BREW-ANSIBLE-CMDB-CVE-20… (GHSA-V92G-XGXW-VVMM)

Vulnerability from osv_homebrew – Published: 2026-08-13 16:35 – Updated: 2026-10-07 22:49 – Source website
VLAI
Summary
Mako: Path traversal via double-slash URI prefix in TemplateLookup
Details

Summary

TemplateLookup.get_template() is vulnerable to path traversal when a URI starts with // (e.g., //../../../secret.txt). The root cause is an inconsistency between two slash-stripping implementations:

  • Template.__init__ strips one leading / using if/slice
  • TemplateLookup.get_template() strips all leading / using re.sub(r"^\/+", "")

When a URI like //../../../../etc/passwd is passed: 1. get_template() strips all / → ../../../../etc/passwd → file found via posixpath.join(dir_, u) 2. Template.__init__ strips one / → /../../../../etc/passwd → normpath → /etc/passwd 3. /etc/passwd.startswith(..) → False → check bypassed

Impact

Arbitrary file read: any file readable by the process can be returned as rendered template content when an application passes untrusted input directly to TemplateLookup.get_template().

Note: this is exploitable at the library API level. HTTP-based exploitation is mitigated by Python's BaseHTTPRequestHandler which normalizes double-slash prefixes since CPython gh-87389. Applications using other HTTP servers that do not normalize paths may be affected.

Fix

Changed Template.__init__ to use lstrip("/") instead of stripping only a single leading slash, so both code paths handle leading slashes consistently.

Severity
7.5 (High)
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
7.7 (High)
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P
References
To clipboard 

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "ecosystem_specific": {
        "fix": null,
        "range_state": "affected",
        "resource": "mako",
        "resource_purl": "pkg:pypi/mako@1.3.9",
        "upstream_fixed_in": "1.3.11"
      },
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Homebrew",
        "name": "ansible-cmdb",
        "purl": "pkg:brew/ansible-cmdb"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "1.31"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "confidence": "high",
    "source": "matched",
    "strategy": "registry",
    "upstream_evidence": [
      {
        "ecosystem": "PyPI",
        "key": "pkg:pypi/mako@1.3.9",
        "name": "mako",
        "resource": "mako",
        "strategy": "registry",
        "subject_version": "1.3.9"
      }
    ]
  },
  "details": "### Summary\n\n`TemplateLookup.get_template()` is vulnerable to path traversal when a URI starts with `//` (e.g., `//../../../secret.txt`). The root cause is an inconsistency between two slash-stripping implementations:\n\n- `Template.__init__` strips **one** leading `/` using `if`/slice\n- `TemplateLookup.get_template()` strips **all** leading `/` using `re.sub(r\"^\\/+\", \"\")`\n\nWhen a URI like `//../../../../etc/passwd` is passed:\n1. `get_template()` strips all `/` \u2192 `../../../../etc/passwd` \u2192 file found via `posixpath.join(dir_, u)`\n2. `Template.__init__` strips one `/` \u2192 `/../../../../etc/passwd` \u2192 `normpath` \u2192 `/etc/passwd`\n3. `/etc/passwd`.startswith(`..`) \u2192 `False` \u2192 **check bypassed**\n\n### Impact\n\nArbitrary file read: any file readable by the process can be returned as rendered template content when an application passes untrusted input directly to `TemplateLookup.get_template()`.\n\nNote: this is exploitable at the library API level. HTTP-based exploitation is mitigated by Python\u0027s `BaseHTTPRequestHandler` which normalizes double-slash prefixes since CPython gh-87389. Applications using other HTTP servers that do not normalize paths may be affected.\n\n### Fix\n\nChanged `Template.__init__` to use `lstrip(\"/\")` instead of stripping only a single leading slash, so both code paths handle leading slashes consistently.",
  "id": "BREW-ansible-cmdb-CVE-2026-41205",
  "modified": "2026-10-07T22:49:54Z",
  "published": "2026-08-13T16:35:16Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/sqlalchemy/mako/security/advisories/GHSA-v92g-xgxw-vvmm"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-41205"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/sqlalchemy/mako/commit/e05ac61989a7fb9dd7dcde6cfd72dc48328719a3"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/pypa/advisory-database/tree/main/vulns/mako/PYSEC-2026-88.yaml"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/sqlalchemy/mako"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/sqlalchemy/mako/releases/tag/rel_1_3_11"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.7.3",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    },
    {
      "score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P",
      "type": "CVSS_V4"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "Mako: Path traversal via double-slash URI prefix in TemplateLookup",
  "upstream": [
    "GHSA-v92g-xgxw-vvmm",
    "CVE-2026-41205",
    "PYSEC-2026-88"
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline

Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC

JSON
How durations are calculated

Following the VTEM framework (Black Hat USA 2015), time to patch starts when the vendor or a coordinator was informed, total time to patch at discovery, and disclosure to patch at public disclosure; vendor response time runs from the report to its acknowledgement. Time to exploit and time unpatched start at the earliest discovery or report, falling back to public disclosure. Unpatched time ends at the first recorded patch, or the calculation time when no patch is recorded. Exploitation to patch shows the interval between those two events; a published proof of concept is a public exploit, not exploitation.

Each result shows its source dates. A negative interval means the end event came first; when date-only inputs leave the order open, the result says so. Date-only inputs are approximate. The earliest evidence wins: KEV report dates and sightings are labelled as such. Records describing another vulnerability are listed but never calculated from, and a PoC alone does not establish exploitation. Missing patch evidence does not prove that no patch exists. Filters below change the event list only.

Loading timeline…




    Related by attack behaviour

    Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.