GHSA-GVJM-HRCM-HVM6

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-05-28 12:30 – Updated: 2026-05-28 12:30
VLAI
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

RDMA/rxe: Reject unknown opcodes before ICRC processing

Even after applying commit 7244491dab34 ("RDMA/rxe: Validate pad and ICRC before payload_size() in rxe_rcv"), a single unauthenticated UDP packet can still trigger panic. That patch handled payload_size() underflow only for valid opcodes with short packets, not for packets carrying an unknown opcode. The unknown-opcode OOB read described below predates that commit and reaches back to the initial Soft RoCE driver.

The check added there reads

pkt->paylen < header_size(pkt) + bth_pad(pkt) + RXE_ICRC_SIZE

where header_size(pkt) expands to rxe_opcode[pkt->opcode].length. The rxe_opcode[] array has 256 entries but is only populated for defined IB opcodes; any other entry (for example opcode 0xff) is zero-initialized, so length == 0 and the check degenerates to

pkt->paylen < 0 + bth_pad(pkt) + RXE_ICRC_SIZE

which does not constrain pkt->paylen enough. rxe_icrc_hdr() then computes

rxe_opcode[pkt->opcode].length - RXE_BTH_BYTES

which underflows when length == 0 and passes a huge value to rxe_crc32(), causing an out-of-bounds read of the skb payload.

Reproduced on v7.0-rc7 with that fix applied, QEMU/KVM with CONFIG_RDMA_RXE=y and CONFIG_KASAN=y, after

rdma link add rxe0 type rxe netdev eth0

A single 48-byte UDP packet to port 4791 with BTH opcode=0xff and QPN=IB_MULTICAST_QPN triggers:

BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in crc32_le+0x115/0x170
Read of size 1 at addr ...
The buggy address is located 0 bytes to the right of
 allocated 704-byte region
Call Trace:
 crc32_le+0x115/0x170
 rxe_icrc_hdr.isra.0+0x226/0x300
 rxe_icrc_check+0x13f/0x3a0
 rxe_rcv+0x6e1/0x16e0
 rxe_udp_encap_recv+0x20a/0x320
 udp_queue_rcv_one_skb+0x7ed/0x12c0

Subsequent packets with the same shape fault on unmapped memory and panic the kernel. The trigger requires only module load and "rdma link add"; no QP, no connection, and no authentication.

Fix this by rejecting packets whose opcode has no rxe_opcode[] entry, detected via the zero mask or zero length, before any length arithmetic runs.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-46133"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-05-28T10:16:28Z",
    "severity": null
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nRDMA/rxe: Reject unknown opcodes before ICRC processing\n\nEven after applying commit 7244491dab34 (\"RDMA/rxe: Validate pad and ICRC\nbefore payload_size() in rxe_rcv\"), a single unauthenticated UDP packet\ncan still trigger panic.  That patch handled payload_size() underflow only\nfor valid opcodes with short packets, not for packets carrying an unknown\nopcode.  The unknown-opcode OOB read described below predates that commit\nand reaches back to the initial Soft RoCE driver.\n\nThe check added there reads\n\n    pkt-\u003epaylen \u003c header_size(pkt) + bth_pad(pkt) + RXE_ICRC_SIZE\n\nwhere header_size(pkt) expands to rxe_opcode[pkt-\u003eopcode].length.  The\nrxe_opcode[] array has 256 entries but is only populated for defined IB\nopcodes; any other entry (for example opcode 0xff) is zero-initialized, so\nlength == 0 and the check degenerates to\n\n    pkt-\u003epaylen \u003c 0 + bth_pad(pkt) + RXE_ICRC_SIZE\n\nwhich does not constrain pkt-\u003epaylen enough.  rxe_icrc_hdr() then computes\n\n    rxe_opcode[pkt-\u003eopcode].length - RXE_BTH_BYTES\n\nwhich underflows when length == 0 and passes a huge value to rxe_crc32(),\ncausing an out-of-bounds read of the skb payload.\n\nReproduced on v7.0-rc7 with that fix applied, QEMU/KVM with\nCONFIG_RDMA_RXE=y and CONFIG_KASAN=y, after\n\n    rdma link add rxe0 type rxe netdev eth0\n\nA single 48-byte UDP packet to port 4791 with BTH opcode=0xff and\nQPN=IB_MULTICAST_QPN triggers:\n\n    BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in crc32_le+0x115/0x170\n    Read of size 1 at addr ...\n    The buggy address is located 0 bytes to the right of\n     allocated 704-byte region\n    Call Trace:\n     crc32_le+0x115/0x170\n     rxe_icrc_hdr.isra.0+0x226/0x300\n     rxe_icrc_check+0x13f/0x3a0\n     rxe_rcv+0x6e1/0x16e0\n     rxe_udp_encap_recv+0x20a/0x320\n     udp_queue_rcv_one_skb+0x7ed/0x12c0\n\nSubsequent packets with the same shape fault on unmapped memory and panic\nthe kernel.  The trigger requires only module load and \"rdma link add\"; no\nQP, no connection, and no authentication.\n\nFix this by rejecting packets whose opcode has no rxe_opcode[] entry,\ndetected via the zero mask or zero length, before any length arithmetic\nruns.",
  "id": "GHSA-gvjm-hrcm-hvm6",
  "modified": "2026-05-28T12:30:30Z",
  "published": "2026-05-28T12:30:30Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-46133"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/006a3a5f75345c6a0dbf13fd3ee01406e93b6733"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/4c6f86d85d03cdb33addce86aa69aa795ca6c47a"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6fa18025e5782afff91415fd5217b39c1e4837d7"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e3dc3a2fb05f4ed49c7f20594c4c52350d032189"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f8ee926431a7bbec2b10c1290664af2cb290b983"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…