CWE-400
DiscouragedUncontrolled Resource Consumption
Abstraction: Class · Status: Draft
The product does not properly control the allocation and maintenance of a limited resource.
5941 vulnerabilities reference this CWE, most recent first.
CVE-2026-21452 (GCVE-0-2026-21452)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-01-02 20:47 – Updated: 2026-01-02 21:22| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/msgpack/msgpack-java/security/… | x_refsource_CONFIRM |
| https://github.com/msgpack/msgpack-java/commit/da… | x_refsource_MISC |
| https://github.com/msgpack/msgpack-java/releases/… | x_refsource_MISC |
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| msgpack | msgpack-java |
Affected:
< 0.9.11
|
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-21452",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "poc"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-01-02T21:21:49.839128Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-01-02T21:22:01.956Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "msgpack-java",
"vendor": "msgpack",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003c 0.9.11"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "MessagePack for Java is a serializer implementation for Java. A denial-of-service vulnerability exists in versions prior to 0.9.11 when deserializing .msgpack files containing EXT32 objects with attacker-controlled payload lengths. While MessagePack-Java parses extension headers lazily, it later trusts the declared EXT payload length when materializing the extension data. When ExtensionValue.getData() is invoked, the library attempts to allocate a byte array of the declared length without enforcing any upper bound. A malicious .msgpack file of only a few bytes can therefore trigger unbounded heap allocation, resulting in JVM heap exhaustion, process termination, or service unavailability. This vulnerability is triggered during model loading / deserialization, making it a model format vulnerability suitable for remote exploitation. The vulnerability enables a remote denial-of-service attack against applications that deserialize untrusted .msgpack model files using MessagePack for Java. A specially crafted but syntactically valid .msgpack file containing an EXT32 object with an attacker-controlled, excessively large payload length can trigger unbounded memory allocation during deserialization. When the model file is loaded, the library trusts the declared length metadata and attempts to allocate a byte array of that size, leading to rapid heap exhaustion, excessive garbage collection, or immediate JVM termination with an OutOfMemoryError. The attack requires no malformed bytes, user interaction, or elevated privileges and can be exploited remotely in real-world environments such as model registries, inference services, CI/CD pipelines, and cloud-based model hosting platforms that accept or fetch .msgpack artifacts. Because the malicious file is extremely small yet valid, it can bypass basic validation and scanning mechanisms, resulting in complete service unavailability and potential cascading failures in production systems. Version 0.9.11 fixes the vulnerability."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 7.5,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-400",
"description": "CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
},
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-789",
"description": "CWE-789: Memory Allocation with Excessive Size Value",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-01-02T20:47:44.874Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/msgpack/msgpack-java/security/advisories/GHSA-cw39-r4h6-8j3x",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/msgpack/msgpack-java/security/advisories/GHSA-cw39-r4h6-8j3x"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/msgpack/msgpack-java/commit/daa2ea6b2f11f500e22c70a22f689f7a9debdeae",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/msgpack/msgpack-java/commit/daa2ea6b2f11f500e22c70a22f689f7a9debdeae"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/msgpack/msgpack-java/releases/tag/v0.9.11",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/msgpack/msgpack-java/releases/tag/v0.9.11"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-cw39-r4h6-8j3x",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "MessagePack-Java Vulnerable to Remote Denial of Service via Malicious .msgpack Model File Triggering Unbounded EXT Payload Allocation"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-21452",
"datePublished": "2026-01-02T20:47:44.874Z",
"dateReserved": "2025-12-29T03:00:29.277Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-01-02T21:22:01.956Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-21435 (GCVE-0-2026-21435)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-02-12 18:22 – Updated: 2026-02-17 15:36- CWE-400 - Uncontrolled Resource Consumption
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/quic-go/webtransport-go/securi… | x_refsource_CONFIRM |
| https://github.com/quic-go/webtransport-go/releas… | x_refsource_MISC |
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| quic-go | webtransport-go |
Affected:
< 0.10.0
|
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-21435",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-02-17T15:35:59.809407Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-02-17T15:36:08.731Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "webtransport-go",
"vendor": "quic-go",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003c 0.10.0"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "webtransport-go is an implementation of the WebTransport protocol. Prior to v0.10.0, an attacker can cause a denial of service in webtransport-go by preventing or indefinitely delaying WebTransport session closure. A malicious peer can withhold QUIC flow control credit on the CONNECT stream, blocking transmission of the WT_CLOSE_SESSION capsule and causing the close operation to hang. This vulnerability is fixed in v0.10.0."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "LOW",
"baseScore": 5.3,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L",
"version": "3.1"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-400",
"description": "CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-02-12T18:24:49.233Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/quic-go/webtransport-go/security/advisories/GHSA-px4r-g4p3-hhqv",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/quic-go/webtransport-go/security/advisories/GHSA-px4r-g4p3-hhqv"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/quic-go/webtransport-go/releases/tag/v0.10.0",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/quic-go/webtransport-go/releases/tag/v0.10.0"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-px4r-g4p3-hhqv",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "webtransport-go CloseWithError can block indefinitely"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-21435",
"datePublished": "2026-02-12T18:22:58.098Z",
"dateReserved": "2025-12-29T03:00:29.275Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-02-17T15:36:08.731Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-20780 (GCVE-0-2026-20780)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-08-11 16:26 – Updated: 2026-08-12 15:40- Denial of Service
- CWE-400 - Uncontrolled Resource Consumption
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| n/a | Intel(R) PROSet/Wireless WiFi Software for Windows |
Affected:
See references
|
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-20780",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-08-12T15:40:25.346405Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-400",
"description": "CWE-400 Uncontrolled Resource Consumption",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-12T15:40:44.515Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Intel(R) PROSet/Wireless WiFi Software for Windows",
"vendor": "n/a",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "See references"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Uncontrolled resource consumption for some Intel(R) PROSet/Wireless WiFi Software for Windows within Ring 2: Device Drivers may allow a denial of service. Unprivileged software adversary with an unauthenticated user combined with a low complexity attack may enable denial of service. This result may potentially occur via local access when attack requirements are not present without special internal knowledge and requires no user interaction. The potential vulnerability may impact the confidentiality (none), integrity (none) and availability (high) of the vulnerable system, resulting in subsequent system confidentiality (none), integrity (none) and availability (low) impacts."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "NONE",
"attackVector": "LOCAL",
"baseScore": 6.9,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "LOW",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:L",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "NONE"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"description": "Denial of Service",
"lang": "en"
},
{
"cweId": "CWE-400",
"description": "Uncontrolled Resource Consumption",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-11T16:26:24.976Z",
"orgId": "6dda929c-bb53-4a77-a76d-48e79601a1ce",
"shortName": "intel"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://intel.com/content/www/us/en/security-center/advisory/intel-sa-01422.html",
"url": "https://intel.com/content/www/us/en/security-center/advisory/intel-sa-01422.html"
}
]
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "6dda929c-bb53-4a77-a76d-48e79601a1ce",
"assignerShortName": "intel",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-20780",
"datePublished": "2026-08-11T16:26:24.976Z",
"dateReserved": "2025-12-03T17:59:50.546Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-12T15:40:44.515Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-20188 (GCVE-0-2026-20188)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-05-06 16:15 – Updated: 2026-05-14 16:30- CWE-400 - Uncontrolled Resource Consumption
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cisco | Cisco Crosswork Network Change Automation |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-20188",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-05-06T17:46:35.111544Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-05-06T17:48:12.690Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Cisco Crosswork Network Change Automation",
"vendor": "Cisco"
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Following the initial publication of the Security Advisory about a denial of service (DoS) condition in Cisco Crosswork Network Controller and Cisco Network Services Orchestrator (NSO), additional information has been made available to the Cisco Product Security Incident Response Team (PSIRT).\r\n\r\nUpon further analysis, the Cisco PSIRT has reclassified this issue as a customer-configurable, resource management issue rather than a security vulnerability."
}
],
"exploits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "The Cisco PSIRT is not aware of any public announcements regarding the content of this advisory."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 0,
"baseSeverity": "NONE",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "cvssV3_1"
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-400",
"description": "Uncontrolled Resource Consumption",
"lang": "en",
"type": "cwe"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-05-14T16:30:22.826Z",
"orgId": "d1c1063e-7a18-46af-9102-31f8928bc633",
"shortName": "cisco"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "cisco-sa-nso-dos-7Egqyc",
"url": "https://sec.cloudapps.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-nso-dos-7Egqyc"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "cisco-sa-nso-dos-7Egqyc",
"defects": [
"CSCwr08237"
],
"discovery": "INTERNAL"
},
"title": "Cisco Crosswork Network Controller and Cisco Network Services Orchestrator Advisory"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "d1c1063e-7a18-46af-9102-31f8928bc633",
"assignerShortName": "cisco",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-20188",
"datePublished": "2026-05-06T16:15:37.396Z",
"dateReserved": "2025-10-08T11:59:15.394Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-05-14T16:30:22.826Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-20139 (GCVE-0-2026-20139)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-02-18 16:45 – Updated: 2026-02-19 19:28| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Splunk | Splunk Enterprise |
Affected:
10.0 , < 10.0.2
(custom)
Affected: 9.4 , < 9.4.8 (custom) Affected: 9.3 , < 9.3.9 (custom) Affected: 9.2 , < 9.2.12 (custom) |
|
| Splunk | Splunk Cloud Platform |
Affected:
10.2.2510 , < 10.2.2510.3
(custom)
Affected: 10.1.2507 , < 10.1.2507.8 (custom) Affected: 10.0.2503 , < 10.0.2503.9 (custom) Affected: 9.3.2411 , < 9.3.2411.121 (custom) |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-20139",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-02-19T19:10:51.635917Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-400",
"description": "CWE-400 Uncontrolled Resource Consumption",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-02-19T19:28:04.863Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "Splunk Enterprise",
"vendor": "Splunk",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "10.0.2",
"status": "affected",
"version": "10.0",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"lessThan": "9.4.8",
"status": "affected",
"version": "9.4",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"lessThan": "9.3.9",
"status": "affected",
"version": "9.3",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"lessThan": "9.2.12",
"status": "affected",
"version": "9.2",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"product": "Splunk Cloud Platform",
"vendor": "Splunk",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "10.2.2510.3",
"status": "affected",
"version": "10.2.2510",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"lessThan": "10.1.2507.8",
"status": "affected",
"version": "10.1.2507",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"lessThan": "10.0.2503.9",
"status": "affected",
"version": "10.0.2503",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"lessThan": "9.3.2411.121",
"status": "affected",
"version": "9.3.2411",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "ST\u00d6K / Fredrik Alexandersson"
}
],
"datePublic": "2026-02-18T00:00:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "In Splunk Enterprise versions below 10.2.0, 10.0.2, 9.4.8, 9.3.9, and 9.2.12, and Splunk Cloud Platform versions below 10.2.2510.3, 10.1.2507.8, 10.0.2503.9, and 9.3.2411.121, a low-privileged user that does not hold the \"admin\" or \"power\" Splunk roles could craft a malicious payload into the `realname`, `tz`, or `email` parameters of the `/splunkd/__raw/services/authentication/users/username` REST API endpoint when they change a password. This could potentially lead to a client\u2011side denial\u2011of\u2011service (DoS). The malicious payload might significantly slow page load times or render Splunk Web temporarily unresponsive."
}
],
"value": "In Splunk Enterprise versions below 10.2.0, 10.0.2, 9.4.8, 9.3.9, and 9.2.12, and Splunk Cloud Platform versions below 10.2.2510.3, 10.1.2507.8, 10.0.2503.9, and 9.3.2411.121, a low-privileged user that does not hold the \"admin\" or \"power\" Splunk roles could craft a malicious payload into the `realname`, `tz`, or `email` parameters of the `/splunkd/__raw/services/authentication/users/username` REST API endpoint when they change a password. This could potentially lead to a client\u2011side denial\u2011of\u2011service (DoS). The malicious payload might significantly slow page load times or render Splunk Web temporarily unresponsive."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"baseScore": 4.3,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-400",
"description": "The software does not properly control the allocation and maintenance of a limited resource thereby enabling an actor to influence the amount of resources consumed, eventually leading to the exhaustion of available resources.",
"lang": "en",
"type": "cwe"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-02-18T16:45:32.308Z",
"orgId": "d1c1063e-7a18-46af-9102-31f8928bc633",
"shortName": "cisco"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://advisory.splunk.com/advisories/SVD-2026-0204"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "SVD-2026-0204"
},
"title": "Client-Side Denial of Service (DoS) through \u0027\u0027/splunkd/__raw/services/authentication/users/username\u0027\u0027 REST API endpoint in Splunk Enterprise"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "d1c1063e-7a18-46af-9102-31f8928bc633",
"assignerShortName": "cisco",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-20139",
"datePublished": "2026-02-18T16:45:32.308Z",
"dateReserved": "2025-10-08T11:59:15.382Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-02-19T19:28:04.863Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
GCVE-1-2026-20113 (CVE-2026-66920)
Vulnerability from gna-1 – Published: 2026-07-28 12:57 – Updated: 2026-07-28 12:57| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/Pivotick/Pivotick/commit/66373… | patch |
{
"containers": {
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Pivotick",
"repo": "https://github.com/Pivotick/Pivotick/",
"vendor": "Pivotick",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "1.4.0",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Jeroen Pinoy"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "remediation developer",
"value": "Sami Mokaddem"
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003ch2\u003e\u003c/h2\u003e\u003cp\u003ePivotick contains an uncontrolled-recursion vulnerability when processing caller-supplied graph and node data. The affected graph algorithms recursively traversed graph edges, while the JSON viewer recursively processed each level of a node\u2019s data structure. A specially crafted graph containing an excessively long path, deeply nested properties, or circular object references could therefore exhaust the JavaScript call stack when Pivotick calculates a layout or displays a node in the inspection modal.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eSuccessful exploitation may cause an uncaught exception, freeze the affected page, or crash the browser tab, resulting in a client-side denial of service. No confidentiality or integrity impact has been identified.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThe patch replaces the recursive graph traversals with iterative stack-based implementations and limits the reachability calculation to 1,000,000 edge traversals. It also limits JSON rendering to 64 levels and detects circular references before descending further into an object.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cbr\u003e"
}
],
"value": "Pivotick contains an uncontrolled-recursion vulnerability when processing caller-supplied graph and node data. The affected graph algorithms recursively traversed graph edges, while the JSON viewer recursively processed each level of a node\u2019s data structure. A specially crafted graph containing an excessively long path, deeply nested properties, or circular object references could therefore exhaust the JavaScript call stack when Pivotick calculates a layout or displays a node in the inspection modal.\n\nSuccessful exploitation may cause an uncaught exception, freeze the affected page, or crash the browser tab, resulting in a client-side denial of service. No confidentiality or integrity impact has been identified.\n\nThe patch replaces the recursive graph traversals with iterative stack-based implementations and limits the reachability calculation to 1,000,000 edge traversals. It also limits JSON rendering to 64 levels and detects circular references before descending further into an object."
}
],
"impacts": [
{
"capecId": "CAPEC-231",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CAPEC-231 Oversized Serialized Data Payloads"
}
]
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "NONE",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 8.2,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "ACTIVE",
"valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:A/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:H",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-674",
"description": "CWE-674 Uncontrolled Recursion",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
},
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-400",
"description": "CWE-400 Uncontrolled Resource Consumption",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"orgId": "00000000-0000-4000-9000-000000000000"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/Pivotick/Pivotick/commit/66373141eb7892fc29a3b42cfb2c160af16765fe"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Pivotick - Stack Exhaustion Denial of Service via Deep or Cyclic Graph Data",
"x_gcve": [
{
"recordType": "advisory",
"vulnId": "gcve-1-2026-20113"
}
],
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 0.2.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "00000000-0000-4000-9000-000000000000",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-66920",
"datePublished": "2026-07-28T12:57:03.816845Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-07-28T12:57:17.742Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-07-28T12:57:17.810625Z",
"requesterUserId": "00000000-0000-4000-9000-000000000000",
"serial": 1,
"state": "PUBLISHED",
"vulnId": "gcve-1-2026-20113"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
GCVE-1-2026-20086 (CVE-2026-78551)
Vulnerability from gna-1 – Published: 2026-08-24 19:19 – Updated: 2026-08-24 19:19| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/RansomLook/RansomLook/commit/8… | patch |
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ransomlook | ransomlook |
Affected:
0 , ≤ 2.0.0
(semver)
|
{
"containers": {
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "ransomlook",
"vendor": "ransomlook",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "2.0.0",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Jeroen Pinoy"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "remediation developer",
"value": "Fafner [_KeyZee_]"
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cp\u003eRansomLook contains multiple weaknesses in its authentication endpoint that allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to enumerate valid usernames, perform unrestricted password-guessing attacks, and potentially exhaust application worker resources.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eFor local authentication, the login implementation previously checked whether a submitted username existed before invoking the password hash verification function. Requests containing a nonexistent username therefore returned significantly faster than requests for valid accounts, for which the computationally expensive password verification routine was executed. A remote attacker could measure these response-time differences to determine which usernames correspond to valid RansomLook accounts.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eIn addition, the \u003ccode\u003e/login\u003c/code\u003e endpoint did not restrict the number or frequency of failed authentication attempts. An attacker could consequently perform password brute-force, dictionary, password-spraying, or credential-stuffing attacks against known accounts without server-side throttling. For valid usernames, each authentication attempt also invokes the password key-derivation function, which consumes a significant amount of CPU time. A sufficiently high rate of login attempts could therefore occupy the application\u0027s synchronous Gunicorn workers and cause a denial of service affecting the entire application.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThe issue has been addressed by always performing password verification using a randomly generated dummy password hash when the supplied username does not exist, eliminating the username-dependent timing discrepancy. Failed authentication attempts are additionally rate-limited per client IP address using Valkey/Redis, with five failed attempts within five minutes resulting in a one-hour block. The reverse-proxy configuration was also updated so that the application derives the client address from a trusted \u003ccode\u003eX-Forwarded-For\u003c/code\u003e value that cannot be overridden by a client-supplied header.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cbr\u003e"
}
],
"value": "RansomLook contains multiple weaknesses in its authentication endpoint that allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to enumerate valid usernames, perform unrestricted password-guessing attacks, and potentially exhaust application worker resources.\n\nFor local authentication, the login implementation previously checked whether a submitted username existed before invoking the password hash verification function. Requests containing a nonexistent username therefore returned significantly faster than requests for valid accounts, for which the computationally expensive password verification routine was executed. A remote attacker could measure these response-time differences to determine which usernames correspond to valid RansomLook accounts.\n\nIn addition, the /login endpoint did not restrict the number or frequency of failed authentication attempts. An attacker could consequently perform password brute-force, dictionary, password-spraying, or credential-stuffing attacks against known accounts without server-side throttling. For valid usernames, each authentication attempt also invokes the password key-derivation function, which consumes a significant amount of CPU time. A sufficiently high rate of login attempts could therefore occupy the application\u0027s synchronous Gunicorn workers and cause a denial of service affecting the entire application.\n\nThe issue has been addressed by always performing password verification using a randomly generated dummy password hash when the supplied username does not exist, eliminating the username-dependent timing discrepancy. Failed authentication attempts are additionally rate-limited per client IP address using Valkey/Redis, with five failed attempts within five minutes resulting in a one-hour block. The reverse-proxy configuration was also updated so that the application derives the client address from a trusted X-Forwarded-For value that cannot be overridden by a client-supplied header."
}
],
"impacts": [
{
"capecId": "CAPEC-49",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CAPEC-49 Password Brute Forcing"
}
]
},
{
"capecId": "CAPEC-16",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CAPEC-16 Dictionary-based Password Attack"
}
]
},
{
"capecId": "CAPEC-565",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CAPEC-565 Password Spraying"
}
]
},
{
"capecId": "CAPEC-600",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CAPEC-600 Credential Stuffing"
}
]
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "NONE",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 8.8,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-307",
"description": "CWE-307 Improper Restriction of Excessive Authentication Attempts",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
},
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-400",
"description": "CWE-400 Uncontrolled Resource Consumption",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"orgId": "00000000-0000-4000-9000-000000000000"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/RansomLook/RansomLook/commit/8602740347b0e928ad9fbaf5bc6ff242337dec6b"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "RansomLook Login Endpoint Allows Timing-Based Username Enumeration and Unthrottled Authentication Attempts",
"x_gcve": [
{
"recordType": "advisory",
"vulnId": "gcve-1-2026-20086"
}
],
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 0.2.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "00000000-0000-4000-9000-000000000000",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-78551",
"datePublished": "2026-08-24T19:19:50.807894Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-08-24T19:19:59.060Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-24T19:19:59.130934Z",
"requesterUserId": "00000000-0000-4000-9000-000000000000",
"serial": 1,
"state": "PUBLISHED",
"vulnId": "gcve-1-2026-20086"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
CVE-2026-20084 (GCVE-0-2026-20084)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-03-25 16:02 – Updated: 2026-03-26 17:35- CWE-400 - Uncontrolled Resource Consumption
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cisco | Cisco IOS XE Software |
Affected:
16.6.1
Affected: 16.6.2 Affected: 16.6.3 Affected: 16.6.4 Affected: 16.6.5 Affected: 16.6.4a Affected: 16.6.6 Affected: 16.6.7 Affected: 16.6.8 Affected: 16.6.9 Affected: 16.6.10 Affected: 16.7.1 Affected: 16.8.1 Affected: 16.8.1a Affected: 16.8.1s Affected: 16.9.1 Affected: 16.9.2 Affected: 16.9.1s Affected: 16.9.3 Affected: 16.9.4 Affected: 16.9.5 Affected: 16.9.6 Affected: 16.9.7 Affected: 16.9.8 Affected: 16.10.1 Affected: 16.10.1s Affected: 16.10.1e Affected: 16.11.1 Affected: 16.11.1b Affected: 16.11.1s Affected: 16.12.1 Affected: 16.12.1s Affected: 16.12.1c Affected: 16.12.2 Affected: 16.12.3 Affected: 16.12.8 Affected: 16.12.2s Affected: 16.12.4 Affected: 16.12.3s Affected: 16.12.3a Affected: 16.12.4a Affected: 16.12.5 Affected: 16.12.6 Affected: 16.12.5b Affected: 16.12.6a Affected: 16.12.7 Affected: 17.1.1 Affected: 17.1.1s Affected: 17.1.1t Affected: 17.1.3 Affected: 17.2.1 Affected: 17.2.1a Affected: 17.3.1 Affected: 17.3.2 Affected: 17.3.3 Affected: 17.3.2a Affected: 17.3.4 Affected: 17.3.5 Affected: 17.3.6 Affected: 17.3.7 Affected: 17.3.8 Affected: 17.3.8a Affected: 17.4.1 Affected: 17.5.1 Affected: 17.6.1 Affected: 17.6.2 Affected: 17.6.3 Affected: 17.6.1y Affected: 17.6.4 Affected: 17.6.5 Affected: 17.6.6 Affected: 17.6.6a Affected: 17.6.5a Affected: 17.6.7 Affected: 17.6.8 Affected: 17.7.1 Affected: 17.10.1 Affected: 17.10.1b Affected: 17.8.1 Affected: 17.9.1 Affected: 17.9.2 Affected: 17.9.3 Affected: 17.9.4 Affected: 17.9.5 Affected: 17.9.4a Affected: 17.9.6 Affected: 17.9.6a Affected: 17.9.7 Affected: 17.9.8 Affected: 17.11.1 Affected: 17.12.1 Affected: 17.12.2 Affected: 17.12.3 Affected: 17.12.4 Affected: 17.12.5 Affected: 17.12.1z5 Affected: 17.13.1 Affected: 17.14.1 Affected: 17.15.1 Affected: 17.15.2 Affected: 17.15.3 Affected: 17.15.2b Affected: 17.15.4 Affected: 17.15.4d Affected: 17.16.1 Affected: 17.17.1 Affected: 17.18.1 |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-20084",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-03-26T17:35:41.843290Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-03-26T17:35:50.008Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "Cisco IOS XE Software",
"vendor": "Cisco",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "16.6.1"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "16.6.2"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "16.6.3"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "16.6.4"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "16.6.5"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "16.6.4a"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "16.6.6"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "16.6.7"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "16.6.8"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "16.6.9"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "16.6.10"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "16.7.1"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "16.8.1"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "16.8.1a"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "16.8.1s"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "16.9.1"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "16.9.2"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "16.9.1s"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "16.9.3"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "16.9.4"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "16.9.5"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "16.9.6"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "16.9.7"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "16.9.8"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "16.10.1"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "16.10.1s"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "16.10.1e"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "16.11.1"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "16.11.1b"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "16.11.1s"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "16.12.1"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "16.12.1s"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "16.12.1c"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "16.12.2"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "16.12.3"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "16.12.8"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "16.12.2s"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "16.12.4"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "16.12.3s"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "16.12.3a"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "16.12.4a"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "16.12.5"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "16.12.6"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "16.12.5b"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "16.12.6a"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "16.12.7"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "17.1.1"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "17.1.1s"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "17.1.1t"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "17.1.3"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "17.2.1"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "17.2.1a"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "17.3.1"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "17.3.2"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "17.3.3"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "17.3.2a"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "17.3.4"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "17.3.5"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "17.3.6"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "17.3.7"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "17.3.8"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "17.3.8a"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "17.4.1"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "17.5.1"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "17.6.1"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "17.6.2"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "17.6.3"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "17.6.1y"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "17.6.4"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "17.6.5"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "17.6.6"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "17.6.6a"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "17.6.5a"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "17.6.7"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "17.6.8"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "17.7.1"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "17.10.1"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "17.10.1b"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "17.8.1"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "17.9.1"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "17.9.2"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "17.9.3"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "17.9.4"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "17.9.5"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "17.9.4a"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "17.9.6"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "17.9.6a"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "17.9.7"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "17.9.8"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "17.11.1"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "17.12.1"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "17.12.2"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "17.12.3"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "17.12.4"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "17.12.5"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "17.12.1z5"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "17.13.1"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "17.14.1"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "17.15.1"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "17.15.2"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "17.15.3"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "17.15.2b"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "17.15.4"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "17.15.4d"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "17.16.1"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "17.17.1"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "17.18.1"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "A vulnerability in the DHCP snooping feature of Cisco IOS XE Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to cause BOOTP packets to be forwarded between VLANs, resulting in a denial of service (DoS) condition. \r\n\r This vulnerability is due to improper handling of BOOTP packets on Cisco Catalyst 9000 Series Switches. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending BOOTP request packets to an affected device. A successful exploit could allow an attacker to forward BOOTP packets from one VLAN to another, resulting in BOOTP VLAN leakage and potentially leading to high CPU utilization. This makes the device unreachable (either through console or remote management) and unable to forward traffic, resulting in a DoS condition. \r\n\r Note: This vulnerability can be exploited with either unicast or broadcast BOOTP packets.\r\n\r There are workarounds that address this vulnerability."
}
],
"exploits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "The Cisco Product Security Incident Response Team (PSIRT) is not aware of any public announcements or malicious use of the vulnerability that is described in this advisory."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 8.6,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "CHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "cvssV3_1"
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-400",
"description": "Uncontrolled Resource Consumption",
"lang": "en",
"type": "cwe"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-03-25T16:02:39.119Z",
"orgId": "d1c1063e-7a18-46af-9102-31f8928bc633",
"shortName": "cisco"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "cisco-sa-bootp-WuBhNBxA",
"url": "https://sec.cloudapps.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-bootp-WuBhNBxA"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "cisco-sa-bootp-WuBhNBxA",
"defects": [
"CSCwq07617"
],
"discovery": "EXTERNAL"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "d1c1063e-7a18-46af-9102-31f8928bc633",
"assignerShortName": "cisco",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-20084",
"datePublished": "2026-03-25T16:02:39.119Z",
"dateReserved": "2025-10-08T11:59:15.366Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-03-26T17:35:50.008Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-20080 (GCVE-0-2026-20080)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-01-21 16:26 – Updated: 2026-01-21 16:47- CWE-400 - Uncontrolled Resource Consumption
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cisco | Cisco Ultra-Reliable Wireless Backhaul |
Affected:
1.0.0
Affected: 1.1.0 Affected: 1.0.2 Affected: 1.0.1 |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-20080",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-01-21T16:47:12.943836Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-01-21T16:47:39.610Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "Cisco Ultra-Reliable Wireless Backhaul",
"vendor": "Cisco",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "1.0.0"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "1.1.0"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "1.0.2"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "1.0.1"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "A vulnerability in the SSH service of Cisco IEC6400 Wireless Backhaul Edge Compute Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to cause the SSH service to stop responding.\r\n\r\nThis vulnerability exists because the SSH service lacks effective flood protection. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by initiating a denial of service (DoS) attack against the SSH port. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to cause the SSH service to be unresponsive during the period of the DoS attack. All other operations remain stable during the attack."
}
],
"exploits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "The Cisco PSIRT is not aware of any public announcements or malicious use of the vulnerability that is described in this advisory."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "LOW",
"baseScore": 5.3,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "cvssV3_1"
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-400",
"description": "Uncontrolled Resource Consumption",
"lang": "en",
"type": "cwe"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-01-21T16:26:06.467Z",
"orgId": "d1c1063e-7a18-46af-9102-31f8928bc633",
"shortName": "cisco"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "cisco-sa-iec6400-Pem5uQ7v",
"url": "https://sec.cloudapps.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-iec6400-Pem5uQ7v"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "cisco-sa-iec6400-Pem5uQ7v",
"defects": [
"CSCws02393"
],
"discovery": "INTERNAL"
},
"title": "Cisco IEC6400 Edge Compute Appliance SSH Denial of Service Vulnerability"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "d1c1063e-7a18-46af-9102-31f8928bc633",
"assignerShortName": "cisco",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-20080",
"datePublished": "2026-01-21T16:26:06.467Z",
"dateReserved": "2025-10-08T11:59:15.363Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-01-21T16:47:39.610Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
GCVE-1-2026-20075 (CVE-2026-66913)
Vulnerability from gna-1 – Published: 2026-07-28 12:18 – Updated: 2026-07-28 12:19- CWE-400 - Uncontrolled Resource Consumption
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/Lookyloo/lookyloo/commit/96589… | patch |
{
"containers": {
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "lookyloo",
"repo": "https://github.com/Lookyloo/lookyloo",
"vendor": "lookyloo",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "1.40.0",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "remediation developer",
"value": "Raphael Vinot"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "https://github.com/EQSTLab"
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cp\u003eLookyloo did not enforce limits on the decompressed size of uploaded capture archives and compressed HAR files.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eAn attacker could submit a specially crafted ZIP, gzip, or zlib-compressed capture containing data that expands to a very large size during processing. Because the application decompressed this content directly in memory without first limiting the output size, processing the malicious capture could exhaust available memory, terminate a web or worker process, or make the Lookyloo instance unavailable.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThe vulnerability affects both full Lookyloo capture archive imports and API submissions containing gzip-compressed HAR data. Repeated exploitation could cause a persistent denial-of-service condition until the affected processes or instance are restarted.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThe patch introduces:\u003c/p\u003e\u003cul\u003e\u003cli\u003eA 1 GB cumulative uncompressed-size limit for imported capture archives.\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003eSize-limited gzip and zlib decompression for compressed HAR files.\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003eExplicit detection and handling of suspected zip bombs.\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003eAn HTTP 400 response when an oversized compressed HAR file is submitted through the API.\u003c/li\u003e\u003c/ul\u003e\u003cbr\u003e"
}
],
"value": "Lookyloo did not enforce limits on the decompressed size of uploaded capture archives and compressed HAR files.\n\nAn attacker could submit a specially crafted ZIP, gzip, or zlib-compressed capture containing data that expands to a very large size during processing. Because the application decompressed this content directly in memory without first limiting the output size, processing the malicious capture could exhaust available memory, terminate a web or worker process, or make the Lookyloo instance unavailable.\n\nThe vulnerability affects both full Lookyloo capture archive imports and API submissions containing gzip-compressed HAR data. Repeated exploitation could cause a persistent denial-of-service condition until the affected processes or instance are restarted.\n\nThe patch introduces:\n\n * A 1 GB cumulative uncompressed-size limit for imported capture archives.\n * Size-limited gzip and zlib decompression for compressed HAR files.\n * Explicit detection and handling of suspected zip bombs.\n * An HTTP 400 response when an oversized compressed HAR file is submitted through the API."
}
],
"impacts": [
{
"capecId": "CAPEC-490",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CAPEC-490 Amplification"
}
]
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "NONE",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 6.9,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "ACTIVE",
"valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:A/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-400",
"description": "CWE-400 Uncontrolled Resource Consumption",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"orgId": "00000000-0000-4000-9000-000000000000"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/Lookyloo/lookyloo/commit/96589da290f018e356db7c0eaddf1aa501630ca7"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Zip Bomb in Lookyloo Capture Upload Allows Denial of Service",
"x_gcve": [
{
"recordType": "advisory",
"vulnId": "gcve-1-2026-20075"
}
],
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 0.2.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "00000000-0000-4000-9000-000000000000",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-66913",
"datePublished": "2026-07-28T12:18:55.710997Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-07-28T12:19:10.431Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-07-28T12:19:10.507016Z",
"requesterUserId": "00000000-0000-4000-9000-000000000000",
"serial": 1,
"state": "PUBLISHED",
"vulnId": "gcve-1-2026-20075"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
Mitigation
Design throttling mechanisms into the system architecture. The best protection is to limit the amount of resources that an unauthorized user can cause to be expended. A strong authentication and access control model will help prevent such attacks from occurring in the first place. The login application should be protected against DoS attacks as much as possible. Limiting the database access, perhaps by caching result sets, can help minimize the resources expended. To further limit the potential for a DoS attack, consider tracking the rate of requests received from users and blocking requests that exceed a defined rate threshold.
Mitigation
- Mitigation of resource exhaustion attacks requires that the target system either:
- The first of these solutions is an issue in itself though, since it may allow attackers to prevent the use of the system by a particular valid user. If the attacker impersonates the valid user, they may be able to prevent the user from accessing the server in question.
- The second solution is simply difficult to effectively institute -- and even when properly done, it does not provide a full solution. It simply makes the attack require more resources on the part of the attacker.
- recognizes the attack and denies that user further access for a given amount of time, or
- uniformly throttles all requests in order to make it more difficult to consume resources more quickly than they can again be freed.
Mitigation
Ensure that protocols have specific limits of scale placed on them.
Mitigation
Ensure that all failures in resource allocation place the system into a safe posture.
CAPEC-147: XML Ping of the Death
An attacker initiates a resource depletion attack where a large number of small XML messages are delivered at a sufficiently rapid rate to cause a denial of service or crash of the target. Transactions such as repetitive SOAP transactions can deplete resources faster than a simple flooding attack because of the additional resources used by the SOAP protocol and the resources necessary to process SOAP messages. The transactions used are immaterial as long as they cause resource utilization on the target. In other words, this is a normal flooding attack augmented by using messages that will require extra processing on the target.
CAPEC-227: Sustained Client Engagement
An adversary attempts to deny legitimate users access to a resource by continually engaging a specific resource in an attempt to keep the resource tied up as long as possible. The adversary's primary goal is not to crash or flood the target, which would alert defenders; rather it is to repeatedly perform actions or abuse algorithmic flaws such that a given resource is tied up and not available to a legitimate user. By carefully crafting a requests that keep the resource engaged through what is seemingly benign requests, legitimate users are limited or completely denied access to the resource.
CAPEC-492: Regular Expression Exponential Blowup
An adversary may execute an attack on a program that uses a poor Regular Expression(Regex) implementation by choosing input that results in an extreme situation for the Regex. A typical extreme situation operates at exponential time compared to the input size. This is due to most implementations using a Nondeterministic Finite Automaton(NFA) state machine to be built by the Regex algorithm since NFA allows backtracking and thus more complex regular expressions.