GHSA-RXMX-G7HR-8MX4

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-04-07 18:15 – Updated: 2026-05-07 16:44
VLAI
Summary
OpenClaw: Zalo replay dedupe keys could suppress messages across chats or senders
Details

Summary

Before OpenClaw 2026.4.2, Zalo webhook replay dedupe keys were not scoped strongly enough across chat and sender dimensions. Legitimate events from different conversations or senders could collide and be dropped as duplicates.

Impact

Cross-conversation or cross-sender collisions could cause silent message suppression and break bot workflows. This was an availability issue in webhook event processing.

Affected Packages / Versions

  • Package: openclaw (npm)
  • Affected versions: <= 2026.4.1
  • Patched versions: >= 2026.4.2
  • Latest published npm version: 2026.4.1

Fix Commit(s)

  • ef7c553dd16ee579f1d1a363f5881a99726c1412 — scope Zalo webhook replay dedupe across the missing event dimensions

Release Process Note

The fix is present on main and is staged for OpenClaw 2026.4.2. Publish this advisory after the 2026.4.2 npm release is live.

Thanks @D0ub1e-D for reporting.

Severity
6.3 (Medium)
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
Show details on source website
To clipboard 

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "database_specific": {
        "last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 2026.4.1"
      },
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "npm",
        "name": "openclaw"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "2026.4.2"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-41354"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-349",
      "CWE-440"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2026-04-07T18:15:59Z",
    "nvd_published_at": null,
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "## Summary\n\nBefore OpenClaw 2026.4.2, Zalo webhook replay dedupe keys were not scoped strongly enough across chat and sender dimensions. Legitimate events from different conversations or senders could collide and be dropped as duplicates.\n\n## Impact\n\nCross-conversation or cross-sender collisions could cause silent message suppression and break bot workflows. This was an availability issue in webhook event processing.\n\n## Affected Packages / Versions\n\n- Package: `openclaw` (npm)\n- Affected versions: `\u003c= 2026.4.1`\n- Patched versions: `\u003e= 2026.4.2`\n- Latest published npm version: `2026.4.1`\n\n## Fix Commit(s)\n\n- `ef7c553dd16ee579f1d1a363f5881a99726c1412` \u2014 scope Zalo webhook replay dedupe across the missing event dimensions\n\n## Release Process Note\n\nThe fix is present on `main` and is staged for OpenClaw `2026.4.2`. Publish this advisory after the `2026.4.2` npm release is live.\n\nThanks @D0ub1e-D for reporting.",
  "id": "GHSA-rxmx-g7hr-8mx4",
  "modified": "2026-05-07T16:44:15Z",
  "published": "2026-04-07T18:15:59Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/openclaw/openclaw/security/advisories/GHSA-rxmx-g7hr-8mx4"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-41354"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/openclaw/openclaw/commit/ef7c553dd16ee579f1d1a363f5881a99726c1412"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/openclaw/openclaw"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/openclaw-insufficient-scope-in-zalo-webhook-replay-dedupe-keys"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V4"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "OpenClaw: Zalo replay dedupe keys could suppress messages across chats or senders"
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.





Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.



Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.