GHSA-7XMJ-3FXQ-R5HP

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-08-08 12:30 – Updated: 2026-08-14 00:31
VLAI
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

libceph: fix two unsafe bare decodes in decode_lockers()

decode_lockers() in cls_lock_client.c contains two bare decode operations that allow a malicious or compromised OSD to trigger slab-out-of-bounds reads:

  1. ceph_decode_32(p) at the num_lockers field has no preceding bounds check. ceph_start_decoding() accepts struct_len=0 as valid -- the internal ceph_decode_need(p, end, 0, bad) always passes -- so when an OSD sends struct_len=0, ceph_start_decoding() returns success with p == end. The immediately following bare ceph_decode_32(p) then reads 4 bytes past the validated buffer boundary. The garbage value is passed directly to kzalloc_objs() as the locker count.

The sibling function decode_watchers() in osd_client.c already uses ceph_decode_32_safe() after its own ceph_start_decoding() call. decode_lockers() was the only site using the bare variant.

  1. ceph_decode_8(p) after the decode_locker() loop has no preceding bounds check. If an OSD crafts num_lockers such that the loop advances p exactly to end, the subsequent bare ceph_decode_8(p) reads one byte past the validated buffer boundary. The result is passed directly into *type, which is used as a lock type discriminator by callers, giving an OSD-controlled one-byte OOB read with direct influence over the lock type field.

Fix both by replacing bare operations with their safe variants: ceph_decode_32(p) -> ceph_decode_32_safe(p, end, num_lockers, err_inval) ceph_decode_8(p) -> ceph_decode_8_safe(p, end, type, err_free_lockers)

The goto targets differ intentionally: err_inval: is a new label returning -EINVAL directly. It is used for the pre-allocation failure path where *lockers is not yet allocated and must not be passed to ceph_free_lockers().

err_free_lockers: is the existing label. It is used for the post-allocation failure path where *lockers is allocated and must be freed.

ret is set to -EINVAL before ceph_decode_8_safe() so that err_free_lockers returns the correct error code on bounds violation. Without this, err_free_lockers would return a stale ret value (0 from the successful decode_locker() loop), silently swallowing the error.

-EINVAL is correct for both failure paths. The data received from the OSD is structurally malformed. -ENOMEM would misrepresent the failure class to callers and to stable@ backporters triaging error paths.

Attacker model: a malicious or compromised OSD in a multi-tenant Ceph deployment can trigger this against any kernel client that issues the lock.get_info class method (e.g. during RBD exclusive lock acquisition).

[ idryomov: trim changelog, formatting ]

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-68082"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-08-08T10:16:55Z",
    "severity": "CRITICAL"
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nlibceph: fix two unsafe bare decodes in decode_lockers()\n\ndecode_lockers() in cls_lock_client.c contains two bare decode operations\nthat allow a malicious or compromised OSD to trigger slab-out-of-bounds\nreads:\n\n1. ceph_decode_32(p) at the num_lockers field has no preceding bounds\n   check. ceph_start_decoding() accepts struct_len=0 as valid -- the\n   internal ceph_decode_need(p, end, 0, bad) always passes -- so when an\n   OSD sends struct_len=0, ceph_start_decoding() returns success with\n   p == end. The immediately following bare ceph_decode_32(p) then reads\n   4 bytes past the validated buffer boundary. The garbage value is\n   passed directly to kzalloc_objs() as the locker count.\n\n   The sibling function decode_watchers() in osd_client.c already uses\n   ceph_decode_32_safe() after its own ceph_start_decoding() call.\n   decode_lockers() was the only site using the bare variant.\n\n2. ceph_decode_8(p) after the decode_locker() loop has no preceding\n   bounds check. If an OSD crafts num_lockers such that the loop\n   advances p exactly to end, the subsequent bare ceph_decode_8(p) reads\n   one byte past the validated buffer boundary. The result is passed\n   directly into *type, which is used as a lock type discriminator by\n   callers, giving an OSD-controlled one-byte OOB read with direct\n   influence over the lock type field.\n\nFix both by replacing bare operations with their safe variants:\n  ceph_decode_32(p) -\u003e ceph_decode_32_safe(p, end, *num_lockers,\n                                           err_inval)\n  ceph_decode_8(p)  -\u003e ceph_decode_8_safe(p, end, *type,\n                                          err_free_lockers)\n\nThe goto targets differ intentionally:\n  err_inval: is a new label returning -EINVAL directly. It is used for\n  the pre-allocation failure path where *lockers is not yet allocated\n  and must not be passed to ceph_free_lockers().\n\n  err_free_lockers: is the existing label. It is used for the\n  post-allocation failure path where *lockers is allocated and must\n  be freed.\n\nret is set to -EINVAL before ceph_decode_8_safe() so that\nerr_free_lockers returns the correct error code on bounds violation.\nWithout this, err_free_lockers would return a stale ret value (0 from\nthe successful decode_locker() loop), silently swallowing the error.\n\n-EINVAL is correct for both failure paths. The data received from the\nOSD is structurally malformed. -ENOMEM would misrepresent the failure\nclass to callers and to stable@ backporters triaging error paths.\n\nAttacker model: a malicious or compromised OSD in a multi-tenant Ceph\ndeployment can trigger this against any kernel client that issues the\nlock.get_info class method (e.g. during RBD exclusive lock acquisition).\n\n[ idryomov: trim changelog, formatting ]",
  "id": "GHSA-7xmj-3fxq-r5hp",
  "modified": "2026-08-14T00:31:51Z",
  "published": "2026-08-08T12:30:24Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-68082"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a109a556115271ca7896dcda7b4b7e45e156c227"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a54be593d0b749161b08a1e56189b2cb9114267a"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…

Loading…