GHSA-66X4-8GF5-HMJ9

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-06-25 15:31 – Updated: 2024-06-25 15:31
VLAI
Details

Lack of privilege checking when processing a redaction in Conduit versions v0.6.0 and lower, allowing a local user to redact any message from users on the same server, given that they are able to send redaction events.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2024-6302"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-280"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2024-06-25T13:15:51Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "Lack of privilege checking when processing a redaction in Conduit versions v0.6.0 and lower, allowing a local user to redact any message from users on the same server, given that they are able to send redaction events.",
  "id": "GHSA-66x4-8gf5-hmj9",
  "modified": "2024-06-25T15:31:08Z",
  "published": "2024-06-25T15:31:08Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-6302"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://conduit.rs/changelog/#v0-7-0-2024-04-25"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://gitlab.com/famedly/conduit/-/releases/v0.7.0"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…