GHSA-JGGH-5RMH-R6H5

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-05-03 12:30 – Updated: 2026-05-07 22:30
VLAI
Summary
Dolibarr has Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity
Details

A security flaw has been discovered in Dolibarr ERP CRM up to 23.0.2. This vulnerability affects the function dol_verifyHash in the library htdocs/core/lib/security.lib.php of the component Online Signature Module. The manipulation results in improper verification of cryptographic signature. The attack may be performed from remote. Attacks of this nature are highly complex. It is stated that the exploitability is difficult. The exploit has been released to the public and may be used for attacks. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Severity
3.7 (Low)
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
2.9 (Low)
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P
Show details on source website
To clipboard 

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Packagist",
        "name": "dolibarr/dolibarr"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "last_affected": "15.0.3"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-7689"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-345"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2026-05-07T22:30:07Z",
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-05-03T10:16:17Z",
    "severity": "LOW"
  },
  "details": "A security flaw has been discovered in Dolibarr ERP CRM up to 23.0.2. This vulnerability affects the function dol_verifyHash in the library htdocs/core/lib/security.lib.php of the component Online Signature Module. The manipulation results in improper verification of cryptographic signature. The attack may be performed from remote. Attacks of this nature are highly complex. It is stated that the exploitability is difficult. The exploit has been released to the public and may be used for attacks. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.",
  "id": "GHSA-jggh-5rmh-r6h5",
  "modified": "2026-05-07T22:30:07Z",
  "published": "2026-05-03T12:30:26Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-7689"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://gist.github.com/Shaon-Xis/d6ae069fc54f006457b68a91d5a8e158"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/Dolibarr/dolibarr"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://vuldb.com/submit/801794"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://vuldb.com/vuln/360859"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://vuldb.com/vuln/360859/cti"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    },
    {
      "score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P",
      "type": "CVSS_V4"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "Dolibarr has Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity "
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.



Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.