{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "PyPI",
        "name": "Django"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "6.0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "6.0.4"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "PyPI",
        "name": "Django"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "5.2"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "5.2.13"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "PyPI",
        "name": "Django"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "4.2"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "4.2.30"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-33033"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-407"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2026-04-08T15:29:16Z",
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-04-07T15:17:39Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "An issue was discovered in 6.0 before 6.0.4, 5.2 before 5.2.13, and 4.2 before 4.2.30. `MultiPartParser` allows remote attackers to degrade performance by submitting multipart uploads with `Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64` including excessive whitespace.\n\nEarlier, unsupported Django series (such as 5.0.x, 4.1.x, and 3.2.x) were not evaluated and may also be affected.\nDjango would like to thank Seokchan Yoon for reporting this issue.",
  "id": "GHSA-5mf9-h53q-7mhq",
  "modified": "2026-06-05T17:51:58Z",
  "published": "2026-04-07T15:30:51Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-33033"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/dev/releases/security"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/django/django"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/pypa/advisory-database/tree/main/vulns/django/PYSEC-2026-48.yaml"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://groups.google.com/g/django-announce"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2026/apr/07/security-releases"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "Django has potential DoS via MultiPartParser through crafted multipart uploads"
}

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-72685"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-407"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-08-13T20:17:29Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "A flaw in Elasticsearch allows a low-privileged authenticated user who can index documents to submit a single small document containing a crafted user-supplied input. Processing one such document occupies a worker thread from a bounded pool for a disproportionate amount of time, degrading the availability of indexing operations on the affected node.",
  "id": "GHSA-5mjq-6xvh-rmv2",
  "modified": "2026-08-13T21:36:11Z",
  "published": "2026-08-13T21:36:11Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-72685"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://discuss.elastic.co/t/elasticsearch-8-19-20-9-4-5-security-update-esa-2026-77/389500"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "npm",
        "name": "js-yaml"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "4.0.0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "4.3.1"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "npm",
        "name": "js-yaml"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "3.0.0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "3.15.1"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-407"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2026-08-06T20:27:32Z",
    "nvd_published_at": null,
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "# Quadratic CPU consumption in `!!omap` resolution (js-yaml 3.x and 4.x)\n\n## Summary\n\n`resolveYamlOmap()` enforces key uniqueness for `!!omap` sequences with a linear\nscan (`objectKeys.indexOf(...)`) inside the per-element loop, making resolution\n**O(n\u00b2)** in the number of entries. A modestly sized YAML document therefore\nconsumes disproportionate CPU inside `yaml.load()`, giving a denial of service\nagainst any consumer that parses untrusted YAML.\n\n`!!omap` is registered in the **default schema**\n(`lib/schema/default.js` \u2192 `require(\u0027../type/omap\u0027)`), so a plain\n`yaml.load(untrustedInput)` with no options is affected \u2014 no custom schema or\nnon-default configuration is required.\n\n**This is the same weakness as CVE-2026-59870 / GHSA-724g-mxrg-4qvm**, which was\nfixed in the 5.x line in 5.2.1. That fix was never backported: both currently\nmaintained legacy lines still carry the original implementation.\n\n## Affected versions\n\n| Line | Latest tested | Status |\n|---|---|---|\n| 3.x | **3.15.0** | Affected \u2014 `objectKeys.indexOf(pairKey)` at `lib/type/omap.js:29` |\n| 4.x | **4.3.0** | Affected \u2014 `objectKeys.indexOf(pairKey)` at `lib/type/omap.js:30` |\n| 5.x | 5.2.2 | **Not affected** \u2014 fixed in 5.2.1 (uses a `Set`) |\n\nBoth figures are the newest release of each line at the time of writing, so\nthis is not a \"you are on an old version\" issue.\n\n## Details\n\n`lib/type/omap.js` (js-yaml 4.3.0):\n\n```js\nif (objectKeys.indexOf(pairKey) === -1) objectKeys.push(pairKey)\nelse return false\n```\n\n`objectKeys` grows by one element per entry, and `Array.prototype.indexOf` is a\nlinear scan, so resolving an `n`-entry `!!omap` performs roughly\n`1 + 2 + \u2026 + n` comparisons \u2014 quadratic in `n`. The work happens synchronously\ninside `yaml.load()`, blocking the event loop for its whole duration.\n\nThe 5.x line already solves exactly this by tracking seen keys in a `Set`\n(`src/tag/sequence/omap.ts`):\n\n```ts\nif (carrier.seen.has(key)) return \u0027duplicate key in ordered map\u0027\ncarrier.seen.add(key)\n```\n\n## Proof of concept\n\n```js\n// poc.js  \u2014  node poc.js\nconst yaml = require(\u0027js-yaml\u0027);\nconst doc = n =\u003e \u0027!!omap\\n\u0027 + Array.from({length: n}, (_, i) =\u003e `- k${i}: ${i}`).join(\u0027\\n\u0027) + \u0027\\n\u0027;\n\nfor (const n of [10000, 20000, 40000, 80000]) {\n  const d = doc(n), t = Date.now();\n  yaml.load(d);                      // default schema, no options\n  console.log(`n=${n} bytes=${d.length} load=${Date.now() - t}ms`);\n}\n```\n\n### Measured (node v20.20.2, default heap, no flags)\n\n**js-yaml 4.3.0**\n\n```\nn=10000  bytes=137787   load=54ms\nn=20000  bytes=297787   load=169ms\nn=40000  bytes=617787   load=646ms\nn=80000  bytes=1257787  load=2607ms\n```\n\n**js-yaml 3.15.0**\n\n```\nn=10000  bytes=137787   load=53ms\nn=20000  bytes=297787   load=166ms\nn=40000  bytes=617787   load=641ms\nn=80000  bytes=1257787  load=2567ms\n```\n\nRuntime grows by a factor of ~4 for each doubling of `n`, which is the\nsignature of O(n\u00b2) (linear growth would be ~2\u00d7).\n\nScaling further: a **2.48 MB** document with 150,000 entries blocked\n`yaml.load()` for **10.8 seconds**.\n\n## Impact\n\nAny service that parses attacker-influenced YAML with js-yaml 3.x or 4.x can be\nstalled with a small input. Because the loop is synchronous, a single request\nblocks the Node.js event loop and stalls every other request in the process \u2014\nso the amplification is per-process, not just per-request.\n\nSuggested severity: consistent with **CVE-2026-59870** (the same weakness in\n5.x), i.e. Availability-only impact, network attack vector, no privileges or\nuser interaction required.\n\n## Suggested fix\n\nMirror the 5.x fix \u2014 replace the linear scan with a `Set`:\n\n```js\n// lib/type/omap.js\nconst seen = new Set()\n// ...\nif (seen.has(pairKey)) return false\nseen.add(pairKey)\n```\n\nThis preserves the existing duplicate-key rejection semantics exactly while\nmaking resolution O(n). A `maxOmapLength`-style cap would also work, but the\n`Set` matches what 5.x already ships and requires no new option.\n\n## References\n\n- CVE-2026-59870 / GHSA-724g-mxrg-4qvm \u2014 same weakness in 5.0.0\u20135.2.0, fixed in 5.2.1\n- `lib/type/omap.js` (3.x, 4.x) \u2014 the affected resolver\n- `lib/schema/default.js` \u2014 registers `!!omap` in the default schema\n\n## Discovery\n\nFound by an automated static-analysis and executed-proof-of-concept scanner run\nagainst js-yaml 4.2.0, then manually verified against 3.15.0 and 4.3.0 by\nexecuting the proof of concept above. All timings in this report were measured\non the **current** releases of each line, not on the version originally scanned.",
  "id": "GHSA-5p4m-2wfm-xmqj",
  "modified": "2026-08-06T20:27:32Z",
  "published": "2026-08-06T20:27:32Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/nodeca/js-yaml/security/advisories/GHSA-5p4m-2wfm-xmqj"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/nodeca/js-yaml"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "JS-YAML: Quadratic CPU consumption in !!omap resolution (3.x and 4.x) \u2014 CVE-2026-59870 fix not backported"
}

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "PyPI",
        "name": "python-multipart"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "0.0.30"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-53539"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-400",
      "CWE-407"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2026-06-15T20:24:09Z",
    "nvd_published_at": null,
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "### Summary\n\nWhen parsing `application/x-www-form-urlencoded` bodies, `QuerystringParser` located the field separator with a two step lookup: it first scanned the entire remaining buffer for `\u0026`, and only when no `\u0026` existed anywhere ahead did it fall back to scanning for `;`. For a body that uses `;` as the separator and contains no `\u0026`, every field iteration performed a full failed `\u0026` scan over the entire remaining buffer before locating the nearby `;`. With N semicolon separated fields in a chunk of size B, this yields O(B^2) byte comparisons per chunk.\n\nAn attacker can submit a small crafted body of the form `a;a;a;...` and cause the parser to spend seconds of CPU per request. A handful of concurrent requests can exhaust worker processes.\n\n### Details\n\nIn `python_multipart/multipart.py`, both the `FIELD_NAME` and `FIELD_DATA` states located the next separator like this:\n\n```python\nsep_pos = data.find(b\"\u0026\", i)\nif sep_pos == -1:\n    sep_pos = data.find(b\";\", i)\n```\n\n`data.find(b\"\u0026\", i)` scans from `i` to the end of the buffer and returns `-1` only when there is no `\u0026` anywhere in the remainder. For a `;` separated body with no `\u0026`, this failed full buffer scan repeats once per field, making parsing quadratic in the body length.\n\nFor example, a 1 MiB url encoded body consisting of `a;` repeated ~500,000 times, submitted with `Content-Type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded`, causes the parser to perform on the order of 10^11 byte comparisons, consuming several seconds of CPU for a single request. Cost scales quadratically with chunk size.\n\nThe parser is reachable through the public `QuerystringParser` class and through the high level `FormParser`, `create_form_parser`, and `parse_form` APIs for url encoded bodies. It is also the parser Starlette and FastAPI use for `application/x-www-form-urlencoded` request bodies via `request.form()`.\n\n### Impact\n\nUncontrolled CPU consumption (denial of service). Parsing is synchronous, so a single small crafted form body occupies the handling worker for seconds, blocking any other work on that worker until parsing finishes. Sustained concurrent requests keep workers continuously busy, degrading or denying service.\n\n### Mitigation\n\nUpgrade to `python-multipart` `0.0.30` or later, which treats only `\u0026` as a field separator (per the [WHATWG URL standard](https://url.spec.whatwg.org/#urlencoded-parsing)) using a single bounded scan, making parsing linear in the body length.",
  "id": "GHSA-5rvq-cxj2-64vf",
  "modified": "2026-06-15T20:24:09Z",
  "published": "2026-06-15T20:24:09Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/Kludex/python-multipart/security/advisories/GHSA-5rvq-cxj2-64vf"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/Kludex/python-multipart"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "python-multipart: Quadratic-time querystring parsing with semicolon separators causes CPU denial of service"
}

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-44390"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-1050",
      "CWE-407"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-05-20T10:16:28Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "NLnet Labs Unbound up to and including version 1.25.0 has a vulnerability when handling replies with very large RRsets that Unbound needs to perform name compression for. Malicious upstream responses with very large RRsets with records that don\u0027t share a suffix above the root can cause Unbound to spend a considerable time applying name compression to downstream replies. This can lead to degraded performance and eventually denial of service in well orchestrated attacks. An adversary can exploit the vulnerability by querying Unbound for the specially crafted contents of a malicious zone with very large RRsets. Before Unbound replies to the query it will try to apply name compression which was an unbounded operation that could lock the CPU until the whole packet was complete. A compression limit was introduced in 1.21.1 for this but it didn\u0027t account for the case where records would not share any suffix above the root. That causes Unbound to go in a different code path because of the compression tree lookup failure and eventually not increment the compression counter for those operations. Unbound 1.25.1 contains a patch with a fix that increments the compression counter regardless of the compression tree lookup. This is a complement fix to CVE-2024-8508.",
  "id": "GHSA-6522-r5fq-99gw",
  "modified": "2026-07-29T15:30:48Z",
  "published": "2026-05-20T12:30:37Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-44390"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:24013"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:36320"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:36777"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:37282"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-44390"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2480130"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/vex/2026/cve-2026-44390.json"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.nlnetlabs.nl/downloads/unbound/CVE-2026-44390.txt"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    },
    {
      "score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:Amber",
      "type": "CVSS_V4"
    }
  ]
}

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-68750"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-407"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-08-06T16:16:51Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "Inefficient Algorithmic Complexity vulnerability in the traversal engine in rrrene html_sanitize_ex allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to exhaust server CPU and memory via a flat run of sibling elements in sanitized HTML. The list clause of HtmlSanitizeEx.Traverser.traverse/2 recurses on the tail of a sibling list and then evaluates List.flatten([head] ++ tail) over the already flattened result, so every one of n siblings copies and re-walks the entire remaining tail. The flattening is only needed for the rare case where scrub returns several replacement nodes for one node, but the cost is paid across the whole tail at every step, making traversal quadratic in sibling count.\n\nThe traverser sits on every public entry point, so no particular scrubber or configuration is required and the payload needs only allowed tags. A 160 KB body of 20,000 sibling elements occupies a scheduler for roughly 1.7 seconds, and the cost grows faster than the body does.\n\nThis issue affects html_sanitize_ex: from 0.3.1 before 1.5.3.",
  "id": "GHSA-684p-mhw3-3cwq",
  "modified": "2026-08-19T12:32:22Z",
  "published": "2026-08-06T18:30:50Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/rrrene/html_sanitize_ex/security/advisories/GHSA-463q-p2fr-mh9p"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-68750"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/rrrene/html_sanitize_ex/commit/507a6fb95dd4c466cac8a8355d8989043e9fbcc1"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/rrrene/html_sanitize_ex/commit/9f5ccedbed230930813f992a1e6906fcf485981e"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://cna.erlef.org/cves/CVE-2026-68750.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://osv.dev/vulnerability/EEF-CVE-2026-68750"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    },
    {
      "score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
      "type": "CVSS_V4"
    }
  ]
}

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "database_specific": {
        "last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 15.31.4"
      },
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Packagist",
        "name": "webonyx/graphql-php"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "15.31.5"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-40476"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-407"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2026-04-14T01:05:05Z",
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-04-17T22:16:33Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "The `OverlappingFieldsCanBeMerged` validation rule exhibits quadratic time complexity when processing queries with many repeated fields sharing the same response name. An attacker can send a crafted query like `{ hello hello hello ... }` with thousands of repeated fields, causing excessive CPU usage during validation before execution begins.\n\nThis is not mitigated by existing QueryDepth or QueryComplexity rules.\n\n**Observed impact (tested on v15.31.4):**\n- 1000 fields: ~0.6s\n- 2000 fields: ~2.4s\n- 3000 fields: ~5.3s\n- 5000 fields: request timeout (\u003e20s)\n\n**Root cause:** `collectConflictsWithin()` performs O(n\u00b2) pairwise comparisons of all fields with the same response name. For identical repeated fields, every comparison returns \"no conflict\" but the quadratic iteration count causes resource exhaustion.\n\n**Fix:** Deduplicate structurally identical fields before pairwise comparison, reducing the complexity from O(n\u00b2) to O(u\u00b2) where u is the number of unique field signatures (typically 1 for this attack pattern).\n\n**Credit:** Ashwak N (ashwakn04@gmail.com)",
  "id": "GHSA-68jq-c3rv-pcrr",
  "modified": "2026-06-08T23:09:48Z",
  "published": "2026-04-14T01:05:05Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/webonyx/graphql-php/security/advisories/GHSA-68jq-c3rv-pcrr"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-40476"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/webonyx/graphql-php"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/webonyx/graphql-php/releases/tag/v15.31.5"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    },
    {
      "score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V4"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "graphql-php is affected by a Denial of Service via quadratic complexity in OverlappingFieldsCanBeMerged validation"
}

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2024-39702"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-407"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2024-07-23T16:15:05Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "In lj_str_hash.c in OpenResty 1.19.3.1 through 1.25.3.1, the string hashing function (used during string interning) allows HashDoS (Hash Denial of Service) attacks. An attacker could cause excessive resource usage during proxy operations via crafted requests, potentially leading to a denial of service with relatively few incoming requests. This vulnerability only exists in the OpenResty fork in the openresty/luajit2 GitHub repository. The LuaJIT/LuaJIT epository. is unaffected/",
  "id": "GHSA-6px8-752j-c2vv",
  "modified": "2024-11-26T18:38:46Z",
  "published": "2024-07-23T18:31:07Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-39702"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://openresty.org/en/ann-1025003002.html"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "NuGet",
        "name": "PeterO.Cbor"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "4.0.0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "4.5.1"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2024-21909"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-407"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2022-01-18T22:57:46Z",
    "nvd_published_at": null,
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "### Impact\nDue to this library\u0027s use of an inefficient algorithm, it is vulnerable to a denial of service attack when a maliciously crafted input is passed to `DecodeFromBytes` or other CBOR decoding mechanisms in this library.\n\nAffected versions _include_ versions 4.0.0 through 4.5.0.\n\nThis vulnerability was privately reported to me.\n\n### Patches\nThis issue has been fixed in version 4.5.1.  Users should use the latest version of this library. (The latest version is not necessarily 4.5.1.  Check the [NuGet page](https://www.nuget.org/packages/PeterO.Cbor) to see the latest version\u0027s version number.)\n\n### Workarounds\n\nAgain, users should use the latest version of this library.\n\nIn the meantime, note that the inputs affected by this issue are all CBOR maps or contain CBOR maps.  An input that decodes to a single CBOR object is not capable of containing a CBOR map if\u0026mdash;\n\n- it begins with a byte other than 0x80 through 0xDF, or\n- it does not contain a byte in the range 0xa0 through 0xBF.\n\nSuch an input is not affected by this vulnerability and an application can choose to perform this check before passing it to a CBOR decoding mechanism.\n\n### For more information\nIf you have any questions or comments about this advisory:\n* Open an issue in [the CBOR repository](https://github.com/peteroupc/CBOR).\n",
  "id": "GHSA-6r92-cgxc-r5fg",
  "modified": "2024-01-03T22:29:30Z",
  "published": "2022-01-21T23:35:35Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/peteroupc/CBOR/security/advisories/GHSA-6r92-cgxc-r5fg"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/peteroupc/CBOR/commit/b4117dbbb4cd5a4a963f9d0c9aa132f033e15b95"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/peteroupc/CBOR"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/peteroupc/CBOR/compare/v4.5...v4.5.1"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [],
  "summary": "Denial of service in CBOR library"
}

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "database_specific": {
        "last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 14.1.1"
      },
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "npm",
        "name": "markdown-it"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "14.2.0"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-48988"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-400",
      "CWE-407"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2026-06-15T20:41:06Z",
    "nvd_published_at": null,
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "### Summary\n\nA quadratic time complexity vulnerability exists in markdown-it\u0027s smartquotes rule (enabled via the `typographer: true` option). An attacker can craft a markdown input consisting of consecutive quotation marks that causes the parser to consume excessive CPU time, leading to denial of service.\n\n### Details\n\nThe vulnerability is in the `replaceAt()` helper function used by the smartquotes rule in `lib/rules_core/smartquotes.mjs`:\n\n```javascript\nfunction replaceAt (str, index, ch) {\n  return str.slice(0, index) + ch + str.slice(index + 1)\n}\n```\n\nWhen markdown-it processes a text token containing many quotation marks (either `\"` or `\u0027`) with `typographer: true`, the smartquotes rule iterates through each quote character and calls `replaceAt()` to substitute it with a typographic (curly) quote. Each call to `replaceAt()` creates three new string slices and concatenates them, which is an O(n) operation where n is the length of the string.\n\nSince this is called once per quote character in the token, and there are n quote characters, the total time complexity becomes O(n^2).\n\nThe root cause is that the smartquotes rule modifies `token.content` in place using string slicing rather than building the result incrementally. The `process_inlines()` function (line 14) processes each quote in the text token, and for matching quote pairs, calls `replaceAt()` on both the opening and closing token\u0027s content (lines 151-152). When the entire input is a single text token of quote characters, this results in quadratic behavior.\n\n### PoC\n\n```javascript\nconst md = require(\u0027markdown-it\u0027);\nconst instance = md({ typographer: true });\n\n// 160,000 consecutive double-quote characters\nconst payload = \u0027\"\u0027.repeat(160000);\n\nconsole.time(\u0027render\u0027);\ninstance.render(payload);\nconsole.timeEnd(\u0027render\u0027);\n// Output: render: ~21000ms (21 seconds)\n\n// Compare with typographer disabled:\nconst safe = md({ typographer: false });\nconsole.time(\u0027render-safe\u0027);\nsafe.render(payload);\nconsole.timeEnd(\u0027render-safe\u0027);\n// Output: render-safe: ~8ms\n```\n\nMeasured timing on a modern system:\n- 10,000 quotes: ~19ms\n- 20,000 quotes: ~51ms\n- 40,000 quotes: ~212ms\n- 80,000 quotes: ~5,430ms\n- 160,000 quotes: ~21,198ms\n\nThe scaling is clearly superlinear (quadratic), with the 80K-\u003e160K step showing a ~3.9x increase for a 2x input increase, consistent with O(n^2).\n\n### Impact\n\nApplications that render user-supplied markdown with `typographer: true` are vulnerable to denial of service. An attacker can submit a relatively small payload (160KB of quote characters) that causes the server to spend over 21 seconds processing a single request. Repeated submissions can exhaust server CPU resources and prevent legitimate users from being served.\n\nThe impact is mitigated by the fact that the `typographer` option defaults to `false` and must be explicitly enabled. However, the typographer feature is commonly enabled in production applications that want smart typography, and the markdown-it documentation prominently suggests enabling it.\n\nA suggested fix would be to replace the `replaceAt()` approach with an array-based or StringBuilder-style approach that collects all replacements and applies them in a single pass, reducing the time complexity to O(n).",
  "id": "GHSA-6v5v-wf23-fmfq",
  "modified": "2026-06-15T20:41:06Z",
  "published": "2026-06-15T20:41:06Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/markdown-it/markdown-it/security/advisories/GHSA-6v5v-wf23-fmfq"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/markdown-it/markdown-it"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "markdown-it: Quadratic complexity DoS in smartquotes rule via replaceAt string operations"
}