FKIE_CVE-2022-41873
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2022-11-11 04:15 - Updated: 2026-06-17 05:035.4 (Medium) - CVSS:3.1/
| URL | Tags | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| security-advisories@github.com | https://github.com/contiki-ng/contiki-ng/pull/2081 | Patch, Third Party Advisory | |
| security-advisories@github.com | https://github.com/contiki-ng/contiki-ng/security/advisories/GHSA-m5cj-fw8m-ffgf | Third Party Advisory | |
| af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108 | https://github.com/contiki-ng/contiki-ng/pull/2081 | Patch, Third Party Advisory | |
| af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108 | https://github.com/contiki-ng/contiki-ng/security/advisories/GHSA-m5cj-fw8m-ffgf | Third Party Advisory |
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| contiki-ng | contiki-ng | * |
{
"affected": [
{
"affectedData": [
{
"product": "contiki-ng",
"vendor": "contiki-ng",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003c 4.9"
}
]
}
],
"source": "security-advisories@github.com"
}
],
"configurations": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:contiki-ng:contiki-ng:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "379D2D9F-EFB4-4C8B-B9FB-82ABC0131AAB",
"versionEndExcluding": "4.9",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Contiki-NG is an open-source, cross-platform operating system for Next-Generation IoT devices. Versions prior to 4.9 are vulnerable to an Out-of-bounds read. While processing the L2CAP protocol, the Bluetooth Low Energy stack of Contiki-NG needs to map an incoming channel ID to its metadata structure. While looking up the corresponding channel structure in get_channel_for_cid (in os/net/mac/ble/ble-l2cap.c), a bounds check is performed on the incoming channel ID, which is meant to ensure that the channel ID does not exceed the maximum number of supported channels.However, an integer truncation issue leads to only the lowest byte of the channel ID to be checked, which leads to an incomplete out-of-bounds check. A crafted channel ID leads to out-of-bounds memory to be read and written with attacker-controlled data. The vulnerability has been patched in the \"develop\" branch of Contiki-NG, and will be included in release 4.9. As a workaround, Users can apply the patch in Contiki-NG pull request 2081 on GitHub."
},
{
"lang": "es",
"value": "Contiki-NG es un sistema operativo multiplataforma de c\u00f3digo abierto para dispositivos Next-Generation IoT. Las versiones anteriores a la 4.9 son vulnerables a una lectura fuera de los l\u00edmites. Mientras procesa el protocolo L2CAP, la pila Bluetooth Low Energy de Contiki-NG necesita asignar un ID de canal entrante a su estructura de metadatos. Mientras se busca la estructura del canal correspondiente en get_channel_for_cid (en os/net/mac/ble/ble-l2cap.c), se realiza una verificaci\u00f3n de los l\u00edmites en el ID del canal entrante, cuyo objetivo es garantizar que el ID del canal no exceda el n\u00famero m\u00e1ximo de canales admitidos. Sin embargo, un problema de truncamiento de enteros hace que solo se verifique el byte m\u00e1s bajo del ID del canal, lo que genera una verificaci\u00f3n fuera de los l\u00edmites incompleta. Una ID de canal manipulada conduce a una memoria fuera de los l\u00edmites para leer y escribir con datos controlados por el atacante. La vulnerabilidad ha sido parcheada en la rama \"develop\" de Contiki-NG y se incluir\u00e1 en la versi\u00f3n 4.9. Como workaround, los usuarios pueden aplicar el parche en la solicitud de extracci\u00f3n 2081 de Contiki-NG en GitHub."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2022-41873",
"lastModified": "2026-06-17T05:03:57.360",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV31": [
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackVector": "ADJACENT_NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 4.2,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"integrityImpact": "LOW",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 1.6,
"impactScore": 2.5,
"source": "security-advisories@github.com",
"type": "Secondary"
},
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "ADJACENT_NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 5.4,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"integrityImpact": "LOW",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 2.8,
"impactScore": 2.5,
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary"
}
],
"ssvcV203": [
{
"source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"ssvcData": {
"id": "CVE-2022-41873",
"options": [
{
"exploitation": "none"
},
{
"automatable": "no"
},
{
"technicalImpact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-04-23T13:54:48.882911Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
}
}
]
},
"published": "2022-11-11T04:15:11.973",
"references": [
{
"source": "security-advisories@github.com",
"tags": [
"Patch",
"Third Party Advisory"
],
"url": "https://github.com/contiki-ng/contiki-ng/pull/2081"
},
{
"source": "security-advisories@github.com",
"tags": [
"Third Party Advisory"
],
"url": "https://github.com/contiki-ng/contiki-ng/security/advisories/GHSA-m5cj-fw8m-ffgf"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Patch",
"Third Party Advisory"
],
"url": "https://github.com/contiki-ng/contiki-ng/pull/2081"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Third Party Advisory"
],
"url": "https://github.com/contiki-ng/contiki-ng/security/advisories/GHSA-m5cj-fw8m-ffgf"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "security-advisories@github.com",
"vulnStatus": "Modified",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-125"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-787"
}
],
"source": "security-advisories@github.com",
"type": "Secondary"
},
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-125"
}
],
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary"
}
]
}
Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline
Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC
How durations are calculated
Following the VTEM framework (Black Hat USA 2015), time to patch starts when the vendor or a coordinator was informed, total time to patch at discovery, and disclosure to patch at public disclosure; vendor response time runs from the report to its acknowledgement. Time to exploit and time unpatched start at the earliest discovery or report, falling back to public disclosure. Unpatched time ends at the first recorded patch, or the calculation time when no patch is recorded. Exploitation to patch shows the interval between those two events; a published proof of concept is a public exploit, not exploitation.
Each result shows its source dates. A negative interval means the end event came first; when date-only inputs leave the order open, the result says so. Date-only inputs are approximate. The earliest evidence wins: KEV report dates and sightings are labelled as such. Records describing another vulnerability are listed but never calculated from, and a PoC alone does not establish exploitation. Missing patch evidence does not prove that no patch exists. Filters below change the event list only.
Loading timeline…
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.