CWE-770
Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling
The product allocates a reusable resource or group of resources on behalf of an actor without imposing any intended restrictions on the size or number of resources that can be allocated.
CVE-2025-14466 (GCVE-0-2025-14466)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2025-12-16 21:31 – Updated: 2025-12-17 18:50
VLAI
Title
Güralp Systems Fortimus Series, Minimus Series, and Certimus Series have an Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling vulnerability
Summary
A vulnerability in the web interface of the Güralp Fortimus Series, Minimus Series and Certimus Series allows an unauthenticated attacker with network access to send specially-crafted HTTP requests that can cause the web service process to deliberately restart. Although this mechanism limits the impact of the attack, it results in a brief denial-of-service condition during the restart.
Severity
5.3 (Medium)
CWE
- CWE-770 - Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling
Assigner
References
2 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://www.cisa.gov/news-events/ics-advisories/i… | government-resource |
| https://github.com/cisagov/CSAF/blob/develop/csaf… |
Impacted products
3 products
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Güralp Systems | Fortimus Series |
Affected:
All versions
|
|
| Güralp Systems | Minimus Series |
Affected:
All versions
|
|
| Güralp Systems | Certimus Series |
Affected:
All versions
|
Date Public
2025-12-16 20:51
Credits
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2025-14466",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-12-17T14:44:12.955842Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-12-17T18:50:33.286Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Fortimus Series",
"vendor": "G\u00fcralp Systems",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "All versions"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Minimus Series",
"vendor": "G\u00fcralp Systems",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "All versions"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Certimus Series",
"vendor": "G\u00fcralp Systems",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "All versions"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Souvik Kandar"
}
],
"datePublic": "2025-12-16T20:51:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cspan style=\"background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);\"\u003eA vulnerability in the web interface of the G\u00fcralp Fortimus Series, Minimus Series and Certimus Series allows an unauthenticated attacker with network access to send specially-crafted HTTP requests that can cause the web service process to deliberately restart. Although this mechanism limits the impact of the attack, it results in a brief denial-of-service condition during the restart.\u003c/span\u003e"
}
],
"value": "A vulnerability in the web interface of the G\u00fcralp Fortimus Series, Minimus Series and Certimus Series allows an unauthenticated attacker with network access to send specially-crafted HTTP requests that can cause the web service process to deliberately restart. Although this mechanism limits the impact of the attack, it results in a brief denial-of-service condition during the restart."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "NONE",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 6.9,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"exploitMaturity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "LOW",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
},
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "LOW",
"baseScore": 5.3,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-770",
"description": "CWE-770 Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-12-16T21:31:55.428Z",
"orgId": "7d14cffa-0d7d-4270-9dc0-52cabd5a23a6",
"shortName": "icscert"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"government-resource"
],
"url": "https://www.cisa.gov/news-events/ics-advisories/icsa-25-350-01"
},
{
"url": "https://github.com/cisagov/CSAF/blob/develop/csaf_files/OT/white/2025/icsa-25-350-01.json"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "ICSA-25-350-01",
"discovery": "EXTERNAL"
},
"title": "G\u00fcralp Systems Fortimus Series, Minimus Series, and Certimus Series have an Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling vulnerability",
"workarounds": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cspan style=\"background-color: rgb(245, 250, 252);\"\u003eG\u00fcralp Systems recommends that users operate their systems behind a NAT or VPN firewall. For more information, please contact G\u00fcralp Systems.\u003c/span\u003e\n\n\u003cbr\u003e"
}
],
"value": "G\u00fcralp Systems recommends that users operate their systems behind a NAT or VPN firewall. For more information, please contact G\u00fcralp Systems."
}
],
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 0.5.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "7d14cffa-0d7d-4270-9dc0-52cabd5a23a6",
"assignerShortName": "icscert",
"cveId": "CVE-2025-14466",
"datePublished": "2025-12-16T21:31:55.428Z",
"dateReserved": "2025-12-10T16:11:02.542Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-12-17T18:50:33.286Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2025-1451 (GCVE-0-2025-1451)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2025-03-20 10:10 – Updated: 2025-10-15 12:50
VLAI
Title
Insufficient Patch Leading to DoS in parisneo/lollms-webui
Summary
A vulnerability in parisneo/lollms-webui v13 arises from the server's handling of multipart boundaries in file uploads. The server does not limit or validate the length of the boundary or the characters appended to it, allowing an attacker to craft requests with excessively long boundaries, leading to resource exhaustion and eventual denial of service (DoS). Despite an attempted patch in commit 483431bb, which blocked hyphen characters from being appended to the multipart boundary, the fix is insufficient. The server remains vulnerable if other characters (e.g., '4', 'a') are used instead of hyphens. This allows attackers to exploit the vulnerability using different characters, causing resource exhaustion and service unavailability.
Severity
7.5 (High)
CWE
- CWE-770 - Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling
Assigner
References
1 reference
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| parisneo | parisneo/lollms-webui |
Affected:
unspecified , ≤ latest
(custom)
|
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2025-1451",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "poc"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-03-20T17:50:39.583223Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-03-20T18:16:03.288Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "parisneo/lollms-webui",
"vendor": "parisneo",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "latest",
"status": "affected",
"version": "unspecified",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "A vulnerability in parisneo/lollms-webui v13 arises from the server\u0027s handling of multipart boundaries in file uploads. The server does not limit or validate the length of the boundary or the characters appended to it, allowing an attacker to craft requests with excessively long boundaries, leading to resource exhaustion and eventual denial of service (DoS). Despite an attempted patch in commit 483431bb, which blocked hyphen characters from being appended to the multipart boundary, the fix is insufficient. The server remains vulnerable if other characters (e.g., \u00274\u0027, \u0027a\u0027) are used instead of hyphens. This allows attackers to exploit the vulnerability using different characters, causing resource exhaustion and service unavailability."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_0": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 7.5,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"version": "3.0"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-770",
"description": "CWE-770 Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-10-15T12:50:05.646Z",
"orgId": "c09c270a-b464-47c1-9133-acb35b22c19a",
"shortName": "@huntr_ai"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://huntr.com/bounties/63f5aea4-953b-4b38-9f10-3afe425be1d4"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "63f5aea4-953b-4b38-9f10-3afe425be1d4",
"discovery": "EXTERNAL"
},
"title": "Insufficient Patch Leading to DoS in parisneo/lollms-webui"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "c09c270a-b464-47c1-9133-acb35b22c19a",
"assignerShortName": "@huntr_ai",
"cveId": "CVE-2025-1451",
"datePublished": "2025-03-20T10:10:49.648Z",
"dateReserved": "2025-02-18T17:36:24.884Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-10-15T12:50:05.646Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
CVE-2025-14525 (GCVE-0-2025-14525)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-01-26 19:36 – Updated: 2026-01-26 20:59
VLAI
Title
Kubevirt: kubevirt: vm administration denial of service via guest agent
Summary
A flaw was found in kubevirt. A user within a virtual machine (VM), if the guest agent is active, can exploit this by causing the agent to report an excessive number of network interfaces. This action can overwhelm the system's ability to store VM configuration updates, effectively blocking changes to the Virtual Machine Instance (VMI). This allows the VM user to restrict the VM administrator's ability to manage the VM, leading to a denial of service for administrative operations.
Severity
6.4 (Medium)
CWE
- CWE-770 - Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling
Assigner
References
2 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-14525 | vdb-entryx_refsource_REDHAT |
| https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2421360 | issue-trackingx_refsource_REDHAT |
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Red Hat | Red Hat OpenShift Virtualization 4 |
cpe:/a:redhat:container_native_virtualization:4 |
Date Public
2026-01-09 02:02
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2025-14525",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-01-26T20:59:35.141666Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-01-26T20:59:41.777Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"collectionURL": "https://access.redhat.com/downloads/content/package-browser/",
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:container_native_virtualization:4"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"packageName": "kubevirt",
"product": "Red Hat OpenShift Virtualization 4",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
}
],
"datePublic": "2026-01-09T02:02:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "A flaw was found in kubevirt. A user within a virtual machine (VM), if the guest agent is active, can exploit this by causing the agent to report an excessive number of network interfaces. This action can overwhelm the system\u0027s ability to store VM configuration updates, effectively blocking changes to the Virtual Machine Instance (VMI). This allows the VM user to restrict the VM administrator\u0027s ability to manage the VM, leading to a denial of service for administrative operations."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"namespace": "https://access.redhat.com/security/updates/classification/",
"value": "Moderate"
},
"type": "Red Hat severity rating"
}
},
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "LOW",
"baseScore": 6.4,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "LOW",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "CHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:L",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS"
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-770",
"description": "Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-01-26T19:36:43.721Z",
"orgId": "53f830b8-0a3f-465b-8143-3b8a9948e749",
"shortName": "redhat"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"vdb-entry",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-14525"
},
{
"name": "RHBZ#2421360",
"tags": [
"issue-tracking",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2421360"
}
],
"timeline": [
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2025-12-11T07:58:03.805Z",
"value": "Reported to Red Hat."
},
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2026-01-09T02:02:00.000Z",
"value": "Made public."
}
],
"title": "Kubevirt: kubevirt: vm administration denial of service via guest agent",
"workarounds": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Mitigation for this issue is either not available or the currently available options do not meet the Red Hat Product Security criteria comprising ease of use and deployment, applicability to widespread installation base or stability."
}
],
"x_generator": {
"engine": "cvelib 1.8.0"
},
"x_redhatCweChain": "CWE-770: Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "53f830b8-0a3f-465b-8143-3b8a9948e749",
"assignerShortName": "redhat",
"cveId": "CVE-2025-14525",
"datePublished": "2026-01-26T19:36:43.721Z",
"dateReserved": "2025-12-11T08:19:47.528Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-01-26T20:59:41.777Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2025-1477 (GCVE-0-2025-1477)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2025-08-13 17:27 – Updated: 2025-08-13 20:01
VLAI
Title
Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling in GitLab
Summary
An issue has been discovered in GitLab CE/EE affecting all versions from 8.14 before 18.0.6, 18.1 before 18.1.4, and 18.2 before 18.2.2 that could have allowed an unauthenticated user to create a denial of service condition by sending specially crafted payloads to specific integration API endpoints.
Severity
6.5 (Medium)
CWE
- CWE-770 - Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling
Assigner
References
2 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/520353 | issue-trackingpermissions-required |
| https://hackerone.com/reports/2987614 | technical-descriptionexploitpermissions-required |
Impacted products
Credits
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2025-1477",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-08-13T20:01:12.488288Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-08-13T20:01:32.448Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:2.3:a:gitlab:gitlab:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "GitLab",
"repo": "git://git@gitlab.com:gitlab-org/gitlab.git",
"vendor": "GitLab",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "18.0.6",
"status": "affected",
"version": "8.14",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "18.1.4",
"status": "affected",
"version": "18.1",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "18.2.2",
"status": "affected",
"version": "18.2",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Thanks [pwnie](https://hackerone.com/pwnie) for reporting this vulnerability through our HackerOne bug bounty program"
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "An issue has been discovered in GitLab CE/EE affecting all versions from 8.14 before 18.0.6, 18.1 before 18.1.4, and 18.2 before 18.2.2 that could have allowed an unauthenticated user to create a denial of service condition by sending specially crafted payloads to specific integration API endpoints."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 6.5,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-770",
"description": "CWE-770: Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-08-13T17:27:25.496Z",
"orgId": "ceab7361-8a18-47b1-92ba-4d7d25f6715a",
"shortName": "GitLab"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "GitLab Issue #520353",
"tags": [
"issue-tracking",
"permissions-required"
],
"url": "https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/520353"
},
{
"name": "HackerOne Bug Bounty Report #2987614",
"tags": [
"technical-description",
"exploit",
"permissions-required"
],
"url": "https://hackerone.com/reports/2987614"
}
],
"solutions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Upgrade to versions 18.0.6, 18.1.4, 18.2.2 or above."
}
],
"title": "Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling in GitLab"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "ceab7361-8a18-47b1-92ba-4d7d25f6715a",
"assignerShortName": "GitLab",
"cveId": "CVE-2025-1477",
"datePublished": "2025-08-13T17:27:25.496Z",
"dateReserved": "2025-02-19T19:02:25.155Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-08-13T20:01:32.448Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
CVE-2025-1478 (GCVE-0-2025-1478)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2025-06-12 10:02 – Updated: 2025-06-12 13:30
VLAI
Title
Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling in GitLab
Summary
An issue has been discovered in GitLab CE/EE affecting all versions from 8.13 before 17.10.7, 17.11 before 17.11.3, and 18.0 before 18.0.1. A lack of input validation in Board Names could be used to trigger a denial of service.
Severity
6.5 (Medium)
CWE
- CWE-770 - Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling
Assigner
References
2 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/520354 | issue-trackingpermissions-required |
| https://hackerone.com/reports/2987444 | technical-descriptionexploitpermissions-required |
Impacted products
Credits
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2025-1478",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-06-12T13:28:26.807319Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-06-12T13:30:42.186Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:2.3:a:gitlab:gitlab:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "GitLab",
"repo": "git://git@gitlab.com:gitlab-org/gitlab.git",
"vendor": "GitLab",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "17.10.8",
"status": "affected",
"version": "8.13",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "17.11.4",
"status": "affected",
"version": "17.11",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "18.0.2",
"status": "affected",
"version": "18.0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Thanks [pwnie](https://hackerone.com/pwnie) for reporting this vulnerability through our HackerOne bug bounty program"
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "An issue has been discovered in GitLab CE/EE affecting all versions from 8.13 before 17.10.7, 17.11 before 17.11.3, and 18.0 before 18.0.1. A lack of input validation in Board Names could be used to trigger a denial of service."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 6.5,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-770",
"description": "CWE-770: Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-06-12T10:02:49.998Z",
"orgId": "ceab7361-8a18-47b1-92ba-4d7d25f6715a",
"shortName": "GitLab"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "GitLab Issue #520354",
"tags": [
"issue-tracking",
"permissions-required"
],
"url": "https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/520354"
},
{
"name": "HackerOne Bug Bounty Report #2987444",
"tags": [
"technical-description",
"exploit",
"permissions-required"
],
"url": "https://hackerone.com/reports/2987444"
}
],
"solutions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Upgrade to versions 17.10.8, 17.11.4, 18.0.2 or above."
}
],
"title": "Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling in GitLab"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "ceab7361-8a18-47b1-92ba-4d7d25f6715a",
"assignerShortName": "GitLab",
"cveId": "CVE-2025-1478",
"datePublished": "2025-06-12T10:02:49.998Z",
"dateReserved": "2025-02-19T19:02:29.887Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-06-12T13:30:42.186Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
CVE-2025-14870 (GCVE-0-2025-14870)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-05-14 05:37 – Updated: 2026-05-14 13:03
VLAI
Title
Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling in GitLab
Summary
GitLab has remediated an issue in GitLab CE/EE affecting all versions from 18.5 before 18.9.7, 18.10 before 18.10.6, and 18.11 before 18.11.3 that could have allowed an unauthenticated user to cause denial of service by sending specially crafted JSON payloads due to insufficient input validation.
Severity
7.5 (High)
CWE
- CWE-770 - Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling
Assigner
References
3 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://hackerone.com/reports/3446641 | technical-descriptionexploitpermissions-required |
| https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/work_items… | |
| https://about.gitlab.com/releases/2026/05/13/patc… |
Impacted products
Credits
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2025-14870",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-05-14T13:02:46.629087Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-05-14T13:03:02.406Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:2.3:a:gitlab:gitlab:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "GitLab",
"repo": "git://git@gitlab.com:gitlab-org/gitlab.git",
"vendor": "GitLab",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "18.9.7",
"status": "affected",
"version": "18.5",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "18.10.6",
"status": "affected",
"version": "18.10",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "18.11.3",
"status": "affected",
"version": "18.11",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Thanks [a92847865](https://hackerone.com/a92847865) for reporting this vulnerability through our HackerOne bug bounty program"
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GitLab has remediated an issue in GitLab CE/EE affecting all versions from 18.5 before 18.9.7, 18.10 before 18.10.6, and 18.11 before 18.11.3 that could have allowed an unauthenticated user to cause denial of service by sending specially crafted JSON payloads due to insufficient input validation."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 7.5,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-770",
"description": "CWE-770: Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-05-14T05:37:32.535Z",
"orgId": "ceab7361-8a18-47b1-92ba-4d7d25f6715a",
"shortName": "GitLab"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "HackerOne Bug Bounty Report #3446641",
"tags": [
"technical-description",
"exploit",
"permissions-required"
],
"url": "https://hackerone.com/reports/3446641"
},
{
"url": "https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/work_items/584490"
},
{
"url": "https://about.gitlab.com/releases/2026/05/13/patch-release-gitlab-18-11-3-released/"
}
],
"solutions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Upgrade to versions 18.9.7, 18.10.6, 18.11.3 or above."
}
],
"title": "Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling in GitLab"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "ceab7361-8a18-47b1-92ba-4d7d25f6715a",
"assignerShortName": "GitLab",
"cveId": "CVE-2025-14870",
"datePublished": "2026-05-14T05:37:32.535Z",
"dateReserved": "2025-12-18T05:04:02.069Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-05-14T13:03:02.406Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2025-14876 (GCVE-0-2025-14876)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-02-18 20:47 – Updated: 2026-02-19 14:33
VLAI
Title
Qemu-kvm: unbounded allocation in virtio-crypto
Summary
A flaw was found in the virtio-crypto device of QEMU. A malicious guest operating system can exploit a missing length limit in the AKCIPHER path, leading to uncontrolled memory allocation. This can result in a denial of service (DoS) on the host system by causing the QEMU process to terminate unexpectedly.
Severity
5.5 (Medium)
CWE
- CWE-770 - Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling
Assigner
References
2 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-14876 | vdb-entryx_refsource_REDHAT |
| https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2423549 | issue-trackingx_refsource_REDHAT |
Impacted products
8 products
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Affected:
7.1.0 , ≤ 10.2.0
(semver)
|
|||
| Red Hat | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10 |
cpe:/o:redhat:enterprise_linux:10 |
|
| Red Hat | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 |
cpe:/o:redhat:enterprise_linux:6 |
|
| Red Hat | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 |
cpe:/o:redhat:enterprise_linux:7 |
|
| Red Hat | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 |
cpe:/o:redhat:enterprise_linux:7 |
|
| Red Hat | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 |
cpe:/o:redhat:enterprise_linux:8 |
|
| Red Hat | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 |
cpe:/o:redhat:enterprise_linux:9 |
|
| Red Hat | Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4 |
cpe:/a:redhat:openshift:4 |
Date Public
2025-12-14 00:00
Credits
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2025-14876",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-02-19T14:32:44.322436Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-02-19T14:33:52.744Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"collectionURL": "https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu",
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"packageName": "qemu",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "10.2.0",
"status": "affected",
"version": "7.1.0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
},
{
"collectionURL": "https://access.redhat.com/downloads/content/package-browser/",
"cpes": [
"cpe:/o:redhat:enterprise_linux:10"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"packageName": "qemu-kvm",
"product": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"collectionURL": "https://access.redhat.com/downloads/content/package-browser/",
"cpes": [
"cpe:/o:redhat:enterprise_linux:6"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"packageName": "qemu-kvm",
"product": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"collectionURL": "https://access.redhat.com/downloads/content/package-browser/",
"cpes": [
"cpe:/o:redhat:enterprise_linux:7"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"packageName": "qemu-kvm",
"product": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"collectionURL": "https://access.redhat.com/downloads/content/package-browser/",
"cpes": [
"cpe:/o:redhat:enterprise_linux:7"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"packageName": "qemu-kvm-ma",
"product": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"collectionURL": "https://access.redhat.com/downloads/content/package-browser/",
"cpes": [
"cpe:/o:redhat:enterprise_linux:8"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"packageName": "virt:rhel/qemu-kvm",
"product": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"collectionURL": "https://access.redhat.com/downloads/content/package-browser/",
"cpes": [
"cpe:/o:redhat:enterprise_linux:9"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"packageName": "qemu-kvm",
"product": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"collectionURL": "https://access.redhat.com/downloads/content/package-browser/",
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:openshift:4"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"packageName": "rhcos",
"product": "Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Red Hat would like to thank James Nakamura \u003cnakamurajames123@gmail.com\u003e for reporting this issue."
}
],
"datePublic": "2025-12-14T00:00:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "A flaw was found in the virtio-crypto device of QEMU. A malicious guest operating system can exploit a missing length limit in the AKCIPHER path, leading to uncontrolled memory allocation. This can result in a denial of service (DoS) on the host system by causing the QEMU process to terminate unexpectedly."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"namespace": "https://access.redhat.com/security/updates/classification/",
"value": "Moderate"
},
"type": "Red Hat severity rating"
}
},
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "LOCAL",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 5.5,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS"
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-770",
"description": "Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-02-18T20:47:54.302Z",
"orgId": "92fb86c3-55a5-4fb5-9c3f-4757b9e96dc5",
"shortName": "fedora"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"vdb-entry",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-14876"
},
{
"name": "RHBZ#2423549",
"tags": [
"issue-tracking",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2423549"
}
],
"timeline": [
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2025-12-18T10:56:01.261Z",
"value": "Reported to Red Hat."
},
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2025-12-14T00:00:00.000Z",
"value": "Made public."
}
],
"title": "Qemu-kvm: unbounded allocation in virtio-crypto",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "cvelib 1.8.0"
},
"x_redhatCweChain": "CWE-770: Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "92fb86c3-55a5-4fb5-9c3f-4757b9e96dc5",
"assignerShortName": "fedora",
"cveId": "CVE-2025-14876",
"datePublished": "2026-02-18T20:47:54.302Z",
"dateReserved": "2025-12-18T10:40:12.917Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-02-19T14:33:52.744Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2025-1516 (GCVE-0-2025-1516)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2025-06-12 10:02 – Updated: 2025-06-12 13:38
VLAI
Title
Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling in GitLab
Summary
An issue has been discovered in GitLab CE/EE affecting all versions from 8.7 before 17.10.8, 17.11 before 17.11.4, and 18.0 before 18.0.2. Improper input validation in Tokens Names could be used to trigger a denial of service.
Severity
6.5 (Medium)
CWE
- CWE-770 - Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling
Assigner
References
2 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/520553 | issue-trackingpermissions-required |
| https://hackerone.com/reports/2991435 | technical-descriptionexploitpermissions-required |
Impacted products
Credits
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2025-1516",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-06-12T13:37:46.047033Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-06-12T13:38:08.165Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:2.3:a:gitlab:gitlab:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "GitLab",
"repo": "git://git@gitlab.com:gitlab-org/gitlab.git",
"vendor": "GitLab",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "17.10.8",
"status": "affected",
"version": "8.7",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "17.11.4",
"status": "affected",
"version": "17.11",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "18.0.2",
"status": "affected",
"version": "18.0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Thanks [pwnie](https://hackerone.com/pwnie) for reporting this vulnerability through our HackerOne bug bounty program"
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "An issue has been discovered in GitLab CE/EE affecting all versions from 8.7 before 17.10.8, 17.11 before 17.11.4, and 18.0 before 18.0.2. Improper input validation in Tokens Names could be used to trigger a denial of service."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 6.5,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-770",
"description": "CWE-770: Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-06-12T10:02:45.134Z",
"orgId": "ceab7361-8a18-47b1-92ba-4d7d25f6715a",
"shortName": "GitLab"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "GitLab Issue #520553",
"tags": [
"issue-tracking",
"permissions-required"
],
"url": "https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/520553"
},
{
"name": "HackerOne Bug Bounty Report #2991435",
"tags": [
"technical-description",
"exploit",
"permissions-required"
],
"url": "https://hackerone.com/reports/2991435"
}
],
"solutions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Upgrade to versions 17.10.8, 17.11.4, 18.0.2 or above."
}
],
"title": "Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling in GitLab"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "ceab7361-8a18-47b1-92ba-4d7d25f6715a",
"assignerShortName": "GitLab",
"cveId": "CVE-2025-1516",
"datePublished": "2025-06-12T10:02:45.134Z",
"dateReserved": "2025-02-20T20:02:28.750Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-06-12T13:38:08.165Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
CVE-2025-15317 (GCVE-0-2025-15317)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-02-09 21:43 – Updated: 2026-02-10 16:01
VLAI
Title
Tanium addressed an uncontrolled resource consumption vulnerability in Tanium Server.
Summary
Tanium addressed an uncontrolled resource consumption vulnerability in Tanium Server.
Severity
6.5 (Medium)
CWE
- CWE-770 - Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling
Assigner
References
1 reference
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tanium | Tanium Server |
Affected:
7.4.6.0 , < 7.4.6.1154
(custom)
Affected: 7.5.6.0 , < 7.5.6.1164 (custom) Affected: 7.6.2.0 , < 7.6.2.1303 (custom) Affected: 7.6.4.0 , < 7.6.4.2124 (custom) cpe:2.3:a:tanium:server:7.4.6.1153:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:tanium:server:7.5.6.1163:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:tanium:server:7.6.2.1302:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:tanium:server:7.6.4.2123:*:*:*:*:*:*:* |
Date Public
2025-03-18 00:00
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2025-15317",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-02-10T16:00:52.783721Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-02-10T16:01:34.788Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:2.3:a:tanium:server:7.4.6.1153:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:tanium:server:7.5.6.1163:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:tanium:server:7.6.2.1302:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:tanium:server:7.6.4.2123:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
],
"product": "Tanium Server",
"vendor": "Tanium",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "7.4.6.1154",
"status": "affected",
"version": "7.4.6.0",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"lessThan": "7.5.6.1164",
"status": "affected",
"version": "7.5.6.0",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"lessThan": "7.6.2.1303",
"status": "affected",
"version": "7.6.2.0",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"lessThan": "7.6.4.2124",
"status": "affected",
"version": "7.6.4.0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"dateAssigned": "2025-12-29T23:12:56.967Z",
"datePublic": "2025-03-18T00:00:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Tanium addressed an uncontrolled resource consumption vulnerability in Tanium Server."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"baseScore": 6.5,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-770",
"description": "Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-02-09T21:43:41.258Z",
"orgId": "3938794e-25f5-4123-a1ba-5cbd7f104512",
"shortName": "Tanium"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "TAN-2025-013",
"url": "https://security.tanium.com/TAN-2025-013"
}
],
"title": "Tanium addressed an uncontrolled resource consumption vulnerability in Tanium Server."
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "3938794e-25f5-4123-a1ba-5cbd7f104512",
"assignerShortName": "Tanium",
"cveId": "CVE-2025-15317",
"datePublished": "2026-02-09T21:43:41.258Z",
"dateReserved": "2025-12-29T23:12:57.132Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-02-10T16:01:34.788Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2025-15474 (GCVE-0-2025-15474)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-01-07 04:33 – Updated: 2026-01-07 14:23
VLAI
Title
AuntyFey Smart Combination Lock BLE Connection Flood DoS
Summary
AuntyFey Smart Combination Lock firmware versions as of 2025-12-24 contain a vulnerability that allows an unauthenticated attacker within Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE) range to cause a denial of service by repeatedly initiating BLE connections. Sustained connection attempts interrupt keypad authentication input and repeatedly force the device into lockout states, preventing legitimate users from unlocking the device.
Severity
CWE
- CWE-770 - Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling
Assigner
References
3 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/nsm-barii/ble-smartlock-dos | technical-descriptionexploit |
| https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0F9L1M4XG | product |
| https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/auntyfey-sma… | third-party-advisory |
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| AuntyFey | AuntyFey Smart Combination Lock |
Affected:
0 , ≤ 2025-12-24
(date)
|
Credits
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2025-15474",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "poc"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-01-07T14:22:38.304434Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-01-07T14:23:06.539Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "AuntyFey Smart Combination Lock",
"vendor": "AuntyFey",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "2025-12-24",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "date"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Jabari Lucien (nsm_barii)"
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "AuntyFey Smart Combination Lock firmware versions as of 2025-12-24 contain a vulnerability that allows an unauthenticated attacker within Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE) range to cause a denial of service by repeatedly initiating BLE connections. Sustained connection attempts interrupt keypad authentication input and repeatedly force the device into lockout states, preventing legitimate users from unlocking the device."
}
],
"value": "AuntyFey Smart Combination Lock firmware versions as of 2025-12-24 contain a vulnerability that allows an unauthenticated attacker within Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE) range to cause a denial of service by repeatedly initiating BLE connections. Sustained connection attempts interrupt keypad authentication input and repeatedly force the device into lockout states, preventing legitimate users from unlocking the device."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "NONE",
"attackVector": "ADJACENT",
"baseScore": 5.3,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"exploitMaturity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "LOW",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-770",
"description": "CWE-770 Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-01-07T04:33:17.467Z",
"orgId": "83251b91-4cc7-4094-a5c7-464a1b83ea10",
"shortName": "VulnCheck"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"technical-description",
"exploit"
],
"url": "https://github.com/nsm-barii/ble-smartlock-dos"
},
{
"tags": [
"product"
],
"url": "https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0F9L1M4XG"
},
{
"tags": [
"third-party-advisory"
],
"url": "https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/auntyfey-smart-combination-lock-ble-connection-flood-dos"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "AuntyFey Smart Combination Lock BLE Connection Flood DoS",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 0.5.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "83251b91-4cc7-4094-a5c7-464a1b83ea10",
"assignerShortName": "VulnCheck",
"cveId": "CVE-2025-15474",
"datePublished": "2026-01-07T04:33:17.467Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-01-07T04:10:49.571Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-01-07T14:23:06.539Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
Mitigation
Phase: Requirements
Description:
- Clearly specify the minimum and maximum expectations for capabilities, and dictate which behaviors are acceptable when resource allocation reaches limits.
Mitigation
Phase: Architecture and Design
Description:
- Limit the amount of resources that are accessible to unprivileged users. Set per-user limits for resources. Allow the system administrator to define these limits. Be careful to avoid CWE-410.
Mitigation
Phase: Architecture and Design
Description:
- Design throttling mechanisms into the system architecture. The best protection is to limit the amount of resources that an unauthorized user can cause to be expended. A strong authentication and access control model will help prevent such attacks from occurring in the first place, and it will help the administrator to identify who is committing the abuse. The login application should be protected against DoS attacks as much as possible. Limiting the database access, perhaps by caching result sets, can help minimize the resources expended. To further limit the potential for a DoS attack, consider tracking the rate of requests received from users and blocking requests that exceed a defined rate threshold.
Mitigation ID: MIT-5
Phase: Implementation
Strategy: Input Validation
Description:
- Assume all input is malicious. Use an "accept known good" input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does.
- When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range of acceptable values, missing or extra inputs, syntax, consistency across related fields, and conformance to business rules. As an example of business rule logic, "boat" may be syntactically valid because it only contains alphanumeric characters, but it is not valid if the input is only expected to contain colors such as "red" or "blue."
- Do not rely exclusively on looking for malicious or malformed inputs. This is likely to miss at least one undesirable input, especially if the code's environment changes. This can give attackers enough room to bypass the intended validation. However, denylists can be useful for detecting potential attacks or determining which inputs are so malformed that they should be rejected outright.
Mitigation ID: MIT-15
Phase: Architecture and Design
Description:
- For any security checks that are performed on the client side, ensure that these checks are duplicated on the server side, in order to avoid CWE-602. Attackers can bypass the client-side checks by modifying values after the checks have been performed, or by changing the client to remove the client-side checks entirely. Then, these modified values would be submitted to the server.
Mitigation
Phase: Architecture and Design
Description:
- Mitigation of resource exhaustion attacks requires that the target system either:
- The first of these solutions is an issue in itself though, since it may allow attackers to prevent the use of the system by a particular valid user. If the attacker impersonates the valid user, they may be able to prevent the user from accessing the server in question.
- The second solution can be difficult to effectively institute -- and even when properly done, it does not provide a full solution. It simply requires more resources on the part of the attacker.
- recognizes the attack and denies that user further access for a given amount of time, typically by using increasing time delays
- uniformly throttles all requests in order to make it more difficult to consume resources more quickly than they can again be freed.
Mitigation
Phase: Architecture and Design
Description:
- Ensure that protocols have specific limits of scale placed on them.
Mitigation ID: MIT-38.1
Phases: Architecture and Design, Implementation
Description:
- If the program must fail, ensure that it fails gracefully (fails closed). There may be a temptation to simply let the program fail poorly in cases such as low memory conditions, but an attacker may be able to assert control before the software has fully exited. Alternately, an uncontrolled failure could cause cascading problems with other downstream components; for example, the program could send a signal to a downstream process so the process immediately knows that a problem has occurred and has a better chance of recovery.
- Ensure that all failures in resource allocation place the system into a safe posture.
Mitigation ID: MIT-47
Phases: Operation, Architecture and Design
Strategy: Resource Limitation
Description:
- Use quotas or other resource-limiting settings provided by the operating system or environment. For example, when managing system resources in POSIX, setrlimit() can be used to set limits for certain types of resources, and getrlimit() can determine how many resources are available. However, these functions are not available on all operating systems.
- When the current levels get close to the maximum that is defined for the application (see CWE-770), then limit the allocation of further resources to privileged users; alternately, begin releasing resources for less-privileged users. While this mitigation may protect the system from attack, it will not necessarily stop attackers from adversely impacting other users.
- Ensure that the application performs the appropriate error checks and error handling in case resources become unavailable (CWE-703).
CAPEC-125: Flooding
An adversary consumes the resources of a target by rapidly engaging in a large number of interactions with the target. This type of attack generally exposes a weakness in rate limiting or flow. When successful this attack prevents legitimate users from accessing the service and can cause the target to crash. This attack differs from resource depletion through leaks or allocations in that the latter attacks do not rely on the volume of requests made to the target but instead focus on manipulation of the target's operations. The key factor in a flooding attack is the number of requests the adversary can make in a given period of time. The greater this number, the more likely an attack is to succeed against a given target.
CAPEC-130: Excessive Allocation
An adversary causes the target to allocate excessive resources to servicing the attackers' request, thereby reducing the resources available for legitimate services and degrading or denying services. Usually, this attack focuses on memory allocation, but any finite resource on the target could be the attacked, including bandwidth, processing cycles, or other resources. This attack does not attempt to force this allocation through a large number of requests (that would be Resource Depletion through Flooding) but instead uses one or a small number of requests that are carefully formatted to force the target to allocate excessive resources to service this request(s). Often this attack takes advantage of a bug in the target to cause the target to allocate resources vastly beyond what would be needed for a normal request.
CAPEC-147: XML Ping of the Death
An attacker initiates a resource depletion attack where a large number of small XML messages are delivered at a sufficiently rapid rate to cause a denial of service or crash of the target. Transactions such as repetitive SOAP transactions can deplete resources faster than a simple flooding attack because of the additional resources used by the SOAP protocol and the resources necessary to process SOAP messages. The transactions used are immaterial as long as they cause resource utilization on the target. In other words, this is a normal flooding attack augmented by using messages that will require extra processing on the target.
CAPEC-197: Exponential Data Expansion
An adversary submits data to a target application which contains nested exponential data expansion to produce excessively large output. Many data format languages allow the definition of macro-like structures that can be used to simplify the creation of complex structures. However, this capability can be abused to create excessive demands on a processor's CPU and memory. A small number of nested expansions can result in an exponential growth in demands on memory.
CAPEC-229: Serialized Data Parameter Blowup
This attack exploits certain serialized data parsers (e.g., XML, YAML, etc.) which manage data in an inefficient manner. The attacker crafts an serialized data file with multiple configuration parameters in the same dataset. In a vulnerable parser, this results in a denial of service condition where CPU resources are exhausted because of the parsing algorithm. The weakness being exploited is tied to parser implementation and not language specific.
CAPEC-230: Serialized Data with Nested Payloads
Applications often need to transform data in and out of a data format (e.g., XML and YAML) by using a parser. It may be possible for an adversary to inject data that may have an adverse effect on the parser when it is being processed. Many data format languages allow the definition of macro-like structures that can be used to simplify the creation of complex structures. By nesting these structures, causing the data to be repeatedly substituted, an adversary can cause the parser to consume more resources while processing, causing excessive memory consumption and CPU utilization.
CAPEC-231: Oversized Serialized Data Payloads
An adversary injects oversized serialized data payloads into a parser during data processing to produce adverse effects upon the parser such as exhausting system resources and arbitrary code execution.
CAPEC-469: HTTP DoS
An attacker performs flooding at the HTTP level to bring down only a particular web application rather than anything listening on a TCP/IP connection. This denial of service attack requires substantially fewer packets to be sent which makes DoS harder to detect. This is an equivalent of SYN flood in HTTP. The idea is to keep the HTTP session alive indefinitely and then repeat that hundreds of times. This attack targets resource depletion weaknesses in web server software. The web server will wait to attacker's responses on the initiated HTTP sessions while the connection threads are being exhausted.
CAPEC-482: TCP Flood
An adversary may execute a flooding attack using the TCP protocol with the intent to deny legitimate users access to a service. These attacks exploit the weakness within the TCP protocol where there is some state information for the connection the server needs to maintain. This often involves the use of TCP SYN messages.
CAPEC-486: UDP Flood
An adversary may execute a flooding attack using the UDP protocol with the intent to deny legitimate users access to a service by consuming the available network bandwidth. Additionally, firewalls often open a port for each UDP connection destined for a service with an open UDP port, meaning the firewalls in essence save the connection state thus the high packet nature of a UDP flood can also overwhelm resources allocated to the firewall. UDP attacks can also target services like DNS or VoIP which utilize these protocols. Additionally, due to the session-less nature of the UDP protocol, the source of a packet is easily spoofed making it difficult to find the source of the attack.
CAPEC-487: ICMP Flood
An adversary may execute a flooding attack using the ICMP protocol with the intent to deny legitimate users access to a service by consuming the available network bandwidth. A typical attack involves a victim server receiving ICMP packets at a high rate from a wide range of source addresses. Additionally, due to the session-less nature of the ICMP protocol, the source of a packet is easily spoofed making it difficult to find the source of the attack.
CAPEC-488: HTTP Flood
An adversary may execute a flooding attack using the HTTP protocol with the intent to deny legitimate users access to a service by consuming resources at the application layer such as web services and their infrastructure. These attacks use legitimate session-based HTTP GET requests designed to consume large amounts of a server's resources. Since these are legitimate sessions this attack is very difficult to detect.
CAPEC-489: SSL Flood
An adversary may execute a flooding attack using the SSL protocol with the intent to deny legitimate users access to a service by consuming all the available resources on the server side. These attacks take advantage of the asymmetric relationship between the processing power used by the client and the processing power used by the server to create a secure connection. In this manner the attacker can make a large number of HTTPS requests on a low provisioned machine to tie up a disproportionately large number of resources on the server. The clients then continue to keep renegotiating the SSL connection. When multiplied by a large number of attacking machines, this attack can result in a crash or loss of service to legitimate users.
CAPEC-490: Amplification
An adversary may execute an amplification where the size of a response is far greater than that of the request that generates it. The goal of this attack is to use a relatively few resources to create a large amount of traffic against a target server. To execute this attack, an adversary send a request to a 3rd party service, spoofing the source address to be that of the target server. The larger response that is generated by the 3rd party service is then sent to the target server. By sending a large number of initial requests, the adversary can generate a tremendous amount of traffic directed at the target. The greater the discrepancy in size between the initial request and the final payload delivered to the target increased the effectiveness of this attack.
CAPEC-491: Quadratic Data Expansion
An adversary exploits macro-like substitution to cause a denial of service situation due to excessive memory being allocated to fully expand the data. The result of this denial of service could cause the application to freeze or crash. This involves defining a very large entity and using it multiple times in a single entity substitution. CAPEC-197 is a similar attack pattern, but it is easier to discover and defend against. This attack pattern does not perform multi-level substitution and therefore does not obviously appear to consume extensive resources.
CAPEC-493: SOAP Array Blowup
An adversary may execute an attack on a web service that uses SOAP messages in communication. By sending a very large SOAP array declaration to the web service, the attacker forces the web service to allocate space for the array elements before they are parsed by the XML parser. The attacker message is typically small in size containing a large array declaration of say 1,000,000 elements and a couple of array elements. This attack targets exhaustion of the memory resources of the web service.
CAPEC-494: TCP Fragmentation
An adversary may execute a TCP Fragmentation attack against a target with the intention of avoiding filtering rules of network controls, by attempting to fragment the TCP packet such that the headers flag field is pushed into the second fragment which typically is not filtered.
CAPEC-495: UDP Fragmentation
An attacker may execute a UDP Fragmentation attack against a target server in an attempt to consume resources such as bandwidth and CPU. IP fragmentation occurs when an IP datagram is larger than the MTU of the route the datagram has to traverse. Typically the attacker will use large UDP packets over 1500 bytes of data which forces fragmentation as ethernet MTU is 1500 bytes. This attack is a variation on a typical UDP flood but it enables more network bandwidth to be consumed with fewer packets. Additionally it has the potential to consume server CPU resources and fill memory buffers associated with the processing and reassembling of fragmented packets.
CAPEC-496: ICMP Fragmentation
An attacker may execute a ICMP Fragmentation attack against a target with the intention of consuming resources or causing a crash. The attacker crafts a large number of identical fragmented IP packets containing a portion of a fragmented ICMP message. The attacker these sends these messages to a target host which causes the host to become non-responsive. Another vector may be sending a fragmented ICMP message to a target host with incorrect sizes in the header which causes the host to hang.
CAPEC-528: XML Flood
An adversary may execute a flooding attack using XML messages with the intent to deny legitimate users access to a web service. These attacks are accomplished by sending a large number of XML based requests and letting the service attempt to parse each one. In many cases this type of an attack will result in a XML Denial of Service (XDoS) due to an application becoming unstable, freezing, or crashing.