Vulnerability-Lookup

GHSA-83W8-P2F5-377R

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-07-24 16:43 – Updated: 2026-07-24 16:43

Summary

@fastify/static vulnerable to route guard bypass via path traversal

Details

Impact

@fastify/static is vulnerable to a bypass of route-based middleware and guards via non-leading .. and %2E%2E path segments. find-my-way does not normalize .. when matching routes, so a request such as /foo/../deep/secret.txt matches the static plugin's catch-all instead of the guarded /deep/*. The getPathnameForSend helper introduced by the fix for GHSA-x428-ghpx-8j92 only guards against the %2F variant; .. and %2E%2E survive the decodeURI + encodeURI round-trip and are then collapsed away by @fastify/send's path.normalize before its own traversal guard runs.

Applications that rely on route-based middleware or guards to protect files served by @fastify/static can be bypassed with non-leading dot-dot path segments.

Patches

Upgrade to @fastify/static 10.1.1.

Workarounds

Do not use route-based middlewares or guards to protect files served by @fastify/static.

Severity

7.5 (High)


                  
                    CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

Show details on source website

JSON

To clipboard

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "database_specific": {
        "last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 10.1.0"
      },
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "npm",
        "name": "@fastify/static"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "10.1.1"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-15074"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-22"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2026-07-24T16:43:21Z",
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-07-23T04:16:31Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "### Impact\n\n`@fastify/static` is vulnerable to a bypass of route-based middleware and guards via non-leading `..` and `%2E%2E` path segments. `find-my-way` does not normalize `..` when matching routes, so a request such as `/foo/../deep/secret.txt` matches the static plugin\u0027s catch-all instead of the guarded `/deep/*`. The `getPathnameForSend` helper introduced by the fix for [GHSA-x428-ghpx-8j92](https://github.com/fastify/fastify-static/security/advisories/GHSA-x428-ghpx-8j92) only guards against the `%2F` variant; `..` and `%2E%2E` survive the `decodeURI` + `encodeURI` round-trip and are then collapsed away by `@fastify/send`\u0027s `path.normalize` before its own traversal guard runs.\n\nApplications that rely on route-based middleware or guards to protect files served by `@fastify/static` can be bypassed with non-leading dot-dot path segments.\n\n### Patches\n\nUpgrade to `@fastify/static` 10.1.1.\n\n### Workarounds\n\nDo not use route-based middlewares or guards to protect files served by `@fastify/static`.",
  "id": "GHSA-83w8-p2f5-377r",
  "modified": "2026-07-24T16:43:21Z",
  "published": "2026-07-24T16:43:21Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/fastify/fastify-static/security/advisories/GHSA-83w8-p2f5-377r"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-15074"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/fastify/fastify-static/commit/db4276f846ba56b21f93768cd6636ee5e2fc58b1"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://cna.openjsf.org/security-advisories.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/fastify/fastify-static"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/fastify/fastify-static/releases/tag/v10.1.1"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "@fastify/static vulnerable to route guard bypass via path traversal"
}

CVE-2026-15074 (GCVE-0-2026-15074)

Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-07-23 03:01 – Updated: 2026-07-23 14:14

Title

@fastify/static vulnerable to route guard bypass via path traversal

Summary

@fastify/static up to and including version 10.1.0 fails to reject dot-dot path segments in request pathnames before the file-resolution stage. This is a bypass of the earlier fix for CVE-2026-6414, which only covered encoded forward slashes. Because the underlying send library normalizes dot segments before applying its own path-traversal guard, an unauthenticated attacker can bypass any route-scoped middleware and read files inside the static root that live under the guarded URL prefix. The bypass does not allow access outside the configured static root by itself, it defeats route-guard filtering only. The issue is patched in @fastify/static 10.1.1.

Severity

7.5 (High)


                        
                          CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

SSVC

Exploitation: none Automatable: yes Technical Impact: partial

CISA Coordinator · CISA-ADP (v2.0.3)

Decision recorded 2026-07-23 14:14 UTC

CWE

CWE-22 - Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal')

Assigner

openjs CNA under the redhat root

CNA scorecard C 65/100 over 127 records in the last 180 days details

References

2 references

URL	Tags
https://github.com/fastify/fastify-static/securit…
https://cna.openjsf.org/security-advisories.html

Impacted products

1 product

Vendor	Product	Version
@fastify/static	@fastify/static	Affected: 0 , < 10.1.1 (semver) Unaffected: 10.1.1 (semver)

Credits

imssm99 mcollina UlisesGascon

Show details on NVD website

JSON

To clipboard

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "metrics": [
          {
            "other": {
              "content": {
                "id": "CVE-2026-15074",
                "options": [
                  {
                    "Exploitation": "none"
                  },
                  {
                    "Automatable": "yes"
                  },
                  {
                    "Technical Impact": "partial"
                  }
                ],
                "role": "CISA Coordinator",
                "timestamp": "2026-07-23T14:14:38.857101Z",
                "version": "2.0.3"
              },
              "type": "ssvc"
            }
          }
        ],
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2026-07-23T14:14:46.933Z",
          "orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
          "shortName": "CISA-ADP"
        },
        "title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "defaultStatus": "unaffected",
          "packageURL": "pkg:npm/@fastify/static",
          "product": "@fastify/static",
          "vendor": "@fastify/static",
          "versions": [
            {
              "lessThan": "10.1.1",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "0",
              "versionType": "semver"
            },
            {
              "status": "unaffected",
              "version": "10.1.1",
              "versionType": "semver"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "credits": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "type": "reporter",
          "value": "imssm99"
        },
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "type": "remediation developer",
          "value": "mcollina"
        },
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "type": "remediation reviewer",
          "value": "UlisesGascon"
        }
      ],
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "supportingMedia": [
            {
              "base64": false,
              "type": "text/html",
              "value": "@fastify/static up to and including version 10.1.0 fails to reject dot-dot path segments in request pathnames before the file-resolution stage. This is a bypass of the earlier fix for CVE-2026-6414, which only covered encoded forward slashes. Because the underlying send library normalizes dot segments before applying its own path-traversal guard, an unauthenticated attacker can bypass any route-scoped middleware and read files inside the static root that live under the guarded URL prefix. The bypass does not allow access outside the configured static root by itself, it defeats route-guard filtering only. The issue is patched in @fastify/static 10.1.1."
            }
          ],
          "value": "@fastify/static up to and including version 10.1.0 fails to reject dot-dot path segments in request pathnames before the file-resolution stage. This is a bypass of the earlier fix for CVE-2026-6414, which only covered encoded forward slashes. Because the underlying send library normalizes dot segments before applying its own path-traversal guard, an unauthenticated attacker can bypass any route-scoped middleware and read files inside the static root that live under the guarded URL prefix. The bypass does not allow access outside the configured static root by itself, it defeats route-guard filtering only. The issue is patched in @fastify/static 10.1.1."
        }
      ],
      "metrics": [
        {
          "cvssV3_1": {
            "baseScore": 7.5,
            "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
            "version": "3.1"
          },
          "format": "CVSS",
          "scenarios": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "GENERAL"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-22",
              "description": "CWE-22: Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory (\u0027Path Traversal\u0027)",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2026-07-23T03:01:47.887Z",
        "orgId": "ce714d77-add3-4f53-aff5-83d477b104bb",
        "shortName": "openjs"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "url": "https://github.com/fastify/fastify-static/security/advisories/GHSA-83w8-p2f5-377r"
        },
        {
          "url": "https://cna.openjsf.org/security-advisories.html"
        }
      ],
      "title": "@fastify/static vulnerable to route guard bypass via path traversal",
      "x_generator": {
        "engine": "cve-kit 1.0.0"
      }
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "ce714d77-add3-4f53-aff5-83d477b104bb",
    "assignerShortName": "openjs",
    "cveId": "CVE-2026-15074",
    "datePublished": "2026-07-23T03:01:47.887Z",
    "dateReserved": "2026-07-08T15:21:49.362Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2026-07-23T14:14:46.933Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.2"
}

Sightings

Author	Source	Type	Date	Other

Nomenclature

Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Vulnerability timeline

Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC

Order JSON

How durations are calculated

Following the VTEM framework (Black Hat USA 2015), time to patch starts when the vendor or a coordinator was informed, total time to patch at discovery, and disclosure to patch at public disclosure; vendor response time runs from the report to its acknowledgement. Time to exploit and time unpatched start at the earliest discovery or report, falling back to public disclosure. Unpatched time ends at the first recorded patch, or the calculation time when no patch is recorded. Exploitation to patch shows the interval between those two events; a published proof of concept is a public exploit, not exploitation.

Each result shows its source dates. A negative interval means the end event came first; when date-only inputs leave the order open, the result says so. Date-only inputs are approximate. The earliest evidence wins: KEV report dates and sightings are labelled as such. Records describing another vulnerability are listed but never calculated from, and a PoC alone does not establish exploitation. Missing patch evidence does not prove that no patch exists. Filters below change the event list only.

Publication & reservation Sightings KEV catalogs Other timestamps

Loading timeline…

The MITRE ATT&CK techniques below are AI-generated suggestions, inferred from the description of the vulnerability by the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-classification-roberta-base model, served locally by ML-Gateway. They have not been verified by an analyst and are provided for guidance only.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.

Action not permitted