GHSA-XM5H-R3M3-MQJ4
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-01 18:42 – Updated: 2022-05-01 18:42
VLAI
Details
Stack-based buffer overflow in Microsoft Office Access allows remote, user-assisted attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted Microsoft Access Database (.mdb) file. NOTE: due to the lack of details as of 20071210, it is not clear whether this issue is the same as CVE-2007-6026 or CVE-2005-0944.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2007-6357"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-119"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2007-12-15T01:46:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Stack-based buffer overflow in Microsoft Office Access allows remote, user-assisted attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted Microsoft Access Database (.mdb) file. NOTE: due to the lack of details as of 20071210, it is not clear whether this issue is the same as CVE-2007-6026 or CVE-2005-0944.",
"id": "GHSA-xm5h-r3m3-mqj4",
"modified": "2022-05-01T18:42:05Z",
"published": "2022-05-01T18:42:05Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2007-6357"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://osvdb.org/44150"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasic\u0026articleId=9052538\u0026source=rss_topic17"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.informationweek.com/shared/printableArticle.jhtml?articleID=204802012"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.us-cert.gov/current/index.html#microsoft_access_database_file_attachment"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…