Common Weakness Enumeration
CWE-78
AllowedImproper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection')
Abstraction: Base · Status: Stable
The product constructs all or part of an OS command using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify the intended OS command when it is sent to a downstream component.
9846 vulnerabilities reference this CWE, most recent first.
CVE-2026-106126 (GCVE-0-2026-106126)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-10-08 19:47 – Updated: 2026-10-08 20:14
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
Command Injection
Summary
A command injection vulnerability in the Active Directory Events Listener of Tenable Identity Exposure (SaaS) allows an authenticated, low-privileged attacker to execute arbitrary commands as SYSTEM on the PDCe.
Severity
9.9 (Critical)
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: total
CISA Coordinator · CISA-ADP (v2.0.3)
Decision recorded 2026-10-08 20:14 UTC
CWE
- CWE-78 - Improper neutralization of special elements used in an OS command ('OS command injection')
Assigner
References
1 reference
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tenable, Inc. | Tenable Identity Exposure (SaaS) |
Affected:
0 , < 3.126.0
(semver)
|
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-106126",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-10-08T20:14:50.276958Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-08T20:14:59.908Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"platforms": [
"Windows"
],
"product": "Tenable Identity Exposure (SaaS)",
"vendor": "Tenable, Inc.",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "3.126.0",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Takumi Ito"
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "A command injection vulnerability in the Active Directory Events Listener of Tenable Identity Exposure (SaaS) allows an authenticated, low-privileged attacker to execute arbitrary commands as SYSTEM on the PDCe."
}
],
"value": "A command injection vulnerability in the Active Directory Events Listener of Tenable Identity Exposure (SaaS) allows an authenticated, low-privileged attacker to execute arbitrary commands as SYSTEM on the PDCe."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 9.9,
"baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "CHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
},
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "NONE",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 9.4,
"baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
"exploitMaturity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"subIntegrityImpact": "HIGH",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-78",
"description": "CWE-78 Improper neutralization of special elements used in an OS command (\u0027OS command injection\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-08T19:47:35.912Z",
"orgId": "5ac1ecc2-367a-4d16-a0b2-35d495ddd0be",
"shortName": "tenable"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://www.tenable.com/security/tns-2026-27"
}
],
"solutions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "To fully resolve this issue, existing installations \u003cstrong\u003emust\u003c/strong\u003e run \u003ccode\u003eRegister-TenableIOA.ps1 -Uninstall\u003c/code\u003e and reinstall the listener after upgrading. Please see the full release notes for additional instructions. (\u003ca href=\"https://docs.tenable.com/identity-exposure.htm\"\u003ehttps://docs.tenable.com/identity-exposure.htm\u003c/a\u003e)"
}
],
"value": "To fully resolve this issue, existing installations must run Register-TenableIOA.ps1 -Uninstall and reinstall the listener after upgrading. Please see the full release notes for additional instructions. ( https://docs.tenable.com/identity-exposure.htm )"
}
],
"title": "Command Injection",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 1.0.5"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "5ac1ecc2-367a-4d16-a0b2-35d495ddd0be",
"assignerShortName": "tenable",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-106126",
"datePublished": "2026-10-08T19:47:35.912Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-10-06T15:41:52.906Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-08T20:14:59.908Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-106059 (GCVE-0-2026-106059)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-10-07 11:59 – Updated: 2026-10-10 02:20
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
GitAhead through 2.7.1 on macOS Command Injection via Show in Finder AppleScript
Summary
GitAhead through 2.7.1 on macOS contains a command injection vulnerability that allows attackers to execute shell commands by crafting repository filenames interpolated unescaped into the Show in Finder AppleScript. Attackers can commit a file whose path contains a double quote followed by a do shell script payload, which runs as the victim user when Show in Finder is chosen.
Severity
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: total
CISA Coordinator · CISA-ADP (v2.0.3)
Decision recorded 2026-10-10 02:20 UTC
CWE
- CWE-78 - Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection')
Assigner
References
4 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/gitahead/gitahead/issues/663 | issue-tracking |
| https://github.com/gitahead/gitahead | product |
| https://github.com/gitahead/gitahead/blob/v2.7.1/… | technical-description |
| https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/gitahead-thr… | third-party-advisory |
Date Public
2026-10-05 00:00
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-106059",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-10-10T02:20:22.813539Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-10T02:20:34.299Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "gitahead",
"vendor": "gitahead",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "2.7.1",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "M.J Dhurgesh"
}
],
"datePublic": "2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GitAhead through 2.7.1 on macOS contains a command injection vulnerability that allows attackers to execute shell commands by crafting repository filenames interpolated unescaped into the Show in Finder AppleScript. Attackers can commit a file whose path contains a double quote followed by a do shell script payload, which runs as the victim user when Show in Finder is chosen."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "NONE",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 8.7,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "PASSIVE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "HIGH"
},
"format": "CVSS"
},
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 8.8,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "REQUIRED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS"
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-78",
"description": "Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command (\u0027OS Command Injection\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-07T11:59:38.400Z",
"orgId": "83251b91-4cc7-4094-a5c7-464a1b83ea10",
"shortName": "VulnCheck"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "GitHub Issue #663",
"tags": [
"issue-tracking"
],
"url": "https://github.com/gitahead/gitahead/issues/663"
},
{
"tags": [
"product"
],
"url": "https://github.com/gitahead/gitahead"
},
{
"tags": [
"technical-description"
],
"url": "https://github.com/gitahead/gitahead/blob/v2.7.1/src/tools/ShowTool.cpp#L40-L48"
},
{
"name": "VulnCheck Advisory: GitAhead through 2.7.1 on macOS Command Injection via Show in Finder AppleScript",
"tags": [
"third-party-advisory"
],
"url": "https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/gitahead-through-2.7.1-on-macos-command-injection-via-show-in-finder-applescript"
}
],
"title": "GitAhead through 2.7.1 on macOS Command Injection via Show in Finder AppleScript",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "vulncheck-endgame"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "83251b91-4cc7-4094-a5c7-464a1b83ea10",
"assignerShortName": "VulnCheck",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-106059",
"datePublished": "2026-10-07T11:59:38.400Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-10-06T14:14:18.038Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-10T02:20:34.299Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-106058 (GCVE-0-2026-106058)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-10-07 11:59 – Updated: 2026-10-07 20:55
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
GitAhead through 2.7.1 OS Command Injection via Git Filter Filenames
Summary
GitAhead through 2.7.1 contains an OS command injection vulnerability in src/git/Filter.cpp that allows malicious repositories to execute commands by substituting crafted filenames into clean/smudge filter commands. Attackers can ship files named with $(command) selected via .gitattributes so checkout or staging runs the command through bash -c as the victim.
Severity
SSVC
Exploitation: poc
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: total
CISA Coordinator · CISA-ADP (v2.0.3)
Decision recorded 2026-10-07 20:55 UTC
CWE
- CWE-78 - Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection')
Assigner
References
4 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/gitahead/gitahead/issues/661 | issue-tracking |
| https://github.com/gitahead/gitahead | product |
| https://github.com/gitahead/gitahead/blob/v2.7.1/… | technical-description |
| https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/gitahead-thr… | third-party-advisory |
Date Public
2026-10-04 00:00
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-106058",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "poc"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-10-07T20:55:31.538442Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-07T20:55:38.241Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"exploit"
],
"url": "https://github.com/gitahead/gitahead/issues/661"
}
],
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "gitahead",
"vendor": "gitahead",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "2.7.1",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "M.J Dhurgesh"
}
],
"datePublic": "2026-10-04T00:00:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GitAhead through 2.7.1 contains an OS command injection vulnerability in src/git/Filter.cpp that allows malicious repositories to execute commands by substituting crafted filenames into clean/smudge filter commands. Attackers can ship files named with $(command) selected via .gitattributes so checkout or staging runs the command through bash -c as the victim."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackRequirements": "PRESENT",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 7.7,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "PASSIVE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "HIGH"
},
"format": "CVSS"
},
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 7.5,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "REQUIRED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS"
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-78",
"description": "Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command (\u0027OS Command Injection\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-07T11:59:37.841Z",
"orgId": "83251b91-4cc7-4094-a5c7-464a1b83ea10",
"shortName": "VulnCheck"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "GitHub Issue #661",
"tags": [
"issue-tracking"
],
"url": "https://github.com/gitahead/gitahead/issues/661"
},
{
"tags": [
"product"
],
"url": "https://github.com/gitahead/gitahead"
},
{
"tags": [
"technical-description"
],
"url": "https://github.com/gitahead/gitahead/blob/v2.7.1/src/git/Filter.cpp#L43-L70"
},
{
"name": "VulnCheck Advisory: GitAhead through 2.7.1 OS Command Injection via Git Filter Filenames",
"tags": [
"third-party-advisory"
],
"url": "https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/gitahead-through-2.7.1-os-command-injection-via-git-filter-filenames"
}
],
"title": "GitAhead through 2.7.1 OS Command Injection via Git Filter Filenames",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "vulncheck-endgame"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "83251b91-4cc7-4094-a5c7-464a1b83ea10",
"assignerShortName": "VulnCheck",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-106058",
"datePublished": "2026-10-07T11:59:37.841Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-10-06T14:14:17.656Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-07T20:55:38.241Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-106057 (GCVE-0-2026-106057)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-10-07 11:59 – Updated: 2026-10-07 14:43
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
patool before 4.0.6 OS Command Injection on Windows via shell_quote_nt
Summary
patool before 4.0.6 contains an OS command injection vulnerability on Windows because shell_quote_nt fails to escape cmd.exe metacharacters or embedded double quotes in archive filenames. Attackers can supply crafted filenames like report&calc.gz for single-file formats run with shell=True to execute commands with patool process privileges.
Severity
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: total
CISA Coordinator · CISA-ADP (v2.0.3)
Decision recorded 2026-10-07 14:42 UTC
CWE
- CWE-78 - Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection')
Assigner
References
4 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/wummel/patool/commit/592f35761… | patch |
| https://github.com/wummel/patool | product |
| https://github.com/wummel/patool/blob/4.0.5/patoo… | technical-description |
| https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/patool-befor… | third-party-advisory |
Impacted products
Date Public
2026-09-02 00:00
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-106057",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-10-07T14:42:55.556286Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-07T14:43:03.949Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"packageURL": "pkg:pypi/patool",
"product": "patool",
"vendor": "wummel",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "4.0.6",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "4.0.6",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Muhammad Sobirov"
}
],
"datePublic": "2026-09-02T00:00:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "patool before 4.0.6 contains an OS command injection vulnerability on Windows because shell_quote_nt fails to escape cmd.exe metacharacters or embedded double quotes in archive filenames. Attackers can supply crafted filenames like report\u0026calc.gz for single-file formats run with shell=True to execute commands with patool process privileges."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "NONE",
"attackVector": "LOCAL",
"baseScore": 8.5,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "PASSIVE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "HIGH"
},
"format": "CVSS"
},
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "LOCAL",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 7.8,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "REQUIRED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS"
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-78",
"description": "Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command (\u0027OS Command Injection\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-07T11:59:37.019Z",
"orgId": "83251b91-4cc7-4094-a5c7-464a1b83ea10",
"shortName": "VulnCheck"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "Patch Commit",
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/wummel/patool/commit/592f35761f428afbcde2888ecd3cc4af43881aeb"
},
{
"tags": [
"product"
],
"url": "https://github.com/wummel/patool"
},
{
"tags": [
"technical-description"
],
"url": "https://github.com/wummel/patool/blob/4.0.5/patoolib/util.py#L110-L116"
},
{
"name": "VulnCheck Advisory: patool before 4.0.6 OS Command Injection on Windows via shell_quote_nt",
"tags": [
"third-party-advisory"
],
"url": "https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/patool-before-4.0.6-os-command-injection-on-windows-via-shell-quote-nt"
}
],
"title": "patool before 4.0.6 OS Command Injection on Windows via shell_quote_nt",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "vulncheck-endgame"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "83251b91-4cc7-4094-a5c7-464a1b83ea10",
"assignerShortName": "VulnCheck",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-106057",
"datePublished": "2026-10-07T11:59:37.019Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-10-06T14:14:17.255Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-07T14:43:03.949Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-106056 (GCVE-0-2026-106056)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-10-07 11:59 – Updated: 2026-10-07 17:05
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
Rundeck before 6.2.0 OS Command Injection via Windows Job Option Quoting
Summary
Rundeck before 6.2.0 contains an OS command injection vulnerability that allows authenticated users with job run permission to execute commands on Windows nodes by supplying crafted option values. Attackers can inject cmd.exe metacharacters such as && or | into free-text options, which CLIUtils.quoteWindowsCMDArg wraps in ineffective single quotes, running commands with node executor credential privileges.
Severity
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: total
CISA Coordinator · CISA-ADP (v2.0.3)
Decision recorded 2026-10-07 16:08 UTC
CWE
- CWE-78 - Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection')
Assigner
References
6 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/rundeck/rundeck/pull/10414 | patchissue-tracking |
| https://github.com/rundeck/rundeck/commit/807d9cf… | patch |
| https://github.com/rundeck/rundeck | product |
| https://github.com/rundeck/rundeck/blob/v6.1.0/co… | technical-description |
| https://github.com/rundeck/rundeck/releases/tag/v6.2.0 | release-notes |
| https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/rundeck-befo… | third-party-advisory |
Impacted products
Date Public
2026-08-10 00:00
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-106056",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-10-07T16:08:10.333316Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-07T17:05:09.208Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "rundeck",
"vendor": "rundeck",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "6.2.0",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.2.0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Eldor Nabijonov"
}
],
"datePublic": "2026-08-10T00:00:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Rundeck before 6.2.0 contains an OS command injection vulnerability that allows authenticated users with job run permission to execute commands on Windows nodes by supplying crafted option values. Attackers can inject cmd.exe metacharacters such as \u0026\u0026 or | into free-text options, which CLIUtils.quoteWindowsCMDArg wraps in ineffective single quotes, running commands with node executor credential privileges."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackRequirements": "PRESENT",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 7.7,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "HIGH"
},
"format": "CVSS"
},
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 7.5,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS"
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-78",
"description": "Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command (\u0027OS Command Injection\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-07T11:59:36.400Z",
"orgId": "83251b91-4cc7-4094-a5c7-464a1b83ea10",
"shortName": "VulnCheck"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "Pull Request #10414",
"tags": [
"patch",
"issue-tracking"
],
"url": "https://github.com/rundeck/rundeck/pull/10414"
},
{
"name": "Patch Commit",
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/rundeck/rundeck/commit/807d9cf0eef63669b342e02e05a740e97f84f013"
},
{
"tags": [
"product"
],
"url": "https://github.com/rundeck/rundeck"
},
{
"tags": [
"technical-description"
],
"url": "https://github.com/rundeck/rundeck/blob/v6.1.0/core/src/main/java/com/dtolabs/rundeck/core/cli/CLIUtils.java#L146-L158"
},
{
"name": "rundeck v6.2.0 Release Notes",
"tags": [
"release-notes"
],
"url": "https://github.com/rundeck/rundeck/releases/tag/v6.2.0"
},
{
"name": "VulnCheck Advisory: Rundeck before 6.2.0 OS Command Injection via Windows Job Option Quoting",
"tags": [
"third-party-advisory"
],
"url": "https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/rundeck-before-6.2.0-os-command-injection-via-windows-job-option-quoting"
}
],
"title": "Rundeck before 6.2.0 OS Command Injection via Windows Job Option Quoting",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "vulncheck-endgame"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "83251b91-4cc7-4094-a5c7-464a1b83ea10",
"assignerShortName": "VulnCheck",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-106056",
"datePublished": "2026-10-07T11:59:36.400Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-10-06T14:14:11.856Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-07T17:05:09.208Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-105841 (GCVE-0-2026-105841)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-10-06 13:35 – Updated: 2026-10-06 13:58
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
lrzsz before 0.13.0 OS Command Injection via lrz Pipe Mode
Summary
lrzsz before 0.13.0 contains an OS command injection vulnerability in the lrz receive utility's pipe mode that allows remote senders to execute commands by supplying crafted filenames. When lrz runs under a suffixed name such as lrztar, procheader() in src/lrz.c passes the unescaped ZMODEM/YMODEM filename to popen(), so shell metacharacters execute as the receiving user.
Severity
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: total
CISA Coordinator · CISA-ADP (v2.0.3)
Decision recorded 2026-10-06 13:56 UTC
CWE
- CWE-78 - Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection')
Assigner
References
3 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://ohse.de/uwe/software/lrzsz/NEWS-0.13.0.html | vendor-advisory |
| https://ohse.de/uwe/software/lrzsz.html | product |
| https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/lrzsz-before… | third-party-advisory |
Impacted products
Date Public
2026-09-30 00:00
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-105841",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-10-06T13:56:33.353808Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-06T13:58:44.875Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "lrzsz",
"vendor": "Uwe Ohse",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "0.13.0",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"cpeApplicability": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:lrzsz_project:lrzsz:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "0.13.0",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Tristan Madani"
}
],
"datePublic": "2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "lrzsz before 0.13.0 contains an OS command injection vulnerability in the lrz receive utility\u0027s pipe mode that allows remote senders to execute commands by supplying crafted filenames. When lrz runs under a suffixed name such as lrztar, procheader() in src/lrz.c passes the unescaped ZMODEM/YMODEM filename to popen(), so shell metacharacters execute as the receiving user."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "PRESENT",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 7.7,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "PASSIVE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "HIGH"
},
"format": "CVSS"
},
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 7.5,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "REQUIRED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS"
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-78",
"description": "Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command (\u0027OS Command Injection\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-06T13:35:46.900Z",
"orgId": "83251b91-4cc7-4094-a5c7-464a1b83ea10",
"shortName": "VulnCheck"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "lrzsz 0.13.0 security changes",
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory"
],
"url": "https://ohse.de/uwe/software/lrzsz/NEWS-0.13.0.html"
},
{
"tags": [
"product"
],
"url": "https://ohse.de/uwe/software/lrzsz.html"
},
{
"name": "VulnCheck Advisory: lrzsz before 0.13.0 OS Command Injection via lrz Pipe Mode",
"tags": [
"third-party-advisory"
],
"url": "https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/lrzsz-before-0.13.0-os-command-injection-via-lrz-pipe-mode"
}
],
"title": "lrzsz before 0.13.0 OS Command Injection via lrz Pipe Mode",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "vulncheck-endgame"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "83251b91-4cc7-4094-a5c7-464a1b83ea10",
"assignerShortName": "VulnCheck",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-105841",
"datePublished": "2026-10-06T13:35:46.900Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-10-05T22:00:10.842Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-06T13:58:44.875Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-105797 (GCVE-0-2026-105797)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-10-06 14:23 – Updated: 2026-10-06 17:36
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
SimpleChat: Command injection via authorization-gate ordering flaw (arbitrary process spawn through MCP stdio transport)
Summary
SimpleChat is a secure AI conversation application with personal and group workspaces for document-grounded interactions. In versions 0.261.003 and 0.261.027, an authorization ordering flaw in POST /api/user/plugins allows an authenticated low-privileged user to omit the top-level MCP type so that _reject_non_admin_mcp_stdio skips inspection before the type is restored from metadata. The stored personal action can then reach McpPluginFactory.create_connector, and MCPStdioPlugin.connect starts the attacker-selected operating-system process under the application service identity when the action tool is invoked. Exploitation requires personal plugins to be enabled and governance to permit MCP actions, and it can expose or modify secrets and data available to the service or disrupt the service. This issue is fixed in version 0.261.031.
Severity
8.8 (High)
SSVC
Exploitation: poc
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: total
CISA Coordinator · CISA-ADP (v2.0.3)
Decision recorded 2026-10-06 17:36 UTC
CWE
Assigner
References
2 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/microsoft/simplechat/security/… | x_refsource_CONFIRM |
| https://github.com/microsoft/simplechat/commit/73… | x_refsource_MISC |
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| microsoft | simplechat |
Affected:
< 0.261.031
|
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-105797",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "poc"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-10-06T17:36:18.199579Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-06T17:36:24.059Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"exploit"
],
"url": "https://github.com/microsoft/simplechat/security/advisories/GHSA-h4mw-qw8m-5x4j"
}
],
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "simplechat",
"vendor": "microsoft",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003c 0.261.031"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "SimpleChat is a secure AI conversation application with personal and group workspaces for document-grounded interactions. In versions 0.261.003 and 0.261.027, an authorization ordering flaw in POST /api/user/plugins allows an authenticated low-privileged user to omit the top-level MCP type so that _reject_non_admin_mcp_stdio skips inspection before the type is restored from metadata. The stored personal action can then reach McpPluginFactory.create_connector, and MCPStdioPlugin.connect starts the attacker-selected operating-system process under the application service identity when the action tool is invoked. Exploitation requires personal plugins to be enabled and governance to permit MCP actions, and it can expose or modify secrets and data available to the service or disrupt the service. This issue is fixed in version 0.261.031."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 8.8,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-78",
"description": "CWE-78: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command (\u0027OS Command Injection\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
},
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-863",
"description": "CWE-863: Incorrect Authorization",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-06T14:23:42.012Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/microsoft/simplechat/security/advisories/GHSA-h4mw-qw8m-5x4j",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/microsoft/simplechat/security/advisories/GHSA-h4mw-qw8m-5x4j"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/microsoft/simplechat/commit/73ff7d6998dc4827a0f6ba002386275a7c1ec804",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/microsoft/simplechat/commit/73ff7d6998dc4827a0f6ba002386275a7c1ec804"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-h4mw-qw8m-5x4j",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "SimpleChat: Command injection via authorization-gate ordering flaw (arbitrary process spawn through MCP stdio transport)"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-105797",
"datePublished": "2026-10-06T14:23:42.012Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-10-05T20:37:19.364Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-06T17:36:24.059Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-105793 (GCVE-0-2026-105793)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-10-06 14:12 – Updated: 2026-10-06 15:01
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
Microsoft UFO: Authenticated Android shell command injection in Mobile MCP `press_key`
Summary
Microsoft UFO is an open-source framework for intelligent automation across devices and platforms. Prior to 3.0.9, the press_key tool in ufo/client/mcp/http_servers/mobile_mcp_server.py accepts a free-form key_code parameter and passes it to `adb shell input keyevent`. The adb client joins the arguments into a remote command string that the Android shell reparses, allowing an authenticated Mobile MCP caller to execute additional commands as the Android shell user on an authorized connected device. Exploitation requires a valid UFO_MCP_API_KEY, adb on the host, and a reachable authorized device, and it does not establish host operating-system execution, Android root execution, or access beyond the Android shell-user privileges. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.9.
Severity
9.1 (Critical)
SSVC
Exploitation: poc
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator · CISA-ADP (v2.0.3)
Decision recorded 2026-10-06 14:55 UTC
CWE
- CWE-78 - Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection')
Assigner
References
3 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/microsoft/UFO/security/advisor… | x_refsource_CONFIRM |
| https://github.com/microsoft/UFO/commit/a53879104… | x_refsource_MISC |
| https://github.com/microsoft/UFO/releases/tag/v3.0.9 | x_refsource_MISC |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-105793",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "poc"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-10-06T14:55:04.730539Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-06T15:01:03.322Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"exploit"
],
"url": "https://github.com/microsoft/UFO/security/advisories/GHSA-5cjx-4375-4877"
}
],
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "UFO",
"vendor": "microsoft",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003c 3.0.9"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Microsoft UFO is an open-source framework for intelligent automation across devices and platforms. Prior to 3.0.9, the press_key tool in ufo/client/mcp/http_servers/mobile_mcp_server.py accepts a free-form key_code parameter and passes it to `adb shell input keyevent`. The adb client joins the arguments into a remote command string that the Android shell reparses, allowing an authenticated Mobile MCP caller to execute additional commands as the Android shell user on an authorized connected device. Exploitation requires a valid UFO_MCP_API_KEY, adb on the host, and a reachable authorized device, and it does not establish host operating-system execution, Android root execution, or access beyond the Android shell-user privileges. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.9."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "LOW",
"baseScore": 9.1,
"baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
"confidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "CHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:H/A:L",
"version": "3.1"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-78",
"description": "CWE-78: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command (\u0027OS Command Injection\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-06T14:12:17.255Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/microsoft/UFO/security/advisories/GHSA-5cjx-4375-4877",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/microsoft/UFO/security/advisories/GHSA-5cjx-4375-4877"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/microsoft/UFO/commit/a538791043327a0c33731d5be428867a5fd71794",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/microsoft/UFO/commit/a538791043327a0c33731d5be428867a5fd71794"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/microsoft/UFO/releases/tag/v3.0.9",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/microsoft/UFO/releases/tag/v3.0.9"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-5cjx-4375-4877",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Microsoft UFO: Authenticated Android shell command injection in Mobile MCP `press_key`"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-105793",
"datePublished": "2026-10-06T14:12:17.255Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-10-05T20:37:19.364Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-06T15:01:03.322Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-105788 (GCVE-0-2026-105788)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-10-06 14:05 – Updated: 2026-10-06 15:08
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
Microsoft UFO: Authenticated Android shell command injection in Mobile MCP type_text and launch_app
Summary
Microsoft UFO is an open-source framework for intelligent automation across devices and platforms. Prior to 3.0.10, the type_text and launch_app tools in ufo/client/mcp/http_servers/mobile_mcp_server.py pass the authenticated caller-controlled text and package_name parameters into adb shell command argument positions without comprehensive validation. The adb client joins those arguments into a remote command string that the Android shell reparses, allowing shell metacharacters to execute additional commands on an authorized connected device as the Android shell user. Exploitation requires a valid Mobile MCP API key and a reachable device authorized for ADB, and it does not establish host operating-system execution, Android root execution, or access beyond the Android shell-user privileges. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.10.
Severity
8.8 (High)
SSVC
Exploitation: poc
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: total
CISA Coordinator · CISA-ADP (v2.0.3)
Decision recorded 2026-10-06 15:05 UTC
CWE
Assigner
References
4 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/microsoft/UFO/security/advisor… | x_refsource_CONFIRM |
| https://github.com/microsoft/UFO/commit/214443218… | x_refsource_MISC |
| https://github.com/microsoft/UFO/commit/a53879104… | x_refsource_MISC |
| https://github.com/microsoft/UFO/releases/tag/v3.0.10 | x_refsource_MISC |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-105788",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "poc"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-10-06T15:05:06.562657Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-06T15:08:18.093Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"exploit"
],
"url": "https://github.com/microsoft/UFO/security/advisories/GHSA-6ppj-5886-4f26"
}
],
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "UFO",
"vendor": "microsoft",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003c 3.0.10"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Microsoft UFO is an open-source framework for intelligent automation across devices and platforms. Prior to 3.0.10, the type_text and launch_app tools in ufo/client/mcp/http_servers/mobile_mcp_server.py pass the authenticated caller-controlled text and package_name parameters into adb shell command argument positions without comprehensive validation. The adb client joins those arguments into a remote command string that the Android shell reparses, allowing shell metacharacters to execute additional commands on an authorized connected device as the Android shell user. Exploitation requires a valid Mobile MCP API key and a reachable device authorized for ADB, and it does not establish host operating-system execution, Android root execution, or access beyond the Android shell-user privileges. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.10."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 8.8,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-78",
"description": "CWE-78: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command (\u0027OS Command Injection\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
},
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-88",
"description": "CWE-88: Improper Neutralization of Argument Delimiters in a Command (\u0027Argument Injection\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-06T14:05:24.022Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/microsoft/UFO/security/advisories/GHSA-6ppj-5886-4f26",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/microsoft/UFO/security/advisories/GHSA-6ppj-5886-4f26"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/microsoft/UFO/commit/214443218bf4a3b8de798fd44e7fd770afefee83",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/microsoft/UFO/commit/214443218bf4a3b8de798fd44e7fd770afefee83"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/microsoft/UFO/commit/a538791043327a0c33731d5be428867a5fd71794",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/microsoft/UFO/commit/a538791043327a0c33731d5be428867a5fd71794"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/microsoft/UFO/releases/tag/v3.0.10",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/microsoft/UFO/releases/tag/v3.0.10"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-6ppj-5886-4f26",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Microsoft UFO: Authenticated Android shell command injection in Mobile MCP type_text and launch_app"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-105788",
"datePublished": "2026-10-06T14:05:24.022Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-10-05T20:37:19.363Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-06T15:08:18.093Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-105767 (GCVE-0-2026-105767)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-10-05 19:48 – Updated: 2026-10-06 14:14
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
Chainguard Academy (edu) integrate-platform-docs composite action interpolates inputs into shell commands
Summary
Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command in the integrate-platform-docs composite GitHub Action of Chainguard Academy (edu) from commit 7375a80caabcc31c33ec90f29687ed78c13d16ff before commit fb0efb2537d326ab18c07d620875b8ed2a4b39f3 allows an actor who controls the project_id or storage_bucket inputs to execute arbitrary shell commands on the GitHub Actions runner, because the inputs are interpolated directly into Bash gcloud storage cp commands in several steps via ${{ inputs.* }} expressions. The only in-repository caller passed repository secrets and ran only on trusted triggers, so no untrusted input was known to reach the vulnerable steps.
Severity
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator · CISA-ADP (v2.0.3)
Decision recorded 2026-10-06 14:14 UTC
CWE
- CWE-78 - Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection')
Assigner
References
2 references
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chainguard | Chainguard Academy (edu) |
Affected:
7375a80caabcc31c33ec90f29687ed78c13d16ff , < fb0efb2537d326ab18c07d620875b8ed2a4b39f3
(git)
|
Date Public
2026-06-26 18:13
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-105767",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-10-06T14:14:17.632816Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-06T14:14:31.450Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"modules": [
"integrate-platform-docs composite action"
],
"platforms": [
"GitHub Actions"
],
"product": "Chainguard Academy (edu)",
"programFiles": [
".github/actions/integrate-platform-docs/action.yaml",
".github/workflows/integrate-platform-docs/action.yaml",
".github/workflows/integrate-enforce-docs/action.yaml"
],
"repo": "https://github.com/chainguard-dev/edu",
"vendor": "Chainguard",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "fb0efb2537d326ab18c07d620875b8ed2a4b39f3",
"status": "affected",
"version": "7375a80caabcc31c33ec90f29687ed78c13d16ff",
"versionType": "git"
}
]
}
],
"configurations": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cp\u003eA workflow uses the \u003ccode\u003eintegrate-platform-docs\u003c/code\u003e action and passes attacker-controlled values into the \u003ccode\u003eproject_id\u003c/code\u003e or \u003ccode\u003estorage_bucket\u003c/code\u003e inputs.\u003c/p\u003e"
}
],
"value": "A workflow uses the integrate-platform-docs action and passes attacker-controlled values into the project_id or storage_bucket inputs."
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "remediation developer",
"value": "Steve Beattie (https://github.com/stevebeattie)"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "coordinator",
"value": "SunnyR (https://github.com/SunnyR)"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "coordinator",
"value": "Chainguard (https://chainguard.dev)"
}
],
"datePublic": "2026-06-26T18:13:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cp\u003eImproper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command in the \u003ccode\u003eintegrate-platform-docs\u003c/code\u003e composite GitHub Action of Chainguard Academy (edu) from commit 7375a80caabcc31c33ec90f29687ed78c13d16ff before commit fb0efb2537d326ab18c07d620875b8ed2a4b39f3 allows an actor who controls the \u003ccode\u003eproject_id\u003c/code\u003e or \u003ccode\u003estorage_bucket\u003c/code\u003e inputs to execute arbitrary shell commands on the GitHub Actions runner, because the inputs are interpolated directly into Bash \u003ccode\u003egcloud storage cp\u003c/code\u003e commands in several steps via \u003ccode\u003e${{ inputs.* }}\u003c/code\u003e expressions. The only in-repository caller passed repository secrets and ran only on trusted triggers, so no untrusted input was known to reach the vulnerable steps.\u003c/p\u003e"
}
],
"value": "Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command in the integrate-platform-docs composite GitHub Action of Chainguard Academy (edu) from commit 7375a80caabcc31c33ec90f29687ed78c13d16ff before commit fb0efb2537d326ab18c07d620875b8ed2a4b39f3 allows an actor who controls the project_id or storage_bucket inputs to execute arbitrary shell commands on the GitHub Actions runner, because the inputs are interpolated directly into Bash gcloud storage cp commands in several steps via ${{ inputs.* }} expressions. The only in-repository caller passed repository secrets and ran only on trusted triggers, so no untrusted input was known to reach the vulnerable steps."
}
],
"impacts": [
{
"capecId": "CAPEC-88",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CAPEC-88 OS Command Injection"
}
]
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "PRESENT",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 2.1,
"baseSeverity": "LOW",
"exploitMaturity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"privilegesRequired": "HIGH",
"providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:H/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "LOW",
"vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
},
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 3.3,
"baseSeverity": "LOW",
"confidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"integrityImpact": "LOW",
"privilegesRequired": "HIGH",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-78",
"description": "CWE-78 Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command (\u0027OS Command Injection\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-05T19:48:47.712Z",
"orgId": "82cea9a6-e9e3-46fe-bdb0-3673de380178",
"shortName": "chainguard"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "Fix commit fb0efb2",
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/chainguard-dev/edu/commit/fb0efb2537d326ab18c07d620875b8ed2a4b39f3"
},
{
"name": "chainguard-dev/edu#3471",
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/chainguard-dev/edu/pull/3471"
}
],
"solutions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cp\u003eFixed in commit fb0efb2537d326ab18c07d620875b8ed2a4b39f3, which passes the inputs to the shell through environment variables instead of expression interpolation. Workflows that reference this action at an older ref should update to fb0efb2537d326ab18c07d620875b8ed2a4b39f3 or later.\u003c/p\u003e"
}
],
"value": "Fixed in commit fb0efb2537d326ab18c07d620875b8ed2a4b39f3, which passes the inputs to the shell through environment variables instead of expression interpolation. Workflows that reference this action at an older ref should update to fb0efb2537d326ab18c07d620875b8ed2a4b39f3 or later."
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "INTERNAL"
},
"timeline": [
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2023-01-20T14:42:00.000Z",
"value": "Action introduced with inline input interpolation (chainguard-dev/edu#227)"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2026-06-26T18:13:00.000Z",
"value": "Fix merged (chainguard-dev/edu#3471)"
}
],
"title": "Chainguard Academy (edu) integrate-platform-docs composite action interpolates inputs into shell commands",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 1.0.5"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "82cea9a6-e9e3-46fe-bdb0-3673de380178",
"assignerShortName": "chainguard",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-105767",
"datePublished": "2026-10-05T19:48:47.712Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-10-05T19:21:04.930Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-06T14:14:31.450Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
Mitigation
Architecture and Design
If at all possible, use library calls rather than external processes to recreate the desired functionality.
Mitigation MIT-22
Architecture and Design
Operation
Strategy: Sandbox or Jail
- Run the code in a "jail" or similar sandbox environment that enforces strict boundaries between the process and the operating system. This may effectively restrict which files can be accessed in a particular directory or which commands can be executed by the software.
- OS-level examples include the Unix chroot jail, AppArmor, and SELinux. In general, managed code may provide some protection. For example, java.io.FilePermission in the Java SecurityManager allows the software to specify restrictions on file operations.
- This may not be a feasible solution, and it only limits the impact to the operating system; the rest of the application may still be subject to compromise.
- Be careful to avoid CWE-243 and other weaknesses related to jails.
Mitigation
Architecture and Design
Strategy: Attack Surface Reduction
For any data that will be used to generate a command to be executed, keep as much of that data out of external control as possible. For example, in web applications, this may require storing the data locally in the session's state instead of sending it out to the client in a hidden form field.
Mitigation MIT-15
Architecture and Design
For any security checks that are performed on the client side, ensure that these checks are duplicated on the server side, in order to avoid CWE-602. Attackers can bypass the client-side checks by modifying values after the checks have been performed, or by changing the client to remove the client-side checks entirely. Then, these modified values would be submitted to the server.
Mitigation MIT-4.3
Architecture and Design
Strategy: Libraries or Frameworks
- Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid.
- For example, consider using the ESAPI Encoding control [REF-45] or a similar tool, library, or framework. These will help the programmer encode outputs in a manner less prone to error.
Mitigation MIT-28
Implementation
Strategy: Output Encoding
While it is risky to use dynamically-generated query strings, code, or commands that mix control and data together, sometimes it may be unavoidable. Properly quote arguments and escape any special characters within those arguments. The most conservative approach is to escape or filter all characters that do not pass an extremely strict allowlist (such as everything that is not alphanumeric or white space). If some special characters are still needed, such as white space, wrap each argument in quotes after the escaping/filtering step. Be careful of argument injection (CWE-88).
Mitigation
Implementation
If the program to be executed allows arguments to be specified within an input file or from standard input, then consider using that mode to pass arguments instead of the command line.
Mitigation MIT-27
Architecture and Design
Strategy: Parameterization
- If available, use structured mechanisms that automatically enforce the separation between data and code. These mechanisms may be able to provide the relevant quoting, encoding, and validation automatically, instead of relying on the developer to provide this capability at every point where output is generated.
- Some languages offer multiple functions that can be used to invoke commands. Where possible, identify any function that invokes a command shell using a single string, and replace it with a function that requires individual arguments. These functions typically perform appropriate quoting and filtering of arguments. For example, in C, the system() function accepts a string that contains the entire command to be executed, whereas execl(), execve(), and others require an array of strings, one for each argument. In Windows, CreateProcess() only accepts one command at a time. In Perl, if system() is provided with an array of arguments, then it will quote each of the arguments.
Mitigation MIT-5
Implementation
Strategy: Input Validation
- Assume all input is malicious. Use an "accept known good" input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does.
- When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range of acceptable values, missing or extra inputs, syntax, consistency across related fields, and conformance to business rules. As an example of business rule logic, "boat" may be syntactically valid because it only contains alphanumeric characters, but it is not valid if the input is only expected to contain colors such as "red" or "blue."
- Do not rely exclusively on looking for malicious or malformed inputs. This is likely to miss at least one undesirable input, especially if the code's environment changes. This can give attackers enough room to bypass the intended validation. However, denylists can be useful for detecting potential attacks or determining which inputs are so malformed that they should be rejected outright.
- When constructing OS command strings, use stringent allowlists that limit the character set based on the expected value of the parameter in the request. This will indirectly limit the scope of an attack, but this technique is less important than proper output encoding and escaping.
- Note that proper output encoding, escaping, and quoting is the most effective solution for preventing OS command injection, although input validation may provide some defense-in-depth. This is because it effectively limits what will appear in output. Input validation will not always prevent OS command injection, especially if you are required to support free-form text fields that could contain arbitrary characters. For example, when invoking a mail program, you might need to allow the subject field to contain otherwise-dangerous inputs like ";" and ">" characters, which would need to be escaped or otherwise handled. In this case, stripping the character might reduce the risk of OS command injection, but it would produce incorrect behavior because the subject field would not be recorded as the user intended. This might seem to be a minor inconvenience, but it could be more important when the program relies on well-structured subject lines in order to pass messages to other components.
- Even if you make a mistake in your validation (such as forgetting one out of 100 input fields), appropriate encoding is still likely to protect you from injection-based attacks. As long as it is not done in isolation, input validation is still a useful technique, since it may significantly reduce your attack surface, allow you to detect some attacks, and provide other security benefits that proper encoding does not address.
Mitigation MIT-21
Architecture and Design
Strategy: Enforcement by Conversion
When the set of acceptable objects, such as filenames or URLs, is limited or known, create a mapping from a set of fixed input values (such as numeric IDs) to the actual filenames or URLs, and reject all other inputs.
Mitigation MIT-32
Operation
Strategy: Compilation or Build Hardening
Run the code in an environment that performs automatic taint propagation and prevents any command execution that uses tainted variables, such as Perl's "-T" switch. This will force the program to perform validation steps that remove the taint, although you must be careful to correctly validate your inputs so that you do not accidentally mark dangerous inputs as untainted (see CWE-183 and CWE-184).
Mitigation MIT-32
Operation
Strategy: Environment Hardening
Run the code in an environment that performs automatic taint propagation and prevents any command execution that uses tainted variables, such as Perl's "-T" switch. This will force the program to perform validation steps that remove the taint, although you must be careful to correctly validate your inputs so that you do not accidentally mark dangerous inputs as untainted (see CWE-183 and CWE-184).
Mitigation MIT-39
Implementation
- Ensure that error messages only contain minimal details that are useful to the intended audience and no one else. The messages need to strike the balance between being too cryptic (which can confuse users) or being too detailed (which may reveal more than intended). The messages should not reveal the methods that were used to determine the error. Attackers can use detailed information to refine or optimize their original attack, thereby increasing their chances of success.
- If errors must be captured in some detail, record them in log messages, but consider what could occur if the log messages can be viewed by attackers. Highly sensitive information such as passwords should never be saved to log files.
- Avoid inconsistent messaging that might accidentally tip off an attacker about internal state, such as whether a user account exists or not.
- In the context of OS Command Injection, error information passed back to the user might reveal whether an OS command is being executed and possibly which command is being used.
Mitigation
Operation
Strategy: Sandbox or Jail
Use runtime policy enforcement to create an allowlist of allowable commands, then prevent use of any command that does not appear in the allowlist. Technologies such as AppArmor are available to do this.
Mitigation MIT-29
Operation
Strategy: Firewall
Use an application firewall that can detect attacks against this weakness. It can be beneficial in cases in which the code cannot be fixed (because it is controlled by a third party), as an emergency prevention measure while more comprehensive software assurance measures are applied, or to provide defense in depth [REF-1481].
Mitigation MIT-17
Architecture and Design
Operation
Strategy: Environment Hardening
Run your code using the lowest privileges that are required to accomplish the necessary tasks [REF-76]. If possible, create isolated accounts with limited privileges that are only used for a single task. That way, a successful attack will not immediately give the attacker access to the rest of the software or its environment. For example, database applications rarely need to run as the database administrator, especially in day-to-day operations.
Mitigation MIT-16
Operation
Implementation
Strategy: Environment Hardening
When using PHP, configure the application so that it does not use register_globals. During implementation, develop the application so that it does not rely on this feature, but be wary of implementing a register_globals emulation that is subject to weaknesses such as CWE-95, CWE-621, and similar issues.
CAPEC-108: Command Line Execution through SQL Injection
An attacker uses standard SQL injection methods to inject data into the command line for execution. This could be done directly through misuse of directives such as MSSQL_xp_cmdshell or indirectly through injection of data into the database that would be interpreted as shell commands. Sometime later, an unscrupulous backend application (or could be part of the functionality of the same application) fetches the injected data stored in the database and uses this data as command line arguments without performing proper validation. The malicious data escapes that data plane by spawning new commands to be executed on the host.
CAPEC-15: Command Delimiters
An attack of this type exploits a programs' vulnerabilities that allows an attacker's commands to be concatenated onto a legitimate command with the intent of targeting other resources such as the file system or database. The system that uses a filter or denylist input validation, as opposed to allowlist validation is vulnerable to an attacker who predicts delimiters (or combinations of delimiters) not present in the filter or denylist. As with other injection attacks, the attacker uses the command delimiter payload as an entry point to tunnel through the application and activate additional attacks through SQL queries, shell commands, network scanning, and so on.
CAPEC-43: Exploiting Multiple Input Interpretation Layers
An attacker supplies the target software with input data that contains sequences of special characters designed to bypass input validation logic. This exploit relies on the target making multiples passes over the input data and processing a "layer" of special characters with each pass. In this manner, the attacker can disguise input that would otherwise be rejected as invalid by concealing it with layers of special/escape characters that are stripped off by subsequent processing steps. The goal is to first discover cases where the input validation layer executes before one or more parsing layers. That is, user input may go through the following logic in an application: <parser1> --> <input validator> --> <parser2>. In such cases, the attacker will need to provide input that will pass through the input validator, but after passing through parser2, will be converted into something that the input validator was supposed to stop.
CAPEC-6: Argument Injection
An attacker changes the behavior or state of a targeted application through injecting data or command syntax through the targets use of non-validated and non-filtered arguments of exposed services or methods.
CAPEC-88: OS Command Injection
In this type of an attack, an adversary injects operating system commands into existing application functions. An application that uses untrusted input to build command strings is vulnerable. An adversary can leverage OS command injection in an application to elevate privileges, execute arbitrary commands and compromise the underlying operating system.