Common Weakness Enumeration

CWE-787

Weakness Allowed-with-Review

Out-of-bounds Write

Abstraction: Base · Status: Draft

The product writes data past the end, or before the beginning, of the intended buffer.

Dimensions

  • Behavior-Type: Write
  • Resource-Type: Memory Buffer
  • Resource-Property: Out-of-bounds
Mapping guidance

This CWE entry is at the Base level of abstraction, which is a preferred level of abstraction for mapping to the root causes of vulnerabilities. However, closer examination is required.

While this CWE is allowed for mapping, it has more specific children that might be a better fit. Carefully read both the name and description to ensure that this mapping is appropriate. Consider the root cause errors that have led to the out-of-bounds write by examining "CanFollow" relationships for this entry.

Relationships and members
ChildOf: CWE-119 · View CWE-1000
ChildOf: CWE-119 · View CWE-1003
ChildOf: CWE-119 · View CWE-1305
ChildOf: CWE-119 · View CWE-1340
Modes of introduction
Implementation
Detection methods

Automated Static Analysis

This weakness can often be detected using automated static analysis tools. Many modern tools use data flow analysis or constraint-based techniques to minimize the number of false positives.

Automated static analysis generally does not account for environmental considerations when reporting out-of-bounds memory operations. This can make it difficult for users to determine which warnings should be investigated first. For example, an analysis tool might report buffer overflows that originate from command line arguments in a program that is not expected to run with setuid or other special privileges.

Effectiveness: High

Detection techniques for buffer-related errors are more mature than for most other weakness types.

Automated Dynamic Analysis

This weakness can be detected using dynamic tools and techniques that interact with the software using large test suites with many diverse inputs, such as fuzz testing (fuzzing), robustness testing, and fault injection. The software's operation may slow down, but it should not become unstable, crash, or generate incorrect results.

Automated Dynamic Analysis

Use tools that are integrated during compilation to insert runtime error-checking mechanisms related to memory safety errors, such as AddressSanitizer (ASan) for C/C++ [REF-1518].

Effectiveness: Moderate

Crafted inputs are necessary to reach the code containing the error, such as generated by fuzzers. Also, these tools may reduce performance, and they only report the error condition - not the original mistake that led to the error.

Content history
Submission: CWE Content Team · MITRE · 2009-10-21 · CWE 1.6
Contribution: "Mapping CWE to 62443" Sub-Working Group · CWE-CAPEC ICS/OT SIG · 2023-04-25 · CWE 4.11

Suggested mappings to ISA/IEC 62443.

Contribution: Abhi Balakrishnan · 2024-02-29 · CWE 4.15

Provided diagram to improve CWE usability

Modification: CWE Content Team · MITRE · 2010-02-16 · CWE 1.8

updated Demonstrative_Examples

Modification: CWE Content Team · MITRE · 2010-09-27 · CWE 1.10

updated Relationships

Modification: CWE Content Team · MITRE · 2011-06-01 · CWE 1.13

updated Common_Consequences

Modification: CWE Content Team · MITRE · 2014-06-23 · CWE 2.7

updated Demonstrative_Examples

Modification: CWE Content Team · MITRE · 2015-12-07 · CWE 2.9

updated Relationships

Modification: CWE Content Team · MITRE · 2018-03-27 · CWE 3.1

updated Description

Modification: CWE Content Team · MITRE · 2019-09-19 · CWE 3.4

updated Applicable_Platforms, Demonstrative_Examples, Detection_Factors, Likelihood_of_Exploit, Observed_Examples, Potential_Mitigations, References, Relationships, Time_of_Introduction

Modification: CWE Content Team · MITRE · 2020-02-24 · CWE 4.0

updated Observed_Examples, Relationships

Modification: CWE Content Team · MITRE · 2020-06-25 · CWE 4.1

updated Observed_Examples

Modification: CWE Content Team · MITRE · 2020-08-20 · CWE 4.2

updated Alternate_Terms, Demonstrative_Examples, Observed_Examples, Relationships

Modification: CWE Content Team · MITRE · 2020-12-10 · CWE 4.3

updated Relationships

Modification: CWE Content Team · MITRE · 2021-03-15 · CWE 4.4

updated Demonstrative_Examples

Modification: CWE Content Team · MITRE · 2021-07-20 · CWE 4.5

updated Demonstrative_Examples, Potential_Mitigations, Relationships

Modification: CWE Content Team · MITRE · 2022-06-28 · CWE 4.8

updated Observed_Examples, Relationships

Modification: CWE Content Team · MITRE · 2022-10-13 · CWE 4.9

updated Applicable_Platforms

Modification: CWE Content Team · MITRE · 2023-01-31 · CWE 4.10

updated Alternate_Terms, Demonstrative_Examples, Description

Modification: CWE Content Team · MITRE · 2023-04-27 · CWE 4.11

updated Potential_Mitigations, References, Relationships, Taxonomy_Mappings

Modification: CWE Content Team · MITRE · 2023-06-29 · CWE 4.12

updated Mapping_Notes, Relationships, Taxonomy_Mappings

Modification: CWE Content Team · MITRE · 2024-02-29 · CWE 4.14

updated Demonstrative_Examples

Modification: CWE Content Team · MITRE · 2024-07-16 · CWE 4.15

updated Alternate_Terms, Common_Consequences, Description, Diagram, Weakness_Ordinalities

Modification: CWE Content Team · MITRE · 2024-11-19 · CWE 4.16

updated Observed_Examples, Relationships

Modification: CWE Content Team · MITRE · 2025-04-03 · CWE 4.17

updated Observed_Examples, Relationships

Modification: CWE Content Team · MITRE · 2025-09-09 · CWE 4.18

updated Affected_Resources, Functional_Areas, References

Modification: CWE Content Team · MITRE · 2025-12-11 · CWE 4.19

updated Applicable_Platforms, Detection_Factors, References, Relationships

Modification: CWE Content Team · MITRE · 2026-04-30 · CWE 4.20

updated Mapping_Notes

Modification: CWE Content Team · MITRE · 2026-10-28 · CWE 5.0

updated Dimensions, Observed_Examples, References, Relationships, Taxonomy_Mappings

16908 vulnerabilities reference this CWE, most recent first.

GHSA-MRV2-9M48-589P

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-24 19:06 – Updated: 2022-05-24 19:06
VLAI
Details

IBM Security Identity Manager Adapters 6.0 and 7.0 are vulnerable to a stack-based buffer overflow, caused by improper bounds checking. A remote authenticated attacker could overflow the and cause the server to crash. IBM X-Force ID: 199247.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2021-20572"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-787"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2021-06-28T16:15:00Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "IBM Security Identity Manager Adapters 6.0 and 7.0 are vulnerable to a stack-based buffer overflow, caused by improper bounds checking. A remote authenticated attacker could overflow the and cause the server to crash. IBM X-Force ID: 199247.",
  "id": "GHSA-mrv2-9m48-589p",
  "modified": "2022-05-24T19:06:23Z",
  "published": "2022-05-24T19:06:23Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-20572"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/199247"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/6465875"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}

GHSA-MRVQ-2CC4-HFFG

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-01-11 00:01 – Updated: 2022-01-14 00:02
VLAI
Details

There is a Heap-based buffer overflow vulnerability with the NFC module in smartphones. Successful exploitation of this vulnerability may cause memory overflow.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2021-39996"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-787"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2022-01-10T14:10:00Z",
    "severity": "CRITICAL"
  },
  "details": "There is a Heap-based buffer overflow vulnerability with the NFC module in smartphones. Successful exploitation of this vulnerability may cause memory overflow.",
  "id": "GHSA-mrvq-2cc4-hffg",
  "modified": "2022-01-14T00:02:56Z",
  "published": "2022-01-11T00:01:30Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-39996"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://consumer.huawei.com/en/support/bulletin/2021/12"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://device.harmonyos.com/en/docs/security/update/security-bulletins-202112-0000001183296718"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}

GHSA-MRW7-HF4F-83PF

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-11-20 20:59 – Updated: 2026-07-17 16:15
VLAI
Summary
vLLM deserialization vulnerability leading to DoS and potential RCE
Details

Summary

A memory corruption vulnerability that leading to a crash (denial-of-service) and potentially remote code execution (RCE) exists in vLLM versions 0.10.2 and later, in the Completions API endpoint. When processing user-supplied prompt embeddings, the endpoint loads serialized tensors using torch.load() without sufficient validation.

Due to a change introduced in PyTorch 2.8.0, sparse tensor integrity checks are disabled by default. As a result, maliciously crafted tensors can bypass internal bounds checks and trigger an out-of-bounds memory write during the call to to_dense(). This memory corruption can crash vLLM and potentially lead to code execution on the server hosting vLLM.

Details

A vulnerability that can lead to RCE from the completions API endpoint exists in vllm, where due to missing checks when loading user-provided tensors, an out-of-bounds write can be triggered. This happens because the default behavior of torch.load(tensor, weights_only=True) since pytorch 2.8.0 is to not perform validity checks for sparse tensors, and this needs to be enabled explicitly using the torch.sparse.check_sparse_tensor_invariants context manager.

The vulnerability is in the following code in vllm/entrypoints/renderer.py:148

    def _load_and_validate_embed(embed: bytes) -> EngineEmbedsPrompt:
        tensor = torch.load(
            io.BytesIO(pybase64.b64decode(embed, validate=True)),
            weights_only=True,
            map_location=torch.device("cpu"),
        )
        assert isinstance(tensor, torch.Tensor) and tensor.dtype in (
            torch.float32,
            torch.bfloat16,
            torch.float16,
        )
        tensor = tensor.to_dense()

Because of the missing checks, loading invalid prompt embedding tensors provided by the user can cause an out-of-bounds write in the call to to_dense .

Impact

All users with access to this API are able to exploit this vulnerability. Unsafe deserialization of untrusted input can be abused to achieve DoS and potentially remote code execution (RCE) in the vLLM server process. This impacts deployments running vLLM as a server or any instance that deserializes untrusted/model-provided payloads.

Fix

https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/pull/27204

Acknowledgements

Finder: AXION Security Research Team (Omri Fainaro, Bary Levy): discovery and coordinated disclosure.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "PyPI",
        "name": "vllm"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0.10.2"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "0.11.1"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2025-62164"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-123",
      "CWE-20",
      "CWE-502",
      "CWE-787"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2025-11-20T20:59:34Z",
    "nvd_published_at": "2025-11-21T02:15:43Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "### Summary\nA memory corruption vulnerability that leading to a crash (denial-of-service) and potentially remote code execution (RCE) exists in vLLM versions 0.10.2 and later, in the Completions API endpoint. When processing user-supplied prompt embeddings, the endpoint loads serialized tensors using torch.load() without sufficient validation.\n\nDue to a change introduced in PyTorch 2.8.0, sparse tensor integrity checks are disabled by default. As a result, maliciously crafted tensors can bypass internal bounds checks and trigger an out-of-bounds memory write during the call to to_dense(). This memory corruption can crash vLLM and potentially lead to code execution on the server hosting vLLM.\n\n### Details\nA vulnerability that can lead to RCE from the completions API endpoint exists in vllm, where due to missing checks when loading user-provided tensors, an out-of-bounds write can be triggered. This happens because the default behavior of `torch.load(tensor, weights_only=True)`  since pytorch 2.8.0 is to not perform validity checks for sparse tensors, and this needs to be enabled explicitly using the [torch.sparse.check_sparse_tensor_invariants](https://docs.pytorch.org/docs/stable/generated/torch.sparse.check_sparse_tensor_invariants.html) context manager.\n\nThe vulnerability is in the following code in [vllm/entrypoints/renderer.py:148](https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/blob/a332b84578cdc0706e040f6a765954c8a289904f/vllm/entrypoints/renderer.py#L148)\n\n```python\n    def _load_and_validate_embed(embed: bytes) -\u003e EngineEmbedsPrompt:\n        tensor = torch.load(\n            io.BytesIO(pybase64.b64decode(embed, validate=True)),\n            weights_only=True,\n            map_location=torch.device(\"cpu\"),\n        )\n        assert isinstance(tensor, torch.Tensor) and tensor.dtype in (\n            torch.float32,\n            torch.bfloat16,\n            torch.float16,\n        )\n        tensor = tensor.to_dense()\n```\n\nBecause of the missing checks, loading invalid prompt embedding tensors provided by the user can cause an out-of-bounds write in the call to `to_dense` .\n\n### Impact\nAll users with access to this API are able to exploit this vulnerability. Unsafe deserialization of untrusted input can be abused to achieve DoS and potentially remote code execution (RCE) in the vLLM server process. This impacts deployments running vLLM as a server or any instance that deserializes untrusted/model-provided payloads.\n\n## Fix\n\nhttps://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/pull/27204\n\n## Acknowledgements\n\nFinder: AXION Security Research Team (Omri Fainaro, Bary Levy): discovery and coordinated disclosure.",
  "id": "GHSA-mrw7-hf4f-83pf",
  "modified": "2026-07-17T16:15:44Z",
  "published": "2025-11-20T20:59:34Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/security/advisories/GHSA-mrw7-hf4f-83pf"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-62164"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/pull/27204"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/commit/58fab50d82838d5014f4a14d991fdb9352c9c84b"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-mrw7-hf4f-83pf"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/pypa/advisory-database/tree/main/vulns/vllm/PYSEC-2026-2018.yaml"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://pypi.org/project/vllm"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "vLLM deserialization vulnerability leading to DoS and potential RCE"
}

GHSA-MRWF-958H-4GW8

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-11-03 19:00 – Updated: 2022-11-03 19:00
VLAI
Details

Tenda AC23 V16.03.07.45_cn was discovered to contain a stack overflow via the firewallEn parameter in the formSetFirewallCfg function.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2022-43108"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-787"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2022-11-03T14:15:00Z",
    "severity": "CRITICAL"
  },
  "details": "Tenda AC23 V16.03.07.45_cn was discovered to contain a stack overflow via the firewallEn parameter in the formSetFirewallCfg function.",
  "id": "GHSA-mrwf-958h-4gw8",
  "modified": "2022-11-03T19:00:24Z",
  "published": "2022-11-03T19:00:24Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-43108"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/ppcrab/IOT_FIRMWARE/blob/main/Tenda/ac23/ac23.md#formsetfirewallcfg"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-MRX4-MFJ9-56XC

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2023-02-14 12:30 – Updated: 2023-02-22 21:30
VLAI
Details

A vulnerability has been identified in Tecnomatix Plant Simulation (All versions < V2201.0006). The affected application contains an out of bounds write past the end of an allocated buffer while parsing a specially crafted SPP file. This could allow an attacker to execute code in the context of the current process. (ZDI-CAN-19809)

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2023-24987"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-787"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2023-02-14T11:15:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "A vulnerability has been identified in Tecnomatix Plant Simulation (All versions \u003c V2201.0006). The affected application contains an out of bounds write past the end of an allocated buffer while parsing a specially crafted SPP file. This could allow an attacker to execute code in the context of the current process. (ZDI-CAN-19809)",
  "id": "GHSA-mrx4-mfj9-56xc",
  "modified": "2023-02-22T21:30:38Z",
  "published": "2023-02-14T12:30:25Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-24987"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-847261.pdf"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-MV25-J7GJ-C8P5

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-01-15 00:01 – Updated: 2022-01-22 00:02
VLAI
Details

WECON LeviStudioU Versions 2019-09-21 and prior are vulnerable to a heap-based buffer overflow, which may allow an attacker to remotely execute code.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2021-23157"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-787"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2022-01-14T20:15:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "WECON LeviStudioU Versions 2019-09-21 and prior are vulnerable to a heap-based buffer overflow, which may allow an attacker to remotely execute code.",
  "id": "GHSA-mv25-j7gj-c8p5",
  "modified": "2022-01-22T00:02:08Z",
  "published": "2022-01-15T00:01:32Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-23157"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.cisa.gov/uscert/ics/advisories/icsa-21-355-03"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.zerodayinitiative.com/advisories/ZDI-22-130"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.zerodayinitiative.com/advisories/ZDI-22-132"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}

GHSA-MV2C-2Q2X-3X5V

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-03-30 12:32 – Updated: 2026-03-30 12:32
VLAI
Details

FTPShell Server 6.83 contains a buffer overflow vulnerability that allows local attackers to crash the application by supplying an excessively long string in the account name field. Attackers can trigger a denial of service by pasting a 417-byte payload into the 'Account name to ban' parameter within the Manage FTP Accounts interface.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2018-25226"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-787"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-03-30T12:16:15Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "FTPShell Server 6.83 contains a buffer overflow vulnerability that allows local attackers to crash the application by supplying an excessively long string in the account name field. Attackers can trigger a denial of service by pasting a 417-byte payload into the \u0027Account name to ban\u0027 parameter within the Manage FTP Accounts interface.",
  "id": "GHSA-mv2c-2q2x-3x5v",
  "modified": "2026-03-30T12:32:26Z",
  "published": "2026-03-30T12:32:26Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2018-25226"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/46430"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/ftpshell-server-denial-of-service-via-account-name"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.ftpshell.com/downloadserver.htm"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.ftpshell.com/index.htm"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    },
    {
      "score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
      "type": "CVSS_V4"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-MV2G-98JJ-RJ6F

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-07-27 21:31 – Updated: 2026-08-18 00:30
VLAI
Details

An out-of-bounds write issue was addressed with improved bounds checking. This issue is fixed in iOS 26.6 and iPadOS 26.6, macOS Sequoia 15.7.8, macOS Sonoma 14.8.8, macOS Tahoe 26.6, tvOS 26.6, visionOS 26.6, watchOS 26.6. A remote attacker may be able to cause unexpected system termination.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-43803"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-787"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-07-27T21:17:03Z",
    "severity": "CRITICAL"
  },
  "details": "An out-of-bounds write issue was addressed with improved bounds checking. This issue is fixed in iOS 26.6 and iPadOS 26.6, macOS Sequoia 15.7.8, macOS Sonoma 14.8.8, macOS Tahoe 26.6, tvOS 26.6, visionOS 26.6, watchOS 26.6. A remote attacker may be able to cause unexpected system termination.",
  "id": "GHSA-mv2g-98jj-rj6f",
  "modified": "2026-08-18T00:30:29Z",
  "published": "2026-07-27T21:31:25Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-43803"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://support.apple.com/en-us/128066"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://support.apple.com/en-us/128067"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://support.apple.com/en-us/128068"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://support.apple.com/en-us/128069"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://support.apple.com/en-us/128070"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://support.apple.com/en-us/128071"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://support.apple.com/en-us/128072"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://support.apple.com/en-us/148287"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-MV3F-C7XW-X6F3

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2023-12-26 18:30 – Updated: 2023-12-30 03:30
VLAI
Details

Tenda W9 V1.0.0.7(4456)_CN was discovered to contain a stack overflow via the function formSetAutoPing.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2023-51097"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-787"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2023-12-26T18:15:08Z",
    "severity": "CRITICAL"
  },
  "details": "Tenda W9 V1.0.0.7(4456)_CN was discovered to contain a stack overflow via the function formSetAutoPing.",
  "id": "GHSA-mv3f-c7xw-x6f3",
  "modified": "2023-12-30T03:30:19Z",
  "published": "2023-12-26T18:30:37Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-51097"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/GD008/TENDA/blob/main/W9/W9_setAutoPing/W9_setAutoPing.md"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-MV4G-WVJ9-GRMF

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-14 01:57 – Updated: 2022-05-14 01:57
VLAI
Details

In impeg2_fmt_conv_yuv420p_to_yuv420sp_uv_av8 of impeg2_format_conv.s there is a possible out of bounds write due to missing bounds check. This could lead to remote code execution with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is needed for exploitation. Product: Android Versions: Android-7.0 Android-7.1.1 Android-7.1.2 Android-8.0 Android-8.1 Android-9.0 Android ID: A-74078669

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2018-9497"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-787"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2018-10-02T19:29:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "In impeg2_fmt_conv_yuv420p_to_yuv420sp_uv_av8 of impeg2_format_conv.s there is a possible out of bounds write due to missing bounds check. This could lead to remote code execution with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is needed for exploitation. Product: Android Versions: Android-7.0 Android-7.1.1 Android-7.1.2 Android-8.0 Android-8.1 Android-9.0 Android ID: A-74078669",
  "id": "GHSA-mv4g-wvj9-grmf",
  "modified": "2022-05-14T01:57:51Z",
  "published": "2022-05-14T01:57:51Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2018-9497"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://android.googlesource.com/platform/external/libmpeg2/+/bef16671c891e16f25a7b174bc528eea109357be"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://source.android.com/security/bulletin/2018-10-01"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://source.android.com/security/bulletin/2018-10-01,"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/105481"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

Mitigation MIT-3
Requirements

Strategy: Language Selection

  • Use a language that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid.
  • For example, many languages that perform their own memory management, such as Java and Perl, are not subject to buffer overflows. Other languages, such as Ada and C#, typically provide overflow protection, but the protection can be disabled by the programmer.
  • Be wary that a language's interface to native code may still be subject to overflows, even if the language itself is theoretically safe.
Mitigation MIT-4.1
Architecture and Design

Strategy: Libraries or Frameworks

  • Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid.
  • Examples include the Safe C String Library (SafeStr) by Messier and Viega [REF-57], and the Strsafe.h library from Microsoft [REF-56]. These libraries provide safer versions of overflow-prone string-handling functions.
Mitigation MIT-10
Operation Build and Compilation

Strategy: Environment Hardening

  • Use automatic buffer overflow detection mechanisms that are offered by certain compilers or compiler extensions. Examples include: the Microsoft Visual Studio /GS flag, Fedora/Red Hat FORTIFY_SOURCE GCC flag, StackGuard, and ProPolice, which provide various mechanisms including canary-based detection and range/index checking.
  • D3-SFCV (Stack Frame Canary Validation) from D3FEND [REF-1334] discusses canary-based detection in detail.
Mitigation MIT-9
Implementation
  • Consider adhering to the following rules when allocating and managing an application's memory:
  • Double check that the buffer is as large as specified.
  • When using functions that accept a number of bytes to copy, such as strncpy(), be aware that if the destination buffer size is equal to the source buffer size, it may not NULL-terminate the string.
  • Check buffer boundaries if accessing the buffer in a loop and make sure there is no danger of writing past the allocated space.
  • If necessary, truncate all input strings to a reasonable length before passing them to the copy and concatenation functions.
Mitigation MIT-11
Operation Build and Compilation

Strategy: Environment Hardening

  • Run or compile the software using features or extensions that randomly arrange the positions of a program's executable and libraries in memory. Because this makes the addresses unpredictable, it can prevent an attacker from reliably jumping to exploitable code.
  • Examples include Address Space Layout Randomization (ASLR) [REF-58] [REF-60] and Position-Independent Executables (PIE) [REF-64]. Imported modules may be similarly realigned if their default memory addresses conflict with other modules, in a process known as "rebasing" (for Windows) and "prelinking" (for Linux) [REF-1332] using randomly generated addresses. ASLR for libraries cannot be used in conjunction with prelink since it would require relocating the libraries at run-time, defeating the whole purpose of prelinking.
  • For more information on these techniques see D3-SAOR (Segment Address Offset Randomization) from D3FEND [REF-1335].
Mitigation MIT-12
Operation

Strategy: Environment Hardening

  • Use a CPU and operating system that offers Data Execution Protection (using hardware NX or XD bits) or the equivalent techniques that simulate this feature in software, such as PaX [REF-60] [REF-61]. These techniques ensure that any instruction executed is exclusively at a memory address that is part of the code segment.
  • For more information on these techniques see D3-PSEP (Process Segment Execution Prevention) from D3FEND [REF-1336].
Mitigation MIT-13
Implementation

Replace unbounded copy functions with analogous functions that support length arguments, such as strcpy with strncpy. Create these if they are not available.

No CAPEC attack patterns related to this CWE.