GHSA-FHJJ-6GR2-W5WG
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-24 17:17 – Updated: 2022-05-24 17:17
VLAI
Details
The UpdateHub module disables DTLS peer checking, which allows for a man in the middle attack. This is mitigated by firmware images requiring valid signatures. However, there is no benefit to using DTLS without the peer checking. See NCC-ZEP-018 This issue affects: zephyrproject-rtos zephyr version 2.1.0 and later versions.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2020-10059"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2020-05-11T23:15:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "The UpdateHub module disables DTLS peer checking, which allows for a man in the middle attack. This is mitigated by firmware images requiring valid signatures. However, there is no benefit to using DTLS without the peer checking. See NCC-ZEP-018 This issue affects: zephyrproject-rtos zephyr version 2.1.0 and later versions.",
"id": "GHSA-fhjj-6gr2-w5wg",
"modified": "2022-05-24T17:17:40Z",
"published": "2022-05-24T17:17:40Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2020-10059"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr/pull/24954"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr/pull/24997"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr/pull/24999"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://docs.zephyrproject.org/latest/security/vulnerabilities.html#CVE-2020-10059"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://zephyrprojectsec.atlassian.net/browse/ZEPSEC-36"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…