GHSA-9MRV-8PVF-HF4M
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-06-12 12:31 – Updated: 2026-08-20 18:32The JwtAccessTokenValidator class in Apache CXF fails to validate the 'aud' (Audience) claims of incoming JWT access tokens. This allows a JWT issued for one Resource Server to be successfully replayed against a completely different Resource Server, leading to Token Confusion/Routing attacks. Users are recommended to upgrade to versions 4.2.2 or 4.1.7, which fixes this issue.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Maven",
"name": "org.apache.cxf:cxf-rt-rs-security-oauth2"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "4.2.0"
},
{
"fixed": "4.2.2"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
},
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Maven",
"name": "org.apache.cxf:cxf-rt-rs-security-oauth2"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "4.1.7"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-50627"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-289",
"CWE-303"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-08-20T18:32:04Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2026-06-12T10:16:22Z",
"severity": "CRITICAL"
},
"details": "The JwtAccessTokenValidator class in Apache CXF fails to validate the \u0027aud\u0027 (Audience) claims of incoming JWT access tokens. This allows a JWT issued for one Resource Server to be successfully replayed against a completely different Resource Server, leading to Token Confusion/Routing attacks.\u00a0Users are recommended to upgrade to versions 4.2.2 or 4.1.7, which fixes this issue.",
"id": "GHSA-9mrv-8pvf-hf4m",
"modified": "2026-08-20T18:32:05Z",
"published": "2026-06-12T12:31:33Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-50627"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:37390"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-50627"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2488298"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/apache/cxf"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://lists.apache.org/thread/0jfzz9q992957b99tw7hodcqjfyxwb1m"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/vex/2026/cve-2026-50627.json"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2026/06/11/4"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "Apache CXF OAuth2 Missing JWT Audience and Issuer Validation in Access Token Validator"
}
Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline
Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC
Loading timeline…
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.