GHSA-VQFF-R82H-9CRC

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-10-16 19:23 – Updated: 2026-10-16 19:23
VLAI
Summary
ckan-mcp-server: DataStore Table UI resource does not validate postMessage origin (in) and posts to targetOrigin "*" (out)
Details

Summary

The MCP Apps UI resource (an interactive DataStore table rendered in the host's webview/iframe) communicates with its parent via postMessage. Its inbound message listener performs no event.origin validation, and its outbound messages are sent with target origin '*'. Any window/frame able to reach the document can inject data into the table and interfere with the MCP UI handshake, and the UI's own JSON-RPC messages are broadcast without an origin restriction.

Affected code

src/resources/datastore-table-ui.ts (inline HTML):

window.addEventListener('message', function (event) {
  var msg = event.data;                    // no check of event.origin
  if (!msg || typeof msg !== 'object') return;
  if (msg.id !== undefined && _pending[msg.id]) { ... resolve/reject pending MCP request ... }
  ...
  if (data && (data.fields || data.records)) initTable(data);   // renders attacker-supplied data
});

// outbound:
window.parent.postMessage({ jsonrpc: '2.0', id: id, method: method, params: params || {} }, '*');
mcpNot: window.parent.postMessage({ jsonrpc:'2.0', method:method, params:params||{} }, '*');

There is no allowlist of accepted origins for inbound messages and no fixed target origin for outbound messages.

Impact

  • Content spoofing. A frame that can postMessage to the UI can supply arbitrary fields/records, causing the table to render fabricated rows and links (e.g. a phishing __link_url) that appear to come from the queried portal. (Values are HTML-escaped, so this is display spoofing, not script injection — no XSS.)
  • Handshake/UX interference. Because inbound messages matching a pending id resolve/reject the UI's MCP requests, an attacker frame can spoof responses to the ui/initialize handshake or otherwise disrupt the panel.
  • Outbound leakage. Posting to '*' means the UI's JSON-RPC messages are delivered to whatever the parent origin is; if the resource is ever embedded by a context other than the trusted host, those messages leak to it.

Exploitability depends on the host embedding model (in a correct MCP Apps host the parent is the trusted host, which limits who can message the frame), so this is a hardening / defense-in-depth issue rather than a directly remotely-triggerable one — hence Low.

Proof of concept

  • poc/verify-no-origin-check.mjs — static confirmation that the listener has no origin check and outbound uses '*':

[x] validates event.origin : NO [x] outgoing postMessage targetOrigin : '*' (any) RESULT: VULNERABLE

  • poc/parent-spoof-poc.html — a page that embeds the UI and injects fabricated rows cross-origin with no handshake; the UI renders them.

Remediation

  • Validate event.origin against the expected host origin on every inbound message; drop messages from other origins.
  • Send outbound postMessage with an explicit target origin (the host origin established at initialize time) instead of '*'.
  • Optionally, bind to a nonce/channel established during ui/initialize so only the negotiated host can drive the panel.
Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "npm",
        "name": "@aborruso/ckan-mcp-server"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "0.4.112"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-76894"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-345",
      "CWE-940"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2026-10-16T19:23:48Z",
    "nvd_published_at": null,
    "severity": "LOW"
  },
  "details": "## Summary\n\nThe MCP Apps UI resource (an interactive DataStore table rendered in the host\u0027s webview/iframe) communicates with its parent via `postMessage`. Its inbound `message` listener performs no `event.origin` validation, and its outbound messages are sent with target origin `\u0027*\u0027`. Any window/frame able to reach the document can inject data into the table and interfere with the MCP UI handshake, and the UI\u0027s own JSON-RPC messages are broadcast without an origin restriction.\n\n## Affected code\n\n`src/resources/datastore-table-ui.ts` (inline HTML):\n\n```js\nwindow.addEventListener(\u0027message\u0027, function (event) {\n  var msg = event.data;                    // no check of event.origin\n  if (!msg || typeof msg !== \u0027object\u0027) return;\n  if (msg.id !== undefined \u0026\u0026 _pending[msg.id]) { ... resolve/reject pending MCP request ... }\n  ...\n  if (data \u0026\u0026 (data.fields || data.records)) initTable(data);   // renders attacker-supplied data\n});\n\n// outbound:\nwindow.parent.postMessage({ jsonrpc: \u00272.0\u0027, id: id, method: method, params: params || {} }, \u0027*\u0027);\nmcpNot: window.parent.postMessage({ jsonrpc:\u00272.0\u0027, method:method, params:params||{} }, \u0027*\u0027);\n```\n\nThere is no allowlist of accepted origins for inbound messages and no fixed target origin for outbound messages.\n\n## Impact\n\n- **Content spoofing.** A frame that can `postMessage` to the UI can supply\n  arbitrary `fields`/`records`, causing the table to render fabricated rows and\n  links (e.g. a phishing `__link_url`) that appear to come from the queried\n  portal. (Values are HTML-escaped, so this is display spoofing, not script\n  injection \u2014 no XSS.)\n- **Handshake/UX interference.** Because inbound messages matching a pending `id`\n  resolve/reject the UI\u0027s MCP requests, an attacker frame can spoof responses to\n  the `ui/initialize` handshake or otherwise disrupt the panel.\n- **Outbound leakage.** Posting to `\u0027*\u0027` means the UI\u0027s JSON-RPC messages are\n  delivered to whatever the parent origin is; if the resource is ever embedded by\n  a context other than the trusted host, those messages leak to it.\n\nExploitability depends on the host embedding model (in a correct MCP Apps host the\nparent is the trusted host, which limits who can message the frame), so this is a\nhardening / defense-in-depth issue rather than a directly remotely-triggerable\none \u2014 hence Low.\n\n## Proof of concept\n\n- `poc/verify-no-origin-check.mjs` \u2014 static confirmation that the listener has no\n  origin check and outbound uses `\u0027*\u0027`:\n\n  ```\n  [x] validates event.origin             : NO\n  [x] outgoing postMessage targetOrigin  : \u0027*\u0027 (any)\n  RESULT: VULNERABLE\n  ```\n\n- `poc/parent-spoof-poc.html` \u2014 a page that embeds the UI and injects fabricated\n  rows cross-origin with no handshake; the UI renders them.\n\n## Remediation\n\n- Validate `event.origin` against the expected host origin on every inbound\n  message; drop messages from other origins.\n- Send outbound `postMessage` with an explicit target origin (the host origin\n  established at initialize time) instead of `\u0027*\u0027`.\n- Optionally, bind to a nonce/channel established during `ui/initialize` so only\n  the negotiated host can drive the panel.",
  "id": "GHSA-vqff-r82h-9crc",
  "modified": "2026-10-16T19:23:48Z",
  "published": "2026-10-16T19:23:48Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/ondata/ckan-mcp-server/security/advisories/GHSA-vqff-r82h-9crc"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/ondata/ckan-mcp-server"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "ckan-mcp-server: DataStore Table UI resource does not validate postMessage origin (in) and posts to targetOrigin \"*\" (out)"
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline

Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC

JSON
Events included in the timeline

Loading timeline…


    Loading…

    Loading…

    Loading…

    Related by attack behaviour

    Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.