PYSEC-2026-2358

Vulnerability from pysec - Published: 2026-07-13 15:35 - Updated: 2026-07-13 16:03
VLAI
Details

A bug in Apache Airflow's KubernetesExecutor caused JWT tokens used by worker pods to authenticate against the Execution API to be passed to the worker container as command-line arguments visible in the pod spec. An authenticated UI/API user with Kubernetes read-only access to the cluster (e.g. pods/get in the Airflow namespace) could harvest the JWT from kubectl describe pod output and then call state-mutating Execution API endpoints — triggering Dag runs, clearing runs, reading or writing Variables / Connections / XComs — as if they were a running task. Affects deployments using the KubernetesExecutor. Users are advised to upgrade to apache-airflow 3.2.2 or later. This is the airflow-core half of the same vulnerability addressed by CVE-2026-27173, which shipped the apache-airflow-providers-cncf-kubernetes side of the fix. Deployments that already upgraded apache-airflow-providers-cncf-kubernetes to 10.17.0 or later per the CVE-2026-27173 advisory should additionally upgrade apache-airflow to 3.2.2 or later to close the core-side surface — the two fixes are complementary, not duplicates.

Impacted products
Name purl
apache-airflow-core pkg:pypi/apache-airflow-core

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "PyPI",
        "name": "apache-airflow-core",
        "purl": "pkg:pypi/apache-airflow-core"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "3.2.2"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ],
      "versions": [
        "3.0.0",
        "3.0.0rc1",
        "3.0.0rc1.post1",
        "3.0.0rc1.post2",
        "3.0.0rc1.post3",
        "3.0.0rc1.post4",
        "3.0.0rc2",
        "3.0.0rc3",
        "3.0.0rc4",
        "3.0.1",
        "3.0.1rc1",
        "3.0.2",
        "3.0.2rc1",
        "3.0.2rc2",
        "3.0.3",
        "3.0.3rc1",
        "3.0.3rc2",
        "3.0.3rc3",
        "3.0.3rc4",
        "3.0.3rc5",
        "3.0.3rc6",
        "3.0.4",
        "3.0.4rc1",
        "3.0.4rc2",
        "3.0.5",
        "3.0.5rc1",
        "3.0.5rc2",
        "3.0.5rc3",
        "3.0.6",
        "3.0.6rc1",
        "3.0.6rc2",
        "3.1.0",
        "3.1.0b1",
        "3.1.0b2",
        "3.1.0rc1",
        "3.1.0rc2",
        "3.1.1",
        "3.1.1rc1",
        "3.1.1rc2",
        "3.1.2",
        "3.1.2rc1",
        "3.1.2rc2",
        "3.1.3",
        "3.1.3rc1",
        "3.1.4",
        "3.1.4rc1",
        "3.1.4rc2",
        "3.1.5",
        "3.1.5rc1",
        "3.1.6",
        "3.1.6rc1",
        "3.1.7",
        "3.1.7rc1",
        "3.1.7rc2",
        "3.1.8",
        "3.1.8rc1",
        "3.1.8rc2",
        "3.2.0",
        "3.2.0b1",
        "3.2.0b2",
        "3.2.0rc1",
        "3.2.0rc2",
        "3.2.1",
        "3.2.1rc1",
        "3.2.1rc2",
        "3.2.1rc3",
        "3.2.2rc1",
        "3.2.2rc2",
        "3.2.2rc3"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-49298",
    "GHSA-5j6p-jrrm-6x94"
  ],
  "details": "A bug in Apache Airflow\u0027s KubernetesExecutor caused JWT tokens used by worker pods to authenticate against the Execution API to be passed to the worker container as command-line arguments visible in the pod spec. An authenticated UI/API user with Kubernetes read-only access to the cluster (e.g. `pods/get` in the Airflow namespace) could harvest the JWT from `kubectl describe pod` output and then call state-mutating Execution API endpoints \u2014 triggering Dag runs, clearing runs, reading or writing Variables / Connections / XComs \u2014 as if they were a running task. Affects deployments using the `KubernetesExecutor`. Users are advised to upgrade to `apache-airflow` 3.2.2 or later. This is the airflow-core half of the same vulnerability addressed by [CVE-2026-27173](https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-27173), which shipped the apache-airflow-providers-cncf-kubernetes side of the fix. Deployments that already upgraded `apache-airflow-providers-cncf-kubernetes` to 10.17.0 or later per the CVE-2026-27173 advisory should additionally upgrade `apache-airflow` to 3.2.2 or later to close the core-side surface \u2014 the two fixes are complementary, not duplicates.",
  "id": "PYSEC-2026-2358",
  "modified": "2026-07-13T16:03:22.978681Z",
  "published": "2026-07-13T15:35:23.107476Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-49298"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/60108"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://lists.apache.org/thread/wo09vrks8189dzsot39rvrx3vnx102tt"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-core"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-5j6p-jrrm-6x94"
    }
  ],
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "Apache Airflow: Execution API JWT leaked via KubernetesExecutor worker command-line args"
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline

Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC

JSON
How durations are calculated

Following the VTEM framework (Black Hat USA 2015), time to patch starts when the vendor or a coordinator was informed, total time to patch at discovery, and disclosure to patch at public disclosure; vendor response time runs from the report to its acknowledgement. Time to exploit and time unpatched start at the earliest discovery or report, falling back to public disclosure. Unpatched time ends at the first recorded patch, or the calculation time when no patch is recorded. Exploitation to patch shows the interval between those two events; a published proof of concept is a public exploit, not exploitation.

Each result shows its source dates. A negative interval means the end event came first; when date-only inputs leave the order open, the result says so. Date-only inputs are approximate. The earliest evidence wins: KEV report dates and sightings are labelled as such. Records describing another vulnerability are listed but never calculated from, and a PoC alone does not establish exploitation. Missing patch evidence does not prove that no patch exists. Filters below change the event list only.

Events included in the timeline

Loading timeline…


    Loading…

    Loading…

    Loading…

    Related by attack behaviour

    Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.