CWE-770
Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling
The product allocates a reusable resource or group of resources on behalf of an actor without imposing any intended restrictions on the size or number of resources that can be allocated.
CVE-2025-1677 (GCVE-0-2025-1677)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2025-04-10 12:30 – Updated: 2025-04-10 13:02
VLAI
Title
Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling in GitLab
Summary
A Denial of Service (DoS) issue has been discovered in GitLab CE/EE affecting all up to 17.8.7, 17.9 prior to 17.9.6 and 17.10 prior to 17.10.4 A denial of service could occur upon injecting oversized payloads into CI pipeline exports.
Severity
6.5 (Medium)
CWE
- CWE-770 - Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling
Assigner
References
2 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/521117 | issue-trackingpermissions-required |
| https://hackerone.com/reports/3004008 | technical-descriptionexploitpermissions-required |
Impacted products
Credits
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2025-1677",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-04-10T13:02:47.849946Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-04-10T13:02:54.300Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:2.3:a:gitlab:gitlab:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "GitLab",
"repo": "git://git@gitlab.com:gitlab-org/gitlab.git",
"vendor": "GitLab",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "17.8.7",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "17.9.6",
"status": "affected",
"version": "17.9",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "17.10.4",
"status": "affected",
"version": "17.10",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Thanks [pwnie](https://hackerone.com/pwnie) for reporting this vulnerability through our HackerOne bug bounty program"
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "A Denial of Service (DoS) issue has been discovered in GitLab CE/EE affecting all up to 17.8.7, 17.9 prior to 17.9.6 and 17.10 prior to 17.10.4 A denial of service could occur upon injecting oversized payloads into CI pipeline exports."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 6.5,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-770",
"description": "CWE-770: Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-04-10T12:30:58.715Z",
"orgId": "ceab7361-8a18-47b1-92ba-4d7d25f6715a",
"shortName": "GitLab"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "GitLab Issue #521117",
"tags": [
"issue-tracking",
"permissions-required"
],
"url": "https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/521117"
},
{
"name": "HackerOne Bug Bounty Report #3004008",
"tags": [
"technical-description",
"exploit",
"permissions-required"
],
"url": "https://hackerone.com/reports/3004008"
}
],
"solutions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Upgrade to version 17.10.4, 17.9.6 or 17.8.7"
}
],
"title": "Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling in GitLab"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "ceab7361-8a18-47b1-92ba-4d7d25f6715a",
"assignerShortName": "GitLab",
"cveId": "CVE-2025-1677",
"datePublished": "2025-04-10T12:30:58.715Z",
"dateReserved": "2025-02-25T07:31:11.520Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-04-10T13:02:54.300Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
CVE-2025-1823 (GCVE-0-2025-1823)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-02-04 21:07 – Updated: 2026-02-05 14:32
VLAI
Title
IBM Jazz Reporting Service Denial of Service
Summary
IBM Jazz Reporting Service could allow an authenticated user on the host network to cause a denial of service using specially crafted SQL query that consumes excess memory resources.
Severity
CWE
- CWE-770 - Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling
Assigner
References
1 reference
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7258083 | vendor-advisorypatch |
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| IBM | Jazz Reporting Service |
Affected:
7.1 , ≤ 7.1iFix006
(semver)
Affected: 7.0.3 , ≤ 7.0.3iFix020 (semver) cpe:2.3:a:ibm:jazz_reporting_service:7.0.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:ibm:jazz_reporting_service:7.0.3:iFix020:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:ibm:jazz_reporting_service:7.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:ibm:jazz_reporting_service:7.1:iFix006:*:*:*:*:*:* |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2025-1823",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-02-05T14:20:10.556705Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-02-05T14:32:02.968Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:2.3:a:ibm:jazz_reporting_service:7.0.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:ibm:jazz_reporting_service:7.0.3:iFix020:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:ibm:jazz_reporting_service:7.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:ibm:jazz_reporting_service:7.1:iFix006:*:*:*:*:*:*"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Jazz Reporting Service",
"vendor": "IBM",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "7.1iFix006",
"status": "affected",
"version": "7.1",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "7.0.3iFix020",
"status": "affected",
"version": "7.0.3",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "IBM Jazz Reporting Service could allow an authenticated user on the host network to cause a denial of service using specially crafted SQL query that consumes excess memory resources. \u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e"
}
],
"value": "IBM Jazz Reporting Service could allow an authenticated user on the host network to cause a denial of service using specially crafted SQL query that consumes excess memory resources."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "ADJACENT_NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "LOW",
"baseScore": 3.5,
"baseSeverity": "LOW",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-770",
"description": "CWE-770 Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-02-04T21:09:35.449Z",
"orgId": "9a959283-ebb5-44b6-b705-dcc2bbced522",
"shortName": "ibm"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"patch"
],
"url": "https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7258083"
}
],
"solutions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cp\u003eIBM strongly recommends addressing the vulnerability now by applying the iFix listed below:\u003c/p\u003e\u003cdiv\u003e\u003ctable\u003e\u003ctbody\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd\u003eProduct\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd\u003eVersion\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd\u003eiFix\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd\u003eRemediation / First Fix\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd\u003eIBM Jazz Reporting Service\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd\u003e7.1\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd\u003e7.1iFix007\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd\u003e\u003ca target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"https://www.ibm.com/support/fixcentral/swg/downloadFixes?parent=IBM%20Engineering\u0026amp;product=ibm/Rational/IBM+Engineering+Lifecycle+Management\u0026amp;release=All\u0026amp;platform=All\u0026amp;function=fixId\u0026amp;fixids=7.1-IBM-ELM-iFix007\u0026amp;includeRequisites=0\u0026amp;includeSupersedes=0\u0026amp;downloadMethod=ddp\u0026amp;login=true\"\u003eFix Central - 7.1\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd\u003eIBM Jazz Reporting Service\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd\u003e7.0.3\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd\u003e7.0.3iFix021\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd\u003e\u003ca target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"https://www.ibm.com/support/fixcentral/swg/doSelectFixes?options.selectedFixes=7.0.3-IBM-ELM-iFix021\u0026amp;continue=1\"\u003eFix Central - 7.0.3\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003c/tbody\u003e\u003c/table\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e"
}
],
"value": "IBM strongly recommends addressing the vulnerability now by applying the iFix listed below:\n\nProductVersioniFixRemediation / First FixIBM Jazz Reporting Service7.17.1iFix007 Fix Central - 7.1 https://www.ibm.com/support/fixcentral/swg/downloadFixes IBM Jazz Reporting Service7.0.37.0.3iFix021 Fix Central - 7.0.3 https://www.ibm.com/support/fixcentral/swg/doSelectFixes"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "IBM Jazz Reporting Service Denial of Service",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 0.5.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "9a959283-ebb5-44b6-b705-dcc2bbced522",
"assignerShortName": "ibm",
"cveId": "CVE-2025-1823",
"datePublished": "2026-02-04T21:07:17.979Z",
"dateReserved": "2025-03-01T14:39:33.891Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-02-05T14:32:02.968Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2025-20141 (GCVE-0-2025-20141)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2025-03-12 16:12 – Updated: 2025-03-21 20:35
VLAI
Title
Cisco IOS XR Software Release 7.9.2 Denial of Service Vulnerabillity
Summary
A vulnerability in the handling of specific packets that are punted from a line card to a route processor in Cisco IOS XR Software Release 7.9.2 could allow an unauthenticated, adjacent attacker to cause control plane traffic to stop working on multiple Cisco IOS XR platforms.
This vulnerability is due to incorrect handling of packets that are punted to the route processor. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending traffic, which must be handled by the Linux stack on the route processor, to an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to cause control plane traffic to stop working, resulting in a denial of service (DoS) condition.
Severity
7.4 (High)
CWE
- CWE-770 - Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling
Assigner
References
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cisco | Cisco IOS XR Software |
Affected:
7.9.2
|
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2025-20141",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-03-21T20:35:07.856911Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-03-21T20:35:20.642Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "Cisco IOS XR Software",
"vendor": "Cisco",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "7.9.2"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "A vulnerability in the handling of specific packets that are punted from a line card to a route processor in Cisco IOS XR Software Release 7.9.2 could allow an unauthenticated, adjacent attacker to cause control plane traffic to stop working on multiple Cisco IOS XR platforms.\u0026nbsp;\r\n\r\nThis vulnerability is due to incorrect handling of packets that are punted to the route processor. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending traffic, which must be handled by the Linux stack on the route processor, to an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to cause control plane traffic to stop working, resulting in a denial of service (DoS) condition."
}
],
"exploits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "The Cisco PSIRT is not aware of any public announcements or malicious use of the vulnerability that is described in this advisory."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "ADJACENT_NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 7.4,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "CHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "cvssV3_1"
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-770",
"description": "Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling",
"lang": "en",
"type": "cwe"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-03-12T16:12:15.494Z",
"orgId": "d1c1063e-7a18-46af-9102-31f8928bc633",
"shortName": "cisco"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "cisco-sa-xr792-bWfVDPY",
"url": "https://sec.cloudapps.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-xr792-bWfVDPY"
},
{
"name": "Crafting endless AS-PATHS in BGP",
"url": "https://blog.apnic.net/2024/09/02/crafting-endless-as-paths-in-bgp/"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "cisco-sa-xr792-bWfVDPY",
"defects": [
"CSCwf89955"
],
"discovery": "INTERNAL"
},
"title": "Cisco IOS XR Software Release 7.9.2 Denial of Service Vulnerabillity"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "d1c1063e-7a18-46af-9102-31f8928bc633",
"assignerShortName": "cisco",
"cveId": "CVE-2025-20141",
"datePublished": "2025-03-12T16:12:15.494Z",
"dateReserved": "2024-10-10T19:15:13.214Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-03-21T20:35:20.642Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
CVE-2025-20209 (GCVE-0-2025-20209)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2025-03-12 16:13 – Updated: 2025-03-12 17:51
VLAI
Title
Cisco IOS XR Software Internet Key Exchange Version 2 Denial of Service Vulnerability
Summary
A vulnerability in the Internet Key Exchange version 2 (IKEv2) function of Cisco IOS XR Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to prevent an affected device from processing any control plane UDP packets.
This vulnerability is due to improper handling of malformed IKEv2 packets. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending malformed IKEv2 packets to an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to prevent the affected device from processing any control plane UDP packets, resulting in a denial of service (DoS) condition.
Cisco has released software updates that address this vulnerability. There are no workarounds that address this vulnerability.
Severity
7.5 (High)
CWE
- CWE-770 - Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling
Assigner
References
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cisco | Cisco IOS XR Software |
Affected:
6.5.3
Affected: 6.6.1 Affected: 6.5.2 Affected: 6.6.2 Affected: 6.5.1 Affected: 7.0.1 Affected: 6.6.25 Affected: 7.0.0 Affected: 7.1.1 Affected: 6.6.3 Affected: 7.0.2 Affected: 7.2.0 Affected: 7.1.2 Affected: 7.2.1 Affected: 7.3.1 Affected: 7.4.1 Affected: 7.2.2 Affected: 7.3.2 Affected: 7.5.1 Affected: 7.3.27 Affected: 7.6.1 Affected: 7.5.2 Affected: 7.7.1 Affected: 7.4.2 Affected: 7.6.2 Affected: 7.8.1 Affected: 7.7.2 Affected: 7.9.1 Affected: 7.8.2 Affected: 7.8.22 Affected: 7.10.1 Affected: 7.7.21 Affected: 7.9.2 Affected: 7.11.1 Affected: 7.10.2 Affected: 24.1.1 Affected: 7.11.2 Affected: 24.2.1 Affected: 24.1.2 Affected: 24.2.11 |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2025-20209",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-03-12T17:50:42.688446Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-03-12T17:51:32.083Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "Cisco IOS XR Software",
"vendor": "Cisco",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "6.5.3"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "6.6.1"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "6.5.2"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "6.6.2"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "6.5.1"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "7.0.1"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "6.6.25"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "7.0.0"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "7.1.1"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "6.6.3"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "7.0.2"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "7.2.0"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "7.1.2"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "7.2.1"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "7.3.1"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "7.4.1"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "7.2.2"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "7.3.2"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "7.5.1"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "7.3.27"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "7.6.1"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "7.5.2"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "7.7.1"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "7.4.2"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "7.6.2"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "7.8.1"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "7.7.2"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "7.9.1"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "7.8.2"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "7.8.22"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "7.10.1"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "7.7.21"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "7.9.2"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "7.11.1"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "7.10.2"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "24.1.1"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "7.11.2"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "24.2.1"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "24.1.2"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "24.2.11"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "A vulnerability in the Internet Key Exchange version 2 (IKEv2) function of Cisco IOS XR Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to prevent an affected device from processing any control plane UDP packets.\u0026nbsp;\r\n\r\nThis vulnerability is due to improper handling of malformed IKEv2 packets. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending malformed IKEv2 packets to an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to prevent the affected device from processing any control plane UDP packets, resulting in a denial of service (DoS) condition.\r\nCisco has released software updates that address this vulnerability. There are no workarounds that address this vulnerability."
}
],
"exploits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "The Cisco PSIRT is not aware of any public announcements or malicious use of the vulnerability that is described in this advisory."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 7.5,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "cvssV3_1"
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-770",
"description": "Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling",
"lang": "en",
"type": "cwe"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-03-12T16:13:12.340Z",
"orgId": "d1c1063e-7a18-46af-9102-31f8928bc633",
"shortName": "cisco"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "cisco-sa-xrike-9wYGpRGq",
"url": "https://sec.cloudapps.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-xrike-9wYGpRGq"
},
{
"name": "Crafting endless AS-PATHS in BGP",
"url": "https://blog.apnic.net/2024/09/02/crafting-endless-as-paths-in-bgp/"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "cisco-sa-xrike-9wYGpRGq",
"defects": [
"CSCwk64612"
],
"discovery": "INTERNAL"
},
"title": "Cisco IOS XR Software Internet Key Exchange Version 2 Denial of Service Vulnerability"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "d1c1063e-7a18-46af-9102-31f8928bc633",
"assignerShortName": "cisco",
"cveId": "CVE-2025-20209",
"datePublished": "2025-03-12T16:13:12.340Z",
"dateReserved": "2024-10-10T19:15:13.231Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-03-12T17:51:32.083Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
CVE-2025-21605 (GCVE-0-2025-21605)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2025-04-23 15:38 – Updated: 2026-02-10 17:06
VLAI
Title
Redis DoS Vulnerability due to unlimited growth of output buffers abused by unauthenticated client
Summary
Redis is an open source, in-memory database that persists on disk. In versions starting at 2.6 and prior to 7.4.3, An unauthenticated client can cause unlimited growth of output buffers, until the server runs out of memory or is killed. By default, the Redis configuration does not limit the output buffer of normal clients (see client-output-buffer-limit). Therefore, the output buffer can grow unlimitedly over time. As a result, the service is exhausted and the memory is unavailable. When password authentication is enabled on the Redis server, but no password is provided, the client can still cause the output buffer to grow from "NOAUTH" responses until the system will run out of memory. This issue has been patched in version 7.4.3. An additional workaround to mitigate this problem without patching the redis-server executable is to block access to prevent unauthenticated users from connecting to Redis. This can be done in different ways. Either using network access control tools like firewalls, iptables, security groups, etc, or enabling TLS and requiring users to authenticate using client side certificates.
Severity
7.5 (High)
CWE
- CWE-770 - Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling
Assigner
References
2 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/redis/redis/security/advisorie… | x_refsource_CONFIRM |
| https://github.com/redis/redis/releases/tag/7.4.3 | x_refsource_MISC |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2025-21605",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-04-23T16:11:06.562685Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-04-23T16:11:18.164Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
},
{
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-02-10T17:06:50.695Z",
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"shortName": "CVE"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2025/05/msg00014.html"
},
{
"url": "https://github.com/valkey-io/valkey/releases/tag/8.1.1"
},
{
"url": "https://www.vicarius.io/vsociety/posts/cve-2025-21605-detection-script-memory-exhaustion-vulnerability-in-redis-database"
},
{
"url": "https://www.vicarius.io/vsociety/posts/cve-2025-21605-mitigation-script-memory-exhaustion-vulnerability-in-redis-database"
}
],
"title": "CVE Program Container",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "ADPogram 0.0.1"
}
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "redis",
"vendor": "redis",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003e= 2.6, \u003c 7.4.3"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Redis is an open source, in-memory database that persists on disk. In versions starting at 2.6 and prior to 7.4.3, An unauthenticated client can cause unlimited growth of output buffers, until the server runs out of memory or is killed. By default, the Redis configuration does not limit the output buffer of normal clients (see client-output-buffer-limit). Therefore, the output buffer can grow unlimitedly over time. As a result, the service is exhausted and the memory is unavailable. When password authentication is enabled on the Redis server, but no password is provided, the client can still cause the output buffer to grow from \"NOAUTH\" responses until the system will run out of memory. This issue has been patched in version 7.4.3. An additional workaround to mitigate this problem without patching the redis-server executable is to block access to prevent unauthenticated users from connecting to Redis. This can be done in different ways. Either using network access control tools like firewalls, iptables, security groups, etc, or enabling TLS and requiring users to authenticate using client side certificates."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 7.5,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-770",
"description": "CWE-770: Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-04-23T15:38:11.042Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/redis/redis/security/advisories/GHSA-r67f-p999-2gff",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/redis/redis/security/advisories/GHSA-r67f-p999-2gff"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/redis/redis/releases/tag/7.4.3",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/redis/redis/releases/tag/7.4.3"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-r67f-p999-2gff",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Redis DoS Vulnerability due to unlimited growth of output buffers abused by unauthenticated client"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2025-21605",
"datePublished": "2025-04-23T15:38:11.042Z",
"dateReserved": "2024-12-29T03:00:24.712Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-02-10T17:06:50.695Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2025-22273 (GCVE-0-2025-22273)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2025-02-28 12:33 – Updated: 2025-03-05 15:53 Exclusively Hosted Service
VLAI
Title
Lack of rate-limiting in password change mechanism in CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager
Summary
Application does not limit the number or frequency of user interactions, such as the number of incoming requests. At the "/EPMUI/VfManager.asmx/ChangePassword" endpoint it is possible to perform a brute force attack on the current password in use.
This issue affects CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager in SaaS version 24.7.1. The status of other versions is unknown. After multiple attempts to contact the vendor we did not receive any answer.
Severity
CWE
- CWE-770 - Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling
Assigner
References
3 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://cert.pl/en/posts/2025/02/CVE-2025-22270/ | third-party-advisory |
| https://cert.pl/posts/2025/02/CVE-2025-22270/ | third-party-advisory |
| https://docs.cyberark.com/epm/24.7.1/en/content/r… | product |
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| CyberArk | Endpoint Privilege Manager |
Affected:
24.7.1
|
Credits
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2025-22273",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-02-28T13:02:35.188402Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-02-28T13:02:49.968Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"platforms": [
"SaaS"
],
"product": "Endpoint Privilege Manager",
"vendor": "CyberArk",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "24.7.1"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Karol Mazurek (Afine Team)"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Maksymilian Kubiak (Afine Team)"
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cp\u003eApplication does not limit the number or frequency of user interactions, such as the number of incoming requests. At the \"/EPMUI/VfManager.asmx/ChangePassword\" endpoint it is possible to perform a brute force attack on the current password in use.\u003cbr\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThis issue affects\u0026nbsp;CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager in SaaS version 24.7.1. The status of other versions is unknown.\u0026nbsp;After multiple attempts to contact the vendor we did not receive any answer.\u003c/p\u003e"
}
],
"value": "Application does not limit the number or frequency of user interactions, such as the number of incoming requests. At the \"/EPMUI/VfManager.asmx/ChangePassword\" endpoint it is possible to perform a brute force attack on the current password in use.\n\n\nThis issue affects\u00a0CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager in SaaS version 24.7.1. The status of other versions is unknown.\u00a0After multiple attempts to contact the vendor we did not receive any answer."
}
],
"impacts": [
{
"capecId": "CAPEC-49",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CAPEC-49 Password Brute Forcing"
}
]
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "NONE",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 9.3,
"baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-770",
"description": "CWE-770 Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-03-05T15:53:23.083Z",
"orgId": "4bb8329e-dd38-46c1-aafb-9bf32bcb93c6",
"shortName": "CERT-PL"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"third-party-advisory"
],
"url": "https://cert.pl/en/posts/2025/02/CVE-2025-22270/"
},
{
"tags": [
"third-party-advisory"
],
"url": "https://cert.pl/posts/2025/02/CVE-2025-22270/"
},
{
"tags": [
"product"
],
"url": "https://docs.cyberark.com/epm/24.7.1/en/content/resources/_topnav/cc_home.htm"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"tags": [
"exclusively-hosted-service"
],
"title": "Lack of rate-limiting in password change mechanism in CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 0.2.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "4bb8329e-dd38-46c1-aafb-9bf32bcb93c6",
"assignerShortName": "CERT-PL",
"cveId": "CVE-2025-22273",
"datePublished": "2025-02-28T12:33:41.107Z",
"dateReserved": "2025-01-02T13:12:19.642Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-03-05T15:53:23.083Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
CVE-2025-22484 (GCVE-0-2025-22484)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2025-06-06 15:52 – Updated: 2025-06-06 16:35
VLAI
Title
File Station 5
Summary
An allocation of resources without limits or throttling vulnerability has been reported to affect File Station 5. If a remote attacker gains a user account, they can then exploit the vulnerability to prevent other systems, applications, or processes from accessing the same type of resource.
We have already fixed the vulnerability in the following version:
File Station 5 5.5.6.4847 and later
Severity
CWE
Assigner
References
1 reference
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| QNAP Systems Inc. | File Station 5 |
Affected:
5.5.x , < 5.5.6.4847
(custom)
|
Credits
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2025-22484",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-06-06T16:19:44.011548Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-06-06T16:35:57.705Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "File Station 5",
"vendor": "QNAP Systems Inc.",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "5.5.6.4847",
"status": "affected",
"version": "5.5.x",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "coral"
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "An allocation of resources without limits or throttling vulnerability has been reported to affect File Station 5. If a remote attacker gains a user account, they can then exploit the vulnerability to prevent other systems, applications, or processes from accessing the same type of resource.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eWe have already fixed the vulnerability in the following version:\u003cbr\u003eFile Station 5 5.5.6.4847 and later\u003cbr\u003e"
}
],
"value": "An allocation of resources without limits or throttling vulnerability has been reported to affect File Station 5. If a remote attacker gains a user account, they can then exploit the vulnerability to prevent other systems, applications, or processes from accessing the same type of resource.\n\nWe have already fixed the vulnerability in the following version:\nFile Station 5 5.5.6.4847 and later"
}
],
"impacts": [
{
"capecId": "CAPEC-130",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CAPEC-130"
}
]
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "NONE",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 7.1,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-770",
"description": "CWE-770",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-06-06T15:52:59.549Z",
"orgId": "2fd009eb-170a-4625-932b-17a53af1051f",
"shortName": "qnap"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://www.qnap.com/en/security-advisory/qsa-25-16"
}
],
"solutions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "We have already fixed the vulnerability in the following version:\u003cbr\u003eFile Station 5 5.5.6.4847 and later\u003cbr\u003e"
}
],
"value": "We have already fixed the vulnerability in the following version:\nFile Station 5 5.5.6.4847 and later"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "QSA-25-16",
"discovery": "EXTERNAL"
},
"title": "File Station 5",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 0.1.0-dev"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "2fd009eb-170a-4625-932b-17a53af1051f",
"assignerShortName": "qnap",
"cveId": "CVE-2025-22484",
"datePublished": "2025-06-06T15:52:59.549Z",
"dateReserved": "2025-01-07T06:55:33.250Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-06-06T16:35:57.705Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
CVE-2025-23028 (GCVE-0-2025-23028)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2025-01-22 16:48 – Updated: 2025-02-18 19:38
VLAI
Title
DoS in Cilium agent DNS proxy from crafted DNS responses
Summary
Cilium is a networking, observability, and security solution with an eBPF-based dataplane. A denial of service vulnerability affects versions 1.14.0 through 1.14.7, 1.15.0 through 1.15.11, and 1.16.0 through 1.16.4. In a Kubernetes cluster where Cilium is configured to proxy DNS traffic, an attacker can crash Cilium agents by sending a crafted DNS response to workloads from outside the cluster. For traffic that is allowed but without using DNS-based policy, the dataplane will continue to pass traffic as configured at the time of the DoS. For workloads that have DNS-based policy configured, existing connections may continue to operate, and new connections made without relying on DNS resolution may continue to be established, but new connections which rely on DNS resolution may be disrupted. Any configuration changes that affect the impacted agent may not be applied until the agent is able to restart. This issue is fixed in Cilium v1.14.18, v1.15.12, and v1.16.5. No known workarounds are available.
Severity
5.3 (Medium)
CWE
- CWE-770 - Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling
Assigner
References
2 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/cilium/cilium/security/advisor… | x_refsource_CONFIRM |
| https://github.com/cilium/cilium/pull/36252 | x_refsource_MISC |
Impacted products
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2025-23028",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-01-22T17:01:24.770374Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-02-18T19:38:18.151Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "cilium",
"vendor": "cilium",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003e= 1.14.0, \u003c 1.14.18"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003e= 1.15.0, \u003c 1.15.12"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003e= 1.16.0, \u003c 1.16.5"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Cilium is a networking, observability, and security solution with an eBPF-based dataplane. A denial of service vulnerability affects versions 1.14.0 through 1.14.7, 1.15.0 through 1.15.11, and 1.16.0 through 1.16.4. In a Kubernetes cluster where Cilium is configured to proxy DNS traffic, an attacker can crash Cilium agents by sending a crafted DNS response to workloads from outside the cluster. For traffic that is allowed but without using DNS-based policy, the dataplane will continue to pass traffic as configured at the time of the DoS. For workloads that have DNS-based policy configured, existing connections may continue to operate, and new connections made without relying on DNS resolution may continue to be established, but new connections which rely on DNS resolution may be disrupted. Any configuration changes that affect the impacted agent may not be applied until the agent is able to restart. This issue is fixed in Cilium v1.14.18, v1.15.12, and v1.16.5. No known workarounds are available."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "LOW",
"baseScore": 5.3,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L",
"version": "3.1"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-770",
"description": "CWE-770: Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-01-22T16:48:19.722Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/cilium/cilium/security/advisories/GHSA-9m5p-c77c-f9j7",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/cilium/cilium/security/advisories/GHSA-9m5p-c77c-f9j7"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/cilium/cilium/pull/36252",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/cilium/cilium/pull/36252"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-9m5p-c77c-f9j7",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "DoS in Cilium agent DNS proxy from crafted DNS responses"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2025-23028",
"datePublished": "2025-01-22T16:48:19.722Z",
"dateReserved": "2025-01-10T15:11:08.881Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-02-18T19:38:18.151Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
CVE-2025-2403 (GCVE-0-2025-2403)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2025-06-24 11:33 – Updated: 2025-06-25 12:42
VLAI
Summary
A denial-of-service vulnerability due to improper prioritization of network traffic over protection mechanism exists in Relion 670/650 and SAM600-IO series device that if exploited could potentially cause critical functions like LDCM (Line Distance Communication Module) to malfunction.
Severity
CWE
- CWE-770 - Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling
Assigner
References
1 reference
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitachi Energy | Relion 670/650 and SAM600-IO |
Affected:
2.2.6.0 , ≤ 2.2.6.2
(custom)
Affected: 2.2.5.6 (custom) Affected: 2.2.4.4 (custom) Affected: 2.2.3.7 (custom) Affected: 2.2.2.6 (custom) |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2025-2403",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-06-24T15:24:33.228316Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-06-25T12:42:35.650Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Relion 670/650 and SAM600-IO",
"vendor": "Hitachi Energy",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "2.2.6.2",
"status": "affected",
"version": "2.2.6.0",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "2.2.5.6",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "2.2.4.4",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "2.2.3.7",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "2.2.2.6",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "A denial-of-service vulnerability due to improper prioritization of network traffic over protection mechanism exists in Relion 670/650 and SAM600-IO series device that if exploited could potentially cause critical functions like LDCM (Line Distance Communication Module) to malfunction.\u003cbr\u003e"
}
],
"value": "A denial-of-service vulnerability due to improper prioritization of network traffic over protection mechanism exists in Relion 670/650 and SAM600-IO series device that if exploited could potentially cause critical functions like LDCM (Line Distance Communication Module) to malfunction."
}
],
"impacts": [
{
"capecId": "CAPEC-125",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CAPEC-125 Flooding"
}
]
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 7.5,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
},
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "NONE",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 8.7,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-770",
"description": "CWE-770 Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-06-24T13:24:16.087Z",
"orgId": "e383dce4-0c27-4495-91c4-0db157728d17",
"shortName": "Hitachi Energy"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://publisher.hitachienergy.com/preview?DocumentID=8DBD000216\u0026LanguageCode=en\u0026DocumentPartId=\u0026Action=Launch"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 0.2.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "e383dce4-0c27-4495-91c4-0db157728d17",
"assignerShortName": "Hitachi Energy",
"cveId": "CVE-2025-2403",
"datePublished": "2025-06-24T11:33:10.236Z",
"dateReserved": "2025-03-17T10:36:28.911Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-06-25T12:42:35.650Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
CVE-2025-24033 (GCVE-0-2025-24033)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2025-01-23 17:40 – Updated: 2025-02-12 20:41
VLAI
Title
@fastify/multipart vulnerable to unlimited consumption of resources
Summary
@fastify/multipart is a Fastify plugin for parsing the multipart content-type. Prior to versions 8.3.1 and 9.0.3, the `saveRequestFiles` function does not delete the uploaded temporary files when user cancels the request. The issue is fixed in versions 8.3.1 and 9.0.3. As a workaround, do not use `saveRequestFiles`.
Severity
7.5 (High)
CWE
- CWE-770 - Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling
Assigner
References
3 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/fastify/fastify-multipart/secu… | x_refsource_CONFIRM |
| https://github.com/fastify/fastify-multipart/issues/546 | x_refsource_MISC |
| https://github.com/fastify/fastify-multipart/pull/567 | x_refsource_MISC |
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| fastify | fastify-multipart |
Affected:
< 8.3.1
Affected: >= 9.0.0, < 9.0.3 |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2025-24033",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "poc"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-01-23T18:54:50.184882Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-02-12T20:41:29.689Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "fastify-multipart",
"vendor": "fastify",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003c 8.3.1"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003e= 9.0.0, \u003c 9.0.3"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "@fastify/multipart is a Fastify plugin for parsing the multipart content-type. Prior to versions 8.3.1 and 9.0.3, the `saveRequestFiles` function does not delete the uploaded temporary files when user cancels the request. The issue is fixed in versions 8.3.1 and 9.0.3. As a workaround, do not use `saveRequestFiles`."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 7.5,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-770",
"description": "CWE-770: Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-01-23T17:40:56.228Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/fastify/fastify-multipart/security/advisories/GHSA-27c6-mcxv-x3fh",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/fastify/fastify-multipart/security/advisories/GHSA-27c6-mcxv-x3fh"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/fastify/fastify-multipart/issues/546",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/fastify/fastify-multipart/issues/546"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/fastify/fastify-multipart/pull/567",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/fastify/fastify-multipart/pull/567"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-27c6-mcxv-x3fh",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "@fastify/multipart vulnerable to unlimited consumption of resources"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2025-24033",
"datePublished": "2025-01-23T17:40:56.228Z",
"dateReserved": "2025-01-16T17:31:06.460Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-02-12T20:41:29.689Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
Mitigation
Phase: Requirements
Description:
- Clearly specify the minimum and maximum expectations for capabilities, and dictate which behaviors are acceptable when resource allocation reaches limits.
Mitigation
Phase: Architecture and Design
Description:
- Limit the amount of resources that are accessible to unprivileged users. Set per-user limits for resources. Allow the system administrator to define these limits. Be careful to avoid CWE-410.
Mitigation
Phase: Architecture and Design
Description:
- Design throttling mechanisms into the system architecture. The best protection is to limit the amount of resources that an unauthorized user can cause to be expended. A strong authentication and access control model will help prevent such attacks from occurring in the first place, and it will help the administrator to identify who is committing the abuse. The login application should be protected against DoS attacks as much as possible. Limiting the database access, perhaps by caching result sets, can help minimize the resources expended. To further limit the potential for a DoS attack, consider tracking the rate of requests received from users and blocking requests that exceed a defined rate threshold.
Mitigation ID: MIT-5
Phase: Implementation
Strategy: Input Validation
Description:
- Assume all input is malicious. Use an "accept known good" input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does.
- When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range of acceptable values, missing or extra inputs, syntax, consistency across related fields, and conformance to business rules. As an example of business rule logic, "boat" may be syntactically valid because it only contains alphanumeric characters, but it is not valid if the input is only expected to contain colors such as "red" or "blue."
- Do not rely exclusively on looking for malicious or malformed inputs. This is likely to miss at least one undesirable input, especially if the code's environment changes. This can give attackers enough room to bypass the intended validation. However, denylists can be useful for detecting potential attacks or determining which inputs are so malformed that they should be rejected outright.
Mitigation ID: MIT-15
Phase: Architecture and Design
Description:
- For any security checks that are performed on the client side, ensure that these checks are duplicated on the server side, in order to avoid CWE-602. Attackers can bypass the client-side checks by modifying values after the checks have been performed, or by changing the client to remove the client-side checks entirely. Then, these modified values would be submitted to the server.
Mitigation
Phase: Architecture and Design
Description:
- Mitigation of resource exhaustion attacks requires that the target system either:
- The first of these solutions is an issue in itself though, since it may allow attackers to prevent the use of the system by a particular valid user. If the attacker impersonates the valid user, they may be able to prevent the user from accessing the server in question.
- The second solution can be difficult to effectively institute -- and even when properly done, it does not provide a full solution. It simply requires more resources on the part of the attacker.
- recognizes the attack and denies that user further access for a given amount of time, typically by using increasing time delays
- uniformly throttles all requests in order to make it more difficult to consume resources more quickly than they can again be freed.
Mitigation
Phase: Architecture and Design
Description:
- Ensure that protocols have specific limits of scale placed on them.
Mitigation ID: MIT-38.1
Phases: Architecture and Design, Implementation
Description:
- If the program must fail, ensure that it fails gracefully (fails closed). There may be a temptation to simply let the program fail poorly in cases such as low memory conditions, but an attacker may be able to assert control before the software has fully exited. Alternately, an uncontrolled failure could cause cascading problems with other downstream components; for example, the program could send a signal to a downstream process so the process immediately knows that a problem has occurred and has a better chance of recovery.
- Ensure that all failures in resource allocation place the system into a safe posture.
Mitigation ID: MIT-47
Phases: Operation, Architecture and Design
Strategy: Resource Limitation
Description:
- Use quotas or other resource-limiting settings provided by the operating system or environment. For example, when managing system resources in POSIX, setrlimit() can be used to set limits for certain types of resources, and getrlimit() can determine how many resources are available. However, these functions are not available on all operating systems.
- When the current levels get close to the maximum that is defined for the application (see CWE-770), then limit the allocation of further resources to privileged users; alternately, begin releasing resources for less-privileged users. While this mitigation may protect the system from attack, it will not necessarily stop attackers from adversely impacting other users.
- Ensure that the application performs the appropriate error checks and error handling in case resources become unavailable (CWE-703).
CAPEC-125: Flooding
An adversary consumes the resources of a target by rapidly engaging in a large number of interactions with the target. This type of attack generally exposes a weakness in rate limiting or flow. When successful this attack prevents legitimate users from accessing the service and can cause the target to crash. This attack differs from resource depletion through leaks or allocations in that the latter attacks do not rely on the volume of requests made to the target but instead focus on manipulation of the target's operations. The key factor in a flooding attack is the number of requests the adversary can make in a given period of time. The greater this number, the more likely an attack is to succeed against a given target.
CAPEC-130: Excessive Allocation
An adversary causes the target to allocate excessive resources to servicing the attackers' request, thereby reducing the resources available for legitimate services and degrading or denying services. Usually, this attack focuses on memory allocation, but any finite resource on the target could be the attacked, including bandwidth, processing cycles, or other resources. This attack does not attempt to force this allocation through a large number of requests (that would be Resource Depletion through Flooding) but instead uses one or a small number of requests that are carefully formatted to force the target to allocate excessive resources to service this request(s). Often this attack takes advantage of a bug in the target to cause the target to allocate resources vastly beyond what would be needed for a normal request.
CAPEC-147: XML Ping of the Death
An attacker initiates a resource depletion attack where a large number of small XML messages are delivered at a sufficiently rapid rate to cause a denial of service or crash of the target. Transactions such as repetitive SOAP transactions can deplete resources faster than a simple flooding attack because of the additional resources used by the SOAP protocol and the resources necessary to process SOAP messages. The transactions used are immaterial as long as they cause resource utilization on the target. In other words, this is a normal flooding attack augmented by using messages that will require extra processing on the target.
CAPEC-197: Exponential Data Expansion
An adversary submits data to a target application which contains nested exponential data expansion to produce excessively large output. Many data format languages allow the definition of macro-like structures that can be used to simplify the creation of complex structures. However, this capability can be abused to create excessive demands on a processor's CPU and memory. A small number of nested expansions can result in an exponential growth in demands on memory.
CAPEC-229: Serialized Data Parameter Blowup
This attack exploits certain serialized data parsers (e.g., XML, YAML, etc.) which manage data in an inefficient manner. The attacker crafts an serialized data file with multiple configuration parameters in the same dataset. In a vulnerable parser, this results in a denial of service condition where CPU resources are exhausted because of the parsing algorithm. The weakness being exploited is tied to parser implementation and not language specific.
CAPEC-230: Serialized Data with Nested Payloads
Applications often need to transform data in and out of a data format (e.g., XML and YAML) by using a parser. It may be possible for an adversary to inject data that may have an adverse effect on the parser when it is being processed. Many data format languages allow the definition of macro-like structures that can be used to simplify the creation of complex structures. By nesting these structures, causing the data to be repeatedly substituted, an adversary can cause the parser to consume more resources while processing, causing excessive memory consumption and CPU utilization.
CAPEC-231: Oversized Serialized Data Payloads
An adversary injects oversized serialized data payloads into a parser during data processing to produce adverse effects upon the parser such as exhausting system resources and arbitrary code execution.
CAPEC-469: HTTP DoS
An attacker performs flooding at the HTTP level to bring down only a particular web application rather than anything listening on a TCP/IP connection. This denial of service attack requires substantially fewer packets to be sent which makes DoS harder to detect. This is an equivalent of SYN flood in HTTP. The idea is to keep the HTTP session alive indefinitely and then repeat that hundreds of times. This attack targets resource depletion weaknesses in web server software. The web server will wait to attacker's responses on the initiated HTTP sessions while the connection threads are being exhausted.
CAPEC-482: TCP Flood
An adversary may execute a flooding attack using the TCP protocol with the intent to deny legitimate users access to a service. These attacks exploit the weakness within the TCP protocol where there is some state information for the connection the server needs to maintain. This often involves the use of TCP SYN messages.
CAPEC-486: UDP Flood
An adversary may execute a flooding attack using the UDP protocol with the intent to deny legitimate users access to a service by consuming the available network bandwidth. Additionally, firewalls often open a port for each UDP connection destined for a service with an open UDP port, meaning the firewalls in essence save the connection state thus the high packet nature of a UDP flood can also overwhelm resources allocated to the firewall. UDP attacks can also target services like DNS or VoIP which utilize these protocols. Additionally, due to the session-less nature of the UDP protocol, the source of a packet is easily spoofed making it difficult to find the source of the attack.
CAPEC-487: ICMP Flood
An adversary may execute a flooding attack using the ICMP protocol with the intent to deny legitimate users access to a service by consuming the available network bandwidth. A typical attack involves a victim server receiving ICMP packets at a high rate from a wide range of source addresses. Additionally, due to the session-less nature of the ICMP protocol, the source of a packet is easily spoofed making it difficult to find the source of the attack.
CAPEC-488: HTTP Flood
An adversary may execute a flooding attack using the HTTP protocol with the intent to deny legitimate users access to a service by consuming resources at the application layer such as web services and their infrastructure. These attacks use legitimate session-based HTTP GET requests designed to consume large amounts of a server's resources. Since these are legitimate sessions this attack is very difficult to detect.
CAPEC-489: SSL Flood
An adversary may execute a flooding attack using the SSL protocol with the intent to deny legitimate users access to a service by consuming all the available resources on the server side. These attacks take advantage of the asymmetric relationship between the processing power used by the client and the processing power used by the server to create a secure connection. In this manner the attacker can make a large number of HTTPS requests on a low provisioned machine to tie up a disproportionately large number of resources on the server. The clients then continue to keep renegotiating the SSL connection. When multiplied by a large number of attacking machines, this attack can result in a crash or loss of service to legitimate users.
CAPEC-490: Amplification
An adversary may execute an amplification where the size of a response is far greater than that of the request that generates it. The goal of this attack is to use a relatively few resources to create a large amount of traffic against a target server. To execute this attack, an adversary send a request to a 3rd party service, spoofing the source address to be that of the target server. The larger response that is generated by the 3rd party service is then sent to the target server. By sending a large number of initial requests, the adversary can generate a tremendous amount of traffic directed at the target. The greater the discrepancy in size between the initial request and the final payload delivered to the target increased the effectiveness of this attack.
CAPEC-491: Quadratic Data Expansion
An adversary exploits macro-like substitution to cause a denial of service situation due to excessive memory being allocated to fully expand the data. The result of this denial of service could cause the application to freeze or crash. This involves defining a very large entity and using it multiple times in a single entity substitution. CAPEC-197 is a similar attack pattern, but it is easier to discover and defend against. This attack pattern does not perform multi-level substitution and therefore does not obviously appear to consume extensive resources.
CAPEC-493: SOAP Array Blowup
An adversary may execute an attack on a web service that uses SOAP messages in communication. By sending a very large SOAP array declaration to the web service, the attacker forces the web service to allocate space for the array elements before they are parsed by the XML parser. The attacker message is typically small in size containing a large array declaration of say 1,000,000 elements and a couple of array elements. This attack targets exhaustion of the memory resources of the web service.
CAPEC-494: TCP Fragmentation
An adversary may execute a TCP Fragmentation attack against a target with the intention of avoiding filtering rules of network controls, by attempting to fragment the TCP packet such that the headers flag field is pushed into the second fragment which typically is not filtered.
CAPEC-495: UDP Fragmentation
An attacker may execute a UDP Fragmentation attack against a target server in an attempt to consume resources such as bandwidth and CPU. IP fragmentation occurs when an IP datagram is larger than the MTU of the route the datagram has to traverse. Typically the attacker will use large UDP packets over 1500 bytes of data which forces fragmentation as ethernet MTU is 1500 bytes. This attack is a variation on a typical UDP flood but it enables more network bandwidth to be consumed with fewer packets. Additionally it has the potential to consume server CPU resources and fill memory buffers associated with the processing and reassembling of fragmented packets.
CAPEC-496: ICMP Fragmentation
An attacker may execute a ICMP Fragmentation attack against a target with the intention of consuming resources or causing a crash. The attacker crafts a large number of identical fragmented IP packets containing a portion of a fragmented ICMP message. The attacker these sends these messages to a target host which causes the host to become non-responsive. Another vector may be sending a fragmented ICMP message to a target host with incorrect sizes in the header which causes the host to hang.
CAPEC-528: XML Flood
An adversary may execute a flooding attack using XML messages with the intent to deny legitimate users access to a web service. These attacks are accomplished by sending a large number of XML based requests and letting the service attempt to parse each one. In many cases this type of an attack will result in a XML Denial of Service (XDoS) due to an application becoming unstable, freezing, or crashing.