CWE-862
Weakness Allowed-with-ReviewMissing Authorization
Abstraction: Class · Status: Incomplete
The product does not perform an authorization check when an actor attempts to access a resource or perform an action.
Dimensions
- Behavior-Property: Missing
- Behavior-Type: Authorization
Mapping guidance
This CWE entry is a Class and might have Base-level children that would be more appropriate
Examine children of this entry to see if there is a better fit
Relationships and members
Modes of introduction
OMISSION: This weakness is caused by missing a security tactic during the architecture and design phase.
Authorization weaknesses may arise when a single-user application is ported to a multi-user environment.
A developer may introduce authorization weaknesses because of a lack of understanding about the underlying technologies. For example, a developer may assume that attackers cannot modify certain inputs such as headers or cookies.
Detection methods
Automated Static Analysis
Automated static analysis is useful for detecting commonly-used idioms for authorization. A tool may be able to analyze related configuration files, such as .htaccess in Apache web servers, or detect the usage of commonly-used authorization libraries.
Generally, automated static analysis tools have difficulty detecting custom authorization schemes. In addition, the software's design may include some functionality that is accessible to any user and does not require an authorization check; an automated technique that detects the absence of authorization may report false positives.
Effectiveness: Limited
Automated Dynamic Analysis
Automated dynamic analysis may find many or all possible interfaces that do not require authorization, but manual analysis is required to determine if the lack of authorization violates business logic.
Manual Analysis
This weakness can be detected using tools and techniques that require manual (human) analysis, such as penetration testing, threat modeling, and interactive tools that allow the tester to record and modify an active session.
Specifically, manual static analysis is useful for evaluating the correctness of custom authorization mechanisms.
Effectiveness: Moderate
These may be more effective than strictly automated techniques. This is especially the case with weaknesses that are related to design and business rules. However, manual efforts might not achieve desired code coverage within limited time constraints.
Manual Static Analysis - Binary or Bytecode
According to SOAR [REF-1479], the following detection techniques may be useful:
Cost effective for partial coverage:
Binary / Bytecode disassembler - then use manual analysis for vulnerabilities & anomalies
Effectiveness: SOAR Partial
Dynamic Analysis with Automated Results Interpretation
According to SOAR [REF-1479], the following detection techniques may be useful:
Cost effective for partial coverage:
Web Application Scanner
Web Services Scanner
Database Scanners
Effectiveness: SOAR Partial
Dynamic Analysis with Manual Results Interpretation
According to SOAR [REF-1479], the following detection techniques may be useful:
Cost effective for partial coverage:
Host Application Interface Scanner
Fuzz Tester
Framework-based Fuzzer
Effectiveness: SOAR Partial
Manual Static Analysis - Source Code
According to SOAR [REF-1479], the following detection techniques may be useful:
Cost effective for partial coverage:
Focused Manual Spotcheck - Focused manual analysis of source
Manual Source Code Review (not inspections)
Effectiveness: SOAR Partial
Automated Static Analysis - Source Code
According to SOAR [REF-1479], the following detection techniques may be useful:
Cost effective for partial coverage:
Source code Weakness Analyzer
Context-configured Source Code Weakness Analyzer
Effectiveness: SOAR Partial
Architecture or Design Review
According to SOAR [REF-1479], the following detection techniques may be useful:
Highly cost effective:
Inspection (IEEE 1028 standard) (can apply to requirements, design, source code, etc.)
Formal Methods / Correct-By-Construction
Effectiveness: High
Notes
Terminology
Assuming a user with a given identity, authorization is the process of determining whether that user can access a given resource, based on the user's privileges and any permissions or other access-control specifications that apply to the resource.
Content history
Suggested mappings to ISA/IEC 62443.
Provided diagram to improve CWE usability
updated Demonstrative_Examples, Related_Attack_Patterns, Relationships
updated Potential_Mitigations, References, Relationships
updated Demonstrative_Examples, Observed_Examples, References, Relationships
updated Potential_Mitigations
updated Relationships
updated Detection_Factors
updated Relationships
updated Applicable_Platforms, Modes_of_Introduction, References, Relationships
updated References
updated Relationships
updated Relationships
updated Relationships
updated Relationships
updated Alternate_Terms, Observed_Examples
updated Observed_Examples, Related_Attack_Patterns, Relationships
updated Relationships
updated Relationships
updated Observed_Examples
updated Description, Potential_Mitigations
updated References, Relationships, Taxonomy_Mappings
updated Mapping_Notes, Relationships, Taxonomy_Mappings
updated Common_Consequences, Description, Diagram, Relationships, Terminology_Notes
updated Applicable_Platforms, Detection_Factors, Observed_Examples, References
updated Applicable_Platforms, Relationships, Weakness_Ordinalities
updated Applicable_Platforms, Observed_Examples, Relationships
updated Applicable_Platforms, Dimensions, References, Relationships, Taxonomy_Mappings
20019 vulnerabilities reference this CWE, most recent first.
GHSA-G2CC-QR3J-8V4W
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-12-09 15:31 – Updated: 2026-04-28 21:35Missing Authorization vulnerability in WP OnlineSupport, Essential Plugin Meta slider and carousel with lightbox allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels.This issue affects Meta slider and carousel with lightbox: from n/a through 1.6.2.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2023-25703"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-862"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2024-12-09T13:15:23Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Missing Authorization vulnerability in WP OnlineSupport, Essential Plugin Meta slider and carousel with lightbox allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels.This issue affects Meta slider and carousel with lightbox: from n/a through 1.6.2.",
"id": "GHSA-g2cc-qr3j-8v4w",
"modified": "2026-04-28T21:35:16Z",
"published": "2024-12-09T15:31:34Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-25703"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://patchstack.com/database/wordpress/plugin/meta-slider-and-carousel-with-lightbox/vulnerability/wordpress-meta-slider-and-carousel-with-lightbox-plugin-1-6-2-broken-access-control?_s_id=cve"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-G2F4-5QVJ-4MPW
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-12-20 18:30 – Updated: 2022-12-20 18:30In onCreate of WifiDppConfiguratorActivity.java, there is a possible way for a guest user to add a WiFi configuration due to a missing permission check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.Product: AndroidVersions: Android-13Android ID: A-224772890
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2022-20503"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-862"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2022-12-16T16:15:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "In onCreate of WifiDppConfiguratorActivity.java, there is a possible way for a guest user to add a WiFi configuration due to a missing permission check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.Product: AndroidVersions: Android-13Android ID: A-224772890",
"id": "GHSA-g2f4-5qvj-4mpw",
"modified": "2022-12-20T18:30:19Z",
"published": "2022-12-20T18:30:19Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-20503"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://source.android.com/security/bulletin/pixel/2022-12-01"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-G2FF-QW45-V2Q6
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-24 17:36 – Updated: 2022-05-24 17:36A privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the WinRing0x64 Driver Privileged I/O Write IRPs functionality of NZXT CAM 4.8.0. A specially crafted I/O request packet (IRP) can cause increased privileges. Using the IRP 0x9c40a0e0 gives a low privilege user direct access to the OUT instruction that is completely unrestrained at an elevated privilege level. An attacker can send a malicious IRP to trigger this vulnerability.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2020-13514"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-269",
"CWE-862"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2020-12-18T20:15:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "A privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the WinRing0x64 Driver Privileged I/O Write IRPs functionality of NZXT CAM 4.8.0. A specially crafted I/O request packet (IRP) can cause increased privileges. Using the IRP 0x9c40a0e0 gives a low privilege user direct access to the OUT instruction that is completely unrestrained at an elevated privilege level. An attacker can send a malicious IRP to trigger this vulnerability.",
"id": "GHSA-g2ff-qw45-v2q6",
"modified": "2022-05-24T17:36:49Z",
"published": "2022-05-24T17:36:49Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2020-13514"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://talosintelligence.com/vulnerability_reports/TALOS-2020-1111"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-G2FM-8HR4-J82H
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-09-02 14:39 – Updated: 2026-09-02 14:39Summary
EasyAdmin serves all backend requests through a single dashboard route and, for custom actions (Action::linkToRoute() / MenuItem::linkToRoute()), swaps the executed controller based on the routeName query parameter on the kernel.controller event.
That swap happens after Symfony's security firewall has already evaluated access_control against the original dashboard URL, and the routeName value was not validated. As a result, a path-based access_control rule protecting the target route was never evaluated, so a low-privilege backend user could reach a more restricted route by name.
Impact
Any application where access_control (or another path-based Symfony security rule) protects some routes more strictly than the dashboard URL used to reach EasyAdmin. An attacker who can reach a single EasyAdmin URL and knows a target route's name can execute that route's controller, bypassing the path-based rule.
Only path-based protections are bypassed. Routes whose controller enforces its own authorization with #[IsGranted] / denyAccessUnlessGranted() remain protected, because those checks are recomputed against the swapped-in controller.
Patches
Fixed in 4.29.16 and 5.5.1. Before dispatching a custom-action route, EasyAdmin now re-evaluates the target route's access_control rule and denies the request if the current user is not granted access.
Workarounds
Add controller-level authorization (#[IsGranted] / denyAccessUnlessGranted()) to any sensitive route, since controller-level checks are still enforced. Upgrading is the recommended fix.
Credits
Reported by @TungNGo02.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Packagist",
"name": "easycorp/easyadmin-bundle"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "4.0.0"
},
{
"fixed": "4.29.16"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
},
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Packagist",
"name": "easycorp/easyadmin-bundle"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "5.0.0"
},
{
"fixed": "5.5.1"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-81892"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-639",
"CWE-862",
"CWE-863"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-09-02T14:39:11Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2026-08-31T21:17:52Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "## Summary\n\nEasyAdmin serves all backend requests through a single dashboard route and, for custom actions (`Action::linkToRoute()` / `MenuItem::linkToRoute()`), swaps the executed controller based on the `routeName` query parameter on the `kernel.controller` event.\n\nThat swap happens **after** Symfony\u0027s security firewall has already evaluated `access_control` against the original dashboard URL, and the `routeName` value was not validated. As a result, a path-based `access_control` rule protecting the *target* route was never evaluated, so a low-privilege backend user could reach a more restricted route by name.\n\n## Impact\n\nAny application where `access_control` (or another path-based Symfony security rule) protects some routes more strictly than the dashboard URL used to reach EasyAdmin. An attacker who can reach a single EasyAdmin URL and knows a target route\u0027s **name** can execute that route\u0027s controller, bypassing the path-based rule.\n\nOnly **path-based** protections are bypassed. Routes whose controller enforces its own authorization with `#[IsGranted]` / `denyAccessUnlessGranted()` remain protected, because those checks are recomputed against the swapped-in controller.\n\n## Patches\n\nFixed in **4.29.16** and **5.5.1**. Before dispatching a custom-action route, EasyAdmin now re-evaluates the target route\u0027s `access_control` rule and denies the request if the current user is not granted access.\n\n## Workarounds\n\nAdd controller-level authorization (`#[IsGranted]` / `denyAccessUnlessGranted()`) to any sensitive route, since controller-level checks are still enforced. Upgrading is the recommended fix.\n\n## Credits\n\nReported by @TungNGo02.",
"id": "GHSA-g2fm-8hr4-j82h",
"modified": "2026-09-02T14:39:11Z",
"published": "2026-09-02T14:39:11Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/EasyCorp/EasyAdminBundle/security/advisories/GHSA-g2fm-8hr4-j82h"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-81892"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/EasyCorp/EasyAdminBundle/commit/03be45c6b7213c4c984a1d0542b7ec60359329f8"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/EasyCorp/EasyAdminBundle/commit/6228dfef598d81eeb0baa35625e50812f3c77699"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/EasyCorp/EasyAdminBundle"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/EasyCorp/EasyAdminBundle/releases/tag/v4.29.16"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/EasyCorp/EasyAdminBundle/releases/tag/v5.5.1"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/FriendsOfPHP/security-advisories/blob/master/easycorp/easyadmin-bundle/CVE-2026-81892.yaml"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "EasyAdmin custom-action dispatcher bypasses access_control on other routes"
}
GHSA-G2GH-VRVV-7C4G
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-07-04 09:31 – Updated: 2026-04-01 18:35Missing Authorization vulnerability in amazewp fluXtore allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels. This issue affects fluXtore: from n/a through 1.6.0.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-30929"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-862"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-07-04T09:15:33Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Missing Authorization vulnerability in amazewp fluXtore allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels. This issue affects fluXtore: from n/a through 1.6.0.",
"id": "GHSA-g2gh-vrvv-7c4g",
"modified": "2026-04-01T18:35:44Z",
"published": "2025-07-04T09:31:16Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-30929"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://patchstack.com/database/wordpress/plugin/fluxtore/vulnerability/wordpress-fluxtore-plugin-1-6-0-broken-access-control-vulnerability?_s_id=cve"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-G2GP-63PX-3C6R
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-04-17 18:31 – Updated: 2026-05-12 12:32Missing Authorization vulnerability in mingocommerce Delete All Posts allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels. This issue affects Delete All Posts: from n/a through 1.1.1.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-23773"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-862"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-04-17T16:15:30Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Missing Authorization vulnerability in mingocommerce Delete All Posts allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels. This issue affects Delete All Posts: from n/a through 1.1.1.",
"id": "GHSA-g2gp-63px-3c6r",
"modified": "2026-05-12T12:32:13Z",
"published": "2025-04-17T18:31:13Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-23773"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://patchstack.com/database/wordpress/plugin/delele-all/vulnerability/wordpress-delete-all-posts-plugin-1-1-1-broken-access-control-vulnerability?_s_id=cve"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-G2H2-54M3-33RQ
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-11-01 15:31 – Updated: 2024-11-01 15:31Missing Authorization vulnerability in MediaRon LLC Custom Query Blocks allows Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLs.This issue affects Custom Query Blocks: from n/a through 5.2.0.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-38794"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-862"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2024-11-01T15:15:35Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Missing Authorization vulnerability in MediaRon LLC Custom Query Blocks allows Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLs.This issue affects Custom Query Blocks: from n/a through 5.2.0.",
"id": "GHSA-g2h2-54m3-33rq",
"modified": "2024-11-01T15:31:58Z",
"published": "2024-11-01T15:31:58Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-38794"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://patchstack.com/database/vulnerability/post-type-archive-mapping/wordpress-custom-query-blocks-plugin-5-2-0-broken-access-control-vulnerability?_s_id=cve"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-G2HJ-PQ3H-FQXR
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-12-13 15:30 – Updated: 2026-04-28 21:35Missing Authorization vulnerability in Rextheme Change WooCommerce Add To Cart Button Text allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels.This issue affects Change WooCommerce Add To Cart Button Text: from n/a through 1.3.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2023-34376"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-862"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2024-12-13T15:15:15Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Missing Authorization vulnerability in Rextheme Change WooCommerce Add To Cart Button Text allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels.This issue affects Change WooCommerce Add To Cart Button Text: from n/a through 1.3.",
"id": "GHSA-g2hj-pq3h-fqxr",
"modified": "2026-04-28T21:35:23Z",
"published": "2024-12-13T15:30:40Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-34376"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://patchstack.com/database/wordpress/plugin/change-woocommerce-add-to-cart-button-text/vulnerability/wordpress-change-woocommerce-add-to-cart-button-text-plugin-1-3-broken-access-control?_s_id=cve"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-G2M8-VCXW-5H4C
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-08-11 21:33 – Updated: 2026-08-11 21:33An issue in MongoDB Server could allow an authenticated user with direct network access to a shard to improperly commit or abort an in-progress prepared transaction, bypassing the intended transaction coordination process. This could result in cross-shard data inconsistency, cluster clock corruption, and violation of transaction atomicity guarantees.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-18709"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-862"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-08-11T19:17:25Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "An issue in MongoDB Server could allow an authenticated user with direct network access to a shard to improperly commit or abort an in-progress prepared transaction, bypassing the intended transaction coordination process. This could result in cross-shard data inconsistency, cluster clock corruption, and violation of transaction atomicity guarantees.",
"id": "GHSA-g2m8-vcxw-5h4c",
"modified": "2026-08-11T21:33:08Z",
"published": "2026-08-11T21:33:08Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-18709"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://jira.mongodb.org/browse/SERVER-130544"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
},
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:H/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
]
}
GHSA-G2P2-28GC-94WX
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-12-12 12:30 – Updated: 2025-12-12 12:30The Simple Bike Rental plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to unauthorized access of data due to a missing capability check on the 'simpbire_carica_prenotazioni' AJAX action in all versions up to, and including, 1.0.6. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Subscriber-level access and above, to retrieve all booking records containing customers' personally identifiable information (PII), including names, email addresses, and phone numbers.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-14065"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-862"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-12-12T12:15:46Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "The Simple Bike Rental plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to unauthorized access of data due to a missing capability check on the \u0027simpbire_carica_prenotazioni\u0027 AJAX action in all versions up to, and including, 1.0.6. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Subscriber-level access and above, to retrieve all booking records containing customers\u0027 personally identifiable information (PII), including names, email addresses, and phone numbers.",
"id": "GHSA-g2p2-28gc-94wx",
"modified": "2025-12-12T12:30:25Z",
"published": "2025-12-12T12:30:25Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-14065"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/simple-bike-rental/tags/1.0.5/includes/ajax.php#L137"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/simple-bike-rental/trunk/includes/ajax.php#L137"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/changeset/3414692/simple-bike-rental"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.wordfence.com/threat-intel/vulnerabilities/id/06f4e758-3328-4ac1-956a-cfadddd12e53?source=cve"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
Mitigation
- Divide the product into anonymous, normal, privileged, and administrative areas. Reduce the attack surface by carefully mapping roles with data and functionality. Use role-based access control (RBAC) [REF-229] to enforce the roles at the appropriate boundaries.
- Note that this approach may not protect against horizontal authorization, i.e., it will not protect a user from attacking others with the same role.
Mitigation
Ensure that access control checks are performed related to the business logic. These checks may be different than the access control checks that are applied to more generic resources such as files, connections, processes, memory, and database records. For example, a database may restrict access for medical records to a specific database user, but each record might only be intended to be accessible to the patient and the patient's doctor [REF-7].
Mitigation MIT-4.4
Strategy: Libraries or Frameworks
- Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid.
- For example, consider using authorization frameworks such as the JAAS Authorization Framework [REF-233] and the OWASP ESAPI Access Control feature [REF-45].
Mitigation
- For web applications, make sure that the access control mechanism is enforced correctly at the server side on every page. Users should not be able to access any unauthorized functionality or information by simply requesting direct access to that page.
- One way to do this is to ensure that all pages containing sensitive information are not cached, and that all such pages restrict access to requests that are accompanied by an active and authenticated session token associated with a user who has the required permissions to access that page.
Mitigation
Use the access control capabilities of your operating system and server environment and define your access control lists accordingly. Use a "default deny" policy when defining these ACLs.
CAPEC-665: Exploitation of Thunderbolt Protection Flaws
An adversary leverages a firmware weakness within the Thunderbolt protocol, on a computing device to manipulate Thunderbolt controller firmware in order to exploit vulnerabilities in the implementation of authorization and verification schemes within Thunderbolt protection mechanisms. Upon gaining physical access to a target device, the adversary conducts high-level firmware manipulation of the victim Thunderbolt controller SPI (Serial Peripheral Interface) flash, through the use of a SPI Programing device and an external Thunderbolt device, typically as the target device is booting up. If successful, this allows the adversary to modify memory, subvert authentication mechanisms, spoof identities and content, and extract data and memory from the target device. Currently 7 major vulnerabilities exist within Thunderbolt protocol with 9 attack vectors as noted in the Execution Flow.