CVE-2026-107575 (GCVE-0-2026-107575)

Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-10-08 11:46 – Updated: 2026-10-08 14:17
VLAI
Title
Inefficient Algorithmic Complexity in hMailServer
Summary
Inefficient algorithmic complexity in the SPF macro expansion of Progressive Robot hMailServer 6.3.4 and 6.3.5 allows a remote unauthenticated attacker to consume worker-thread time by publishing a crafted SPF record. RFC 7208 section 7.1 requires a name too long to look up to lose whole labels from the left; the server did this by removing one label at a time and copying the rest of the name each time, so the work grew with the square of the expansion. An attacker who publishes an SPF record for a domain they control, with a mechanism whose domain-spec expands through macros to a name far longer than 253 characters, makes the SPF check of a message from that domain take several seconds. The expansion is bounded by SPF's own per-term and per-macro limits, so the loss of availability is partial.
Severity
5.3 (Medium)
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
SSVC
Exploitation: none Automatable: yes Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator · CISA-ADP (v2.0.3)
Decision recorded 2026-10-08 14:16 UTC
CWE
  • CWE-407 - Inefficient Algorithmic Complexity
Assigner
GitLab CNA under the mitre root
CNA scorecard C 75/100 over 288 records in the last 180 days details
References
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version CPE status
Progressive Robot Ltd hMailServer Affected: 6.3.4 , < 6.3.6 (semver)
guessed Create a notification for this product.
Credits
Found in the hMailServer project's own security review (Progressive Robot Ltd)
Show details on NVD website
To clipboard 

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "metrics": [
          {
            "other": {
              "content": {
                "id": "CVE-2026-107575",
                "options": [
                  {
                    "Exploitation": "none"
                  },
                  {
                    "Automatable": "yes"
                  },
                  {
                    "Technical Impact": "partial"
                  }
                ],
                "role": "CISA Coordinator",
                "timestamp": "2026-10-08T14:16:55.314371Z",
                "version": "2.0.3"
              },
              "type": "ssvc"
            }
          }
        ],
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2026-10-08T14:17:04.989Z",
          "orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
          "shortName": "CISA-ADP"
        },
        "title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "defaultStatus": "unaffected",
          "product": "hMailServer",
          "repo": "https://gitlab.com/hmailserver/hmailserver",
          "vendor": "Progressive Robot Ltd",
          "versions": [
            {
              "lessThan": "6.3.6",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "6.3.4",
              "versionType": "semver"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "credits": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "type": "finder",
          "value": "Found in the hMailServer project\u0027s own security review (Progressive Robot Ltd)"
        }
      ],
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "Inefficient algorithmic complexity in the SPF macro expansion of Progressive Robot hMailServer 6.3.4 and 6.3.5 allows a remote unauthenticated attacker to consume worker-thread time by publishing a crafted SPF record. RFC 7208 section 7.1 requires a name too long to look up to lose whole labels from the left; the server did this by removing one label at a time and copying the rest of the name each time, so the work grew with the square of the expansion. An attacker who publishes an SPF record for a domain they control, with a mechanism whose domain-spec expands through macros to a name far longer than 253 characters, makes the SPF check of a message from that domain take several seconds. The expansion is bounded by SPF\u0027s own per-term and per-macro limits, so the loss of availability is partial."
        }
      ],
      "metrics": [
        {
          "cvssV3_1": {
            "attackComplexity": "LOW",
            "attackVector": "NETWORK",
            "availabilityImpact": "LOW",
            "baseScore": 5.3,
            "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
            "confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
            "integrityImpact": "NONE",
            "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
            "scope": "UNCHANGED",
            "userInteraction": "NONE",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L",
            "version": "3.1"
          },
          "format": "CVSS",
          "scenarios": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "GENERAL"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-407",
              "description": "CWE-407: Inefficient Algorithmic Complexity",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2026-10-08T11:46:46.082Z",
        "orgId": "ceab7361-8a18-47b1-92ba-4d7d25f6715a",
        "shortName": "GitLab"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "url": "https://gitlab.com/hmailserver/hmailserver/-/work_items/74"
        },
        {
          "url": "https://gitlab.com/hmailserver/hmailserver/-/releases/v6.3.6"
        }
      ],
      "solutions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "Upgrade to hMailServer 6.3.6, which finds where the name becomes short enough and cuts it once. Until then, turn SPF checking off, or accept the bounded delay."
        }
      ],
      "title": "Inefficient Algorithmic Complexity in hMailServer"
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "ceab7361-8a18-47b1-92ba-4d7d25f6715a",
    "assignerShortName": "GitLab",
    "cveId": "CVE-2026-107575",
    "datePublished": "2026-10-08T11:46:46.082Z",
    "dateReserved": "2026-10-08T10:51:40.639Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2026-10-08T14:17:04.989Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.2",
  "vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
    "epss": {
      "cve": "CVE-2026-107575",
      "date": "2026-10-10",
      "epss": "0.00387",
      "percentile": "0.30761"
    },
    "nvd": {
      "cve": {
        "affected": [
          {
            "affectedData": [
              {
                "defaultStatus": "unaffected",
                "product": "hMailServer",
                "repo": "https://gitlab.com/hmailserver/hmailserver",
                "vendor": "Progressive Robot Ltd",
                "versions": [
                  {
                    "lessThan": "6.3.6",
                    "status": "affected",
                    "version": "6.3.4",
                    "versionType": "semver"
                  }
                ]
              }
            ],
            "source": "cve@gitlab.com"
          }
        ],
        "cveTags": [],
        "descriptions": [
          {
            "lang": "en",
            "value": "Inefficient algorithmic complexity in the SPF macro expansion of Progressive Robot hMailServer 6.3.4 and 6.3.5 allows a remote unauthenticated attacker to consume worker-thread time by publishing a crafted SPF record. RFC 7208 section 7.1 requires a name too long to look up to lose whole labels from the left; the server did this by removing one label at a time and copying the rest of the name each time, so the work grew with the square of the expansion. An attacker who publishes an SPF record for a domain they control, with a mechanism whose domain-spec expands through macros to a name far longer than 253 characters, makes the SPF check of a message from that domain take several seconds. The expansion is bounded by SPF\u0027s own per-term and per-macro limits, so the loss of availability is partial."
          }
        ],
        "id": "CVE-2026-107575",
        "lastModified": "2026-10-08T21:02:43.860",
        "metrics": {
          "cvssMetricV31": [
            {
              "cvssData": {
                "attackComplexity": "LOW",
                "attackVector": "NETWORK",
                "availabilityImpact": "LOW",
                "baseScore": 5.3,
                "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
                "confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
                "integrityImpact": "NONE",
                "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
                "scope": "UNCHANGED",
                "userInteraction": "NONE",
                "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L",
                "version": "3.1"
              },
              "exploitabilityScore": 3.9,
              "impactScore": 1.4,
              "source": "cve@gitlab.com",
              "type": "Secondary"
            }
          ],
          "ssvcV203": [
            {
              "source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
              "ssvcData": {
                "id": "CVE-2026-107575",
                "options": [
                  {
                    "exploitation": "none"
                  },
                  {
                    "automatable": "yes"
                  },
                  {
                    "technicalImpact": "partial"
                  }
                ],
                "role": "CISA Coordinator",
                "timestamp": "2026-10-08T14:16:55.314371Z",
                "version": "2.0.3"
              }
            }
          ]
        },
        "published": "2026-10-08T12:17:15.333",
        "references": [
          {
            "source": "cve@gitlab.com",
            "url": "https://gitlab.com/hmailserver/hmailserver/-/releases/v6.3.6"
          },
          {
            "source": "cve@gitlab.com",
            "url": "https://gitlab.com/hmailserver/hmailserver/-/work_items/74"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIdentifier": "cve@gitlab.com",
        "vulnStatus": "Deferred",
        "weaknesses": [
          {
            "description": [
              {
                "lang": "en",
                "value": "CWE-407"
              }
            ],
            "source": "cve@gitlab.com",
            "type": "Secondary"
          }
        ]
      }
    },
    "vulnrichment": {
      "containers": {
        "adp": [
          {
            "metrics": [
              {
                "other": {
                  "content": {
                    "id": "CVE-2026-107575",
                    "options": [
                      {
                        "Exploitation": "none"
                      },
                      {
                        "Automatable": "yes"
                      },
                      {
                        "Technical Impact": "partial"
                      }
                    ],
                    "role": "CISA Coordinator",
                    "timestamp": "2026-10-08T14:16:55.314371Z",
                    "version": "2.0.3"
                  },
                  "type": "ssvc"
                }
              }
            ],
            "providerMetadata": {
              "dateUpdated": "2026-10-08T14:17:00.390Z",
              "orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
              "shortName": "CISA-ADP"
            },
            "title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
          }
        ],
        "cna": {
          "affected": [
            {
              "defaultStatus": "unaffected",
              "product": "hMailServer",
              "repo": "https://gitlab.com/hmailserver/hmailserver",
              "vendor": "Progressive Robot Ltd",
              "versions": [
                {
                  "lessThan": "6.3.6",
                  "status": "affected",
                  "version": "6.3.4",
                  "versionType": "semver"
                }
              ]
            }
          ],
          "credits": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "finder",
              "value": "Found in the hMailServer project\u0027s own security review (Progressive Robot Ltd)"
            }
          ],
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "Inefficient algorithmic complexity in the SPF macro expansion of Progressive Robot hMailServer 6.3.4 and 6.3.5 allows a remote unauthenticated attacker to consume worker-thread time by publishing a crafted SPF record. RFC 7208 section 7.1 requires a name too long to look up to lose whole labels from the left; the server did this by removing one label at a time and copying the rest of the name each time, so the work grew with the square of the expansion. An attacker who publishes an SPF record for a domain they control, with a mechanism whose domain-spec expands through macros to a name far longer than 253 characters, makes the SPF check of a message from that domain take several seconds. The expansion is bounded by SPF\u0027s own per-term and per-macro limits, so the loss of availability is partial."
            }
          ],
          "metrics": [
            {
              "cvssV3_1": {
                "attackComplexity": "LOW",
                "attackVector": "NETWORK",
                "availabilityImpact": "LOW",
                "baseScore": 5.3,
                "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
                "confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
                "integrityImpact": "NONE",
                "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
                "scope": "UNCHANGED",
                "userInteraction": "NONE",
                "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L",
                "version": "3.1"
              },
              "format": "CVSS",
              "scenarios": [
                {
                  "lang": "en",
                  "value": "GENERAL"
                }
              ]
            }
          ],
          "problemTypes": [
            {
              "descriptions": [
                {
                  "cweId": "CWE-407",
                  "description": "CWE-407: Inefficient Algorithmic Complexity",
                  "lang": "en",
                  "type": "CWE"
                }
              ]
            }
          ],
          "providerMetadata": {
            "dateUpdated": "2026-10-08T11:46:46.082Z",
            "orgId": "ceab7361-8a18-47b1-92ba-4d7d25f6715a",
            "shortName": "GitLab"
          },
          "references": [
            {
              "url": "https://gitlab.com/hmailserver/hmailserver/-/work_items/74"
            },
            {
              "url": "https://gitlab.com/hmailserver/hmailserver/-/releases/v6.3.6"
            }
          ],
          "solutions": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "Upgrade to hMailServer 6.3.6, which finds where the name becomes short enough and cuts it once. Until then, turn SPF checking off, or accept the bounded delay."
            }
          ],
          "title": "Inefficient Algorithmic Complexity in hMailServer"
        }
      },
      "cveMetadata": {
        "assignerOrgId": "ceab7361-8a18-47b1-92ba-4d7d25f6715a",
        "assignerShortName": "GitLab",
        "cveId": "CVE-2026-107575",
        "datePublished": "2026-10-08T11:46:46.082Z",
        "dateReserved": "2026-10-08T10:51:40.639Z",
        "dateUpdated": "2026-10-08T14:17:04.989Z",
        "state": "PUBLISHED"
      },
      "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
      "dataVersion": "5.2"
    }
  }
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.





Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.



Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.