FKIE_CVE-2025-9230
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2025-09-30 14:15 - Updated: 2025-11-04 22:16
Severity ?
Summary
Issue summary: An application trying to decrypt CMS messages encrypted using
password based encryption can trigger an out-of-bounds read and write.
Impact summary: This out-of-bounds read may trigger a crash which leads to
Denial of Service for an application. The out-of-bounds write can cause
a memory corruption which can have various consequences including
a Denial of Service or Execution of attacker-supplied code.
Although the consequences of a successful exploit of this vulnerability
could be severe, the probability that the attacker would be able to
perform it is low. Besides, password based (PWRI) encryption support in CMS
messages is very rarely used. For that reason the issue was assessed as
Moderate severity according to our Security Policy.
The FIPS modules in 3.5, 3.4, 3.3, 3.2, 3.1 and 3.0 are not affected by this
issue, as the CMS implementation is outside the OpenSSL FIPS module
boundary.
References
Impacted products
| Vendor | Product | Version |
|---|
{
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Issue summary: An application trying to decrypt CMS messages encrypted using\npassword based encryption can trigger an out-of-bounds read and write.\n\nImpact summary: This out-of-bounds read may trigger a crash which leads to\nDenial of Service for an application. The out-of-bounds write can cause\na memory corruption which can have various consequences including\na Denial of Service or Execution of attacker-supplied code.\n\nAlthough the consequences of a successful exploit of this vulnerability\ncould be severe, the probability that the attacker would be able to\nperform it is low. Besides, password based (PWRI) encryption support in CMS\nmessages is very rarely used. For that reason the issue was assessed as\nModerate severity according to our Security Policy.\n\nThe FIPS modules in 3.5, 3.4, 3.3, 3.2, 3.1 and 3.0 are not affected by this\nissue, as the CMS implementation is outside the OpenSSL FIPS module\nboundary."
},
{
"lang": "es",
"value": "Resumen del problema: Una aplicaci\u00f3n que intenta descifrar mensajes CMS cifrados usando cifrado basado en contrase\u00f1a puede desencadenar una lectura y escritura fuera de l\u00edmites.\n\nResumen del impacto: Esta lectura fuera de l\u00edmites puede desencadenar un fallo que lleva a una Denegaci\u00f3n de Servicio para una aplicaci\u00f3n. La escritura fuera de l\u00edmites puede causar una corrupci\u00f3n de memoria que puede tener varias consecuencias, incluyendo una Denegaci\u00f3n de Servicio o la ejecuci\u00f3n de c\u00f3digo suministrado por el atacante.\n\nAunque las consecuencias de un exploit exitoso de esta vulnerabilidad podr\u00edan ser graves, la probabilidad de que el atacante pudiera realizarlo es baja. Adem\u00e1s, el soporte de cifrado basado en contrase\u00f1a (PWRI) en mensajes CMS se usa muy raramente. Por esa raz\u00f3n, el problema fue evaluado como de severidad Moderada seg\u00fan nuestra Pol\u00edtica de Seguridad.\n\nLos m\u00f3dulos FIPS en 3.5, 3.4, 3.3, 3.2, 3.1 y 3.0 no se ven afectados por este problema, ya que la implementaci\u00f3n de CMS est\u00e1 fuera del l\u00edmite del m\u00f3dulo FIPS de OpenSSL."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2025-9230",
"lastModified": "2025-11-04T22:16:45.360",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV31": [
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 7.5,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 3.9,
"impactScore": 3.6,
"source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"type": "Secondary"
}
]
},
"published": "2025-09-30T14:15:41.050",
"references": [
{
"source": "openssl-security@openssl.org",
"url": "https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/5965ea5dd6960f36d8b7f74f8eac67a8eb8f2b45"
},
{
"source": "openssl-security@openssl.org",
"url": "https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/9e91358f365dee6c446dcdcdb01c04d2743fd280"
},
{
"source": "openssl-security@openssl.org",
"url": "https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/a79c4ce559c6a3a8fd4109e9f33c1185d5bf2def"
},
{
"source": "openssl-security@openssl.org",
"url": "https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/b5282d677551afda7d20e9c00e09561b547b2dfd"
},
{
"source": "openssl-security@openssl.org",
"url": "https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/bae259a211ada6315dc50900686daaaaaa55f482"
},
{
"source": "openssl-security@openssl.org",
"url": "https://github.openssl.org/openssl/extended-releases/commit/c2b96348bfa662f25f4fabf81958ae822063dae3"
},
{
"source": "openssl-security@openssl.org",
"url": "https://github.openssl.org/openssl/extended-releases/commit/dfbaf161d8dafc1132dd88cd48ad990ed9b4c8ba"
},
{
"source": "openssl-security@openssl.org",
"url": "https://openssl-library.org/news/secadv/20250930.txt"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2025/09/30/5"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2025/10/msg00001.html"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "openssl-security@openssl.org",
"vulnStatus": "Awaiting Analysis",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-125"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-787"
}
],
"source": "openssl-security@openssl.org",
"type": "Secondary"
}
]
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…