInsufficient Verification of Data Authenticity
Abstraction: Class · Status: Draft
The product does not sufficiently verify the origin or authenticity of data, in a way that causes it to accept invalid data.
944 vulnerabilities reference this CWE, most recent first.
CVE-2025-30192 (GCVE-0-2025-30192)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2025-07-21 12:49 – Updated: 2025-07-21 13:05
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
A Recursor configured to send out ECS enabled queries can be sensitive to spoofing attempts
Summary
An attacker spoofing answers to ECS enabled requests sent out by the Recursor has a chance of success higher than non-ECS enabled queries.
The updated version include various mitigations against spoofing attempts of ECS enabled queries by chaining ECS enabled requests and enforcing stricter validation of the received answers.
The most strict mitigation done when the new setting outgoing.edns_subnet_harden (old style name edns-subnet-harden) is enabled.
Severity
7.5 (High)
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: yes
Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
CWE
- CWE-345 - Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity
Assigner
References
1 reference
Impacted products
Date Public
2025-05-21 14:00
Credits
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2025-30192",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-07-21T13:05:23.317665Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-07-21T13:05:35.258Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"collectionURL": "https://repo.powerdns.com/",
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"modules": [
"resolver"
],
"packageName": "pdns-recursor",
"product": "Recursor",
"programFiles": [
"lwres.cc"
],
"repo": "https://github.com/PowerDNS/pdns",
"vendor": "PowerDNS",
"versions": [
{
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "5.0.12",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "5.1.6",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "5.2.4",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Xiang Li of AOSP Lab Nankai University"
}
],
"datePublic": "2025-05-21T14:00:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cp\u003eAn attacker spoofing answers to ECS enabled requests sent out by the Recursor has a chance of success higher than non-ECS enabled queries.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThe updated version include various mitigations against spoofing attempts of ECS enabled queries by chaining ECS enabled requests and enforcing stricter validation of the received answers.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThe most strict mitigation done when the new setting outgoing.edns_subnet_harden (old style name edns-subnet-harden) is enabled.\u003c/p\u003e"
}
],
"value": "An attacker spoofing answers to ECS enabled requests sent out by the Recursor has a chance of success higher than non-ECS enabled queries.\n\nThe updated version include various mitigations against spoofing attempts of ECS enabled queries by chaining ECS enabled requests and enforcing stricter validation of the received answers.\n\nThe most strict mitigation done when the new setting outgoing.edns_subnet_harden (old style name edns-subnet-harden) is enabled."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 7.5,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-345",
"description": "CWE-345 Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-07-21T12:49:31.532Z",
"orgId": "8ce71d90-2354-404b-a86e-bec2cc4e6981",
"shortName": "OX"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://docs.powerdns.com/recursor/security-advisories/powerdns-advisory-2025-04.html"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "PowerDNS Security Advisory 2025-04",
"discovery": "EXTERNAL"
},
"title": "A Recursor configured to send out ECS enabled queries can be sensitive to spoofing attempts",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 0.2.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "8ce71d90-2354-404b-a86e-bec2cc4e6981",
"assignerShortName": "OX",
"cveId": "CVE-2025-30192",
"datePublished": "2025-07-21T12:49:31.532Z",
"dateReserved": "2025-03-18T08:39:46.884Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-07-21T13:05:35.258Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
CVE-2025-30144 (GCVE-0-2025-30144)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2025-03-19 15:41 – Updated: 2025-03-19 18:29
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
Fast-JWT Improperly Validates iss Claims
Summary
fast-jwt provides fast JSON Web Token (JWT) implementation. Prior to 5.0.6, the fast-jwt library does not properly validate the iss claim based on the RFC 7519. The iss (issuer) claim validation within the fast-jwt library permits an array of strings as a valid iss value. This design flaw enables a potential attack where a malicious actor crafts a JWT with an iss claim structured as ['https://attacker-domain/', 'https://valid-iss']. Due to the permissive validation, the JWT will be deemed valid. Furthermore, if the application relies on external libraries like get-jwks that do not independently validate the iss claim, the attacker can leverage this vulnerability to forge a JWT that will be accepted by the victim application. Essentially, the attacker can insert their own domain into the iss array, alongside the legitimate issuer, and bypass the intended security checks. This issue is fixed in 5.0.6.
Severity
6.5 (Medium)
SSVC
Exploitation: poc
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
CWE
Assigner
References
3 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/nearform/fast-jwt/security/adv… | x_refsource_CONFIRM |
| https://github.com/nearform/fast-jwt/commit/cc26b… | x_refsource_MISC |
| https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc7519#page-9 | x_refsource_MISC |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2025-30144",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "poc"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-03-19T18:29:09.571171Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-03-19T18:29:22.749Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "fast-jwt",
"vendor": "nearform",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003c 5.0.6"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "fast-jwt provides fast JSON Web Token (JWT) implementation. Prior to 5.0.6, the fast-jwt library does not properly validate the iss claim based on the RFC 7519. The iss (issuer) claim validation within the fast-jwt library permits an array of strings as a valid iss value. This design flaw enables a potential attack where a malicious actor crafts a JWT with an iss claim structured as [\u0027https://attacker-domain/\u0027, \u0027https://valid-iss\u0027]. Due to the permissive validation, the JWT will be deemed valid. Furthermore, if the application relies on external libraries like get-jwks that do not independently validate the iss claim, the attacker can leverage this vulnerability to forge a JWT that will be accepted by the victim application. Essentially, the attacker can insert their own domain into the iss array, alongside the legitimate issuer, and bypass the intended security checks. This issue is fixed in 5.0.6."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 6.5,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-345",
"description": "CWE-345: Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
},
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-290",
"description": "CWE-290: Authentication Bypass by Spoofing",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-03-19T15:41:19.642Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/nearform/fast-jwt/security/advisories/GHSA-gm45-q3v2-6cf8",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/nearform/fast-jwt/security/advisories/GHSA-gm45-q3v2-6cf8"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/nearform/fast-jwt/commit/cc26b1d473f900446ad846f8f0b10eb1c0adcbdd",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/nearform/fast-jwt/commit/cc26b1d473f900446ad846f8f0b10eb1c0adcbdd"
},
{
"name": "https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc7519#page-9",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc7519#page-9"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-gm45-q3v2-6cf8",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Fast-JWT Improperly Validates iss Claims"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2025-30144",
"datePublished": "2025-03-19T15:41:19.642Z",
"dateReserved": "2025-03-17T12:41:42.564Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-03-19T18:29:22.749Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
CVE-2025-27735 (GCVE-0-2025-27735)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2025-04-08 17:24 – Updated: 2026-02-13 19:33
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
Windows Virtualization-Based Security (VBS) Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability
Summary
Insufficient verification of data authenticity in Windows Virtualization-Based Security (VBS) Enclave allows an authorized attacker to bypass a security feature locally.
Severity
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: total
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
CWE
- CWE-345 - Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity
Assigner
References
1 reference
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerabi… | vendor-advisorypatch |
Impacted products
17 products
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Microsoft | Windows 10 Version 1507 |
Affected:
10.0.10240.0 , < 10.0.10240.20978
(custom)
|
|
| Microsoft | Windows 10 Version 1607 |
Affected:
10.0.14393.0 , < 10.0.14393.7969
(custom)
|
|
| Microsoft | Windows 10 Version 1809 |
Affected:
10.0.17763.0 , < 10.0.17763.7136
(custom)
|
|
| Microsoft | Windows 10 Version 21H2 |
Affected:
10.0.19044.0 , < 10.0.19044.5737
(custom)
|
|
| Microsoft | Windows 10 Version 22H2 |
Affected:
10.0.19045.0 , < 10.0.19045.5737
(custom)
|
|
| Microsoft | Windows 11 version 22H2 |
Affected:
10.0.22621.0 , < 10.0.22621.5189
(custom)
|
|
| Microsoft | Windows 11 version 22H3 |
Affected:
10.0.22631.0 , < 10.0.22631.5189
(custom)
|
|
| Microsoft | Windows 11 Version 23H2 |
Affected:
10.0.22631.0 , < 10.0.22631.5189
(custom)
|
|
| Microsoft | Windows 11 Version 24H2 |
Affected:
10.0.26100.0 , < 10.0.26100.3775
(custom)
|
|
| Microsoft | Windows Server 2016 |
Affected:
10.0.14393.0 , < 10.0.14393.7969
(custom)
|
|
| Microsoft | Windows Server 2016 (Server Core installation) |
Affected:
10.0.14393.0 , < 10.0.14393.7969
(custom)
|
|
| Microsoft | Windows Server 2019 |
Affected:
10.0.17763.0 , < 10.0.17763.7136
(custom)
|
|
| Microsoft | Windows Server 2019 (Server Core installation) |
Affected:
10.0.17763.0 , < 10.0.17763.7136
(custom)
|
|
| Microsoft | Windows Server 2022 |
Affected:
10.0.20348.0 , < 10.0.20348.3453
(custom)
|
|
| Microsoft | Windows Server 2022, 23H2 Edition (Server Core installation) |
Affected:
10.0.25398.0 , < 10.0.25398.1551
(custom)
|
|
| Microsoft | Windows Server 2025 |
Affected:
10.0.26100.0 , < 10.0.26100.3775
(custom)
|
|
| Microsoft | Windows Server 2025 (Server Core installation) |
Affected:
10.0.26100.0 , < 10.0.26100.3775
(custom)
|
Date Public
2025-04-08 07:00
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2025-27735",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-04-08T19:44:25.628844Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-04-08T19:44:34.541Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"platforms": [
"32-bit Systems",
"x64-based Systems"
],
"product": "Windows 10 Version 1507",
"vendor": "Microsoft",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "10.0.10240.20978",
"status": "affected",
"version": "10.0.10240.0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"platforms": [
"32-bit Systems",
"x64-based Systems"
],
"product": "Windows 10 Version 1607",
"vendor": "Microsoft",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "10.0.14393.7969",
"status": "affected",
"version": "10.0.14393.0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"platforms": [
"32-bit Systems",
"x64-based Systems"
],
"product": "Windows 10 Version 1809",
"vendor": "Microsoft",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "10.0.17763.7136",
"status": "affected",
"version": "10.0.17763.0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"platforms": [
"32-bit Systems",
"ARM64-based Systems",
"x64-based Systems"
],
"product": "Windows 10 Version 21H2",
"vendor": "Microsoft",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "10.0.19044.5737",
"status": "affected",
"version": "10.0.19044.0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"platforms": [
"32-bit Systems",
"ARM64-based Systems",
"x64-based Systems"
],
"product": "Windows 10 Version 22H2",
"vendor": "Microsoft",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "10.0.19045.5737",
"status": "affected",
"version": "10.0.19045.0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"platforms": [
"ARM64-based Systems",
"x64-based Systems"
],
"product": "Windows 11 version 22H2",
"vendor": "Microsoft",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "10.0.22621.5189",
"status": "affected",
"version": "10.0.22621.0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"platforms": [
"ARM64-based Systems"
],
"product": "Windows 11 version 22H3",
"vendor": "Microsoft",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "10.0.22631.5189",
"status": "affected",
"version": "10.0.22631.0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"platforms": [
"x64-based Systems"
],
"product": "Windows 11 Version 23H2",
"vendor": "Microsoft",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "10.0.22631.5189",
"status": "affected",
"version": "10.0.22631.0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"platforms": [
"ARM64-based Systems",
"x64-based Systems"
],
"product": "Windows 11 Version 24H2",
"vendor": "Microsoft",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "10.0.26100.3775",
"status": "affected",
"version": "10.0.26100.0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"platforms": [
"x64-based Systems"
],
"product": "Windows Server 2016",
"vendor": "Microsoft",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "10.0.14393.7969",
"status": "affected",
"version": "10.0.14393.0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"platforms": [
"x64-based Systems"
],
"product": "Windows Server 2016 (Server Core installation)",
"vendor": "Microsoft",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "10.0.14393.7969",
"status": "affected",
"version": "10.0.14393.0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"platforms": [
"x64-based Systems"
],
"product": "Windows Server 2019",
"vendor": "Microsoft",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "10.0.17763.7136",
"status": "affected",
"version": "10.0.17763.0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"platforms": [
"x64-based Systems"
],
"product": "Windows Server 2019 (Server Core installation)",
"vendor": "Microsoft",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "10.0.17763.7136",
"status": "affected",
"version": "10.0.17763.0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"platforms": [
"x64-based Systems"
],
"product": "Windows Server 2022",
"vendor": "Microsoft",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "10.0.20348.3453",
"status": "affected",
"version": "10.0.20348.0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"platforms": [
"x64-based Systems"
],
"product": "Windows Server 2022, 23H2 Edition (Server Core installation)",
"vendor": "Microsoft",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "10.0.25398.1551",
"status": "affected",
"version": "10.0.25398.0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"platforms": [
"x64-based Systems"
],
"product": "Windows Server 2025",
"vendor": "Microsoft",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "10.0.26100.3775",
"status": "affected",
"version": "10.0.26100.0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"platforms": [
"x64-based Systems"
],
"product": "Windows Server 2025 (Server Core installation)",
"vendor": "Microsoft",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "10.0.26100.3775",
"status": "affected",
"version": "10.0.26100.0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"cpeApplicability": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:microsoft:windows_10_1809:*:*:*:*:*:*:x86:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "10.0.17763.7136",
"versionStartIncluding": "10.0.17763.0",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:microsoft:windows_server_2019:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "10.0.17763.7136",
"versionStartIncluding": "10.0.17763.0",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:microsoft:windows_server_2019:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "10.0.17763.7136",
"versionStartIncluding": "10.0.17763.0",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:microsoft:windows_server_2022:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "10.0.20348.3453",
"versionStartIncluding": "10.0.20348.0",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:microsoft:windows_10_21H2:*:*:*:*:*:*:x86:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "10.0.19044.5737",
"versionStartIncluding": "10.0.19044.0",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:microsoft:windows_11_22H2:*:*:*:*:*:*:arm64:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "10.0.22621.5189",
"versionStartIncluding": "10.0.22621.0",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:microsoft:windows_10_22H2:*:*:*:*:*:*:x64:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "10.0.19045.5737",
"versionStartIncluding": "10.0.19045.0",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:microsoft:windows_server_2025:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "10.0.26100.3775",
"versionStartIncluding": "10.0.26100.0",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:microsoft:windows_11_23H2:*:*:*:*:*:*:arm64:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "10.0.22631.5189",
"versionStartIncluding": "10.0.22631.0",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:microsoft:windows_11_23H2:*:*:*:*:*:*:x64:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "10.0.22631.5189",
"versionStartIncluding": "10.0.22631.0",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:microsoft:windows_server_23h2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "10.0.25398.1551",
"versionStartIncluding": "10.0.25398.0",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:microsoft:windows_11_24H2:*:*:*:*:*:*:arm64:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "10.0.26100.3775",
"versionStartIncluding": "10.0.26100.0",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:microsoft:windows_server_2025:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "10.0.26100.3775",
"versionStartIncluding": "10.0.26100.0",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:microsoft:windows_10_1507:*:*:*:*:*:*:x86:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "10.0.10240.20978",
"versionStartIncluding": "10.0.10240.0",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:microsoft:windows_10_1607:*:*:*:*:*:*:x86:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "10.0.14393.7969",
"versionStartIncluding": "10.0.14393.0",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:microsoft:windows_server_2016:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "10.0.14393.7969",
"versionStartIncluding": "10.0.14393.0",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:microsoft:windows_server_2016:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "10.0.14393.7969",
"versionStartIncluding": "10.0.14393.0",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"datePublic": "2025-04-08T07:00:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en-US",
"value": "Insufficient verification of data authenticity in Windows Virtualization-Based Security (VBS) Enclave allows an authorized attacker to bypass a security feature locally."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"baseScore": 6,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N/E:U/RL:O/RC:C",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en-US",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-345",
"description": "CWE-345: Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity",
"lang": "en-US",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-02-13T19:33:25.997Z",
"orgId": "f38d906d-7342-40ea-92c1-6c4a2c6478c8",
"shortName": "microsoft"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "Windows Virtualization-Based Security (VBS) Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability",
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"patch"
],
"url": "https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2025-27735"
}
],
"title": "Windows Virtualization-Based Security (VBS) Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "f38d906d-7342-40ea-92c1-6c4a2c6478c8",
"assignerShortName": "microsoft",
"cveId": "CVE-2025-27735",
"datePublished": "2025-04-08T17:24:09.332Z",
"dateReserved": "2025-03-06T04:26:08.552Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-02-13T19:33:25.997Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2025-27616 (GCVE-0-2025-27616)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2025-03-10 18:56 – Updated: 2025-03-11 18:56
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
Vela Server has Insufficient Webhook Payload Data Verification
Summary
Vela is a Pipeline Automation (CI/CD) framework built on Linux container technology written in Golang. Prior to versions 0.25.3 and 0.26.3, by spoofing a webhook payload with a specific set of headers and body data, an attacker could transfer ownership of a repository and its repo level secrets to a separate repository. These secrets could be exfiltrated by follow up builds to the repository. Users with an enabled repository with access to repo level CI secrets in Vela are vulnerable to the exploit, and any user with access to the CI instance and the linked source control manager can perform the exploit. Versions 0.25.3 and 0.26.3 fix the issue. No known workarounds are available.
Severity
8.6 (High)
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
CWE
Assigner
References
5 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/go-vela/server/security/adviso… | x_refsource_CONFIRM |
| https://github.com/go-vela/server/commit/257886e5… | x_refsource_MISC |
| https://github.com/go-vela/server/commit/67c1892e… | x_refsource_MISC |
| https://github.com/go-vela/server/releases/tag/v0.25.3 | x_refsource_MISC |
| https://github.com/go-vela/server/releases/tag/v0.26.3 | x_refsource_MISC |
Impacted products
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2025-27616",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-03-11T18:55:53.094356Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-03-11T18:56:11.199Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "server",
"vendor": "go-vela",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003c 0.25.3"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003e= 0.26.0, \u003c 0.26.3"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Vela is a Pipeline Automation (CI/CD) framework built on Linux container technology written in Golang. Prior to versions 0.25.3 and 0.26.3, by spoofing a webhook payload with a specific set of headers and body data, an attacker could transfer ownership of a repository and its repo level secrets to a separate repository. These secrets could be exfiltrated by follow up builds to the repository. Users with an enabled repository with access to repo level CI secrets in Vela are vulnerable to the exploit, and any user with access to the CI instance and the linked source control manager can perform the exploit. Versions 0.25.3 and 0.26.3 fix the issue. No known workarounds are available."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 8.6,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "CHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-290",
"description": "CWE-290: Authentication Bypass by Spoofing",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
},
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-345",
"description": "CWE-345: Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-03-10T18:56:14.537Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/go-vela/server/security/advisories/GHSA-9m63-33q3-xq5x",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/go-vela/server/security/advisories/GHSA-9m63-33q3-xq5x"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/go-vela/server/commit/257886e5a3eea518548387885894e239668584f5",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/go-vela/server/commit/257886e5a3eea518548387885894e239668584f5"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/go-vela/server/commit/67c1892e2464dc54b8d2588815dfb7819222500b",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/go-vela/server/commit/67c1892e2464dc54b8d2588815dfb7819222500b"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/go-vela/server/releases/tag/v0.25.3",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/go-vela/server/releases/tag/v0.25.3"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/go-vela/server/releases/tag/v0.26.3",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/go-vela/server/releases/tag/v0.26.3"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-9m63-33q3-xq5x",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Vela Server has Insufficient Webhook Payload Data Verification"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2025-27616",
"datePublished": "2025-03-10T18:56:14.537Z",
"dateReserved": "2025-03-03T15:10:34.080Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-03-11T18:56:11.199Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
CVE-2025-27257 (GCVE-0-2025-27257)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2025-03-10 09:05 – Updated: 2025-03-12 11:10
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Summary
Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity vulnerability in GE Vernova UR IED family devices allows an authenticated user to install a modified firmware.
The firmware signature verification is enforced only on the client-side dedicated software Enervista UR Setup, allowing the integration check to be bypassed.
Severity
6.1 (Medium)
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
CWE
- CWE-345 - Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity
Assigner
References
Impacted products
19 products
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| GE Vernova | N60 multilin |
Affected:
7.0 , ≤ 8.60
(custom)
|
|
| GE Vernova | B30 Multilin |
Affected:
7.0 , ≤ 8.60
(custom)
|
|
| GE Vernova | B90 Multilin |
Affected:
7.0 , ≤ 8.60
(custom)
|
|
| GE Vernova | C30 Multilin |
Affected:
7.0 , ≤ 8.60
(custom)
|
|
| GE Vernova | C60 Multilin |
Affected:
7.0 , ≤ 8.60
(custom)
|
|
| GE Vernova | C70 Multilin |
Affected:
7.0 , ≤ 8.60
(custom)
|
|
| GE Vernova | C95 Multilin |
Affected:
7.0 , ≤ 8.60
(custom)
|
|
| GE Vernova | D30 Multilin |
Affected:
7.0 , ≤ 8.60
(custom)
|
|
| GE Vernova | D60 Multilin |
Affected:
7.0 , ≤ 8.60
(custom)
|
|
| GE Vernova | F35 Multilin |
Affected:
7.0 , ≤ 8.60
(custom)
|
|
| GE Vernova | F60 Multilin |
Affected:
7.0 , ≤ 8.60
(custom)
|
|
| GE Vernova | G30 Multilin |
Affected:
7.0 , ≤ 8.60
(custom)
|
|
| GE Vernova | G60 Multilin |
Affected:
7.0 , ≤ 8.60
(custom)
|
|
| GE Vernova | L30 Multilin |
Affected:
7.0 , ≤ 8.60
(custom)
|
|
| GE Vernova | L60 Multilin |
Affected:
7.0 , ≤ 8.60
(custom)
|
|
| GE Vernova | L90 Multilin |
Affected:
7.0 , ≤ 8.60
(custom)
|
|
| GE Vernova | M60 Multilin |
Affected:
7.0 , ≤ 8.60
(custom)
|
|
| GE Vernova | T35 Multilin |
Affected:
7.0 , ≤ 8.60
(custom)
|
|
| GE Vernova | T60 Multilin |
Affected:
7.0 , ≤ 8.60
(custom)
|
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2025-27257",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-03-10T13:23:04.580273Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-03-10T13:23:20.325Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "N60 multilin",
"vendor": "GE Vernova",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "8.60",
"status": "affected",
"version": "7.0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "B30 Multilin",
"vendor": "GE Vernova",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "8.60",
"status": "affected",
"version": "7.0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "B90 Multilin",
"vendor": "GE Vernova",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "8.60",
"status": "affected",
"version": "7.0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "C30 Multilin",
"vendor": "GE Vernova",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "8.60",
"status": "affected",
"version": "7.0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "C60 Multilin",
"vendor": "GE Vernova",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "8.60",
"status": "affected",
"version": "7.0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "C70 Multilin",
"vendor": "GE Vernova",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "8.60",
"status": "affected",
"version": "7.0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "C95 Multilin",
"vendor": "GE Vernova",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "8.60",
"status": "affected",
"version": "7.0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "D30 Multilin",
"vendor": "GE Vernova",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "8.60",
"status": "affected",
"version": "7.0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "D60 Multilin",
"vendor": "GE Vernova",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "8.60",
"status": "affected",
"version": "7.0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "F35 Multilin",
"vendor": "GE Vernova",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "8.60",
"status": "affected",
"version": "7.0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "F60 Multilin",
"vendor": "GE Vernova",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "8.60",
"status": "affected",
"version": "7.0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "G30 Multilin",
"vendor": "GE Vernova",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "8.60",
"status": "affected",
"version": "7.0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "G60 Multilin",
"vendor": "GE Vernova",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "8.60",
"status": "affected",
"version": "7.0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "L30 Multilin",
"vendor": "GE Vernova",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "8.60",
"status": "affected",
"version": "7.0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "L60 Multilin",
"vendor": "GE Vernova",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "8.60",
"status": "affected",
"version": "7.0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "L90 Multilin",
"vendor": "GE Vernova",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "8.60",
"status": "affected",
"version": "7.0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "M60 Multilin",
"vendor": "GE Vernova",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "8.60",
"status": "affected",
"version": "7.0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "T35 Multilin",
"vendor": "GE Vernova",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "8.60",
"status": "affected",
"version": "7.0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "T60 Multilin",
"vendor": "GE Vernova",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "8.60",
"status": "affected",
"version": "7.0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "M60 Multilin",
"vendor": "GE Vernova",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "8.60",
"status": "affected",
"version": "7.0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity vulnerability in GE Vernova UR IED family devices allows an authenticated user to install a modified firmware.\u003cbr\u003eThe firmware signature verification is enforced only on the client-side dedicated software Enervista UR Setup, a\u003cspan style=\"background-color: var(--wht);\"\u003ellowing the integration check to be bypassed.\u003c/span\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e"
}
],
"value": "Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity vulnerability in GE Vernova UR IED family devices allows an authenticated user to install a modified firmware.\nThe firmware signature verification is enforced only on the client-side dedicated software Enervista UR Setup, allowing the integration check to be bypassed."
}
],
"impacts": [
{
"capecId": "CAPEC-638",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CAPEC-638 Altered Component Firmware"
}
]
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "ADJACENT_NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 6.1,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "HIGH",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-345",
"description": "CWE-345 Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-03-12T11:10:57.902Z",
"orgId": "bec8025f-a851-46e5-b3a3-058e6b0aa23c",
"shortName": "Nozomi"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://www.gevernova.com/grid-solutions/app/DownloadFile.aspx?prod=urfamily\u0026type=21\u0026file=76"
},
{
"url": "https://www.nozominetworks.com/labs/vulnerability-advisories-cve-2025-27257"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 0.2.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "bec8025f-a851-46e5-b3a3-058e6b0aa23c",
"assignerShortName": "Nozomi",
"cveId": "CVE-2025-27257",
"datePublished": "2025-03-10T09:05:34.817Z",
"dateReserved": "2025-02-21T08:32:26.974Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-03-12T11:10:57.902Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
CVE-2025-25188 (GCVE-0-2025-25188)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2025-02-10 17:35 – Updated: 2025-02-12 15:47
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
DNSSEC validation may accept broken authentication chains
Summary
Hickory DNS is a Rust based DNS client, server, and resolver. A vulnerability present starting in version 0.8.0 and prior to versions 0.24.3 and 0.25.0-alpha.5 impacts Hickory DNS users relying on DNSSEC verification in the client library, stub resolver, or recursive resolver. The DNSSEC validation routines treat entire RRsets of DNSKEY records as trusted once they have established trust in only one of the DNSKEYs. As a result, if a zone includes a DNSKEY with a public key that matches a configured trust anchor, all keys in that zone will be trusted to authenticate other records in the zone. There is a second variant of this vulnerability involving DS records, where an authenticated DS record covering one DNSKEY leads to trust in signatures made by an unrelated DNSKEY in the same zone. Versions 0.24.3 and 0.25.0-alpha.5 fix the issue.
Severity
SSVC
Exploitation: poc
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
CWE
- CWE-345 - Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity
Assigner
References
2 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/hickory-dns/hickory-dns/securi… | x_refsource_CONFIRM |
| https://github.com/hickory-dns/hickory-dns/commit… | x_refsource_MISC |
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| hickory-dns | hickory-dns |
Affected:
>= 0.8.0, < 0.24.3
Affected: >= 0.25.0-alpha.1, < 0.25.0-alpha.5 |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2025-25188",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "poc"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-02-10T17:56:07.547520Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-02-12T15:47:59.943Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "hickory-dns",
"vendor": "hickory-dns",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003e= 0.8.0, \u003c 0.24.3"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003e= 0.25.0-alpha.1, \u003c 0.25.0-alpha.5"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Hickory DNS is a Rust based DNS client, server, and resolver. A vulnerability present starting in version 0.8.0 and prior to versions 0.24.3 and 0.25.0-alpha.5 impacts Hickory DNS users relying on DNSSEC verification in the client library, stub resolver, or recursive resolver. The DNSSEC validation routines treat entire RRsets of DNSKEY records as trusted once they have established trust in only one of the DNSKEYs. As a result, if a zone includes a DNSKEY with a public key that matches a configured trust anchor, all keys in that zone will be trusted to authenticate other records in the zone. There is a second variant of this vulnerability involving DS records, where an authenticated DS record covering one DNSKEY leads to trust in signatures made by an unrelated DNSKEY in the same zone. Versions 0.24.3 and 0.25.0-alpha.5 fix the issue."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "NONE",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 5.7,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "HIGH"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-345",
"description": "CWE-345: Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-02-10T17:35:25.265Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/hickory-dns/hickory-dns/security/advisories/GHSA-37wc-h8xc-5hc4",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/hickory-dns/hickory-dns/security/advisories/GHSA-37wc-h8xc-5hc4"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/hickory-dns/hickory-dns/commit/e118c6eec569f4340421f86ee0686714010c63e9",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/hickory-dns/hickory-dns/commit/e118c6eec569f4340421f86ee0686714010c63e9"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-37wc-h8xc-5hc4",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "DNSSEC validation may accept broken authentication chains"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2025-25188",
"datePublished": "2025-02-10T17:35:25.265Z",
"dateReserved": "2025-02-03T19:30:53.399Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-02-12T15:47:59.943Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
CVE-2025-24903 (GCVE-0-2025-24903)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2025-02-13 15:20 – Updated: 2025-02-13 16:27
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
libsignal-service-rs Doesn't Check Origin of Sync Messages
Summary
libsignal-service-rs is a Rust version of the libsignal-service-java library which implements the core functionality to communicate with Signal servers. Prior to commit 82d70f6720e762898f34ae76b0894b0297d9b2f8, any contact may forge a sync message, impersonating another device of the local user. The origin of sync messages is not checked. Patched libsignal-service can be found after commit 82d70f6720e762898f34ae76b0894b0297d9b2f8. The `Metadata` struct contains an additional `was_encrypted` field, which breaks the API, but should be easily resolvable. No known workarounds are available.
Severity
8.5 (High)
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
CWE
- CWE-345 - Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity
Assigner
References
2 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/whisperfish/libsignal-service-… | x_refsource_CONFIRM |
| https://github.com/whisperfish/libsignal-service-… | x_refsource_MISC |
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| whisperfish | libsignal-service-rs |
Affected:
< 82d70f6720e762898f34ae76b0894b0297d9b2f8
|
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2025-24903",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-02-13T16:26:57.836430Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-02-13T16:27:04.294Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "libsignal-service-rs",
"vendor": "whisperfish",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003c 82d70f6720e762898f34ae76b0894b0297d9b2f8"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "libsignal-service-rs is a Rust version of the libsignal-service-java library which implements the core functionality to communicate with Signal servers. Prior to commit 82d70f6720e762898f34ae76b0894b0297d9b2f8, any contact may forge a sync message, impersonating another device of the local user. The origin of sync messages is not checked. Patched libsignal-service can be found after commit 82d70f6720e762898f34ae76b0894b0297d9b2f8. The `Metadata` struct contains an additional `was_encrypted` field, which breaks the API, but should be easily resolvable. No known workarounds are available."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 8.5,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "CHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:H/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-345",
"description": "CWE-345: Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-02-13T15:20:28.251Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/whisperfish/libsignal-service-rs/security/advisories/GHSA-r58q-66g9-h6g8",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/whisperfish/libsignal-service-rs/security/advisories/GHSA-r58q-66g9-h6g8"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/whisperfish/libsignal-service-rs/commit/82d70f6720e762898f34ae76b0894b0297d9b2f8",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/whisperfish/libsignal-service-rs/commit/82d70f6720e762898f34ae76b0894b0297d9b2f8"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-r58q-66g9-h6g8",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "libsignal-service-rs Doesn\u0027t Check Origin of Sync Messages"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2025-24903",
"datePublished": "2025-02-13T15:20:28.251Z",
"dateReserved": "2025-01-27T15:32:29.453Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-02-13T16:27:04.294Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
CVE-2025-24882 (GCVE-0-2025-24882)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2025-01-29 17:40 – Updated: 2025-01-29 17:52
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
regclient may ignore pinned manifest digests
Summary
regclient is a Docker and OCI Registry Client in Go. A malicious registry could return a different digest for a pinned manifest without detection. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.7.1.
Severity
5.2 (Medium)
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
Assigner
References
2 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/regclient/regclient/security/a… | x_refsource_CONFIRM |
| https://github.com/regclient/regclient/commit/7d1… | x_refsource_MISC |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2025-24882",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-01-29T17:52:40.596309Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-01-29T17:52:45.827Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "regclient",
"vendor": "regclient",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003c 0.7.1"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "regclient is a Docker and OCI Registry Client in Go. A malicious registry could return a different digest for a pinned manifest without detection. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.7.1."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 5.2,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "HIGH",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "REQUIRED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-20",
"description": "CWE-20: Improper Input Validation",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
},
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-345",
"description": "CWE-345: Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-01-29T17:40:07.496Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/regclient/regclient/security/advisories/GHSA-qv35-3gw6-8q4j",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/regclient/regclient/security/advisories/GHSA-qv35-3gw6-8q4j"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/regclient/regclient/commit/7d17cff26c22196b5ddd66bda8c5ee4abf3d1269",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/regclient/regclient/commit/7d17cff26c22196b5ddd66bda8c5ee4abf3d1269"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-qv35-3gw6-8q4j",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "regclient may ignore pinned manifest digests"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2025-24882",
"datePublished": "2025-01-29T17:40:07.496Z",
"dateReserved": "2025-01-27T15:32:29.449Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-01-29T17:52:45.827Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
CVE-2025-24807 (GCVE-0-2025-24807)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2025-02-11 15:31 – Updated: 2025-02-11 16:12
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
Fast DDS does not verify Permissions CA
Summary
eprosima Fast DDS is a C++ implementation of the DDS (Data Distribution Service) standard of the OMG (Object Management Group). Prior to versions 2.6.10, 2.10.7, 2.14.5, 3.0.2, 3.1.2, and 3.2.0, per design, PermissionsCA is not full chain validated, nor is the expiration date validated. Access control plugin validates only the S/MIME signature which causes an expired PermissionsCA to be taken as valid. Even though this issue is responsible for allowing `governance/permissions` from an expired PermissionsCA and having the system crash when PermissionsCA is not self-signed and contains the full-chain, the impact is low. Versions 2.6.10, 2.10.7, 2.14.5, 3.0.2, 3.1.2, and 3.2.0 contain a fix for the issue.
Severity
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
CWE
- CWE-345 - Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity
Assigner
References
6 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/eProsima/Fast-DDS/security/adv… | x_refsource_CONFIRM |
| https://github.com/eProsima/Fast-DDS/pull/5530 | x_refsource_MISC |
| https://github.com/eProsima/Fast-DDS/blob/2.6.9/s… | x_refsource_MISC |
| https://github.com/eProsima/Fast-DDS/blob/2.6.9/s… | x_refsource_MISC |
| https://github.com/eProsima/Fast-DDS/blob/2.6.9/s… | x_refsource_MISC |
| https://www.omg.org/spec/DDS-SECURITY/1.1/PDF | x_refsource_MISC |
Impacted products
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2025-24807",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-02-11T16:12:29.982265Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-02-11T16:12:41.714Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "Fast-DDS",
"vendor": "eProsima",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003c 2.6.10"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003e= 2.7.0, \u003c 2.10.7"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003e= 2.11.0, \u003c 2.14.5"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003e= 3.0.0, \u003c 3.0.2"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003e= 3.1.0, \u003c 3.1.2"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "eprosima Fast DDS is a C++ implementation of the DDS (Data Distribution Service) standard of the OMG (Object Management Group). Prior to versions 2.6.10, 2.10.7, 2.14.5, 3.0.2, 3.1.2, and 3.2.0, per design, PermissionsCA is not full chain validated, nor is the expiration date validated. Access control plugin validates only the S/MIME signature which causes an expired PermissionsCA to be taken as valid. Even though this issue is responsible for allowing `governance/permissions` from an expired PermissionsCA and having the system crash when PermissionsCA is not self-signed and contains the full-chain, the impact is low. Versions 2.6.10, 2.10.7, 2.14.5, 3.0.2, 3.1.2, and 3.2.0 contain a fix for the issue."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "NONE",
"attackVector": "LOCAL",
"baseScore": 4.5,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "HIGH"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-345",
"description": "CWE-345: Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-02-11T15:31:50.337Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/eProsima/Fast-DDS/security/advisories/GHSA-w33g-jmm2-8983",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/eProsima/Fast-DDS/security/advisories/GHSA-w33g-jmm2-8983"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/eProsima/Fast-DDS/pull/5530",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/eProsima/Fast-DDS/pull/5530"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/eProsima/Fast-DDS/blob/2.6.9/src/cpp/security/accesscontrol/Permissions.cpp#L390-L396",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/eProsima/Fast-DDS/blob/2.6.9/src/cpp/security/accesscontrol/Permissions.cpp#L390-L396"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/eProsima/Fast-DDS/blob/2.6.9/src/cpp/security/accesscontrol/Permissions.cpp#L412",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/eProsima/Fast-DDS/blob/2.6.9/src/cpp/security/accesscontrol/Permissions.cpp#L412"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/eProsima/Fast-DDS/blob/2.6.9/src/cpp/security/authentication/PKIDH.cpp#L241",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/eProsima/Fast-DDS/blob/2.6.9/src/cpp/security/authentication/PKIDH.cpp#L241"
},
{
"name": "https://www.omg.org/spec/DDS-SECURITY/1.1/PDF",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://www.omg.org/spec/DDS-SECURITY/1.1/PDF"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-w33g-jmm2-8983",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Fast DDS does not verify Permissions CA"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2025-24807",
"datePublished": "2025-02-11T15:31:50.337Z",
"dateReserved": "2025-01-23T17:11:35.840Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-02-11T16:12:41.714Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
CVE-2025-23415 (GCVE-0-2025-23415)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2025-02-05 17:31 – Updated: 2025-02-12 20:51
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
BIG-IP APM Endpoint Inspection vulnerability
Summary
An insufficient verification of data authenticity vulnerability exists in BIG-IP APM Access Policy endpoint inspection that may allow an attacker to bypass endpoint inspection checks for VPN connection initiated thru BIG-IP APM browser network access VPN client for Windows, macOS and Linux.
Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated.
Severity
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
CWE
- CWE-345 - Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity
Assigner
References
1 reference
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://my.f5.com/manage/s/article/K000139656 | vendor-advisory |
Impacted products
Date Public
2025-02-05 15:00
Credits
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2025-23415",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-02-05T18:34:04.259266Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-02-12T20:51:34.425Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"modules": [
"APM"
],
"product": "BIG-IP",
"vendor": "F5",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "17.1.2",
"status": "affected",
"version": "17.1.0",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"lessThan": "16.1.5",
"status": "affected",
"version": "16.1.0",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"changes": [
{
"at": "Hotfix-BIGIP-15.1.10.6.0.11.6-ENG.iso",
"status": "unaffected"
}
],
"lessThan": "*",
"status": "affected",
"version": "15.1.0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "F5"
}
],
"datePublic": "2025-02-05T15:00:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cspan style=\"background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);\"\u003eAn insufficient verification of data authenticity vulnerability exists in BIG-IP APM Access Policy endpoint inspection that may allow an attacker to bypass endpoint inspection checks for VPN connection initiated thru BIG-IP APM browser network access VPN client for Windows, macOS and Linux.\u003c/span\u003e\n\n \n\n\n\n\nNote: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated."
}
],
"value": "An insufficient verification of data authenticity vulnerability exists in BIG-IP APM Access Policy endpoint inspection that may allow an attacker to bypass endpoint inspection checks for VPN connection initiated thru BIG-IP APM browser network access VPN client for Windows, macOS and Linux.\n\n \n\n\n\n\nNote: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 3.1,
"baseSeverity": "LOW",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "LOW",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "REQUIRED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
},
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "PRESENT",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 2.3,
"baseSeverity": "LOW",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "PASSIVE",
"valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "LOW",
"vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-345",
"description": "CWE-345 Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-02-05T17:31:00.674Z",
"orgId": "9dacffd4-cb11-413f-8451-fbbfd4ddc0ab",
"shortName": "f5"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory"
],
"url": "https://my.f5.com/manage/s/article/K000139656"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "INTERNAL"
},
"title": "BIG-IP APM Endpoint Inspection vulnerability",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "F5 SIRTBot v1.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "9dacffd4-cb11-413f-8451-fbbfd4ddc0ab",
"assignerShortName": "f5",
"cveId": "CVE-2025-23415",
"datePublished": "2025-02-05T17:31:00.674Z",
"dateReserved": "2025-01-22T00:16:50.275Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-02-12T20:51:34.425Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
No mitigation information available for this CWE.
CAPEC-111: JSON Hijacking (aka JavaScript Hijacking)
An attacker targets a system that uses JavaScript Object Notation (JSON) as a transport mechanism between the client and the server (common in Web 2.0 systems using AJAX) to steal possibly confidential information transmitted from the server back to the client inside the JSON object by taking advantage of the loophole in the browser's Same Origin Policy that does not prohibit JavaScript from one website to be included and executed in the context of another website.
CAPEC-141: Cache Poisoning
An attacker exploits the functionality of cache technologies to cause specific data to be cached that aids the attackers' objectives. This describes any attack whereby an attacker places incorrect or harmful material in cache. The targeted cache can be an application's cache (e.g. a web browser cache) or a public cache (e.g. a DNS or ARP cache). Until the cache is refreshed, most applications or clients will treat the corrupted cache value as valid. This can lead to a wide range of exploits including redirecting web browsers towards sites that install malware and repeatedly incorrect calculations based on the incorrect value.
CAPEC-142: DNS Cache Poisoning
A domain name server translates a domain name (such as www.example.com) into an IP address that Internet hosts use to contact Internet resources. An adversary modifies a public DNS cache to cause certain names to resolve to incorrect addresses that the adversary specifies. The result is that client applications that rely upon the targeted cache for domain name resolution will be directed not to the actual address of the specified domain name but to some other address. Adversaries can use this to herd clients to sites that install malware on the victim's computer or to masquerade as part of a Pharming attack.
CAPEC-148: Content Spoofing
An adversary modifies content to make it contain something other than what the original content producer intended while keeping the apparent source of the content unchanged. The term content spoofing is most often used to describe modification of web pages hosted by a target to display the adversary's content instead of the owner's content. However, any content can be spoofed, including the content of email messages, file transfers, or the content of other network communication protocols. Content can be modified at the source (e.g. modifying the source file for a web page) or in transit (e.g. intercepting and modifying a message between the sender and recipient). Usually, the adversary will attempt to hide the fact that the content has been modified, but in some cases, such as with web site defacement, this is not necessary. Content Spoofing can lead to malware exposure, financial fraud (if the content governs financial transactions), privacy violations, and other unwanted outcomes.
CAPEC-218: Spoofing of UDDI/ebXML Messages
An attacker spoofs a UDDI, ebXML, or similar message in order to impersonate a service provider in an e-business transaction. UDDI, ebXML, and similar standards are used to identify businesses in e-business transactions. Among other things, they identify a particular participant, WSDL information for SOAP transactions, and supported communication protocols, including security protocols. By spoofing one of these messages an attacker could impersonate a legitimate business in a transaction or could manipulate the protocols used between a client and business. This could result in disclosure of sensitive information, loss of message integrity, or even financial fraud.
CAPEC-384: Application API Message Manipulation via Man-in-the-Middle
An attacker manipulates either egress or ingress data from a client within an application framework in order to change the content of messages. Performing this attack can allow the attacker to gain unauthorized privileges within the application, or conduct attacks such as phishing, deceptive strategies to spread malware, or traditional web-application attacks. The techniques require use of specialized software that allow the attacker to perform adversary-in-the-middle (CAPEC-94) communications between the web browser and the remote system. Despite the use of AiTH software, the attack is actually directed at the server, as the client is one node in a series of content brokers that pass information along to the application framework. Additionally, it is not true "Adversary-in-the-Middle" attack at the network layer, but an application-layer attack the root cause of which is the master applications trust in the integrity of code supplied by the client.
CAPEC-385: Transaction or Event Tampering via Application API Manipulation
An attacker hosts or joins an event or transaction within an application framework in order to change the content of messages or items that are being exchanged. Performing this attack allows the attacker to manipulate content in such a way as to produce messages or content that look authentic but may contain deceptive links, substitute one item or another, spoof an existing item and conduct a false exchange, or otherwise change the amounts or identity of what is being exchanged. The techniques require use of specialized software that allow the attacker to man-in-the-middle communications between the web browser and the remote system in order to change the content of various application elements. Often, items exchanged in game can be monetized via sales for coin, virtual dollars, etc. The purpose of the attack is for the attack to scam the victim by trapping the data packets involved the exchange and altering the integrity of the transfer process.
CAPEC-386: Application API Navigation Remapping
An attacker manipulates either egress or ingress data from a client within an application framework in order to change the destination and/or content of links/buttons displayed to a user within API messages. Performing this attack allows the attacker to manipulate content in such a way as to produce messages or content that looks authentic but contains links/buttons that point to an attacker controlled destination. Some applications make navigation remapping more difficult to detect because the actual HREF values of images, profile elements, and links/buttons are masked. One example would be to place an image in a user's photo gallery that when clicked upon redirected the user to an off-site location. Also, traditional web vulnerabilities (such as CSRF) can be constructed with remapped buttons or links. In some cases navigation remapping can be used for Phishing attacks or even means to artificially boost the page view, user site reputation, or click-fraud.
CAPEC-387: Navigation Remapping To Propagate Malicious Content
An adversary manipulates either egress or ingress data from a client within an application framework in order to change the content of messages and thereby circumvent the expected application logic.
CAPEC-388: Application API Button Hijacking
An attacker manipulates either egress or ingress data from a client within an application framework in order to change the destination and/or content of buttons displayed to a user within API messages. Performing this attack allows the attacker to manipulate content in such a way as to produce messages or content that looks authentic but contains buttons that point to an attacker controlled destination.
CAPEC-665: Exploitation of Thunderbolt Protection Flaws
An adversary leverages a firmware weakness within the Thunderbolt protocol, on a computing device to manipulate Thunderbolt controller firmware in order to exploit vulnerabilities in the implementation of authorization and verification schemes within Thunderbolt protection mechanisms. Upon gaining physical access to a target device, the adversary conducts high-level firmware manipulation of the victim Thunderbolt controller SPI (Serial Peripheral Interface) flash, through the use of a SPI Programing device and an external Thunderbolt device, typically as the target device is booting up. If successful, this allows the adversary to modify memory, subvert authentication mechanisms, spoof identities and content, and extract data and memory from the target device. Currently 7 major vulnerabilities exist within Thunderbolt protocol with 9 attack vectors as noted in the Execution Flow.
CAPEC-701: Browser in the Middle (BiTM)
An adversary exploits the inherent functionalities of a web browser, in order to establish an unnoticed remote desktop connection in the victim's browser to the adversary's system. The adversary must deploy a web client with a remote desktop session that the victim can access.