PYSEC-2026-3708

Vulnerability from pysec - Published: 2026-08-12 16:17 - Updated: 2026-08-19 13:09
VLAI
Details

Apache Airflow's Task SDK rebuilt a Callback object from serialized data by re-running its constructor, which imports the module named by the stored callback path. Because SyncCallback is itself an Airflow class it passes the default allowed_deserialization_classes allow-list, so tightening that setting does not help. A Dag author — who controls a task instance's next_kwargs through the task execution API — can therefore cause an arbitrary module to be imported inside the scheduler process, when the scheduler's awaiting_input timeout sweep deserializes that value. No non-default configuration is required; the sweep runs unconditionally. Versions before 3.3.0 are not affected: the class existed, but the scheduler sweep that reaches it did not. This is a separate code path from CVE-2026-58076 and CVE-2026-67260, which cover different gadgets reaching deserialization — applying either of those fixes does not address this one. Users are advised to upgrade to apache-airflow 3.3.1 or later.

Impacted products
Name purl
apache-airflow pkg:pypi/apache-airflow
Aliases

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "ecosystem_specific": {},
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "PyPI",
        "name": "apache-airflow",
        "purl": "pkg:pypi/apache-airflow"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "3.3.0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "3.3.1"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ],
      "versions": [
        "3.3.0",
        "3.3.1rc1",
        "3.3.1rc2"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-67587"
  ],
  "details": "Apache Airflow\u0027s Task SDK rebuilt a `Callback` object from serialized data by re-running its constructor, which imports the module named by the stored callback path. Because `SyncCallback` is itself an Airflow class it passes the default `allowed_deserialization_classes` allow-list, so tightening that setting does not help. A Dag author \u2014 who controls a task instance\u0027s `next_kwargs` through the task execution API \u2014 can therefore cause an arbitrary module to be imported inside the scheduler process, when the scheduler\u0027s `awaiting_input` timeout sweep deserializes that value. No non-default configuration is required; the sweep runs unconditionally. Versions before 3.3.0 are not affected: the class existed, but the scheduler sweep that reaches it did not. This is a separate code path from CVE-2026-58076 and CVE-2026-67260, which cover different gadgets reaching deserialization \u2014 applying either of those fixes does not address this one. Users are advised to upgrade to apache-airflow 3.3.1 or later.",
  "id": "PYSEC-2026-3708",
  "modified": "2026-08-19T13:09:03.140566Z",
  "published": "2026-08-12T16:17:15.090Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-58076"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-67260"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://lists.apache.org/thread/o00ww4n69qojvsckb464dtwd2nhzy6t0"
    },
    {
      "type": "FIX",
      "url": "https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/70704"
    }
  ],
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…

Loading…