CWE-78
AllowedImproper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection')
Abstraction: Base · Status: Stable
The product constructs all or part of an OS command using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify the intended OS command when it is sent to a downstream component.
9846 vulnerabilities reference this CWE, most recent first.
CVE-2026-105740 (GCVE-0-2026-105740)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-10-05 20:46 – Updated: 2026-10-06 18:20- CWE-78 - Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection')
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/langflow-ai/langflow/security/… | x_refsource_CONFIRM |
| https://github.com/langflow-ai/langflow/security/… | x_refsource_MISC |
| https://github.com/langflow-ai/langflow/pull/12290 | x_refsource_MISC |
| https://github.com/langflow-ai/langflow/commit/ef… | x_refsource_MISC |
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| langflow-ai | langflow |
Affected:
< 1.9.0
|
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-105740",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "poc"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-10-06T18:20:20.481095Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-06T18:20:28.495Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"exploit"
],
"url": "https://github.com/langflow-ai/langflow/security/advisories/GHSA-7w94-79vh-5mr2"
},
{
"tags": [
"exploit"
],
"url": "https://github.com/langflow-ai/langflow/security/advisories/GHSA-w794-rj3p-xv45"
}
],
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "langflow",
"vendor": "langflow-ai",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003c 1.9.0"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Langflow is a tool for building and deploying AI-powered agents and workflows. Prior to 1.9.0, any authenticated Langflow user can achieve Remote Code Execution (RCE) on the server by adding an MCP server with the \"Stdio\" transport. The user-supplied command field is passed directly to bash -c \"exec {command}\" with zero validation, no allowlisting, and no sandboxing. The command executes immediately when the server list is fetched. Additionally, the env field allows arbitrary environment variable injection (e.g., LD_PRELOAD, PATH override). This vulnerability is fixed in 1.9.0."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 9.9,
"baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "CHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-78",
"description": "CWE-78: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command (\u0027OS Command Injection\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-05T20:46:18.854Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/langflow-ai/langflow/security/advisories/GHSA-7w94-79vh-5mr2",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/langflow-ai/langflow/security/advisories/GHSA-7w94-79vh-5mr2"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/langflow-ai/langflow/security/advisories/GHSA-w794-rj3p-xv45",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/langflow-ai/langflow/security/advisories/GHSA-w794-rj3p-xv45"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/langflow-ai/langflow/pull/12290",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/langflow-ai/langflow/pull/12290"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/langflow-ai/langflow/commit/efbc4a16e639409d938a4883463d27ef0bc637a0",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/langflow-ai/langflow/commit/efbc4a16e639409d938a4883463d27ef0bc637a0"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-7w94-79vh-5mr2",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Langflow: Authenticated RCE via MCP Stdio transport allows any user to execute arbitrary OS commands on the server"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-105740",
"datePublished": "2026-10-05T20:46:18.854Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-10-05T19:11:07.946Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-06T18:20:28.495Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-105697 (GCVE-0-2026-105697)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-10-05 20:16 – Updated: 2026-10-09 19:55- CWE-78 - Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection')
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/langflow-ai/langflow/security/… | x_refsource_CONFIRM |
| https://github.com/langflow-ai/langflow/security/… | x_refsource_MISC |
| https://github.com/langflow-ai/langflow/pull/12290 | x_refsource_MISC |
| https://github.com/langflow-ai/langflow/pull/14036 | x_refsource_MISC |
| https://github.com/langflow-ai/langflow/commit/eb… | x_refsource_MISC |
| https://github.com/langflow-ai/langflow/commit/ef… | x_refsource_MISC |
| https://github.com/langflow-ai/langflow/releases/… | x_refsource_MISC |
| https://www.ox.security/blog/mcp-supply-chain-adv… | x_refsource_MISC |
| https://www.ox.security/blog/the-mother-of-all-ai… | x_refsource_MISC |
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| langflow-ai | langflow |
Affected:
>= 1.1.2, < 1.10.3
|
|
| langflow-ai | langflow-base |
Affected:
>= 0.1.2, < 0.10.3
|
|
| langflow-ai | lfx |
Affected:
< 1.10.3
|
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-105697",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-10-06T14:36:02.678305Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-06T14:49:22.922Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "langflow",
"vendor": "langflow-ai",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003e= 1.1.2, \u003c 1.10.3"
}
]
},
{
"product": "langflow-base",
"vendor": "langflow-ai",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003e= 0.1.2, \u003c 0.10.3"
}
]
},
{
"product": "lfx",
"vendor": "langflow-ai",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003c 1.10.3"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Langflow is a tool for building and deploying AI-powered agents and workflows. Before Langflow 1.10.3, the MCP stdio transport launched whatever command / args a user put in an MCP server configuration, with no allowlist and (before 1.10.3) wrapped in bash -c \"exec {command} ...\". Any user able to reach the MCP server settings (\"Settings \u2192 MCP Servers \u2192 Add MCP Server\", POST/PATCH /api/v2/mcp/servers/{server_name}) or to build a flow with the MCP Tools component could add a \"server\" whose command is an arbitrary OS command (touch, rm -rf, a reverse shell, ...). The command runs on the Langflow host as the Langflow process user as soon as Langflow tries to connect to the server (listing servers, loading tools, running the flow) \u2014 even when the UI then reports that the stdio server failed to start. With the default LANGFLOW_AUTO_LOGIN=true, GET /api/v1/auto_login hands out a token without credentials, so on an exposed instance running the default configuration this is reachable without an account. AUTO_LOGIN is documented as a development-only setting; with it disabled, any authenticated (non-admin) user can exploit it. This issue is fixed in Langflow 1.10.3, langflow-base 0.10.3, and lfx 1.10.3."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 9.9,
"baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "CHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-78",
"description": "CWE-78: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command (\u0027OS Command Injection\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-09T19:55:07.117Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/langflow-ai/langflow/security/advisories/GHSA-w794-rj3p-xv45",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/langflow-ai/langflow/security/advisories/GHSA-w794-rj3p-xv45"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/langflow-ai/langflow/security/advisories/GHSA-7w94-79vh-5mr2",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/langflow-ai/langflow/security/advisories/GHSA-7w94-79vh-5mr2"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/langflow-ai/langflow/pull/12290",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/langflow-ai/langflow/pull/12290"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/langflow-ai/langflow/pull/14036",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/langflow-ai/langflow/pull/14036"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/langflow-ai/langflow/commit/eba285edf1dd4a33bf23a9cb8113c991fcdf3d1d",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/langflow-ai/langflow/commit/eba285edf1dd4a33bf23a9cb8113c991fcdf3d1d"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/langflow-ai/langflow/commit/efbc4a16e639409d938a4883463d27ef0bc637a0",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/langflow-ai/langflow/commit/efbc4a16e639409d938a4883463d27ef0bc637a0"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/langflow-ai/langflow/releases/tag/v1.10.3",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/langflow-ai/langflow/releases/tag/v1.10.3"
},
{
"name": "https://www.ox.security/blog/mcp-supply-chain-advisory-rce-vulnerabilities-across-the-ai-ecosystem",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://www.ox.security/blog/mcp-supply-chain-advisory-rce-vulnerabilities-across-the-ai-ecosystem"
},
{
"name": "https://www.ox.security/blog/the-mother-of-all-ai-supply-chains-critical-systemic-vulnerability-at-the-core-of-the-mcp",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://www.ox.security/blog/the-mother-of-all-ai-supply-chains-critical-systemic-vulnerability-at-the-core-of-the-mcp"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-w794-rj3p-xv45",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Langflow: OS command injection (RCE) via arbitrary command in MCP stdio server configuration"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-105697",
"datePublished": "2026-10-05T20:16:58.291Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-10-05T17:48:58.627Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-09T19:55:07.117Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-105691 (GCVE-0-2026-105691)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-10-05 19:53 – Updated: 2026-10-06 16:47- CWE-78 - Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection')
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/penpot/penpot/security/advisor… | x_refsource_CONFIRM |
| https://github.com/penpot/penpot/pull/11272 | x_refsource_MISC |
| https://github.com/penpot/penpot/commit/aa3bc1ae9… | x_refsource_MISC |
| https://github.com/penpot/penpot/releases/tag/2.18.0 | x_refsource_MISC |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-105691",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "poc"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-10-06T16:46:58.381592Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-06T16:47:15.701Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"exploit"
],
"url": "https://github.com/penpot/penpot/security/advisories/GHSA-4f36-m4hj-cv86"
}
],
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "penpot",
"vendor": "penpot",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003c 2.18.0"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Penpot is an open-source design and prototyping platform. Prior to 2.18.0, the SVG exporter places an attacker-controlled text object\u0027s fill-color value into a ppmcolormask command string and executes that string through child_process.exec. A user who can edit a file can store shell metacharacters in the fill color and trigger SVG export, causing commands to execute with the exporter service\u0027s privileges. The same export can be triggered through a valid public share link to a malicious file. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.18.0."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 9.9,
"baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "CHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-78",
"description": "CWE-78: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command (\u0027OS Command Injection\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-05T19:53:54.552Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/penpot/penpot/security/advisories/GHSA-4f36-m4hj-cv86",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/penpot/penpot/security/advisories/GHSA-4f36-m4hj-cv86"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/penpot/penpot/pull/11272",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/penpot/penpot/pull/11272"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/penpot/penpot/commit/aa3bc1ae984577f0354d4270d2546e15985f4bcf",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/penpot/penpot/commit/aa3bc1ae984577f0354d4270d2546e15985f4bcf"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/penpot/penpot/releases/tag/2.18.0",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/penpot/penpot/releases/tag/2.18.0"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-4f36-m4hj-cv86",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Penpot: Authenticated OS Command Injection in Penpot SVG Exporter via Legacy fill-color"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-105691",
"datePublished": "2026-10-05T19:53:54.552Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-10-05T17:48:58.626Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-06T16:47:15.701Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-105487 (GCVE-0-2026-105487)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-10-06 01:45 – Updated: 2026-10-06 13:00| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://vuldb.com/vuln/413623 | vdb-entrytechnical-description |
| https://vuldb.com/vuln/413623/cti | signaturepermissions-required |
| https://vuldb.com/cve/CVE-2026-105487 | third-party-advisory |
| https://vuldb.com/submit/986584 | third-party-advisory |
| https://github.com/yogeshojha/rengine/issues/1561 | exploitissue-tracking |
| https://github.com/yogeshojha/rengine/pull/1562 | issue-trackingpatch |
| https://github.com/yogeshojha/rengine/ | product |
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| yogeshojha | reNgine |
Affected:
2.0
Affected: 2.1 Affected: 2.2.0 cpe:2.3:a:yogeshojha:rengine:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-105487",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "poc"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-10-06T13:00:06.424292Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-06T13:00:16.402Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:2.3:a:yogeshojha:rengine:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
],
"modules": [
"listTargets Endpoint"
],
"product": "reNgine",
"vendor": "yogeshojha",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "2.0"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "2.1"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "2.2.0"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "reporter",
"value": "Lim2frEe (VulDB User)"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "coordinator",
"value": "VulDB CNA Team"
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "A vulnerability was found in yogeshojha reNgine up to 2.2.0. Affected by this vulnerability is the function subdomain_discovery of the file web/reNgine/tasks.py of the component listTargets Endpoint. The manipulation of the argument Name results in os command injection. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been made public and could be used. The pull request to fix this issue awaits acceptance."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"baseScore": 5.3,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P",
"version": "4.0"
}
},
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"baseScore": 6.3,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L/E:P/RL:X/RC:C",
"version": "3.1"
}
},
{
"cvssV3_0": {
"baseScore": 6.3,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L/E:P/RL:X/RC:C",
"version": "3.0"
}
},
{
"cvssV2_0": {
"baseScore": 6.5,
"vectorString": "AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P/E:POC/RL:ND/RC:C",
"version": "2.0"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-78",
"description": "OS Command Injection",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
},
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-77",
"description": "Command Injection",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-06T01:45:12.198Z",
"orgId": "1af790b2-7ee1-4545-860a-a788eba489b5",
"shortName": "VulDB"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "VDB-413623 | yogeshojha reNgine listTargets Endpoint tasks.py subdomain_discovery os command injection",
"tags": [
"vdb-entry",
"technical-description"
],
"url": "https://vuldb.com/vuln/413623"
},
{
"name": "VDB-413623 | CTI Indicators (IOB, IOC, TTP, IOA)",
"tags": [
"signature",
"permissions-required"
],
"url": "https://vuldb.com/vuln/413623/cti"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-105487 | CVE Analysis and Report",
"tags": [
"third-party-advisory"
],
"url": "https://vuldb.com/cve/CVE-2026-105487"
},
{
"name": "Submit #986584 | yogeshojha reNgine \u003c=v2.2.0 Command Injection",
"tags": [
"third-party-advisory"
],
"url": "https://vuldb.com/submit/986584"
},
{
"tags": [
"exploit",
"issue-tracking"
],
"url": "https://github.com/yogeshojha/rengine/issues/1561"
},
{
"tags": [
"issue-tracking",
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/yogeshojha/rengine/pull/1562"
},
{
"tags": [
"product"
],
"url": "https://github.com/yogeshojha/rengine/"
}
],
"timeline": [
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z",
"value": "Advisory disclosed"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2026-10-05T02:00:00.000Z",
"value": "VulDB entry created"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2026-10-05T17:32:25.000Z",
"value": "VulDB entry last update"
}
],
"title": "yogeshojha reNgine listTargets Endpoint tasks.py subdomain_discovery os command injection",
"x_generator": [
"VulDB PVTS v202610"
]
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "1af790b2-7ee1-4545-860a-a788eba489b5",
"assignerShortName": "VulDB",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-105487",
"datePublished": "2026-10-06T01:45:12.198Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-10-05T15:26:20.539Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-06T13:00:16.402Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-105484 (GCVE-0-2026-105484)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-10-06 01:00 – Updated: 2026-10-06 13:25| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://vuldb.com/vuln/413619 | vdb-entrytechnical-description |
| https://vuldb.com/vuln/413619/cti | signaturepermissions-required |
| https://vuldb.com/cve/CVE-2026-105484 | third-party-advisory |
| https://vuldb.com/submit/984434 | third-party-advisory |
| https://www.totolink.net/ | broken-linkproduct |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-105484",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-10-06T13:24:46.638835Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-06T13:25:02.411Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:2.3:o:totolink:x6000r_firmware:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
],
"modules": [
"UploadFirmwareFile Handler"
],
"product": "X6000R",
"vendor": "TOTOLINK",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "9.4.0cu.652_B20230116"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "reporter",
"value": "liumingjie (VulDB User)"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "coordinator",
"value": "VulDB Vulnerability Moderation Team"
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "A security vulnerability has been detected in TOTOLINK X6000R 9.4.0cu.652_B20230116. The impacted element is the function firmware_check of the file /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi of the component UploadFirmwareFile Handler. Such manipulation of the argument file_name leads to os command injection. The attack may be performed from remote."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"baseScore": 10,
"baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X",
"version": "4.0"
}
},
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"baseScore": 10,
"baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H/E:X/RL:X/RC:R",
"version": "3.1"
}
},
{
"cvssV3_0": {
"baseScore": 10,
"baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H/E:X/RL:X/RC:R",
"version": "3.0"
}
},
{
"cvssV2_0": {
"baseScore": 10,
"vectorString": "AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C/E:ND/RL:ND/RC:UR",
"version": "2.0"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-78",
"description": "OS Command Injection",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
},
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-77",
"description": "Command Injection",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-06T01:00:19.684Z",
"orgId": "1af790b2-7ee1-4545-860a-a788eba489b5",
"shortName": "VulDB"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "VDB-413619 | TOTOLINK X6000R UploadFirmwareFile cstecgi.cgi firmware_check os command injection",
"tags": [
"vdb-entry",
"technical-description"
],
"url": "https://vuldb.com/vuln/413619"
},
{
"name": "VDB-413619 | CTI Indicators (IOB, IOC, TTP, IOA)",
"tags": [
"signature",
"permissions-required"
],
"url": "https://vuldb.com/vuln/413619/cti"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-105484 | CVE Analysis and Report",
"tags": [
"third-party-advisory"
],
"url": "https://vuldb.com/cve/CVE-2026-105484"
},
{
"name": "Submit #984434 | TOTOLINK X6000R 9.4.0cu.652_B20230116 CWE-78 OS Command Injection",
"tags": [
"third-party-advisory"
],
"url": "https://vuldb.com/submit/984434"
},
{
"tags": [
"broken-link",
"product"
],
"url": "https://www.totolink.net/"
}
],
"timeline": [
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z",
"value": "Advisory disclosed"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2026-10-05T02:00:00.000Z",
"value": "VulDB entry created"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2026-10-05T17:07:07.000Z",
"value": "VulDB entry last update"
}
],
"title": "TOTOLINK X6000R UploadFirmwareFile cstecgi.cgi firmware_check os command injection",
"x_generator": [
"VulDB PVTS v202610"
]
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "1af790b2-7ee1-4545-860a-a788eba489b5",
"assignerShortName": "VulDB",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-105484",
"datePublished": "2026-10-06T01:00:19.684Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-10-05T15:01:47.713Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-06T13:25:02.411Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-105429 (GCVE-0-2026-105429)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-10-14 04:33 – Updated: 2026-10-16 15:31| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/netbirdio/netbird/security/adv… | vendor-advisory |
| https://github.com/netbirdio/netbird/pull/6805 | patch |
| https://github.com/netbirdio/netbird/releases/tag… | release-notes |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-105429",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-10-16T15:15:22.027937Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-16T15:31:53.347Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"collectionURL": "https://pkg.go.dev",
"cpes": [
"cpe:2.3:a:netbird:netbird:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"modules": [
"client/ssh/config"
],
"packageName": "github.com/netbirdio/netbird",
"platforms": [
"Linux",
"macOS",
"Windows",
"FreeBSD"
],
"product": "NetBird",
"programFiles": [
"client/ssh/config/manager.go"
],
"repo": "https://github.com/netbirdio/netbird",
"vendor": "NetBird",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "0.74.7",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0.60.0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Arjun Basnet from Securin"
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Improper neutralization of special elements in the NetBird client SSH configuration manager (client/ssh/config/manager.go) in NetBird versions 0.60.0 through 0.74.6 allows a malicious or compromised peer to execute arbitrary commands on other NetBird client hosts. The client writes a system-wide OpenSSH drop-in file (/etc/ssh/ssh_config.d/99-netbird.conf, or the equivalent under %PROGRAMDATA%\\ssh\\ssh_config.d on Windows) that embeds each peer FQDN or hostname inside a double-quoted Match host directive without escaping. A peer name containing a double quote breaks out of the quoted context and injects arbitrary SSH configuration directives, including exec commands, which run locally as any user on the host the next time that user runs ssh. Desktop clients on Linux, macOS, Windows and FreeBSD are affected; the Android and iOS apps are not. The issue is fixed in version 0.74.7, which accepts a peer FQDN or hostname only if it is a valid DNS name."
}
],
"impacts": [
{
"capecId": "CAPEC-88",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CAPEC-88 OS Command Injection"
}
]
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"baseScore": 8.9,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H",
"version": "4.0"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
},
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"baseScore": 8,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-78",
"description": "CWE-78 Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command (\u0027OS Command Injection\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
},
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-116",
"description": "CWE-116 Improper Encoding or Escaping of Output",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-14T04:33:44.856Z",
"orgId": "33c584b5-0579-4c06-b2a0-8d8329fcab9c",
"shortName": "securin"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "GHSA-xmg2-v32j-x2hf",
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory"
],
"url": "https://github.com/netbirdio/netbird/security/advisories/GHSA-xmg2-v32j-x2hf"
},
{
"name": "Fix pull request #6805",
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/netbirdio/netbird/pull/6805"
},
{
"name": "NetBird v0.74.7 release",
"tags": [
"release-notes"
],
"url": "https://github.com/netbirdio/netbird/releases/tag/v0.74.7"
}
],
"solutions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Upgrade the NetBird client to version 0.74.7 or later. In this version, buildHostPatterns accepts a peer FQDN or hostname only if it is a plain DNS name, and rejects quotes, whitespace, newlines, commas and SSH pattern metacharacters (pull request #6805)."
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-xmg2-v32j-x2hf",
"discovery": "EXTERNAL"
},
"timeline": [
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2026-07-13T00:00:00.000Z",
"value": "Reported to the vendor through a GitHub Security Advisory"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2026-07-15T00:00:00.000Z",
"value": "Vendor accepted the report"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2026-07-17T00:00:00.000Z",
"value": "Fix released in version 0.74.7"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2026-09-01T00:00:00.000Z",
"value": "Vendor advisory GHSA-xmg2-v32j-x2hf published"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z",
"value": "CVE ID assigned"
}
],
"title": "NetBird client SSH config Match line injection via peer FQDN or hostname allows local command execution",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "draft"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "33c584b5-0579-4c06-b2a0-8d8329fcab9c",
"assignerShortName": "securin",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-105429",
"datePublished": "2026-10-14T04:33:44.856Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-10-05T12:51:29.957Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-16T15:31:53.347Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-105407 (GCVE-0-2026-105407)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-10-12 10:44 – Updated: 2026-10-15 18:07- CWE-78 - Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection')
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dassault Systèmes | Tuleap Enterprise Edition |
Affected:
17.0-1 , ≤ 17.0-40
(custom)
Affected: 17.5-1 , ≤ 17.5-31 (custom) |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-105407",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-10-15T17:57:45.022789Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-15T18:07:09.474Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Tuleap Enterprise Edition",
"vendor": "Dassault Syst\u00e8mes",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "17.0-40",
"status": "affected",
"version": "17.0-1",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "17.5-31",
"status": "affected",
"version": "17.5-1",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "An OS Command Injection vulnerability affecting Tuleap Enterprise Edition from 17.0 through 17.5 could allow an attacker to execute arbitrary commands on the server."
}
],
"value": "An OS Command Injection vulnerability affecting Tuleap Enterprise Edition from 17.0 through 17.5 could allow an attacker to execute arbitrary commands on the server."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 8.8,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-78",
"description": "CWE-78 Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command (\u0027OS Command Injection\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-12T10:44:42.732Z",
"orgId": "f5a594e6-46a7-4e60-8a08-0a786e70e433",
"shortName": "3DS"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://www.3ds.com/trust-center/security/security-advisories/cve-2026-105407"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "EXTERNAL"
},
"title": "OS Command Injection vulnerability affecting Tuleap Enterprise Edition from 17.0 through 17.5",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 0.1.0-dev"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "f5a594e6-46a7-4e60-8a08-0a786e70e433",
"assignerShortName": "3DS",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-105407",
"datePublished": "2026-10-12T10:44:42.732Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-10-05T11:03:29.305Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-15T18:07:09.474Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-105134 (GCVE-0-2026-105134)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-10-04 05:30 – Updated: 2026-10-15 03:57| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://vuldb.com/vuln/413351 | vdb-entrytechnical-description |
| https://vuldb.com/vuln/413351/cti | signaturepermissions-required |
| https://vuldb.com/cve/CVE-2026-105134 | third-party-advisory |
| https://vuldb.com/submit/942743 | third-party-advisory |
| https://www.ahsay.com/en/support/help-centre/rele… | patch |
| https://www.cisa.gov/known-exploited-vulnerabilit… | government-resource |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-105134",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "active"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-10-14T00:00:00+00:00",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
},
{
"other": {
"content": {
"dateAdded": "2026-10-14",
"reference": "https://www.cisa.gov/known-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog?field_cve=CVE-2026-105134"
},
"type": "kev"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-15T03:57:03.605Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"government-resource"
],
"url": "https://www.cisa.gov/known-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog?field_cve=CVE-2026-105134"
}
],
"timeline": [
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z",
"value": "CVE-2026-105134 added to CISA KEV"
}
],
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:2.3:a:ahsay:ahsaycbs:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
],
"modules": [
"Replication Receiver"
],
"product": "AhsayCBS",
"vendor": "Ahsay",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "10.3.0"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "10.3.1"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "10.3.2"
},
{
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "10.3.4"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "reporter",
"value": "nickc (VulDB User)"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "coordinator",
"value": "VulDB Vulnerability Moderation Team"
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "A flaw has been found in Ahsay AhsayCBS up to 10.3.2. This vulnerability affects unknown code of the file /rps/api/json/UpdateReceivers.do of the component Replication Receiver. Executing a manipulation of the argument random can lead to os command injection. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploit has been published and may be used. Upgrading to version 10.3.4 is able to resolve this issue. Upgrading the affected component is advised."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"baseScore": 10,
"baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:P",
"version": "4.0"
}
},
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"baseScore": 10,
"baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H/E:P/RL:O/RC:C",
"version": "3.1"
}
},
{
"cvssV3_0": {
"baseScore": 10,
"baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H/E:P/RL:O/RC:C",
"version": "3.0"
}
},
{
"cvssV2_0": {
"baseScore": 10,
"vectorString": "AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C/E:POC/RL:OF/RC:C",
"version": "2.0"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-78",
"description": "OS Command Injection",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
},
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-77",
"description": "Command Injection",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-04T05:30:12.882Z",
"orgId": "1af790b2-7ee1-4545-860a-a788eba489b5",
"shortName": "VulDB"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "VDB-413351 | Ahsay AhsayCBS Replication Receiver UpdateReceivers.do os command injection",
"tags": [
"vdb-entry",
"technical-description"
],
"url": "https://vuldb.com/vuln/413351"
},
{
"name": "VDB-413351 | CTI Indicators (IOB, IOC, TTP, IOA)",
"tags": [
"signature",
"permissions-required"
],
"url": "https://vuldb.com/vuln/413351/cti"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-105134 | CVE Analysis and Report",
"tags": [
"third-party-advisory"
],
"url": "https://vuldb.com/cve/CVE-2026-105134"
},
{
"name": "Submit #942743 | Ahsay Systems Corporation Limited Ahsay CBS 10.3.0 Remote Code Execution via Arbitrary File Write",
"tags": [
"third-party-advisory"
],
"url": "https://vuldb.com/submit/942743"
},
{
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://www.ahsay.com/en/support/help-centre/release-notes/cbs/v10.3.4"
}
],
"timeline": [
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2026-10-03T00:00:00.000Z",
"value": "Advisory disclosed"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2026-10-03T02:00:00.000Z",
"value": "VulDB entry created"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2026-10-03T15:18:49.000Z",
"value": "VulDB entry last update"
}
],
"title": "Ahsay AhsayCBS Replication Receiver UpdateReceivers.do os command injection",
"x_generator": [
"VulDB PVTS v202610"
]
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "1af790b2-7ee1-4545-860a-a788eba489b5",
"assignerShortName": "VulDB",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-105134",
"datePublished": "2026-10-04T05:30:12.882Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-10-03T13:13:35.953Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-15T03:57:03.605Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-105110 (GCVE-0-2026-105110)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-10-08 09:00 – Updated: 2026-10-08 17:09| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/BlackHatExploitation/innbox_root | exploitthird-party-advisory |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-105110",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "poc"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-10-08T17:09:32.738410Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-08T17:09:52.166Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Innbox",
"vendor": "Iskratel"
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "OS Command Injection in the login.xgi CGI endpoint in Iskratel Innbox GPON ONT devices allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to execute arbitrary commands as root via the CLI parameter."
}
],
"value": "OS Command Injection in the login.xgi CGI endpoint in Iskratel Innbox GPON ONT devices allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to execute arbitrary commands as root via the CLI parameter."
}
],
"impacts": [
{
"capecId": "CAPEC-88",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "An unauthenticated remote attacker can execute arbitrary commands as root, leading to full device compromise including credential extraction, configuration tampering, and persistent backdoor installation."
}
]
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 9.8,
"baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
},
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "NONE",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 9.3,
"baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
"exploitMaturity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "LOW",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"subIntegrityImpact": "LOW",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:L/SI:L/SA:L",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-78",
"description": "CWE-78 Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command (\u0027OS Command Injection\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
},
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-306",
"description": "CWE-306 Missing Authentication for Critical Function",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-08T09:00:40.700Z",
"orgId": "309f9ea4-e3e9-4c6c-b79d-e8eb01244f2c",
"shortName": "TuranSec"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "Exploit PoC and Technical Details",
"tags": [
"exploit",
"third-party-advisory"
],
"url": "https://github.com/BlackHatExploitation/innbox_root"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "EXTERNAL"
},
"title": "Iskratel Innbox Unauthenticated Remote Code Execution via login.xgi CLI Parameter",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "TuranSec CNA"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "309f9ea4-e3e9-4c6c-b79d-e8eb01244f2c",
"assignerShortName": "TuranSec",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-105110",
"datePublished": "2026-10-08T09:00:40.700Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-10-03T11:45:52.353Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-08T17:09:52.166Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-105106 (GCVE-0-2026-105106)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-10-14 07:23 – Updated: 2026-10-14 17:56- CWE-78 - Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection')
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Koha Community | Koha |
Affected:
0 , < 24.11.00
(custom)
Affected: 24.11.00 , < 24.11.20 (custom) Affected: 25.05.00 , < 25.05.15 (custom) Affected: 25.11.00 , < 25.11.09 (custom) Affected: 26.05.00 , < 26.05.04 (custom) |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-105106",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "poc"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-10-14T17:55:56.921737Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-14T17:56:36.316Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"exploit"
],
"url": "https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=42674"
}
],
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Koha",
"vendor": "Koha Community",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "24.11.00",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"lessThan": "24.11.20",
"status": "affected",
"version": "24.11.00",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"lessThan": "25.05.15",
"status": "affected",
"version": "25.05.00",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"lessThan": "25.11.09",
"status": "affected",
"version": "25.11.00",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"lessThan": "26.05.04",
"status": "affected",
"version": "26.05.00",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Sanjar Tulkinov Anvar o\u0027g\u0027li"
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cp\u003eKoha is vulnerable to OS command injection in the Task Scheduler deletion path. The tools/scheduler.pl handler accepts the jobid request parameter for op=cud-delete and passes it to C4::Scheduler::remove_at_job without validating it. Schedule::At::remove substitutes the supplied job ID into an atrm command string without quoting or escaping it and executes the command through a single-argument system() call, which invokes the shell. An authenticated staff user with the tools =\u0026gt; schedule_tasks permission can therefore execute arbitrary operating-system commands as the Koha web/application user by supplying shell metacharacters in jobid. The issue is fixed in Koha 24.11.20, 25.05.15, 25.11.09, and 26.05.04, and in the 26.11 development branch.\u003c/p\u003e"
}
],
"value": "Koha is vulnerable to OS command injection in the Task Scheduler deletion path. The tools/scheduler.pl handler accepts the jobid request parameter for op=cud-delete and passes it to C4::Scheduler::remove_at_job without validating it. Schedule::At::remove substitutes the supplied job ID into an atrm command string without quoting or escaping it and executes the command through a single-argument system() call, which invokes the shell. An authenticated staff user with the tools =\u003e schedule_tasks permission can therefore execute arbitrary operating-system commands as the Koha web/application user by supplying shell metacharacters in jobid. The issue is fixed in Koha 24.11.20, 25.05.15, 25.11.09, and 26.05.04, and in the 26.11 development branch."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 8.8,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-78",
"description": "CWE-78: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command (\u0027OS Command Injection\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-14T07:23:03.069Z",
"orgId": "309f9ea4-e3e9-4c6c-b79d-e8eb01244f2c",
"shortName": "TuranSec"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"issue-tracking"
],
"url": "https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=42674"
},
{
"url": "https://download.koha-community.org/"
},
{
"tags": [
"related"
],
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-30076"
},
{
"tags": [
"related"
],
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-28739"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Koha authenticated OS command injection in tools/scheduler.pl via the jobid parameter when deleting a scheduled task"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "309f9ea4-e3e9-4c6c-b79d-e8eb01244f2c",
"assignerShortName": "TuranSec",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-105106",
"datePublished": "2026-10-14T07:23:03.069Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-10-03T11:45:52.353Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-14T17:56:36.316Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
Mitigation
If at all possible, use library calls rather than external processes to recreate the desired functionality.
Mitigation MIT-22
Strategy: Sandbox or Jail
- Run the code in a "jail" or similar sandbox environment that enforces strict boundaries between the process and the operating system. This may effectively restrict which files can be accessed in a particular directory or which commands can be executed by the software.
- OS-level examples include the Unix chroot jail, AppArmor, and SELinux. In general, managed code may provide some protection. For example, java.io.FilePermission in the Java SecurityManager allows the software to specify restrictions on file operations.
- This may not be a feasible solution, and it only limits the impact to the operating system; the rest of the application may still be subject to compromise.
- Be careful to avoid CWE-243 and other weaknesses related to jails.
Mitigation
Strategy: Attack Surface Reduction
For any data that will be used to generate a command to be executed, keep as much of that data out of external control as possible. For example, in web applications, this may require storing the data locally in the session's state instead of sending it out to the client in a hidden form field.
Mitigation MIT-15
For any security checks that are performed on the client side, ensure that these checks are duplicated on the server side, in order to avoid CWE-602. Attackers can bypass the client-side checks by modifying values after the checks have been performed, or by changing the client to remove the client-side checks entirely. Then, these modified values would be submitted to the server.
Mitigation MIT-4.3
Strategy: Libraries or Frameworks
- Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid.
- For example, consider using the ESAPI Encoding control [REF-45] or a similar tool, library, or framework. These will help the programmer encode outputs in a manner less prone to error.
Mitigation MIT-28
Strategy: Output Encoding
While it is risky to use dynamically-generated query strings, code, or commands that mix control and data together, sometimes it may be unavoidable. Properly quote arguments and escape any special characters within those arguments. The most conservative approach is to escape or filter all characters that do not pass an extremely strict allowlist (such as everything that is not alphanumeric or white space). If some special characters are still needed, such as white space, wrap each argument in quotes after the escaping/filtering step. Be careful of argument injection (CWE-88).
Mitigation
If the program to be executed allows arguments to be specified within an input file or from standard input, then consider using that mode to pass arguments instead of the command line.
Mitigation MIT-27
Strategy: Parameterization
- If available, use structured mechanisms that automatically enforce the separation between data and code. These mechanisms may be able to provide the relevant quoting, encoding, and validation automatically, instead of relying on the developer to provide this capability at every point where output is generated.
- Some languages offer multiple functions that can be used to invoke commands. Where possible, identify any function that invokes a command shell using a single string, and replace it with a function that requires individual arguments. These functions typically perform appropriate quoting and filtering of arguments. For example, in C, the system() function accepts a string that contains the entire command to be executed, whereas execl(), execve(), and others require an array of strings, one for each argument. In Windows, CreateProcess() only accepts one command at a time. In Perl, if system() is provided with an array of arguments, then it will quote each of the arguments.
Mitigation MIT-5
Strategy: Input Validation
- Assume all input is malicious. Use an "accept known good" input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does.
- When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range of acceptable values, missing or extra inputs, syntax, consistency across related fields, and conformance to business rules. As an example of business rule logic, "boat" may be syntactically valid because it only contains alphanumeric characters, but it is not valid if the input is only expected to contain colors such as "red" or "blue."
- Do not rely exclusively on looking for malicious or malformed inputs. This is likely to miss at least one undesirable input, especially if the code's environment changes. This can give attackers enough room to bypass the intended validation. However, denylists can be useful for detecting potential attacks or determining which inputs are so malformed that they should be rejected outright.
- When constructing OS command strings, use stringent allowlists that limit the character set based on the expected value of the parameter in the request. This will indirectly limit the scope of an attack, but this technique is less important than proper output encoding and escaping.
- Note that proper output encoding, escaping, and quoting is the most effective solution for preventing OS command injection, although input validation may provide some defense-in-depth. This is because it effectively limits what will appear in output. Input validation will not always prevent OS command injection, especially if you are required to support free-form text fields that could contain arbitrary characters. For example, when invoking a mail program, you might need to allow the subject field to contain otherwise-dangerous inputs like ";" and ">" characters, which would need to be escaped or otherwise handled. In this case, stripping the character might reduce the risk of OS command injection, but it would produce incorrect behavior because the subject field would not be recorded as the user intended. This might seem to be a minor inconvenience, but it could be more important when the program relies on well-structured subject lines in order to pass messages to other components.
- Even if you make a mistake in your validation (such as forgetting one out of 100 input fields), appropriate encoding is still likely to protect you from injection-based attacks. As long as it is not done in isolation, input validation is still a useful technique, since it may significantly reduce your attack surface, allow you to detect some attacks, and provide other security benefits that proper encoding does not address.
Mitigation MIT-21
Strategy: Enforcement by Conversion
When the set of acceptable objects, such as filenames or URLs, is limited or known, create a mapping from a set of fixed input values (such as numeric IDs) to the actual filenames or URLs, and reject all other inputs.
Mitigation MIT-32
Strategy: Compilation or Build Hardening
Run the code in an environment that performs automatic taint propagation and prevents any command execution that uses tainted variables, such as Perl's "-T" switch. This will force the program to perform validation steps that remove the taint, although you must be careful to correctly validate your inputs so that you do not accidentally mark dangerous inputs as untainted (see CWE-183 and CWE-184).
Mitigation MIT-32
Strategy: Environment Hardening
Run the code in an environment that performs automatic taint propagation and prevents any command execution that uses tainted variables, such as Perl's "-T" switch. This will force the program to perform validation steps that remove the taint, although you must be careful to correctly validate your inputs so that you do not accidentally mark dangerous inputs as untainted (see CWE-183 and CWE-184).
Mitigation MIT-39
- Ensure that error messages only contain minimal details that are useful to the intended audience and no one else. The messages need to strike the balance between being too cryptic (which can confuse users) or being too detailed (which may reveal more than intended). The messages should not reveal the methods that were used to determine the error. Attackers can use detailed information to refine or optimize their original attack, thereby increasing their chances of success.
- If errors must be captured in some detail, record them in log messages, but consider what could occur if the log messages can be viewed by attackers. Highly sensitive information such as passwords should never be saved to log files.
- Avoid inconsistent messaging that might accidentally tip off an attacker about internal state, such as whether a user account exists or not.
- In the context of OS Command Injection, error information passed back to the user might reveal whether an OS command is being executed and possibly which command is being used.
Mitigation
Strategy: Sandbox or Jail
Use runtime policy enforcement to create an allowlist of allowable commands, then prevent use of any command that does not appear in the allowlist. Technologies such as AppArmor are available to do this.
Mitigation MIT-29
Strategy: Firewall
Use an application firewall that can detect attacks against this weakness. It can be beneficial in cases in which the code cannot be fixed (because it is controlled by a third party), as an emergency prevention measure while more comprehensive software assurance measures are applied, or to provide defense in depth [REF-1481].
Mitigation MIT-17
Strategy: Environment Hardening
Run your code using the lowest privileges that are required to accomplish the necessary tasks [REF-76]. If possible, create isolated accounts with limited privileges that are only used for a single task. That way, a successful attack will not immediately give the attacker access to the rest of the software or its environment. For example, database applications rarely need to run as the database administrator, especially in day-to-day operations.
Mitigation MIT-16
Strategy: Environment Hardening
When using PHP, configure the application so that it does not use register_globals. During implementation, develop the application so that it does not rely on this feature, but be wary of implementing a register_globals emulation that is subject to weaknesses such as CWE-95, CWE-621, and similar issues.
CAPEC-108: Command Line Execution through SQL Injection
An attacker uses standard SQL injection methods to inject data into the command line for execution. This could be done directly through misuse of directives such as MSSQL_xp_cmdshell or indirectly through injection of data into the database that would be interpreted as shell commands. Sometime later, an unscrupulous backend application (or could be part of the functionality of the same application) fetches the injected data stored in the database and uses this data as command line arguments without performing proper validation. The malicious data escapes that data plane by spawning new commands to be executed on the host.
CAPEC-15: Command Delimiters
An attack of this type exploits a programs' vulnerabilities that allows an attacker's commands to be concatenated onto a legitimate command with the intent of targeting other resources such as the file system or database. The system that uses a filter or denylist input validation, as opposed to allowlist validation is vulnerable to an attacker who predicts delimiters (or combinations of delimiters) not present in the filter or denylist. As with other injection attacks, the attacker uses the command delimiter payload as an entry point to tunnel through the application and activate additional attacks through SQL queries, shell commands, network scanning, and so on.
CAPEC-43: Exploiting Multiple Input Interpretation Layers
An attacker supplies the target software with input data that contains sequences of special characters designed to bypass input validation logic. This exploit relies on the target making multiples passes over the input data and processing a "layer" of special characters with each pass. In this manner, the attacker can disguise input that would otherwise be rejected as invalid by concealing it with layers of special/escape characters that are stripped off by subsequent processing steps. The goal is to first discover cases where the input validation layer executes before one or more parsing layers. That is, user input may go through the following logic in an application: <parser1> --> <input validator> --> <parser2>. In such cases, the attacker will need to provide input that will pass through the input validator, but after passing through parser2, will be converted into something that the input validator was supposed to stop.
CAPEC-6: Argument Injection
An attacker changes the behavior or state of a targeted application through injecting data or command syntax through the targets use of non-validated and non-filtered arguments of exposed services or methods.
CAPEC-88: OS Command Injection
In this type of an attack, an adversary injects operating system commands into existing application functions. An application that uses untrusted input to build command strings is vulnerable. An adversary can leverage OS command injection in an application to elevate privileges, execute arbitrary commands and compromise the underlying operating system.