GHSA-Q8GF-9RVJ-GMGJ
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-08-25 18:12 – Updated: 2026-08-25 18:12Summary
'Elixir.GRPC.Server.Adapters.Cowboy.Handler':read_full_body/3 accumulates every received chunk into a single growing binary with no size cap. When the client omits the grpc-timeout header, the read timeout resolves to :infinity, allowing a slow-trickle attacker to hold the connection open indefinitely while memory grows. A single unauthenticated connection is sufficient to exhaust BEAM memory and crash the node.
Details
The read loop in lib/grpc/server/adapters/cowboy/handler.ex calls :cowboy_req.read_body/2 in a recursive loop, concatenating each chunk: body <> data. There is no running-total check and no configurable maximum body size. As the loop drains the receive buffer, cowboy issues fresh HTTP/2 WINDOW_UPDATE frames, so the client can keep pushing data indefinitely.
The grpc-timeout header is attacker-supplied and optional. When absent, timeout_left_opt(nil) returns :infinity, so the per-chunk read also has no deadline. The two missing controls compound: a fast client can blast multi-gigabyte payloads directly into memory; a slow client can trickle data forever.
PoC
- Start any
grpcserver exposing a unary RPC (no special configuration required). - Open an HTTP/2 connection and send a POST to any unary RPC path with
Content-Type: application/grpc+proto— omit thegrpc-timeoutheader. - Stream a large body (e.g. 1 GiB) in chunks without sending the final
END_STREAMflag immediately. - Observe BEAM memory growing proportionally to uploaded data with no server-side cap.
Impact
Affects grpc ≥ 0.3.1. No authentication, no special configuration, and no specific RPC method required, the unbounded read is on the default unary ingress path.
References
- Introduction commit: https://github.com/elixir-grpc/grpc/commit/d1abe70a6cad6dac4a3f8235d883d7c896989560
- Patch commit: https://github.com/elixir-grpc/grpc/commit/49e18c3ec6bb9afe2f712caad3dbab5c56a68a00
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Hex",
"name": "grpc"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0.3.1"
},
{
"fixed": "1.0.0"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-48854"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-770"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-08-25T18:12:05Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2026-06-15T23:16:45Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "### Summary\n\n`\u0027Elixir.GRPC.Server.Adapters.Cowboy.Handler\u0027:read_full_body/3` accumulates every received chunk into a single growing binary with no size cap. When the client omits the `grpc-timeout` header, the read timeout resolves to `:infinity`, allowing a slow-trickle attacker to hold the connection open indefinitely while memory grows. A single unauthenticated connection is sufficient to exhaust BEAM memory and crash the node.\n\n### Details\n\nThe read loop in `lib/grpc/server/adapters/cowboy/handler.ex` calls `:cowboy_req.read_body/2` in a recursive loop, concatenating each chunk: `body \u003c\u003e data`. There is no running-total check and no configurable maximum body size. As the loop drains the receive buffer, cowboy issues fresh HTTP/2 `WINDOW_UPDATE` frames, so the client can keep pushing data indefinitely.\n\nThe `grpc-timeout` header is attacker-supplied and optional. When absent, `timeout_left_opt(nil)` returns `:infinity`, so the per-chunk read also has no deadline. The two missing controls compound: a fast client can blast multi-gigabyte payloads directly into memory; a slow client can trickle data forever.\n\n### PoC\n\n1. Start any `grpc` server exposing a unary RPC (no special configuration required).\n2. Open an HTTP/2 connection and send a POST to any unary RPC path with `Content-Type: application/grpc+proto` \u2014 omit the `grpc-timeout` header.\n3. Stream a large body (e.g. 1 GiB) in chunks without sending the final `END_STREAM` flag immediately.\n4. Observe BEAM memory growing proportionally to uploaded data with no server-side cap.\n\n### Impact\n\nAffects `grpc` \u2265 0.3.1. No authentication, no special configuration, and no specific RPC method required, the unbounded read is on the default unary ingress path.\n\n### References\n\n* Introduction commit: https://github.com/elixir-grpc/grpc/commit/d1abe70a6cad6dac4a3f8235d883d7c896989560\n* Patch commit: https://github.com/elixir-grpc/grpc/commit/49e18c3ec6bb9afe2f712caad3dbab5c56a68a00",
"id": "GHSA-q8gf-9rvj-gmgj",
"modified": "2026-08-25T18:12:05Z",
"published": "2026-08-25T18:12:05Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/elixir-grpc/grpc/security/advisories/GHSA-q8gf-9rvj-gmgj"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-48854"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/elixir-grpc/grpc/pull/542"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/elixir-grpc/grpc/commit/49e18c3ec6bb9afe2f712caad3dbab5c56a68a00"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://cna.erlef.org/cves/CVE-2026-48854.html"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/elixir-grpc/grpc"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/elixir-grpc/grpc/releases/tag/v1.0.0"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://osv.dev/vulnerability/EEF-CVE-2026-48854"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
],
"summary": "gRPC Erlang package has unbounded request body accumulation in `read_full_body/3`"
}
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.