Common Weakness Enumeration

CWE-862

Allowed-with-Review

Missing Authorization

Abstraction: Class · Status: Incomplete

The product does not perform an authorization check when an actor attempts to access a resource or perform an action.

14602 vulnerabilities reference this CWE, most recent first.

GHSA-WQ8H-VPFM-4FRM

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-11-06 18:32 – Updated: 2026-01-20 15:31
VLAI
Details

Missing Authorization vulnerability in ThemeNectar Salient salient.This issue affects Salient: from n/a through < 17.4.0.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2025-62028"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-862"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2025-11-06T16:16:08Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "Missing Authorization vulnerability in ThemeNectar Salient salient.This issue affects Salient: from n/a through \u003c 17.4.0.",
  "id": "GHSA-wq8h-vpfm-4frm",
  "modified": "2026-01-20T15:31:52Z",
  "published": "2025-11-06T18:32:56Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-62028"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://patchstack.com/database/Wordpress/Theme/salient/vulnerability/wordpress-salient-theme-17-4-0-broken-access-control-vulnerability?_s_id=cve"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://vdp.patchstack.com/database/Wordpress/Theme/salient/vulnerability/wordpress-salient-theme-17-4-0-broken-access-control-vulnerability"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://vdp.patchstack.com/database/Wordpress/Theme/salient/vulnerability/wordpress-salient-theme-17-4-0-broken-access-control-vulnerability?_s_id=cve"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-WQ9H-H745-R69V

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-11-16 06:30 – Updated: 2024-11-16 06:30
VLAI
Details

The WP Log Viewer plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to unauthorized use of functionality due to a missing capability check on several AJAX actions in all versions up to, and including, 1.2.1. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Subscriber-level access and above, to access logs, update plugin-related user settings and general plugin settings.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2024-11085"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-862"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2024-11-16T04:15:05Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "The WP Log Viewer plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to unauthorized use of functionality due to a missing capability check on several AJAX actions in all versions up to, and including, 1.2.1. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Subscriber-level access and above, to access logs, update plugin-related user settings and general plugin settings.",
  "id": "GHSA-wq9h-h745-r69v",
  "modified": "2024-11-16T06:30:40Z",
  "published": "2024-11-16T06:30:40Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-11085"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/wp-log-viewer/trunk/libs/Ajax.php"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.wordfence.com/threat-intel/vulnerabilities/id/e27bd526-1a5f-4628-8bb2-1741496f897f?source=cve"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-WQC4-CWR9-MWW9

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-08-28 06:30 – Updated: 2025-08-28 06:30
VLAI
Details

Multiple plugins and/or themes for WordPress by LiquidThemes are vulnerable to unauthorized access due to a missing capability check on the liquid_reset_wordpress_before AJAX in various versions. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Subscriber-level access and above, to deactivate all of a site's plugins. While we escalated this to Envato after not being able to establish contact, it appears the developer added a nonce check, however that is not sufficient protection as the nonce is exposed to all users with access to the dashboard.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2025-0951"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-862"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2025-08-28T04:15:56Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "Multiple plugins and/or themes for WordPress by LiquidThemes are vulnerable to unauthorized access due to a missing capability check on the liquid_reset_wordpress_before AJAX in various versions. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Subscriber-level access and above, to deactivate all of a site\u0027s plugins. While we escalated this to Envato after not being able to establish contact, it appears the developer added a nonce check, however that is not sufficient protection as the nonce is exposed to all users with access to the dashboard.",
  "id": "GHSA-wqc4-cwr9-mww9",
  "modified": "2025-08-28T06:30:57Z",
  "published": "2025-08-28T06:30:57Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-0951"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://themeforest.net/user/liquidthemes"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.wordfence.com/threat-intel/vulnerabilities/id/0099c700-e1af-4d97-a518-151a9139ea35?source=cve"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-WQCW-G35J-J578

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-05-05 21:49 – Updated: 2026-05-13 16:27
VLAI
Summary
Kubewarden vulnerable to RBAC Reconnaissance via unchecked can_i host capability call
Details

Impact

Kubewarden is a policy engine for Kubernetes. Kubewarden cluster operators can grant permissions to users to deploy namespaced AdmissionPolicies and AdmissionPolicyGroups in their Namespaces. One of Kubewarden promises is that configured users can deploy namespaced policies in a safe manner, without privilege escalation.

An attacker with privileged AdmissionPolicy or AdmissionPolicyGroup create permissions (which isn't the default) can craft a policy that makes use of the can_i host callback. The callback issues a SubjectAccessReview (SAR) requests to enumerate RBAC permissions of any user or service account across the cluster. Three operations on the host capabilities kubewarden/kubernetes binding enforce the context-aware allow-list via can_access_kubernetes_resource():

  • list_resources_by_namespace
  • list_resources_all
  • get_resource

However, can_i does not perform that check and forwards the request directly to the callback handler, which executes a real SubjectAccessReview using policy-server privileges. This creates a policy-level authorization gap: can_i is effectively usable even when the policy has no context-aware resource grant.

This is an information disclosure / reconnaissance issue, and not direct workload data exfiltration. The attacker learns permission information, such as whether specific service accounts can "get secrets", "create pods", or "bind clusterroles" in chosen namespaces.

Patches

Cluster Operators, if providing their users with privileges to deploy AdmissionPolicies or AdmissionPolicygroups (which isn't the default), must then also deploy PolicyServers with reduced permissions for host capability calls. This includes the PolicyServer default. For that, make use of the new feature in v1.35: - For custom PolicyServers: Set the new PolicyServer.spec.namespacedPoliciesCapabilities , for example to an empty list [] which doesn't allow any capability. - For the default PolicyServer, set the .Values.policyServer.namespacedPoliciesCapabilities , for example to an empty list [] which doesn't allow any capability.

Also, if needed, they must ensure that those namespaced AdmissionPolicies or AdmissionPolicygroups are scheduled in the PolicyServers with reduced permissions. For that, they could make use of the new ns-policyserver-mapper policy, their own policy or other means, such as GitOps.

See: https://docs.kubewarden.io/howtos/policy-servers/namespaced-policies-capabilities

Workarounds

Cluster Operators can opt for: - Not allowing users to create namespaced policies (AdmissionPolicies, AdmissionPolicyGroups). - Removing SubjectAccessReview "create" permissions for the PolicyServer ServiceAccount RBAC being used, in custom PolicyServers and the PolicyServer default.

Resources

  • Code changes, with new security feature: https://github.com/kubewarden/kubewarden-controller/pull/1693
  • Documentation changes: https://github.com/kubewarden/docs/pull/737
  • Explained new feature on 1.35.0
  • Updated Threat model assessment
Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Go",
        "name": "github.com/kubewarden/kubewarden-controller"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "1.35.0"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-42541"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-862"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2026-05-05T21:49:03Z",
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-05-12T18:17:24Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "### Impact\nKubewarden is a policy engine for Kubernetes. Kubewarden cluster operators can grant permissions to users to deploy namespaced AdmissionPolicies and AdmissionPolicyGroups in their Namespaces. One of Kubewarden promises is that configured users can deploy namespaced policies in a safe manner, without privilege escalation.\n\nAn attacker with privileged AdmissionPolicy or AdmissionPolicyGroup create permissions (which isn\u0027t the default) can craft a policy that makes use of the `can_i` host callback. The callback issues a SubjectAccessReview (SAR) requests to enumerate RBAC permissions of any user or service account across the cluster. Three operations on the host capabilities `kubewarden/kubernetes` binding enforce the context-aware allow-list via `can_access_kubernetes_resource()`:\n\n- `list_resources_by_namespace`\n- `list_resources_all`\n- `get_resource`\n\nHowever, `can_i` does not perform that check and forwards the request directly to the callback handler, which executes a real SubjectAccessReview using policy-server privileges. This creates a policy-level authorization gap: `can_i` is effectively usable even when the policy has no context-aware resource grant.\n\nThis is an information disclosure / reconnaissance issue, and not direct workload data exfiltration. The attacker learns permission information, such as whether specific service accounts can \"get secrets\", \"create pods\", or \"bind clusterroles\" in chosen namespaces.\n\n### Patches\n\nCluster Operators, if providing their users with privileges to deploy AdmissionPolicies or AdmissionPolicygroups (which isn\u0027t the default), must then also deploy PolicyServers with reduced permissions for host capability calls. This includes the PolicyServer `default`. \nFor that, make use of the new feature in v1.35:\n- For custom PolicyServers: Set the new `PolicyServer.spec.namespacedPoliciesCapabilities` , for example to an empty list `[]` which doesn\u0027t allow any capability.\n- For the `default` PolicyServer, set the `.Values.policyServer.namespacedPoliciesCapabilities` , for example to an empty list `[]` which doesn\u0027t allow any capability. \n\nAlso, if needed, they must ensure that those namespaced AdmissionPolicies or AdmissionPolicygroups are scheduled in the PolicyServers with reduced permissions.\nFor that, they could make use of the new [ns-policyserver-mapper](https://artifacthub.io/packages/kubewarden/kubewarden-policy-library/ns-policyserver-mapper) policy, their own policy or other means, such as GitOps.\n\nSee: https://docs.kubewarden.io/howtos/policy-servers/namespaced-policies-capabilities\n\n### Workarounds\n\nCluster Operators can opt for:\n- Not allowing users to create namespaced policies (AdmissionPolicies, AdmissionPolicyGroups).\n- Removing SubjectAccessReview \"create\" permissions for the PolicyServer ServiceAccount RBAC being used, in custom PolicyServers and the  PolicyServer `default`.\n\n### Resources\n\n- Code changes, with new security feature: https://github.com/kubewarden/kubewarden-controller/pull/1693\n- Documentation changes: https://github.com/kubewarden/docs/pull/737\n  - Explained new feature on 1.35.0\n  - Updated Threat model assessment",
  "id": "GHSA-wqcw-g35j-j578",
  "modified": "2026-05-13T16:27:04Z",
  "published": "2026-05-05T21:49:03Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/kubewarden/adm-controller/security/advisories/GHSA-wqcw-g35j-j578"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/kubewarden/kubewarden-controller/security/advisories/GHSA-wqcw-g35j-j578"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-42541"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/kubewarden/docs/pull/737"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/kubewarden/kubewarden-controller/pull/1693"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://docs.kubewarden.io/howtos/policy-servers/namespaced-policies-capabilities"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/kubewarden/kubewarden-controller"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "Kubewarden vulnerable to RBAC Reconnaissance via unchecked can_i host capability call"
}

GHSA-WQF3-6PF2-M6R6

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-12-16 09:31 – Updated: 2026-01-20 15:32
VLAI
Details

Missing Authorization vulnerability in Brevo Sendinblue for WooCommerce woocommerce-sendinblue-newsletter-subscription allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels.This issue affects Sendinblue for WooCommerce: from n/a through <= 4.0.49.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2025-66128"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-862"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2025-12-16T09:15:57Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "Missing Authorization vulnerability in Brevo Sendinblue for WooCommerce woocommerce-sendinblue-newsletter-subscription allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels.This issue affects Sendinblue for WooCommerce: from n/a through \u003c= 4.0.49.",
  "id": "GHSA-wqf3-6pf2-m6r6",
  "modified": "2026-01-20T15:32:14Z",
  "published": "2025-12-16T09:31:09Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-66128"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://patchstack.com/database/Wordpress/Plugin/woocommerce-sendinblue-newsletter-subscription/vulnerability/wordpress-sendinblue-for-woocommerce-plugin-4-0-49-broken-access-control-vulnerability?_s_id=cve"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://vdp.patchstack.com/database/Wordpress/Plugin/woocommerce-sendinblue-newsletter-subscription/vulnerability/wordpress-sendinblue-for-woocommerce-plugin-4-0-49-broken-access-control-vulnerability?_s_id=cve"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-WQFH-GQ79-J8MF

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-05-08 22:46 – Updated: 2026-06-08 23:47
VLAI
Summary
free5GC's NEF nnef-callback route group is unauthenticated; forged callback requests are accepted into the processing path
Details

Summary

free5GC's NEF mounts the nnef-callback route group without inbound OAuth2/bearer-token authorization. A forged or arbitrary bearer token (e.g. Authorization: Bearer not-a-real-token) is enough to reach the SMF-callback handler -- the callback body is parsed and dispatched into NEF business logic instead of being rejected at the auth boundary. Same root cause as the other NEF SBI findings: the route group is mounted without any inbound auth middleware. NEF does not authenticate the producer NF identity before processing callback content; if an attacker can guess or obtain a valid NotifId, this missing auth boundary lets forged callbacks act on real subscription state. The route group is also reachable even when the runtime ServiceList does not declare it (it lists only nnef-pfdmanagement and nnef-oam).

Details

Validated against the NEF container in the official Docker compose lab. - Running Docker image: free5gc/nef:v4.2.1 - Docker validation date: 2026-03-11

NEF advertises OAuth2 setting receive from NRF: true, yet the nnef-callback route group is mounted with no inbound auth middleware. The API layer reads the raw request body and deserializes it before any auth check, then the processor looks up subscription state by NotifId.

Code evidence (paths in free5gc/nef): - Callback route group mounted without auth middleware: NFs/nef/internal/sbi/server.go:64 - Callback route exposed at /notification/smf: NFs/nef/internal/sbi/api_callback.go:13 - API layer reads raw request bytes and deserializes them before any auth check: NFs/nef/internal/sbi/api_callback.go:23 - Processor looks up the subscription by NotifId: NFs/nef/internal/sbi/processor/callback.go:13 - NEF context only exposes outbound token acquisition (GetTokenCtx); there is no inbound authorization path: NFs/nef/internal/context/nef_context.go:153 - Config validation only allows nnef-pfdmanagement and nnef-oam: NFs/nef/pkg/factory/config.go:126

PoC

Reproduced against the running NEF at http://10.100.200.19:8000 using a fabricated bearer token.

Send a forged callback request:

curl -i \
  -H 'Authorization: Bearer not-a-real-token' \
  -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
  --data '{"notifId":"forged-notif","eventNotifs":[]}' \
  http://10.100.200.19:8000/nnef-callback/v1/notification/smf

Observed output:

HTTP/1.1 404 Not Found
{"title":"Data not found","status":404,"detail":"Subscription is not found"}

The 404 is positive auth-bypass evidence: the request was parsed and dispatched into the callback business handler instead of being rejected at the auth boundary. NEF container logs (docker logs nef) confirm the callback handler was reached:

[INFO][NEF][TraffInfl] SmfNotification - NotifId[forged-notif]
[INFO][NEF][GIN] | 404 | POST | /nnef-callback/v1/notification/smf

Impact

Missing inbound authentication (CWE-306) and authorization (CWE-862) on the NEF nnef-callback SBI route group. This is the trusted ingestion point for SMF -> NEF notifications. The defect is route-group-scoped: there is no auth middleware on the group at all, so every callback endpoint inside this group inherits the missing inbound auth boundary. Severity is scored against the route group's intended capability surface (consume SMF notifications and mutate NEF / downstream subscription state), NOT against the specific PoC where the chosen NotifId happened to be invalid.

Any party that can reach NEF on the SBI can: - Submit forged SMF callbacks to NEF anonymously, with body content fully controlled by the attacker. - Reach NEF callback business logic without proving producer NF identity, so any attacker who can guess or obtain a valid NotifId can deliver forged event notifications against real subscription state -- corrupting AF traffic-influence / PFD-management subscription views and the downstream SMF/UPF policy decisions that depend on them. - Hit any future callback added behind this same route group anonymously, because the auth boundary does not exist for this group.

The nnef-callback route group is also reachable even when the runtime ServiceList does not declare it, so operators relying on ServiceList to disable the service do not actually get that protection.

Affected: free5gc v4.2.1.

Upstream issue: https://github.com/free5gc/free5gc/issues/860 Upstream fix: https://github.com/free5gc/nef/pull/24

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Go",
        "name": "github.com/free5gc/nef"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "last_affected": "1.2.3"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-44320"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-306",
      "CWE-862"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2026-05-08T22:46:37Z",
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-05-27T17:16:37Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "### Summary\nfree5GC\u0027s NEF mounts the `nnef-callback` route group without inbound OAuth2/bearer-token authorization. A forged or arbitrary bearer token (e.g. `Authorization: Bearer not-a-real-token`) is enough to reach the SMF-callback handler -- the callback body is parsed and dispatched into NEF business logic instead of being rejected at the auth boundary. Same root cause as the other NEF SBI findings: the route group is mounted without any inbound auth middleware. NEF does not authenticate the producer NF identity before processing callback content; if an attacker can guess or obtain a valid `NotifId`, this missing auth boundary lets forged callbacks act on real subscription state. The route group is also reachable even when the runtime `ServiceList` does not declare it (it lists only `nnef-pfdmanagement` and `nnef-oam`).\n\n### Details\nValidated against the NEF container in the official Docker compose lab.\n- Running Docker image: `free5gc/nef:v4.2.1`\n- Docker validation date: 2026-03-11\n\nNEF advertises `OAuth2 setting receive from NRF: true`, yet the `nnef-callback` route group is mounted with no inbound auth middleware. The API layer reads the raw request body and deserializes it before any auth check, then the processor looks up subscription state by `NotifId`.\n\nCode evidence (paths in `free5gc/nef`):\n- Callback route group mounted without auth middleware: `NFs/nef/internal/sbi/server.go:64`\n- Callback route exposed at `/notification/smf`: `NFs/nef/internal/sbi/api_callback.go:13`\n- API layer reads raw request bytes and deserializes them before any auth check: `NFs/nef/internal/sbi/api_callback.go:23`\n- Processor looks up the subscription by `NotifId`: `NFs/nef/internal/sbi/processor/callback.go:13`\n- NEF context only exposes outbound token acquisition (`GetTokenCtx`); there is no inbound authorization path: `NFs/nef/internal/context/nef_context.go:153`\n- Config validation only allows `nnef-pfdmanagement` and `nnef-oam`: `NFs/nef/pkg/factory/config.go:126`\n\n### PoC\nReproduced against the running NEF at `http://10.100.200.19:8000` using a fabricated bearer token.\n\nSend a forged callback request:\n```\ncurl -i \\\n  -H \u0027Authorization: Bearer not-a-real-token\u0027 \\\n  -H \u0027Content-Type: application/json\u0027 \\\n  --data \u0027{\"notifId\":\"forged-notif\",\"eventNotifs\":[]}\u0027 \\\n  http://10.100.200.19:8000/nnef-callback/v1/notification/smf\n```\n\nObserved output:\n```\nHTTP/1.1 404 Not Found\n{\"title\":\"Data not found\",\"status\":404,\"detail\":\"Subscription is not found\"}\n```\n\nThe `404` is positive auth-bypass evidence: the request was parsed and dispatched into the callback business handler instead of being rejected at the auth boundary. NEF container logs (`docker logs nef`) confirm the callback handler was reached:\n```\n[INFO][NEF][TraffInfl] SmfNotification - NotifId[forged-notif]\n[INFO][NEF][GIN] | 404 | POST | /nnef-callback/v1/notification/smf\n```\n\n### Impact\nMissing inbound authentication (CWE-306) and authorization (CWE-862) on the NEF `nnef-callback` SBI route group. This is the trusted ingestion point for SMF -\u003e NEF notifications. The defect is route-group-scoped: there is no auth middleware on the group at all, so every callback endpoint inside this group inherits the missing inbound auth boundary. Severity is scored against the route group\u0027s intended capability surface (consume SMF notifications and mutate NEF / downstream subscription state), NOT against the specific PoC where the chosen `NotifId` happened to be invalid.\n\nAny party that can reach NEF on the SBI can:\n- Submit forged SMF callbacks to NEF anonymously, with body content fully controlled by the attacker.\n- Reach NEF callback business logic without proving producer NF identity, so any attacker who can guess or obtain a valid `NotifId` can deliver forged event notifications against real subscription state -- corrupting AF traffic-influence / PFD-management subscription views and the downstream SMF/UPF policy decisions that depend on them.\n- Hit any future callback added behind this same route group anonymously, because the auth boundary does not exist for this group.\n\nThe `nnef-callback` route group is also reachable even when the runtime `ServiceList` does not declare it, so operators relying on `ServiceList` to disable the service do not actually get that protection.\n\nAffected: free5gc v4.2.1.\n\nUpstream issue: https://github.com/free5gc/free5gc/issues/860\nUpstream fix: https://github.com/free5gc/nef/pull/24",
  "id": "GHSA-wqfh-gq79-j8mf",
  "modified": "2026-06-08T23:47:16Z",
  "published": "2026-05-08T22:46:37Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/free5gc/free5gc/security/advisories/GHSA-wqfh-gq79-j8mf"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-44320"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/free5gc/free5gc/issues/860"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/free5gc/nef/pull/24"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/free5gc/free5gc"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "free5GC\u0027s NEF nnef-callback route group is unauthenticated; forged callback requests are accepted into the processing path"
}

GHSA-WQJF-7QXP-8HC8

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-10-16 09:30 – Updated: 2024-10-16 09:30
VLAI
Details

The Indeed Membership Pro plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to authorization bypass due to missing capability checks on various AJAX actions in versions 7.3 - 8.6. This makes it possible for authenticated attacker, with minimal permission, such as a subscriber, to perform a variety of actions such as modifying settings and viewing sensitive data.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2020-36833"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-862"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2024-10-16T07:15:07Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "The Indeed Membership Pro plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to authorization bypass due to missing capability checks on various AJAX actions in versions 7.3 - 8.6. This makes it possible for authenticated attacker, with minimal permission, such as a subscriber, to perform a variety of actions such as modifying settings and viewing sensitive data.",
  "id": "GHSA-wqjf-7qxp-8hc8",
  "modified": "2024-10-16T09:30:30Z",
  "published": "2024-10-16T09:30:30Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2020-36833"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://wpscan.com/vulnerability/9811025e-ab17-4255-aaaf-4f0306f5d281"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.wordfence.com/threat-intel/vulnerabilities/id/ab1cc1ef-d0e0-491d-91a8-eaa0605fc1da?source=cve"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-WQJF-RX4G-QXMR

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-02-21 06:30 – Updated: 2024-02-21 06:30
VLAI
Details

The WooCommerce Google Sheet Connector plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to unauthorized modification of data due to a missing capability check on the execute_post_data function in all versions up to, and including, 1.3.11. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update plugin settings.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2024-1562"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-862"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2024-02-21T04:15:07Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "The WooCommerce Google Sheet Connector plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to unauthorized modification of data due to a missing capability check on the execute_post_data function in all versions up to, and including, 1.3.11. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update plugin settings.",
  "id": "GHSA-wqjf-rx4g-qxmr",
  "modified": "2024-02-21T06:30:32Z",
  "published": "2024-02-21T06:30:32Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-1562"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/changeset?sfp_email=\u0026sfph_mail=\u0026reponame=\u0026old=3038517%40wc-gsheetconnector\u0026new=3038517%40wc-gsheetconnector\u0026sfp_email=\u0026sfph_mail="
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.wordfence.com/threat-intel/vulnerabilities/id/e36df7b7-fcbc-4e5d-812c-861bfe8abb55?source=cve"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-WQM5-MW93-49XF

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2023-09-14 06:30 – Updated: 2024-04-04 07:40
VLAI
Details

The WooCommerce CVR Payment Gateway plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to unauthorized modification of data due to a missing capability check on the refresh_order_cvr_data AJAX action in versions up to 6.1.0. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers with contributor-level access and above, to update CVR numbers for orders.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2023-4948"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-862"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2023-09-14T04:15:10Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "The WooCommerce CVR Payment Gateway plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to unauthorized modification of data due to a missing capability check on the refresh_order_cvr_data AJAX action in versions up to 6.1.0. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers with contributor-level access and above, to update CVR numbers for orders.",
  "id": "GHSA-wqm5-mw93-49xf",
  "modified": "2024-04-04T07:40:01Z",
  "published": "2023-09-14T06:30:19Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-4948"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://plugins.yanco.dk/product/woocommerce-cvr-payment-gateway"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.wordfence.com/threat-intel/vulnerabilities/id/f72ba0e2-a9c4-43b0-a01f-185554090162?source=cve"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-WQP4-7XMQ-WW2W

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-06-09 18:30 – Updated: 2026-04-01 18:31
VLAI
Details

Missing Authorization vulnerability in Premmerce Premmerce Product Filter for WooCommerce.This issue affects Premmerce Product Filter for WooCommerce: from n/a through 3.7.2.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2024-31359"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-862"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2024-06-09T18:15:10Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "Missing Authorization vulnerability in Premmerce Premmerce Product Filter for WooCommerce.This issue affects Premmerce Product Filter for WooCommerce: from n/a through 3.7.2.",
  "id": "GHSA-wqp4-7xmq-ww2w",
  "modified": "2026-04-01T18:31:48Z",
  "published": "2024-06-09T18:30:36Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-31359"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://patchstack.com/database/Wordpress/Plugin/premmerce-woocommerce-product-filter/vulnerability/wordpress-premmerce-product-filter-for-woocommerce-plugin-3-7-2-broken-access-control-vulnerability?_s_id=cve"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://patchstack.com/database/vulnerability/premmerce-woocommerce-product-filter/wordpress-premmerce-product-filter-for-woocommerce-plugin-3-7-2-broken-access-control-vulnerability?_s_id=cve"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

Mitigation
Architecture and Design
  • Divide the product into anonymous, normal, privileged, and administrative areas. Reduce the attack surface by carefully mapping roles with data and functionality. Use role-based access control (RBAC) [REF-229] to enforce the roles at the appropriate boundaries.
  • Note that this approach may not protect against horizontal authorization, i.e., it will not protect a user from attacking others with the same role.
Mitigation
Architecture and Design

Ensure that access control checks are performed related to the business logic. These checks may be different than the access control checks that are applied to more generic resources such as files, connections, processes, memory, and database records. For example, a database may restrict access for medical records to a specific database user, but each record might only be intended to be accessible to the patient and the patient's doctor [REF-7].

Mitigation MIT-4.4
Architecture and Design

Strategy: Libraries or Frameworks

  • Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid.
  • For example, consider using authorization frameworks such as the JAAS Authorization Framework [REF-233] and the OWASP ESAPI Access Control feature [REF-45].
Mitigation
Architecture and Design
  • For web applications, make sure that the access control mechanism is enforced correctly at the server side on every page. Users should not be able to access any unauthorized functionality or information by simply requesting direct access to that page.
  • One way to do this is to ensure that all pages containing sensitive information are not cached, and that all such pages restrict access to requests that are accompanied by an active and authenticated session token associated with a user who has the required permissions to access that page.
Mitigation
System Configuration Installation

Use the access control capabilities of your operating system and server environment and define your access control lists accordingly. Use a "default deny" policy when defining these ACLs.

CAPEC-665: Exploitation of Thunderbolt Protection Flaws

An adversary leverages a firmware weakness within the Thunderbolt protocol, on a computing device to manipulate Thunderbolt controller firmware in order to exploit vulnerabilities in the implementation of authorization and verification schemes within Thunderbolt protection mechanisms. Upon gaining physical access to a target device, the adversary conducts high-level firmware manipulation of the victim Thunderbolt controller SPI (Serial Peripheral Interface) flash, through the use of a SPI Programing device and an external Thunderbolt device, typically as the target device is booting up. If successful, this allows the adversary to modify memory, subvert authentication mechanisms, spoof identities and content, and extract data and memory from the target device. Currently 7 major vulnerabilities exist within Thunderbolt protocol with 9 attack vectors as noted in the Execution Flow.