GHSA-RQ5J-2985-G74R
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-07-25 12:31 – Updated: 2026-07-27 06:30In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
iommufd: Use sizeof(*hdr) instead of sizeof(hdr) in veventq read
The bound-check in iommufd_veventq_fops_read() for the normal vEVENT path uses sizeof(hdr) where the surrounding code uses sizeof(*hdr):
if (!vevent_for_lost_events_header(cur) &&
sizeof(hdr) + cur->data_len > count - done) {
hdr is declared as struct iommufd_vevent_header , so sizeof(hdr) evaluates to the size of the pointer. Surrounding code uses sizeof(hdr) consistently:
if (done >= count || sizeof(*hdr) > count - done) {
...
if (copy_to_user(buf + done, hdr, sizeof(*hdr))) {
...
done += sizeof(*hdr);
struct iommufd_vevent_header is currently 8 bytes (two __u32 fields, flags and sequence), so on 64-bit (sizeof(void *) == 8) the two expressions happen to be equal and the check works as intended.
On 32-bit (sizeof(void *) == 4) the check under-counts the header by 4 bytes: a vEVENT whose data_len causes 8 + cur->data_len to exceed count - done while 4 + cur->data_len does not will pass the check, then the loop will copy_to_user 8 bytes of header followed by data_len bytes of payload, writing past the user-supplied buffer.
It is also a latent bug for any future expansion of struct iommufd_vevent_header beyond sizeof(void *) on 64-bit; the check should not depend on the type happening to match the host pointer width.
Use sizeof(*hdr) to match the rest of the function and the actual amount that will be copied.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-64293"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-787"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-07-25T10:17:10Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\niommufd: Use sizeof(*hdr) instead of sizeof(hdr) in veventq read\n\nThe bound-check in iommufd_veventq_fops_read() for the normal vEVENT\npath uses sizeof(hdr) where the surrounding code uses sizeof(*hdr):\n\n\tif (!vevent_for_lost_events_header(cur) \u0026\u0026\n\t sizeof(hdr) + cur-\u003edata_len \u003e count - done) {\n\nhdr is declared as struct iommufd_vevent_header *, so sizeof(hdr)\nevaluates to the size of the pointer. Surrounding code uses\nsizeof(*hdr) consistently:\n\n\tif (done \u003e= count || sizeof(*hdr) \u003e count - done) {\n\t...\n\tif (copy_to_user(buf + done, hdr, sizeof(*hdr))) {\n\t...\n\tdone += sizeof(*hdr);\n\nstruct iommufd_vevent_header is currently 8 bytes (two __u32 fields,\nflags and sequence), so on 64-bit (sizeof(void *) == 8) the two\nexpressions happen to be equal and the check works as intended.\n\nOn 32-bit (sizeof(void *) == 4) the check under-counts the header by\n4 bytes: a vEVENT whose data_len causes 8 + cur-\u003edata_len to exceed\ncount - done while 4 + cur-\u003edata_len does not will pass the check,\nthen the loop will copy_to_user 8 bytes of header followed by data_len\nbytes of payload, writing past the user-supplied buffer.\n\nIt is also a latent bug for any future expansion of struct\niommufd_vevent_header beyond sizeof(void *) on 64-bit; the check\nshould not depend on the type happening to match the host pointer\nwidth.\n\nUse sizeof(*hdr) to match the rest of the function and the actual\namount that will be copied.",
"id": "GHSA-rq5j-2985-g74r",
"modified": "2026-07-27T06:30:31Z",
"published": "2026-07-25T12:31:29Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-64293"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/04a177f91160ee18da98f5689482cf0f589ec869"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/0cdbb97a4dbd69abdd2ab998b4fbc7803d4b0b72"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/be93d186ae88a92e7aa77e122d4e661fa57b1e39"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline
Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC
How durations are calculated
Following the VTEM framework (Black Hat USA 2015), time to patch starts when the vendor or a coordinator was informed, total time to patch at discovery, and disclosure to patch at public disclosure; vendor response time runs from the report to its acknowledgement. Time to exploit and time unpatched start at the earliest discovery or report, falling back to public disclosure. Unpatched time ends at the first recorded patch, or the calculation time when no patch is recorded. Exploitation to patch shows the interval between those two events; a published proof of concept is a public exploit, not exploitation.
Each result shows its source dates. A negative interval means the end event came first; when date-only inputs leave the order open, the result says so. Date-only inputs are approximate. The earliest evidence wins: KEV report dates and sightings are labelled as such. Records describing another vulnerability are listed but never calculated from, and a PoC alone does not establish exploitation. Missing patch evidence does not prove that no patch exists. Filters below change the event list only.
Loading timeline…
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.