GCVE Workshop - 22 September 2026 (14:00-18:00), Luxembourg Before The Vulnopticon Conference - Registration

GHSA-627W-X4JQ-G83V

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-09-04 15:36 – Updated: 2026-09-04 15:36
VLAI
Details

LobeChat (LobeHub) 2.2.1 does not properly verify inbound chat-platform webhook signatures in the QQ and Feishu adapters. The webhook route (/api/agent/webhooks/:platform) is unauthenticated by design and delegates verification to each adapter; the QQ adapter performs no Ed25519 signature verification on dispatched message events, and the Feishu adapter only performs an optional static-token comparison that is skipped when no token is configured (the default) and is not a body signature. An unauthenticated attacker who knows the public webhook URL can POST forged inbound messages with an attacker-chosen sender identity and arbitrary text, causing the bot owner's agent to process attacker-controlled input and treat the attacker as a trusted platform sender.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-85621"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-345"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-09-04T15:17:42Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "LobeChat (LobeHub) 2.2.1 does not properly verify inbound chat-platform webhook signatures in the QQ and Feishu adapters. The webhook route (/api/agent/webhooks/:platform) is unauthenticated by design and delegates verification to each adapter; the QQ adapter performs no Ed25519 signature verification on dispatched message events, and the Feishu adapter only performs an optional static-token comparison that is skipped when no token is configured (the default) and is not a body signature. An unauthenticated attacker who knows the public webhook URL can POST forged inbound messages with an attacker-chosen sender identity and arbitrary text, causing the bot owner\u0027s agent to process attacker-controlled input and treat the attacker as a trusted platform sender.",
  "id": "GHSA-627w-x4jq-g83v",
  "modified": "2026-09-04T15:36:13Z",
  "published": "2026-09-04T15:36:13Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-85621"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/lobehub/lobehub/issues/16538"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/lobehub/lobehub"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/lobehub/lobehub/blob/v2.2.15/packages/chat-adapter-feishu/src/adapter.ts"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/lobehub/lobehub/blob/v2.2.15/packages/chat-adapter-qq/src/adapter.ts"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/lobechat-2.2.1-webhook-signature-verification-bypass-qq-feishu"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    },
    {
      "score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
      "type": "CVSS_V4"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…

Loading…