CVE-2007-6357 (GCVE-0-2007-6357)

Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2007-12-15 01:00 – Updated: 2024-08-07 16:02
VLAI
Summary
Stack-based buffer overflow in Microsoft Office Access allows remote, user-assisted attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted Microsoft Access Database (.mdb) file. NOTE: due to the lack of details as of 20071210, it is not clear whether this issue is the same as CVE-2007-6026 or CVE-2005-0944.
Severity
No CVSS data available.
CWE
  • n/a
Assigner
References
Date Public
2007-12-10 00:00
Show details on NVD website
To clipboard 

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2024-08-07T16:02:36.179Z",
          "orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
          "shortName": "CVE"
        },
        "references": [
          {
            "name": "44150",
            "tags": [
              "vdb-entry",
              "x_refsource_OSVDB",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "http://osvdb.org/44150"
          },
          {
            "tags": [
              "x_refsource_MISC",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "http://www.informationweek.com/shared/printableArticle.jhtml?articleID=204802012"
          },
          {
            "tags": [
              "x_refsource_MISC",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "http://www.us-cert.gov/current/index.html#microsoft_access_database_file_attachment"
          },
          {
            "tags": [
              "x_refsource_MISC",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasic\u0026articleId=9052538\u0026source=rss_topic17"
          }
        ],
        "title": "CVE Program Container"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "product": "n/a",
          "vendor": "n/a",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "n/a"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "datePublic": "2007-12-10T00:00:00.000Z",
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "Stack-based buffer overflow in Microsoft Office Access allows remote, user-assisted attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted Microsoft Access Database (.mdb) file.  NOTE: due to the lack of details as of 20071210, it is not clear whether this issue is the same as CVE-2007-6026 or CVE-2005-0944."
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "description": "n/a",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "text"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2008-11-15T10:00:00.000Z",
        "orgId": "8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca",
        "shortName": "mitre"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "name": "44150",
          "tags": [
            "vdb-entry",
            "x_refsource_OSVDB"
          ],
          "url": "http://osvdb.org/44150"
        },
        {
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_MISC"
          ],
          "url": "http://www.informationweek.com/shared/printableArticle.jhtml?articleID=204802012"
        },
        {
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_MISC"
          ],
          "url": "http://www.us-cert.gov/current/index.html#microsoft_access_database_file_attachment"
        },
        {
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_MISC"
          ],
          "url": "http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasic\u0026articleId=9052538\u0026source=rss_topic17"
        }
      ],
      "x_legacyV4Record": {
        "CVE_data_meta": {
          "ASSIGNER": "cve@mitre.org",
          "ID": "CVE-2007-6357",
          "STATE": "PUBLIC"
        },
        "affects": {
          "vendor": {
            "vendor_data": [
              {
                "product": {
                  "product_data": [
                    {
                      "product_name": "n/a",
                      "version": {
                        "version_data": [
                          {
                            "version_value": "n/a"
                          }
                        ]
                      }
                    }
                  ]
                },
                "vendor_name": "n/a"
              }
            ]
          }
        },
        "data_format": "MITRE",
        "data_type": "CVE",
        "data_version": "4.0",
        "description": {
          "description_data": [
            {
              "lang": "eng",
              "value": "Stack-based buffer overflow in Microsoft Office Access allows remote, user-assisted attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted Microsoft Access Database (.mdb) file.  NOTE: due to the lack of details as of 20071210, it is not clear whether this issue is the same as CVE-2007-6026 or CVE-2005-0944."
            }
          ]
        },
        "problemtype": {
          "problemtype_data": [
            {
              "description": [
                {
                  "lang": "eng",
                  "value": "n/a"
                }
              ]
            }
          ]
        },
        "references": {
          "reference_data": [
            {
              "name": "44150",
              "refsource": "OSVDB",
              "url": "http://osvdb.org/44150"
            },
            {
              "name": "http://www.informationweek.com/shared/printableArticle.jhtml?articleID=204802012",
              "refsource": "MISC",
              "url": "http://www.informationweek.com/shared/printableArticle.jhtml?articleID=204802012"
            },
            {
              "name": "http://www.us-cert.gov/current/index.html#microsoft_access_database_file_attachment",
              "refsource": "MISC",
              "url": "http://www.us-cert.gov/current/index.html#microsoft_access_database_file_attachment"
            },
            {
              "name": "http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasic\u0026articleId=9052538\u0026source=rss_topic17",
              "refsource": "MISC",
              "url": "http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasic\u0026articleId=9052538\u0026source=rss_topic17"
            }
          ]
        }
      }
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca",
    "assignerShortName": "mitre",
    "cveId": "CVE-2007-6357",
    "datePublished": "2007-12-15T01:00:00.000Z",
    "dateReserved": "2007-12-14T00:00:00.000Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2024-08-07T16:02:36.179Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.1",
  "vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
    "epss": {
      "cve": "CVE-2007-6357",
      "date": "2026-07-17",
      "epss": "0.15959",
      "percentile": "0.96534"
    },
    "nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2007-6357\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"cve@mitre.org\",\"published\":\"2007-12-15T01:46:00.000\",\"lastModified\":\"2026-04-23T00:35:47.467\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Modified\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"Stack-based buffer overflow in Microsoft Office Access allows remote, user-assisted attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted Microsoft Access Database (.mdb) file.  NOTE: due to the lack of details as of 20071210, it is not clear whether this issue is the same as CVE-2007-6026 or CVE-2005-0944.\"},{\"lang\":\"es\",\"value\":\"Desbordamiento de b\u00fafer basado en pila en Microsoft Office Access permite a atacantes remotos con  la intervenci\u00f3n del usuario ejecutar c\u00f3digo de su elecci\u00f3n a trav\u00e9s de archivos Microsoft Access Database (.mdb) manipulados. NOTA: Debido a la falta de detalles como en 20071210, no est\u00e1 claro si esta cuesti\u00f3n es la misma que la CVE-2007-6026 o CVE-2005-0944.\"}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV2\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"2.0\",\"vectorString\":\"AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:N\",\"baseScore\":5.8,\"accessVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"accessComplexity\":\"MEDIUM\",\"authentication\":\"NONE\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"PARTIAL\",\"integrityImpact\":\"PARTIAL\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"NONE\"},\"baseSeverity\":\"MEDIUM\",\"exploitabilityScore\":8.6,\"impactScore\":4.9,\"acInsufInfo\":false,\"obtainAllPrivilege\":false,\"obtainUserPrivilege\":false,\"obtainOtherPrivilege\":false,\"userInteractionRequired\":true}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-119\"}]}],\"configurations\":[{\"nodes\":[{\"operator\":\"OR\",\"negate\":false,\"cpeMatch\":[{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:microsoft:access:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"9D0896FF-FF7D-4AC2-B38D-8FED10E17767\"}]}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"http://osvdb.org/44150\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\"},{\"url\":\"http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasic\u0026articleId=9052538\u0026source=rss_topic17\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\"},{\"url\":\"http://www.informationweek.com/shared/printableArticle.jhtml?articleID=204802012\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\"},{\"url\":\"http://www.us-cert.gov/current/index.html#microsoft_access_database_file_attachment\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\"},{\"url\":\"http://osvdb.org/44150\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"},{\"url\":\"http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasic\u0026articleId=9052538\u0026source=rss_topic17\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"},{\"url\":\"http://www.informationweek.com/shared/printableArticle.jhtml?articleID=204802012\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"},{\"url\":\"http://www.us-cert.gov/current/index.html#microsoft_access_database_file_attachment\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"}]}}"
  }
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.





Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.