Common Weakness Enumeration
CWE-1220
AllowedInsufficient Granularity of Access Control
Abstraction: Base · Status: Incomplete
The product implements access controls via a policy or other feature with the intention to disable or restrict accesses (reads and/or writes) to assets in a system from untrusted agents. However, implemented access controls lack required granularity, which renders the control policy too broad because it allows accesses from unauthorized agents to the security-sensitive assets.
219 vulnerabilities reference this CWE, most recent first.
CVE-2026-103509 (GCVE-0-2026-103509)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-10-15 14:41 – Updated: 2026-10-15 17:58
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
Credential Disclosure in P4 Search Configuration API
Summary
P4 Search (formerly Helix Search) returns stored credentials in cleartext through its configuration API to users with administrative privileges on the connected P4 Server, allowing privilege escalation.
This affects 2026.4.2 and earlier and is fixed in 2026.4.3.
Severity
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator · CISA-ADP (v2.0.3)
Decision recorded 2026-10-15 17:58 UTC
CWE
- CWE-1220 - Insufficient granularity of access control
Assigner
References
1 reference
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Perforce | P4 (Helix core) |
Affected:
0 , ≤ 2026.4.3
(custom)
Unaffected: 2026.4.3 |
Date Public
2026-10-07 14:35
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-103509",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-10-15T17:58:27.883817Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-15T17:58:34.271Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"packageName": "P4Search",
"product": "P4 (Helix core)",
"vendor": "Perforce",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "2026.4.3",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "2026.4.3"
}
]
}
],
"datePublic": "2026-10-07T14:35:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "P4 Search (formerly Helix Search) returns stored credentials in cleartext through its configuration API to users with administrative privileges on the connected P4 Server, allowing privilege escalation.\u003cbr\u003eThis affects 2026.4.2 and earlier and is fixed in 2026.4.3."
}
],
"value": "P4 Search (formerly Helix Search) returns stored credentials in cleartext through its configuration API to users with administrative privileges on the connected P4 Server, allowing privilege escalation.\nThis affects 2026.4.2 and earlier and is fixed in 2026.4.3."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "NONE",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 8.5,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"exploitMaturity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"privilegesRequired": "HIGH",
"providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"subIntegrityImpact": "HIGH",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-1220",
"description": "CWE-1220 Insufficient granularity of access control",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-15T14:41:28.829Z",
"orgId": "ca2a266c-be2f-4d4b-92d0-47b76b1a9c4e",
"shortName": "Perforce"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://portal.perforce.com/s/cve/a91Qi000003Gdi1IAC/credential-disclosure-in-p4-search-configuration-api"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Credential Disclosure in P4 Search Configuration API",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 1.0.5"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "ca2a266c-be2f-4d4b-92d0-47b76b1a9c4e",
"assignerShortName": "Perforce",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-103509",
"datePublished": "2026-10-15T14:41:28.829Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-09-30T17:38:12.196Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-15T17:58:34.271Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-93294 (GCVE-0-2026-93294)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-10-13 17:05 – Updated: 2026-10-13 19:31
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
Azure Monitor data source resource proxy allows calls to arbitrary Azure Resource Manager APIs
Summary
A user with query access to an Azure Monitor data source can use its resource proxy to call Azure Resource Manager APIs beyond those Grafana needs, with the data source's Azure identity (unintended proxy). The impact is bounded by the Azure role granted to that identity.
Severity
6.3 (Medium)
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator · CISA-ADP (v2.0.3)
Decision recorded 2026-10-13 17:26 UTC
Assigner
References
1 reference
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://grafana.com/security/security-advisories/… | vendor-advisory |
Impacted products
2 products
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Grafana | Grafana Enterprise |
Affected:
8.1.0 , ≤ 12.3.11
(semver)
Affected: 12.4.0 , < 12.4.13 (semver) Affected: 13.0.0 , < 13.0.11 (semver) Affected: 13.1.0 , < 13.1.8 (semver) Affected: 13.2.0 , < 13.2.4 (semver) |
|
| Grafana | Grafana OSS |
Affected:
8.1.0 , ≤ 12.3.11
(semver)
Affected: 12.4.0 , < 12.4.13 (semver) Affected: 13.0.0 , < 13.0.11 (semver) Affected: 13.1.0 , < 13.1.8 (semver) Affected: 13.2.0 , < 13.2.4 (semver) |
Date Public
2026-10-13 11:41
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-93294",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-10-13T17:26:28.085923Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-13T19:31:30.245Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Grafana Enterprise",
"vendor": "Grafana",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "12.3.11",
"status": "affected",
"version": "8.1.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "12.4.13",
"status": "affected",
"version": "12.4.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "13.0.11",
"status": "affected",
"version": "13.0.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "13.1.8",
"status": "affected",
"version": "13.1.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "13.2.4",
"status": "affected",
"version": "13.2.0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Grafana OSS",
"vendor": "Grafana",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "12.3.11",
"status": "affected",
"version": "8.1.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "12.4.13",
"status": "affected",
"version": "12.4.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "13.0.11",
"status": "affected",
"version": "13.0.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "13.1.8",
"status": "affected",
"version": "13.1.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "13.2.4",
"status": "affected",
"version": "13.2.0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"datePublic": "2026-10-13T11:41:03.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "A user with query access to an Azure Monitor data source can use its resource proxy to call Azure Resource Manager APIs beyond those Grafana needs, with the data source\u0027s Azure identity (unintended proxy). The impact is bounded by the Azure role granted to that identity."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"baseScore": 6.3,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-441",
"description": "CWE-441",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
},
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-863",
"description": "CWE-863",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
},
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-1220",
"description": "CWE-1220",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-13T17:05:49.715Z",
"orgId": "57da9224-a3e2-4646-9d0e-c4dc2e05e7da",
"shortName": "GRAFANA"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory"
],
"url": "https://grafana.com/security/security-advisories/cve-2026-93294"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "EXTERNAL_REPORT"
},
"title": "Azure Monitor data source resource proxy allows calls to arbitrary Azure Resource Manager APIs"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "57da9224-a3e2-4646-9d0e-c4dc2e05e7da",
"assignerShortName": "GRAFANA",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-93294",
"datePublished": "2026-10-13T17:05:49.715Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-09-17T16:21:17.776Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-13T19:31:30.245Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-86338 (GCVE-0-2026-86338)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-09-16 08:28 – Updated: 2026-09-16 14:49
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
Ash field policies do not filter-nil forbidden calculations and aggregates, enabling an information-disclosure oracle
Summary
Ash field_policies are documented to protect against filter-based information disclosure: when a field the actor may not see is referenced in a filter, it is replaced with an expression that evaluates to nil, so a filter cannot be used as a yes/no oracle to read a value the actor cannot see.
This nilling was applied to attributes but not to calculations or aggregates. A user-supplied filter reference to a calculation or aggregate carries an Ash.Query.Calculation / Ash.Query.Aggregate struct, which the authorizer's reference replacement did not match (it only matched the Ash.Resource.* structs), so the filter ran against the real value.
As a result, an actor whose field policies forbid a calculation or aggregate can still filter by it (for example filter(secret_calc == "x") or filter(comment_count == n)) and learn the value from whether rows match — an oracle that recovers field-policy-protected values one probe at a time. Filtering is commonly exposed to lower-privileged actors (for example via AshGraphql or AshJsonApi filter arguments), which is exactly the surface field policies are meant to protect.
The fix routes filter references to calculations and aggregates through the same field-policy nilling as attributes.
This issue affects ash: from 2.11.0-rc.0 before 3.33.4.
Severity
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator · CISA-ADP (v2.0.3)
Decision recorded 2026-09-16 14:49 UTC
CWE
- CWE-1220 - Insufficient Granularity of Access Control
Assigner
References
5 references
Impacted products
2 products
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ash-project | ash |
Affected:
2.11.0-rc.0 , < 3.33.4
(semver)
cpe:2.3:a:ash-project:ash:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* |
|
| ash-project | ash |
Affected:
0b6d93c7c4637280b46ae66ea1d2eaf013701238 , < b3d4503241f3deacb5ceb955e10a4fa927da0f67
(git)
cpe:2.3:a:ash-project:ash:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-86338",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-09-16T14:49:09.195379Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-16T14:49:17.203Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"collectionURL": "https://repo.hex.pm",
"cpes": [
"cpe:2.3:a:ash-project:ash:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"modules": [
"\u0027Elixir.Ash.Policy.Authorizer\u0027"
],
"packageName": "ash",
"packageURL": "pkg:hex/ash",
"product": "ash",
"programFiles": [
"lib/ash/policy/authorizer/authorizer.ex"
],
"programRoutines": [
{
"name": "\u0027Elixir.Ash.Policy.Authorizer\u0027:do_replace_ref/2"
}
],
"repo": "https://github.com/ash-project/ash",
"vendor": "ash-project",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "3.33.4",
"status": "affected",
"version": "2.11.0-rc.0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
},
{
"collectionURL": "https://github.com",
"cpes": [
"cpe:2.3:a:ash-project:ash:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"modules": [
"\u0027Elixir.Ash.Policy.Authorizer\u0027"
],
"packageName": "ash-project/ash",
"packageURL": "pkg:github/ash-project/ash",
"product": "ash",
"programFiles": [
"lib/ash/policy/authorizer/authorizer.ex"
],
"programRoutines": [
{
"name": "\u0027Elixir.Ash.Policy.Authorizer\u0027:do_replace_ref/2"
}
],
"repo": "https://github.com/ash-project/ash",
"vendor": "ash-project",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "b3d4503241f3deacb5ceb955e10a4fa927da0f67",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0b6d93c7c4637280b46ae66ea1d2eaf013701238",
"versionType": "git"
}
]
}
],
"configurations": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cp\u003eReachable only when an application uses \u003ccode\u003eAsh.Policy.Authorizer\u003c/code\u003e field policies to restrict a calculation or aggregate, and exposes filtering on it to an actor who is denied that field (for example an authenticated user filtering through AshGraphql or AshJsonApi).\u003c/p\u003e"
},
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/markdown",
"value": "Reachable only when an application uses `Ash.Policy.Authorizer` field policies to restrict a calculation or aggregate, and exposes filtering on it to an actor who is denied that field (for example an authenticated user filtering through AshGraphql or AshJsonApi)."
}
],
"value": "Reachable only when an application uses Ash.Policy.Authorizer field policies to restrict a calculation or aggregate, and exposes filtering on it to an actor who is denied that field (for example an authenticated user filtering through AshGraphql or AshJsonApi)."
}
],
"cpeApplicability": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:ash-project:ash:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "3.33.4",
"versionStartIncluding": "2.11.0-rc.0",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
],
"operator": "AND"
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "reporter",
"value": "Jesse Williams"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "remediation developer",
"value": "Zach Daniel / Ash Project"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "coordinator",
"value": "Jonatan M\u00e4nnchen / EEF"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Jesse Williams"
}
],
"dateAssigned": "2026-09-15T23:33:34.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cp\u003eAsh \u003ccode\u003efield_policies\u003c/code\u003e are documented to protect against filter-based information disclosure: when a field the actor may not see is referenced in a filter, it is replaced with an expression that evaluates to \u003ccode\u003enil\u003c/code\u003e, so a filter cannot be used as a yes/no oracle to read a value the actor cannot see.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThis nilling was applied to attributes but not to calculations or aggregates. A user-supplied filter reference to a calculation or aggregate carries an \u003ccode\u003eAsh.Query.Calculation\u003c/code\u003e / \u003ccode\u003eAsh.Query.Aggregate\u003c/code\u003e struct, which the authorizer\u0027s reference replacement did not match (it only matched the \u003ccode\u003eAsh.Resource.*\u003c/code\u003e structs), so the filter ran against the real value.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAs a result, an actor whose field policies forbid a calculation or aggregate can still filter by it (for example \u003ccode\u003efilter(secret_calc == \"x\")\u003c/code\u003e or \u003ccode\u003efilter(comment_count == n)\u003c/code\u003e) and learn the value from whether rows match \u2014 an oracle that recovers field-policy-protected values one probe at a time. Filtering is commonly exposed to lower-privileged actors (for example via AshGraphql or AshJsonApi filter arguments), which is exactly the surface field policies are meant to protect.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe fix routes filter references to calculations and aggregates through the same field-policy nilling as attributes.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThis issue affects ash: from 2.11.0-rc.0 before 3.33.4.\u003c/p\u003e"
},
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/markdown",
"value": "Ash `field_policies` are documented to protect against filter-based information disclosure: when a field the actor may not see is referenced in a filter, it is replaced with an expression that evaluates to `nil`, so a filter cannot be used as a yes/no oracle to read a value the actor cannot see.\n\nThis nilling was applied to attributes but not to calculations or aggregates. A user-supplied filter reference to a calculation or aggregate carries an `Ash.Query.Calculation` / `Ash.Query.Aggregate` struct, which the authorizer\u0027s reference replacement did not match (it only matched the `Ash.Resource.*` structs), so the filter ran against the real value.\n\nAs a result, an actor whose field policies forbid a calculation or aggregate can still filter by it (for example `filter(secret_calc == \"x\")` or `filter(comment_count == n)`) and learn the value from whether rows match \u2014 an oracle that recovers field-policy-protected values one probe at a time. Filtering is commonly exposed to lower-privileged actors (for example via AshGraphql or AshJsonApi filter arguments), which is exactly the surface field policies are meant to protect.\n\nThe fix routes filter references to calculations and aggregates through the same field-policy nilling as attributes.\n\nThis issue affects ash: from 2.11.0-rc.0 before 3.33.4."
}
],
"value": "Ash field_policies are documented to protect against filter-based information disclosure: when a field the actor may not see is referenced in a filter, it is replaced with an expression that evaluates to nil, so a filter cannot be used as a yes/no oracle to read a value the actor cannot see.\n\nThis nilling was applied to attributes but not to calculations or aggregates. A user-supplied filter reference to a calculation or aggregate carries an Ash.Query.Calculation / Ash.Query.Aggregate struct, which the authorizer\u0027s reference replacement did not match (it only matched the Ash.Resource.* structs), so the filter ran against the real value.\n\nAs a result, an actor whose field policies forbid a calculation or aggregate can still filter by it (for example filter(secret_calc == \"x\") or filter(comment_count == n)) and learn the value from whether rows match \u2014 an oracle that recovers field-policy-protected values one probe at a time. Filtering is commonly exposed to lower-privileged actors (for example via AshGraphql or AshJsonApi filter arguments), which is exactly the surface field policies are meant to protect.\n\nThe fix routes filter references to calculations and aggregates through the same field-policy nilling as attributes.\n\nThis issue affects ash: from 2.11.0-rc.0 before 3.33.4."
}
],
"impacts": [
{
"capecId": "CAPEC-1",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CAPEC-1 Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLs"
}
]
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "PRESENT",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 6,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-1220",
"description": "CWE-1220 Insufficient Granularity of Access Control",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-16T08:28:44.114Z",
"orgId": "6b3ad84c-e1a6-4bf7-a703-f496b71e49db",
"shortName": "EEF"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "GHSA-7qr8-wrvq-566q",
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory"
],
"url": "https://github.com/ash-project/ash/security/advisories/GHSA-7qr8-wrvq-566q"
},
{
"name": "EEF CNA record for CVE-2026-86338",
"tags": [
"related"
],
"url": "https://cna.erlef.org/cves/CVE-2026-86338.html"
},
{
"name": "OSV record EEF-CVE-2026-86338",
"tags": [
"related"
],
"url": "https://osv.dev/vulnerability/EEF-CVE-2026-86338"
},
{
"name": "Introducing commit 0b6d93c in ash-project/ash",
"tags": [
"related"
],
"url": "https://github.com/ash-project/ash/commit/0b6d93c7c4637280b46ae66ea1d2eaf013701238"
},
{
"name": "Fix commit b3d4503 in ash-project/ash",
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/ash-project/ash/commit/b3d4503241f3deacb5ceb955e10a4fa927da0f67"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "EXTERNAL"
},
"title": "Ash field policies do not filter-nil forbidden calculations and aggregates, enabling an information-disclosure oracle"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "6b3ad84c-e1a6-4bf7-a703-f496b71e49db",
"assignerShortName": "EEF",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-86338",
"datePublished": "2026-09-16T08:28:44.114Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-09-15T15:30:01.895Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-16T14:49:17.203Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-83499 (GCVE-0-2026-83499)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-10-13 18:59 – Updated: 2026-10-16 21:13
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
Windows Server Update Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability
Summary
Insufficient granularity of access control in Windows Server Update Service allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally.
Severity
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: total
CISA Coordinator · CISA-ADP (v2.0.3)
Decision recorded 2026-10-13 20:41 UTC
CWE
- CWE-1220 - Insufficient Granularity of Access Control
Assigner
References
1 reference
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerabi… | vendor-advisorypatch |
Impacted products
13 products
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Microsoft | Windows 10 Version 1607 |
Affected:
10.0.14393.0 , < 10.0.14393.9612
(custom)
|
|
| Microsoft | Windows 10 Version 1809 |
Affected:
10.0.17763.0 , < 10.0.17763.9376
(custom)
|
|
| Microsoft | Windows Server 2012 |
Affected:
6.2.9200.0 , < 6.2.9200.26434
(custom)
|
|
| Microsoft | Windows Server 2012 (Server Core installation) |
Affected:
6.2.9200.0 , < 6.2.9200.26434
(custom)
|
|
| Microsoft | Windows Server 2012 R2 |
Affected:
6.3.9600.0 , < 6.3.9600.23470
(custom)
|
|
| Microsoft | Windows Server 2012 R2 (Server Core installation) |
Affected:
6.3.9600.0 , < 6.3.9600.23470
(custom)
|
|
| Microsoft | Windows Server 2016 |
Affected:
10.0.14393.0 , < 10.0.14393.9612
(custom)
|
|
| Microsoft | Windows Server 2016 (Server Core installation) |
Affected:
10.0.14393.0 , < 10.0.14393.9612
(custom)
|
|
| Microsoft | Windows Server 2019 |
Affected:
10.0.17763.0 , < 10.0.17763.9376
(custom)
|
|
| Microsoft | Windows Server 2019 (Server Core installation) |
Affected:
10.0.17763.0 , < 10.0.17763.9376
(custom)
|
|
| Microsoft | Windows Server 2022 |
Affected:
10.0.20348.0 , < 10.0.20348.5761
(custom)
|
|
| Microsoft | Windows Server 2025 |
Affected:
10.0.26100.0 , < 10.0.26100.33650
(custom)
|
|
| Microsoft | Windows Server 2025 (Server Core installation) |
Affected:
10.0.26100.0 , < 10.0.26100.33650
(custom)
|
Date Public
2026-10-13 14:00
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-83499",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-10-13T20:41:55.922291Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-13T20:44:24.933Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"platforms": [
"32-bit Systems",
"x64-based Systems"
],
"product": "Windows 10 Version 1607",
"vendor": "Microsoft",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "10.0.14393.9612",
"status": "affected",
"version": "10.0.14393.0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"platforms": [
"32-bit Systems",
"x64-based Systems"
],
"product": "Windows 10 Version 1809",
"vendor": "Microsoft",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "10.0.17763.9376",
"status": "affected",
"version": "10.0.17763.0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"platforms": [
"x64-based Systems"
],
"product": "Windows Server 2012",
"vendor": "Microsoft",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "6.2.9200.26434",
"status": "affected",
"version": "6.2.9200.0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"platforms": [
"x64-based Systems"
],
"product": "Windows Server 2012 (Server Core installation)",
"vendor": "Microsoft",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "6.2.9200.26434",
"status": "affected",
"version": "6.2.9200.0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"platforms": [
"x64-based Systems"
],
"product": "Windows Server 2012 R2",
"vendor": "Microsoft",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "6.3.9600.23470",
"status": "affected",
"version": "6.3.9600.0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"platforms": [
"x64-based Systems"
],
"product": "Windows Server 2012 R2 (Server Core installation)",
"vendor": "Microsoft",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "6.3.9600.23470",
"status": "affected",
"version": "6.3.9600.0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"platforms": [
"x64-based Systems"
],
"product": "Windows Server 2016",
"vendor": "Microsoft",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "10.0.14393.9612",
"status": "affected",
"version": "10.0.14393.0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"platforms": [
"x64-based Systems"
],
"product": "Windows Server 2016 (Server Core installation)",
"vendor": "Microsoft",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "10.0.14393.9612",
"status": "affected",
"version": "10.0.14393.0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"platforms": [
"x64-based Systems"
],
"product": "Windows Server 2019",
"vendor": "Microsoft",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "10.0.17763.9376",
"status": "affected",
"version": "10.0.17763.0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"platforms": [
"x64-based Systems"
],
"product": "Windows Server 2019 (Server Core installation)",
"vendor": "Microsoft",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "10.0.17763.9376",
"status": "affected",
"version": "10.0.17763.0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"platforms": [
"x64-based Systems"
],
"product": "Windows Server 2022",
"vendor": "Microsoft",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "10.0.20348.5761",
"status": "affected",
"version": "10.0.20348.0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"platforms": [
"x64-based Systems"
],
"product": "Windows Server 2025",
"vendor": "Microsoft",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "10.0.26100.33650",
"status": "affected",
"version": "10.0.26100.0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"platforms": [
"x64-based Systems"
],
"product": "Windows Server 2025 (Server Core installation)",
"vendor": "Microsoft",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "10.0.26100.33650",
"status": "affected",
"version": "10.0.26100.0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"cpeApplicability": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:microsoft:windows_10_1809:*:*:*:*:*:*:x86:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "10.0.17763.9376",
"versionStartIncluding": "10.0.17763.0",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:microsoft:windows_server_2019:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "10.0.17763.9376",
"versionStartIncluding": "10.0.17763.0",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:microsoft:windows_server_2019:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "10.0.17763.9376",
"versionStartIncluding": "10.0.17763.0",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:microsoft:windows_server_2022:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "10.0.20348.5761",
"versionStartIncluding": "10.0.20348.0",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:microsoft:windows_server_2025:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "10.0.26100.33650",
"versionStartIncluding": "10.0.26100.0",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:microsoft:windows_server_2025:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "10.0.26100.33650",
"versionStartIncluding": "10.0.26100.0",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:microsoft:windows_10_1607:*:*:*:*:*:*:x86:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "10.0.14393.9612",
"versionStartIncluding": "10.0.14393.0",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:microsoft:windows_server_2016:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "10.0.14393.9612",
"versionStartIncluding": "10.0.14393.0",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:microsoft:windows_server_2016:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "10.0.14393.9612",
"versionStartIncluding": "10.0.14393.0",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:microsoft:windows_server_2012:*:*:*:*:*:*:x64:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.2.9200.26434",
"versionStartIncluding": "6.2.9200.0",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:microsoft:windows_server_2012:*:*:*:*:*:*:x64:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.2.9200.26434",
"versionStartIncluding": "6.2.9200.0",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:microsoft:windows_server_2012_R2:*:*:*:*:*:*:x64:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.3.9600.23470",
"versionStartIncluding": "6.3.9600.0",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:microsoft:windows_server_2012_R2:*:*:*:*:*:*:x64:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.3.9600.23470",
"versionStartIncluding": "6.3.9600.0",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"datePublic": "2026-10-13T14:00:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en-US",
"value": "Insufficient granularity of access control in Windows Server Update Service allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"baseScore": 7.8,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H/E:U/RL:O/RC:C",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en-US",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-1220",
"description": "CWE-1220: Insufficient Granularity of Access Control",
"lang": "en-US",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-16T21:13:33.563Z",
"orgId": "f38d906d-7342-40ea-92c1-6c4a2c6478c8",
"shortName": "microsoft"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "Windows Server Update Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability",
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"patch"
],
"url": "https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-83499"
}
],
"title": "Windows Server Update Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "f38d906d-7342-40ea-92c1-6c4a2c6478c8",
"assignerShortName": "microsoft",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-83499",
"datePublished": "2026-10-13T18:59:46.007Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-08-31T15:57:21.153Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-16T21:13:33.563Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-81969 (GCVE-0-2026-81969)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-10-13 18:59 – Updated: 2026-10-16 21:13
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
Windows Server Update Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability
Summary
Insufficient granularity of access control in Windows Server Update Service allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally.
Severity
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: total
CISA Coordinator · CISA-ADP (v2.0.3)
Decision recorded 2026-10-13 20:42 UTC
CWE
- CWE-1220 - Insufficient Granularity of Access Control
Assigner
References
1 reference
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerabi… | vendor-advisorypatch |
Impacted products
13 products
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Microsoft | Windows 10 Version 1607 |
Affected:
10.0.14393.0 , < 10.0.14393.9612
(custom)
|
|
| Microsoft | Windows 10 Version 1809 |
Affected:
10.0.17763.0 , < 10.0.17763.9376
(custom)
|
|
| Microsoft | Windows Server 2012 |
Affected:
6.2.9200.0 , < 6.2.9200.26434
(custom)
|
|
| Microsoft | Windows Server 2012 (Server Core installation) |
Affected:
6.2.9200.0 , < 6.2.9200.26434
(custom)
|
|
| Microsoft | Windows Server 2012 R2 |
Affected:
6.3.9600.0 , < 6.3.9600.23470
(custom)
|
|
| Microsoft | Windows Server 2012 R2 (Server Core installation) |
Affected:
6.3.9600.0 , < 6.3.9600.23470
(custom)
|
|
| Microsoft | Windows Server 2016 |
Affected:
10.0.14393.0 , < 10.0.14393.9612
(custom)
|
|
| Microsoft | Windows Server 2016 (Server Core installation) |
Affected:
10.0.14393.0 , < 10.0.14393.9612
(custom)
|
|
| Microsoft | Windows Server 2019 |
Affected:
10.0.17763.0 , < 10.0.17763.9376
(custom)
|
|
| Microsoft | Windows Server 2019 (Server Core installation) |
Affected:
10.0.17763.0 , < 10.0.17763.9376
(custom)
|
|
| Microsoft | Windows Server 2022 |
Affected:
10.0.20348.0 , < 10.0.20348.5761
(custom)
|
|
| Microsoft | Windows Server 2025 |
Affected:
10.0.26100.0 , < 10.0.26100.33650
(custom)
|
|
| Microsoft | Windows Server 2025 (Server Core installation) |
Affected:
10.0.26100.0 , < 10.0.26100.33650
(custom)
|
Date Public
2026-10-13 14:00
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-81969",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-10-13T20:42:04.437010Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-13T20:44:25.181Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"platforms": [
"32-bit Systems",
"x64-based Systems"
],
"product": "Windows 10 Version 1607",
"vendor": "Microsoft",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "10.0.14393.9612",
"status": "affected",
"version": "10.0.14393.0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"platforms": [
"32-bit Systems",
"x64-based Systems"
],
"product": "Windows 10 Version 1809",
"vendor": "Microsoft",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "10.0.17763.9376",
"status": "affected",
"version": "10.0.17763.0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"platforms": [
"x64-based Systems"
],
"product": "Windows Server 2012",
"vendor": "Microsoft",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "6.2.9200.26434",
"status": "affected",
"version": "6.2.9200.0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"platforms": [
"x64-based Systems"
],
"product": "Windows Server 2012 (Server Core installation)",
"vendor": "Microsoft",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "6.2.9200.26434",
"status": "affected",
"version": "6.2.9200.0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"platforms": [
"x64-based Systems"
],
"product": "Windows Server 2012 R2",
"vendor": "Microsoft",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "6.3.9600.23470",
"status": "affected",
"version": "6.3.9600.0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"platforms": [
"x64-based Systems"
],
"product": "Windows Server 2012 R2 (Server Core installation)",
"vendor": "Microsoft",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "6.3.9600.23470",
"status": "affected",
"version": "6.3.9600.0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"platforms": [
"x64-based Systems"
],
"product": "Windows Server 2016",
"vendor": "Microsoft",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "10.0.14393.9612",
"status": "affected",
"version": "10.0.14393.0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"platforms": [
"x64-based Systems"
],
"product": "Windows Server 2016 (Server Core installation)",
"vendor": "Microsoft",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "10.0.14393.9612",
"status": "affected",
"version": "10.0.14393.0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"platforms": [
"x64-based Systems"
],
"product": "Windows Server 2019",
"vendor": "Microsoft",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "10.0.17763.9376",
"status": "affected",
"version": "10.0.17763.0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"platforms": [
"x64-based Systems"
],
"product": "Windows Server 2019 (Server Core installation)",
"vendor": "Microsoft",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "10.0.17763.9376",
"status": "affected",
"version": "10.0.17763.0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"platforms": [
"x64-based Systems"
],
"product": "Windows Server 2022",
"vendor": "Microsoft",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "10.0.20348.5761",
"status": "affected",
"version": "10.0.20348.0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"platforms": [
"x64-based Systems"
],
"product": "Windows Server 2025",
"vendor": "Microsoft",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "10.0.26100.33650",
"status": "affected",
"version": "10.0.26100.0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"platforms": [
"x64-based Systems"
],
"product": "Windows Server 2025 (Server Core installation)",
"vendor": "Microsoft",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "10.0.26100.33650",
"status": "affected",
"version": "10.0.26100.0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"cpeApplicability": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:microsoft:windows_10_1809:*:*:*:*:*:*:x86:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "10.0.17763.9376",
"versionStartIncluding": "10.0.17763.0",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:microsoft:windows_server_2019:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "10.0.17763.9376",
"versionStartIncluding": "10.0.17763.0",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:microsoft:windows_server_2019:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "10.0.17763.9376",
"versionStartIncluding": "10.0.17763.0",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:microsoft:windows_server_2022:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "10.0.20348.5761",
"versionStartIncluding": "10.0.20348.0",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:microsoft:windows_server_2025:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "10.0.26100.33650",
"versionStartIncluding": "10.0.26100.0",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:microsoft:windows_server_2025:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "10.0.26100.33650",
"versionStartIncluding": "10.0.26100.0",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:microsoft:windows_10_1607:*:*:*:*:*:*:x86:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "10.0.14393.9612",
"versionStartIncluding": "10.0.14393.0",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:microsoft:windows_server_2016:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "10.0.14393.9612",
"versionStartIncluding": "10.0.14393.0",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:microsoft:windows_server_2016:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "10.0.14393.9612",
"versionStartIncluding": "10.0.14393.0",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:microsoft:windows_server_2012:*:*:*:*:*:*:x64:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.2.9200.26434",
"versionStartIncluding": "6.2.9200.0",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:microsoft:windows_server_2012:*:*:*:*:*:*:x64:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.2.9200.26434",
"versionStartIncluding": "6.2.9200.0",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:microsoft:windows_server_2012_R2:*:*:*:*:*:*:x64:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.3.9600.23470",
"versionStartIncluding": "6.3.9600.0",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:microsoft:windows_server_2012_R2:*:*:*:*:*:*:x64:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.3.9600.23470",
"versionStartIncluding": "6.3.9600.0",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"datePublic": "2026-10-13T14:00:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en-US",
"value": "Insufficient granularity of access control in Windows Server Update Service allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"baseScore": 7.8,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H/E:U/RL:O/RC:C",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en-US",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-1220",
"description": "CWE-1220: Insufficient Granularity of Access Control",
"lang": "en-US",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-16T21:13:32.055Z",
"orgId": "f38d906d-7342-40ea-92c1-6c4a2c6478c8",
"shortName": "microsoft"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "Windows Server Update Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability",
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"patch"
],
"url": "https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-81969"
}
],
"title": "Windows Server Update Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "f38d906d-7342-40ea-92c1-6c4a2c6478c8",
"assignerShortName": "microsoft",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-81969",
"datePublished": "2026-10-13T18:59:45.750Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-08-27T20:58:07.632Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-16T21:13:32.055Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-78433 (GCVE-0-2026-78433)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-10-14 14:38 – Updated: 2026-10-14 14:38
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
Gitea private attachment disclosure through repository mismatch
Summary
Gitea's web attachment handler skips its cross-repository ownership check for attachments created before 16 January 2026 and checks permissions against the repository named in the request URL instead. An unauthenticated attacker who knows a private attachment's UUID can request it through a public repository's attachment path and retrieve its contents. This can expose issue and pull request attachments or release assets; the random attachment UUID must already be known to the attacker.
Severity
No CVSS data available.
CWE
Assigner
References
5 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/security/adviso… | vendor-advisory |
| https://blog.gitea.com/release-of-1.27.3/ | release-notes |
| https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/39048 | patch |
| https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/39077 | patch |
| https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/releases/tag/v1.27.3 | release-notes |
{
"containers": {
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"packageName": "gitea.dev",
"product": "Gitea",
"vendor": "Gitea",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "1.27.2",
"status": "affected",
"version": "1.26.0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "reporter",
"value": "https://github.com/iabdullah215"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "remediation developer",
"value": "https://github.com/bircni"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "remediation developer",
"value": "https://github.com/silverwind"
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Gitea\u0027s web attachment handler skips its cross-repository ownership check for attachments created before 16 January 2026 and checks permissions against the repository named in the request URL instead. An unauthenticated attacker who knows a private attachment\u0027s UUID can request it through a public repository\u0027s attachment path and retrieve its contents. This can expose issue and pull request attachments or release assets; the random attachment UUID must already be known to the attacker."
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-284",
"description": "CWE-284: Improper Access Control",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
},
{
"cweId": "CWE-639",
"description": "CWE-639: Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
},
{
"cweId": "CWE-863",
"description": "CWE-863: Incorrect Authorization",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
},
{
"cweId": "CWE-1220",
"description": "CWE-1220: Insufficient Granularity of Access Control",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-14T14:38:17.247Z",
"orgId": "88ee5874-cf24-4952-aea0-31affedb7ff2",
"shortName": "Gitea"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "GitHub Security Advisory GHSA-frpv-2xgv-wxpq",
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory"
],
"url": "https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/security/advisories/GHSA-frpv-2xgv-wxpq"
},
{
"name": "Gitea 1.27.3 release announcement",
"tags": [
"release-notes"
],
"url": "https://blog.gitea.com/release-of-1.27.3/"
},
{
"name": "Fix: go-gitea/gitea pull request #39048",
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/39048"
},
{
"name": "Fix: go-gitea/gitea pull request #39077",
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/39077"
},
{
"name": "go-gitea/gitea v1.27.3 release",
"tags": [
"release-notes"
],
"url": "https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/releases/tag/v1.27.3"
}
],
"title": "Gitea private attachment disclosure through repository mismatch"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "88ee5874-cf24-4952-aea0-31affedb7ff2",
"assignerShortName": "Gitea",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-78433",
"datePublished": "2026-10-14T14:38:17.247Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-08-24T20:45:09.297Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-14T14:38:17.247Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-78230 (GCVE-0-2026-78230)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-09-08 16:41 – Updated: 2026-09-08 17:33
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
AshAi aggregate tool can read field-policy-protected fields
Summary
AshAi exposes Ash read actions to language-model tool calls. The read tool accepts an aggregate result type (min, max, sum, avg) that builds an ad-hoc Ash.Query.Aggregate over a named field and returns its raw value.
Ash field policies redact forbidden fields on returned records (replacing them with %Ash.ForbiddenField{}), but that redaction does not apply to aggregate values. A tool caller could therefore read a field the calling actor's field policies forbid by requesting it as an aggregate; min/max in particular return an actual field value. This includes fields that are public? true but restricted per-actor by a field policy, such as sensitive PII. The tool's existing check only required the field to be public, which is a separate axis from per-actor field-policy authorization.
The fix authorizes the aggregated field against the resource's field policies, so aggregating over a field the actor may not see is refused or scoped to the rows where it is visible.
This issue affects ash_ai: from 0.1.0 before 1.0.3.
Severity
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator · CISA-ADP (v2.0.3)
Decision recorded 2026-09-08 17:33 UTC
CWE
- CWE-1220 - Insufficient Granularity of Access Control
Assigner
References
5 references
Impacted products
2 products
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ash-project | ash_ai |
Affected:
0.1.0 , < 1.0.3
(semver)
cpe:2.3:a:ash-project:ash_ai:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* |
|
| ash-project | ash_ai |
Affected:
2ba234b50946a3b8116190c8467f9f4dfa5edce7 , < 9c02de581625c342c9870a672830bff28c1d701e
(git)
cpe:2.3:a:ash-project:ash_ai:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-78230",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-09-08T17:33:49.017554Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-08T17:33:57.604Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"collectionURL": "https://repo.hex.pm",
"cpes": [
"cpe:2.3:a:ash-project:ash_ai:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"modules": [
"\u0027Elixir.AshAi.Tool.Execution\u0027"
],
"packageName": "ash_ai",
"packageURL": "pkg:hex/ash_ai",
"product": "ash_ai",
"programFiles": [
"lib/ash_ai/tool/execution.ex"
],
"programRoutines": [
{
"name": "\u0027Elixir.AshAi.Tool.Execution\u0027:execute_read/4"
}
],
"repo": "https://github.com/ash-project/ash_ai",
"vendor": "ash-project",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "1.0.3",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0.1.0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
},
{
"collectionURL": "https://github.com",
"cpes": [
"cpe:2.3:a:ash-project:ash_ai:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"modules": [
"\u0027Elixir.AshAi.Tool.Execution\u0027"
],
"packageName": "ash-project/ash_ai",
"packageURL": "pkg:github/ash-project/ash_ai",
"product": "ash_ai",
"programFiles": [
"lib/ash_ai/tool/execution.ex"
],
"programRoutines": [
{
"name": "\u0027Elixir.AshAi.Tool.Execution\u0027:execute_read/4"
}
],
"repo": "https://github.com/ash-project/ash_ai",
"vendor": "ash-project",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "9c02de581625c342c9870a672830bff28c1d701e",
"status": "affected",
"version": "2ba234b50946a3b8116190c8467f9f4dfa5edce7",
"versionType": "git"
}
]
}
],
"configurations": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cp\u003eReachable only when an application exposes an AshAi read tool over a resource whose field policies restrict a field that the calling actor can still name as an aggregate (for example a \u003ccode\u003epublic? true\u003c/code\u003e but field-policy-protected attribute).\u003c/p\u003e"
},
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/markdown",
"value": "Reachable only when an application exposes an AshAi read tool over a resource whose field policies restrict a field that the calling actor can still name as an aggregate (for example a `public? true` but field-policy-protected attribute)."
}
],
"value": "Reachable only when an application exposes an AshAi read tool over a resource whose field policies restrict a field that the calling actor can still name as an aggregate (for example a public? true but field-policy-protected attribute)."
}
],
"cpeApplicability": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:ash-project:ash_ai:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "1.0.3",
"versionStartIncluding": "0.1.0",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
],
"operator": "AND"
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "remediation developer",
"value": "Zach Daniel / Ash Project"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "coordinator",
"value": "Jonatan M\u00e4nnchen / EEF"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Aaron Hong / Remedy"
}
],
"dateAssigned": "2026-09-08T15:44:25.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cp\u003eAshAi exposes Ash read actions to language-model tool calls. The read tool accepts an aggregate result type (\u003ccode\u003emin\u003c/code\u003e, \u003ccode\u003emax\u003c/code\u003e, \u003ccode\u003esum\u003c/code\u003e, \u003ccode\u003eavg\u003c/code\u003e) that builds an ad-hoc \u003ccode\u003eAsh.Query.Aggregate\u003c/code\u003e over a named field and returns its raw value.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAsh field policies redact forbidden fields on returned records (replacing them with \u003ccode\u003e%Ash.ForbiddenField{}\u003c/code\u003e), but that redaction does not apply to aggregate values. A tool caller could therefore read a field the calling actor\u0027s field policies forbid by requesting it as an aggregate; \u003ccode\u003emin\u003c/code\u003e/\u003ccode\u003emax\u003c/code\u003e in particular return an actual field value. This includes fields that are \u003ccode\u003epublic? true\u003c/code\u003e but restricted per-actor by a field policy, such as sensitive PII. The tool\u0027s existing check only required the field to be public, which is a separate axis from per-actor field-policy authorization.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe fix authorizes the aggregated field against the resource\u0027s field policies, so aggregating over a field the actor may not see is refused or scoped to the rows where it is visible.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThis issue affects ash_ai: from 0.1.0 before 1.0.3.\u003c/p\u003e"
},
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/markdown",
"value": "AshAi exposes Ash read actions to language-model tool calls. The read tool accepts an aggregate result type (`min`, `max`, `sum`, `avg`) that builds an ad-hoc `Ash.Query.Aggregate` over a named field and returns its raw value.\n\nAsh field policies redact forbidden fields on returned records (replacing them with `%Ash.ForbiddenField{}`), but that redaction does not apply to aggregate values. A tool caller could therefore read a field the calling actor\u0027s field policies forbid by requesting it as an aggregate; `min`/`max` in particular return an actual field value. This includes fields that are `public? true` but restricted per-actor by a field policy, such as sensitive PII. The tool\u0027s existing check only required the field to be public, which is a separate axis from per-actor field-policy authorization.\n\nThe fix authorizes the aggregated field against the resource\u0027s field policies, so aggregating over a field the actor may not see is refused or scoped to the rows where it is visible.\n\nThis issue affects ash_ai: from 0.1.0 before 1.0.3."
}
],
"value": "AshAi exposes Ash read actions to language-model tool calls. The read tool accepts an aggregate result type (min, max, sum, avg) that builds an ad-hoc Ash.Query.Aggregate over a named field and returns its raw value.\n\nAsh field policies redact forbidden fields on returned records (replacing them with %Ash.ForbiddenField{}), but that redaction does not apply to aggregate values. A tool caller could therefore read a field the calling actor\u0027s field policies forbid by requesting it as an aggregate; min/max in particular return an actual field value. This includes fields that are public? true but restricted per-actor by a field policy, such as sensitive PII. The tool\u0027s existing check only required the field to be public, which is a separate axis from per-actor field-policy authorization.\n\nThe fix authorizes the aggregated field against the resource\u0027s field policies, so aggregating over a field the actor may not see is refused or scoped to the rows where it is visible.\n\nThis issue affects ash_ai: from 0.1.0 before 1.0.3."
}
],
"impacts": [
{
"capecId": "CAPEC-1",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CAPEC-1 Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLs"
}
]
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "PRESENT",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 6,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-1220",
"description": "CWE-1220 Insufficient Granularity of Access Control",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-08T16:41:45.975Z",
"orgId": "6b3ad84c-e1a6-4bf7-a703-f496b71e49db",
"shortName": "EEF"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "GHSA-v5rw-36x5-r5vx",
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory"
],
"url": "https://github.com/ash-project/ash_ai/security/advisories/GHSA-v5rw-36x5-r5vx"
},
{
"name": "EEF CNA record for CVE-2026-78230",
"tags": [
"related"
],
"url": "https://cna.erlef.org/cves/CVE-2026-78230.html"
},
{
"name": "OSV record EEF-CVE-2026-78230",
"tags": [
"related"
],
"url": "https://osv.dev/vulnerability/EEF-CVE-2026-78230"
},
{
"name": "Introducing commit 2ba234b in ash-project/ash_ai",
"tags": [
"related"
],
"url": "https://github.com/ash-project/ash_ai/commit/2ba234b50946a3b8116190c8467f9f4dfa5edce7"
},
{
"name": "Fix commit 9c02de5 in ash-project/ash_ai",
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/ash-project/ash_ai/commit/9c02de581625c342c9870a672830bff28c1d701e"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "EXTERNAL"
},
"title": "AshAi aggregate tool can read field-policy-protected fields"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "6b3ad84c-e1a6-4bf7-a703-f496b71e49db",
"assignerShortName": "EEF",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-78230",
"datePublished": "2026-09-08T16:41:45.975Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-08-31T00:45:02.439Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-08T17:33:57.604Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-78216 (GCVE-0-2026-78216)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-09-08 16:42 – Updated: 2026-09-08 17:27
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
AshLua eval read operations can read field-policy-protected fields via aggregates
Summary
AshLua exposes Ash read actions to Lua scripts run through an eval action. A read call accepts an operation (list, min, max, first, sum, avg) that builds an ad-hoc Ash.Query.Aggregate over a named field and returns its raw value.
Ash field policies redact forbidden fields on returned records (replacing them with %Ash.ForbiddenField{}), but that redaction does not apply to aggregate values. A script could therefore read a field the calling actor's field policies forbid by requesting it as an aggregate instead of as a field. This includes fields that are public? true but restricted per-actor by a field policy, such as sensitive PII. The prior hardening only enforced the exposed-field allow-list (field visibility), which is a separate axis from per-actor field-policy authorization.
The fix authorizes the aggregated field against the resource's field policies, so aggregating over a field the actor may not see is refused or scoped to the rows where it is visible.
This issue affects ash_lua: from 0.1.0 before 0.2.2.
Severity
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator · CISA-ADP (v2.0.3)
Decision recorded 2026-09-08 17:26 UTC
CWE
- CWE-1220 - Insufficient Granularity of Access Control
Assigner
References
5 references
Impacted products
2 products
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ash-project | ash_lua |
Affected:
0.1.0 , < 0.2.2
(semver)
cpe:2.3:a:ash-project:ash_lua:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* |
|
| ash-project | ash_lua |
Affected:
8675e47cca81f36594083a7e63379bac9e123e72 , < 266a5dcc56d5015b6d316c10606169e753b07450
(git)
cpe:2.3:a:ash-project:ash_lua:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-78216",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-09-08T17:26:34.675766Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-08T17:27:08.856Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"collectionURL": "https://repo.hex.pm",
"cpes": [
"cpe:2.3:a:ash-project:ash_lua:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"modules": [
"\u0027Elixir.AshLua.Runtime\u0027"
],
"packageName": "ash_lua",
"packageURL": "pkg:hex/ash_lua",
"product": "ash_lua",
"programFiles": [
"lib/ash_lua/runtime.ex"
],
"programRoutines": [
{
"name": "\u0027Elixir.AshLua.Runtime\u0027:run_read_operation/5"
}
],
"repo": "https://github.com/ash-project/ash_lua",
"vendor": "ash-project",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "0.2.2",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0.1.0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
},
{
"collectionURL": "https://github.com",
"cpes": [
"cpe:2.3:a:ash-project:ash_lua:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"modules": [
"\u0027Elixir.AshLua.Runtime\u0027"
],
"packageName": "ash-project/ash_lua",
"packageURL": "pkg:github/ash-project/ash_lua",
"product": "ash_lua",
"programFiles": [
"lib/ash_lua/runtime.ex"
],
"programRoutines": [
{
"name": "\u0027Elixir.AshLua.Runtime\u0027:run_read_operation/5"
}
],
"repo": "https://github.com/ash-project/ash_lua",
"vendor": "ash-project",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "266a5dcc56d5015b6d316c10606169e753b07450",
"status": "affected",
"version": "8675e47cca81f36594083a7e63379bac9e123e72",
"versionType": "git"
}
]
}
],
"configurations": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cp\u003eReachable only when an application exposes an AshLua \u003ccode\u003eeval\u003c/code\u003e action over a resource whose field policies restrict a field that the calling actor can still name as an operation aggregate (for example a \u003ccode\u003epublic? true\u003c/code\u003e but field-policy-protected attribute).\u003c/p\u003e"
},
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/markdown",
"value": "Reachable only when an application exposes an AshLua `eval` action over a resource whose field policies restrict a field that the calling actor can still name as an operation aggregate (for example a `public? true` but field-policy-protected attribute)."
}
],
"value": "Reachable only when an application exposes an AshLua eval action over a resource whose field policies restrict a field that the calling actor can still name as an operation aggregate (for example a public? true but field-policy-protected attribute)."
}
],
"cpeApplicability": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:ash-project:ash_lua:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "0.2.2",
"versionStartIncluding": "0.1.0",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
],
"operator": "AND"
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "remediation developer",
"value": "Zach Daniel / Ash Project"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "coordinator",
"value": "Jonatan M\u00e4nnchen / EEF"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Aaron Hong / Remedy"
}
],
"dateAssigned": "2026-09-08T15:43:48.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cp\u003eAshLua exposes Ash read actions to Lua scripts run through an \u003ccode\u003eeval\u003c/code\u003e action. A read call accepts an \u003ccode\u003eoperation\u003c/code\u003e (\u003ccode\u003elist\u003c/code\u003e, \u003ccode\u003emin\u003c/code\u003e, \u003ccode\u003emax\u003c/code\u003e, \u003ccode\u003efirst\u003c/code\u003e, \u003ccode\u003esum\u003c/code\u003e, \u003ccode\u003eavg\u003c/code\u003e) that builds an ad-hoc \u003ccode\u003eAsh.Query.Aggregate\u003c/code\u003e over a named field and returns its raw value.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAsh field policies redact forbidden fields on returned records (replacing them with \u003ccode\u003e%Ash.ForbiddenField{}\u003c/code\u003e), but that redaction does not apply to aggregate values. A script could therefore read a field the calling actor\u0027s field policies forbid by requesting it as an aggregate instead of as a field. This includes fields that are \u003ccode\u003epublic? true\u003c/code\u003e but restricted per-actor by a field policy, such as sensitive PII. The prior hardening only enforced the exposed-field allow-list (field visibility), which is a separate axis from per-actor field-policy authorization.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe fix authorizes the aggregated field against the resource\u0027s field policies, so aggregating over a field the actor may not see is refused or scoped to the rows where it is visible.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThis issue affects ash_lua: from 0.1.0 before 0.2.2.\u003c/p\u003e"
},
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/markdown",
"value": "AshLua exposes Ash read actions to Lua scripts run through an `eval` action. A read call accepts an `operation` (`list`, `min`, `max`, `first`, `sum`, `avg`) that builds an ad-hoc `Ash.Query.Aggregate` over a named field and returns its raw value.\n\nAsh field policies redact forbidden fields on returned records (replacing them with `%Ash.ForbiddenField{}`), but that redaction does not apply to aggregate values. A script could therefore read a field the calling actor\u0027s field policies forbid by requesting it as an aggregate instead of as a field. This includes fields that are `public? true` but restricted per-actor by a field policy, such as sensitive PII. The prior hardening only enforced the exposed-field allow-list (field visibility), which is a separate axis from per-actor field-policy authorization.\n\nThe fix authorizes the aggregated field against the resource\u0027s field policies, so aggregating over a field the actor may not see is refused or scoped to the rows where it is visible.\n\nThis issue affects ash_lua: from 0.1.0 before 0.2.2."
}
],
"value": "AshLua exposes Ash read actions to Lua scripts run through an eval action. A read call accepts an operation (list, min, max, first, sum, avg) that builds an ad-hoc Ash.Query.Aggregate over a named field and returns its raw value.\n\nAsh field policies redact forbidden fields on returned records (replacing them with %Ash.ForbiddenField{}), but that redaction does not apply to aggregate values. A script could therefore read a field the calling actor\u0027s field policies forbid by requesting it as an aggregate instead of as a field. This includes fields that are public? true but restricted per-actor by a field policy, such as sensitive PII. The prior hardening only enforced the exposed-field allow-list (field visibility), which is a separate axis from per-actor field-policy authorization.\n\nThe fix authorizes the aggregated field against the resource\u0027s field policies, so aggregating over a field the actor may not see is refused or scoped to the rows where it is visible.\n\nThis issue affects ash_lua: from 0.1.0 before 0.2.2."
}
],
"impacts": [
{
"capecId": "CAPEC-1",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CAPEC-1 Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLs"
}
]
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "PRESENT",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 6,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-1220",
"description": "CWE-1220 Insufficient Granularity of Access Control",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-08T16:42:20.908Z",
"orgId": "6b3ad84c-e1a6-4bf7-a703-f496b71e49db",
"shortName": "EEF"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "GHSA-5whv-8rcp-x33j",
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory"
],
"url": "https://github.com/ash-project/ash_lua/security/advisories/GHSA-5whv-8rcp-x33j"
},
{
"name": "EEF CNA record for CVE-2026-78216",
"tags": [
"related"
],
"url": "https://cna.erlef.org/cves/CVE-2026-78216.html"
},
{
"name": "OSV record EEF-CVE-2026-78216",
"tags": [
"related"
],
"url": "https://osv.dev/vulnerability/EEF-CVE-2026-78216"
},
{
"name": "Introducing commit 8675e47 in ash-project/ash_lua",
"tags": [
"related"
],
"url": "https://github.com/ash-project/ash_lua/commit/8675e47cca81f36594083a7e63379bac9e123e72"
},
{
"name": "Fix commit 266a5dc in ash-project/ash_lua",
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/ash-project/ash_lua/commit/266a5dcc56d5015b6d316c10606169e753b07450"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "EXTERNAL"
},
"title": "AshLua eval read operations can read field-policy-protected fields via aggregates"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "6b3ad84c-e1a6-4bf7-a703-f496b71e49db",
"assignerShortName": "EEF",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-78216",
"datePublished": "2026-09-08T16:42:20.908Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-08-31T00:45:02.446Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-08T17:27:08.856Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-78122 (GCVE-0-2026-78122)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-08-22 23:06 – Updated: 2026-09-24 14:19
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
docker-socket-proxy through 0.5.0 Insufficient Access Control Granularity Exposes Container Filesystems
Summary
docker-socket-proxy fails to properly gate read endpoints in the /containers Docker API namespace when the CONTAINERS environment variable is set. Attackers can use GET requests to /containers/{id}/archive, /containers/{id}/export, /containers/{id}/logs, and /containers/{id}/top to read arbitrary files and download entire container filesystems as tar archives.
Severity
SSVC
Exploitation: poc
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator · CISA-ADP (v2.0.3)
Decision recorded 2026-08-26 17:55 UTC
CWE
- CWE-1220 - Insufficient Granularity of Access Control
Assigner
References
6 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/Tecnativa/docker-socket-proxy/… | issue-tracking |
| https://github.com/Tecnativa/docker-socket-proxy | product |
| https://github.com/Tecnativa/docker-socket-proxy/… | technical-description |
| https://github.com/Tecnativa/docker-socket-proxy/… | issue-trackingpatch |
| https://gist.github.com/nedlir/e4f52f88a757f02c67… | exploit |
| https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/docker-socke… | third-party-advisory |
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tecnativa | docker-socket-proxy |
Affected:
0 , ≤ 0.5.0
(semver)
|
Date Public
2026-08-15 00:00
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-78122",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "poc"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-08-26T17:55:36.477479Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-26T17:55:57.621Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"exploit"
],
"url": "https://github.com/Tecnativa/docker-socket-proxy/issues/182"
}
],
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"collectionURL": "https://hub.docker.com/r/tecnativa/docker-socket-proxy",
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"packageURL": "pkg:docker/tecnativa/docker-socket-proxy",
"product": "docker-socket-proxy",
"vendor": "Tecnativa",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "0.5.0",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "nedlir"
}
],
"datePublic": "2026-08-15T00:00:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "docker-socket-proxy fails to properly gate read endpoints in the /containers Docker API namespace when the CONTAINERS environment variable is set. Attackers can use GET requests to /containers/{id}/archive, /containers/{id}/export, /containers/{id}/logs, and /containers/{id}/top to read arbitrary files and download entire container filesystems as tar archives."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "NONE",
"attackVector": "ADJACENT",
"baseScore": 8.3,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "NONE"
},
"format": "CVSS"
},
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "ADJACENT_NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 7.4,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "CHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS"
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-1220",
"description": "Insufficient Granularity of Access Control",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-24T14:19:41.384Z",
"orgId": "83251b91-4cc7-4094-a5c7-464a1b83ea10",
"shortName": "VulnCheck"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "GitHub Issue #182",
"tags": [
"issue-tracking"
],
"url": "https://github.com/Tecnativa/docker-socket-proxy/issues/182"
},
{
"tags": [
"product"
],
"url": "https://github.com/Tecnativa/docker-socket-proxy"
},
{
"tags": [
"technical-description"
],
"url": "https://github.com/Tecnativa/docker-socket-proxy/blob/v0.5.0/haproxy.cfg#L49-L61"
},
{
"tags": [
"issue-tracking",
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/Tecnativa/docker-socket-proxy/pull/183"
},
{
"tags": [
"exploit"
],
"url": "https://gist.github.com/nedlir/e4f52f88a757f02c67db1fd5dd70d732"
},
{
"name": "VulnCheck Advisory: docker-socket-proxy through 0.5.0 Insufficient Access Control Granularity Exposes Container Filesystems",
"tags": [
"third-party-advisory"
],
"url": "https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/docker-socket-proxy-through-insufficient-access-control-granularity-exposes-container-filesystems"
}
],
"title": "docker-socket-proxy through 0.5.0 Insufficient Access Control Granularity Exposes Container Filesystems",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "vulncheck-endgame"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "83251b91-4cc7-4094-a5c7-464a1b83ea10",
"assignerShortName": "VulnCheck",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-78122",
"datePublished": "2026-08-22T23:06:32.896Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-08-22T22:56:18.102Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-24T14:19:41.384Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-77480 (GCVE-0-2026-77480)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-09-08 17:18 – Updated: 2026-10-14 23:13
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
SQL Server Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability
Summary
Insufficient granularity of access control in SQL Server allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.
Severity
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: total
CISA Coordinator · CISA-ADP (v2.0.3)
Decision recorded 2026-09-09 04:26 UTC
CWE
- CWE-1220 - Insufficient Granularity of Access Control
Assigner
References
1 reference
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerabi… | vendor-advisorypatch |
Impacted products
8 products
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Microsoft | Microsoft SQL Server 2017 (CU 31) |
Affected:
14.0.0 , < 14.0.3550.4
(custom)
|
|
| Microsoft | Microsoft SQL Server 2017 (GDR) |
Affected:
14.0.0 , < 14.0.2130.4
(custom)
|
|
| Microsoft | Microsoft SQL Server 2019 (CU 32) |
Affected:
15.0.0.0 , < 15.0.4490.9
(custom)
|
|
| Microsoft | Microsoft SQL Server 2019 (GDR) |
Affected:
15.0.0 , < 15.0.2190.7
(custom)
|
|
| Microsoft | Microsoft SQL Server 2022 (CU 26) |
Affected:
16.0.0.0 , < 16.0.4275.2
(custom)
|
|
| Microsoft | Microsoft SQL Server 2022 (GDR) |
Affected:
16.0.0 , < 16.0.1200.5
(custom)
|
|
| Microsoft | Microsoft SQL Server 2025 (CU8) |
Affected:
17.0.0.0 , < 17.0.4085.5
(custom)
|
|
| Microsoft | Microsoft SQL Server 2025 for x64-based Systems (GDR) |
Affected:
17.0.1050.2 , < 17.0.1135.8
(custom)
|
Date Public
2026-09-08 14:00
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-77480",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-09-09T04:26:36.357526Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-09T09:54:52.349Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"platforms": [
"x64-based Systems"
],
"product": "Microsoft SQL Server 2017 (CU 31)",
"vendor": "Microsoft",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "14.0.3550.4",
"status": "affected",
"version": "14.0.0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"platforms": [
"x64-based Systems"
],
"product": "Microsoft SQL Server 2017 (GDR)",
"vendor": "Microsoft",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "14.0.2130.4",
"status": "affected",
"version": "14.0.0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"platforms": [
"x64-based Systems"
],
"product": "Microsoft SQL Server 2019 (CU 32)",
"vendor": "Microsoft",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "15.0.4490.9",
"status": "affected",
"version": "15.0.0.0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"platforms": [
"x64-based Systems"
],
"product": "Microsoft SQL Server 2019 (GDR)",
"vendor": "Microsoft",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "15.0.2190.7",
"status": "affected",
"version": "15.0.0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"platforms": [
"x64-based Systems"
],
"product": "Microsoft SQL Server 2022 (CU 26)",
"vendor": "Microsoft",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "16.0.4275.2",
"status": "affected",
"version": "16.0.0.0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"platforms": [
"x64-based Systems"
],
"product": "Microsoft SQL Server 2022 (GDR)",
"vendor": "Microsoft",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "16.0.1200.5",
"status": "affected",
"version": "16.0.0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"platforms": [
"x64-based Systems"
],
"product": "Microsoft SQL Server 2025 (CU8)",
"vendor": "Microsoft",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "17.0.4085.5",
"status": "affected",
"version": "17.0.0.0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"platforms": [
"x64-based Systems"
],
"product": "Microsoft SQL Server 2025 for x64-based Systems (GDR)",
"vendor": "Microsoft",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "17.0.1135.8",
"status": "affected",
"version": "17.0.1050.2",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"cpeApplicability": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:microsoft:sql_server_2017:*:-:*:*:*:*:x64:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "14.0.2130.4",
"versionStartIncluding": "14.0.0",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:microsoft:sql_server_2019:*:*:*:*:*:*:x64:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "15.0.2190.7",
"versionStartIncluding": "15.0.0",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:microsoft:sql_server_2017:*:-:*:*:*:*:x64:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "14.0.3550.4",
"versionStartIncluding": "14.0.0",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:microsoft:sql_server_2022:*:*:*:*:*:*:x64:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "16.0.1200.5",
"versionStartIncluding": "16.0.0",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:microsoft:sql_server_2025:*:*:*:*:*:*:x64:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "17.0.1135.8",
"versionStartIncluding": "17.0.1050.2",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:microsoft:sql_server_2019:*:*:*:*:*:*:x64:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "15.0.4490.9",
"versionStartIncluding": "15.0.0.0",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:microsoft:sql_server_2022:*:*:*:*:*:*:x64:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "16.0.4275.2",
"versionStartIncluding": "16.0.0.0",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:microsoft:sql_server_2025:*:*:*:*:*:*:x64:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "17.0.4085.5",
"versionStartIncluding": "17.0.0.0",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"datePublic": "2026-09-08T14:00:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en-US",
"value": "Insufficient granularity of access control in SQL Server allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"baseScore": 8.8,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H/E:U/RL:O/RC:C",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en-US",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-1220",
"description": "CWE-1220: Insufficient Granularity of Access Control",
"lang": "en-US",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-14T23:13:35.498Z",
"orgId": "f38d906d-7342-40ea-92c1-6c4a2c6478c8",
"shortName": "microsoft"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "SQL Server Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability",
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"patch"
],
"url": "https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-77480"
}
],
"title": "SQL Server Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "f38d906d-7342-40ea-92c1-6c4a2c6478c8",
"assignerShortName": "microsoft",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-77480",
"datePublished": "2026-09-08T17:18:11.858Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-08-20T20:11:33.672Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-14T23:13:35.498Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
Mitigation
Architecture and Design
Implementation
Testing
- Access-control-policy protections must be reviewed for design inconsistency and common weaknesses.
- Access-control-policy definition and programming flow must be tested in pre-silicon, post-silicon testing.
CAPEC-1: Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLs
In applications, particularly web applications, access to functionality is mitigated by an authorization framework. This framework maps Access Control Lists (ACLs) to elements of the application's functionality; particularly URL's for web apps. In the case that the administrator failed to specify an ACL for a particular element, an attacker may be able to access it with impunity. An attacker with the ability to access functionality not properly constrained by ACLs can obtain sensitive information and possibly compromise the entire application. Such an attacker can access resources that must be available only to users at a higher privilege level, can access management sections of the application, or can run queries for data that they otherwise not supposed to.
CAPEC-180: Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels
An attacker exploits a weakness in the configuration of access controls and is able to bypass the intended protection that these measures guard against and thereby obtain unauthorized access to the system or network. Sensitive functionality should always be protected with access controls. However configuring all but the most trivial access control systems can be very complicated and there are many opportunities for mistakes. If an attacker can learn of incorrectly configured access security settings, they may be able to exploit this in an attack.