GCVE Workshop - 22 September 2026 (14:00-18:00), Luxembourg Before The Vulnopticon Conference - Registration

GHSA-G35J-M5XG-VH3Q

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-07-24 20:49 – Updated: 2026-07-24 20:49
VLAI
Summary
webtransport-go: Memory Exhaustion Attack due to Buffering of Unknown Capsules
Details

Summary

An attacker can cause excessive memory allocation in webtransport-go by sending an unknown WebTransport capsule with a large payload. The implementation skips unknown capsules by reading the entire capsule body into memory, instead of draining it without retaining the data. This can lead to memory exhaustion.

Impact

A misbehaving or malicious peer can cause a denial-of-service (DoS) attack against webtransport-go clients or servers by triggering excessive memory allocation, potentially leading to crashes or resource exhaustion.

Details

WebTransport sessions use capsules on the HTTP/3 request stream. Unknown capsule types are ignored, but the capsule body still needs to be consumed before the next capsule can be parsed.

webtransport-go used io.ReadAll when skipping unknown capsules. Since the capsule reader is only limited by the capsule's declared length, a peer could send a large unknown capsule and cause the receiver to allocate memory for the full capsule body.

QUIC flow control limits buffered data, but it does not bound total allocation here, since reading the stream advances the flow control window while retaining the received bytes in memory.

The Fix

webtransport-go now drains unknown capsules to io.Discard instead of buffering them. This consumes the capsule body so parsing can continue, without retaining the payload in memory.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "database_specific": {
        "last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 0.11.0"
      },
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Go",
        "name": "github.com/quic-go/webtransport-go"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "0.11.1"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-57497"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-770"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2026-07-24T20:49:28Z",
    "nvd_published_at": null,
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "## Summary\n\nAn attacker can cause excessive memory allocation in webtransport-go by sending an unknown WebTransport capsule with a large payload. The implementation skips unknown capsules by reading the entire capsule body into memory, instead of draining it without retaining the data. This can lead to memory exhaustion.\n\n## Impact\n\nA misbehaving or malicious peer can cause a denial-of-service (DoS) attack against webtransport-go clients or servers by triggering excessive memory allocation, potentially leading to crashes or resource exhaustion.\n\n## Details\n\nWebTransport sessions use capsules on the HTTP/3 request stream. Unknown capsule types are ignored, but the capsule body still needs to be consumed before the next capsule can be parsed.\n\nwebtransport-go used `io.ReadAll` when skipping unknown capsules. Since the capsule reader is only limited by the capsule\u0027s declared length, a peer could send a large unknown capsule and cause the receiver to allocate memory for the full capsule body.\n\nQUIC flow control limits buffered data, but it does not bound total allocation here, since reading the stream advances the flow control window while retaining the received bytes in memory.\n\n## The Fix\n\nwebtransport-go now drains unknown capsules to `io.Discard` instead of buffering them. This consumes the capsule body so parsing can continue, without retaining the payload in memory.",
  "id": "GHSA-g35j-m5xg-vh3q",
  "modified": "2026-07-24T20:49:28Z",
  "published": "2026-07-24T20:49:28Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/quic-go/webtransport-go/security/advisories/GHSA-g35j-m5xg-vh3q"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/quic-go/webtransport-go/pull/290"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/quic-go/webtransport-go/commit/3aecd11736579530ff067651c30a543eb0b4b8c4"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/quic-go/webtransport-go"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/quic-go/webtransport-go/releases/tag/v0.11.1"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "webtransport-go: Memory Exhaustion Attack due to Buffering of Unknown Capsules"
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…