GHSA-4G8V-7HMF-PF24

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-07-25 12:31 – Updated: 2026-07-27 06:30
VLAI
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

PCI/IOV: Skip VF Resizable BAR restore on read error

sriov_restore_vf_rebar_state() uses the VF Resizable BAR Control register to decide how many VF BARs to restore (nbars) and which VF BAR each iteration addresses (bar_idx). bar_idx indexes into dev->sriov->barsz[], which has only PCI_SRIOV_NUM_BARS (6) entries.

When a device does not respond, config reads typically return PCI_ERROR_RESPONSE (~0). Both fields are 3 bits wide, so nbars and bar_idx both evaluate to 7. The barsz[] access then goes out of bounds. UBSAN reports this as:

UBSAN: array-index-out-of-bounds in drivers/pci/iov.c:948:51 index 7 is out of range for type 'resource_size_t [6]'

Observed on an NVIDIA RTX PRO 1000 GPU (GB207GLM) that stopped responding during a failed GC6 power state exit. The subsequent pci_restore_state() invoked sriov_restore_vf_rebar_state() while config reads returned 0xffffffff, triggering the splat.

Bail out if any VF Resizable BAR Control read returns PCI_ERROR_RESPONSE. No further VF BARs are touched, which is safe because a config read that returns PCI_ERROR_RESPONSE indicates the device is unreachable and restoration is pointless. This mirrors the guard in pci_restore_rebar_state().

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-64460"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-07-25T10:17:31Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nPCI/IOV: Skip VF Resizable BAR restore on read error\n\nsriov_restore_vf_rebar_state() uses the VF Resizable BAR Control register\nto decide how many VF BARs to restore (nbars) and which VF BAR each\niteration addresses (bar_idx). bar_idx indexes into dev-\u003esriov-\u003ebarsz[],\nwhich has only PCI_SRIOV_NUM_BARS (6) entries.\n\nWhen a device does not respond, config reads typically return\nPCI_ERROR_RESPONSE (~0).  Both fields are 3 bits wide, so nbars and bar_idx\nboth evaluate to 7. The barsz[] access then goes out of bounds.  UBSAN\nreports this as:\n\n  UBSAN: array-index-out-of-bounds in drivers/pci/iov.c:948:51 index 7 is out of range for type \u0027resource_size_t [6]\u0027\n\nObserved on an NVIDIA RTX PRO 1000 GPU (GB207GLM) that stopped responding\nduring a failed GC6 power state exit. The subsequent pci_restore_state()\ninvoked sriov_restore_vf_rebar_state() while config reads returned\n0xffffffff, triggering the splat.\n\nBail out if any VF Resizable BAR Control read returns PCI_ERROR_RESPONSE.\nNo further VF BARs are touched, which is safe because a config read that\nreturns PCI_ERROR_RESPONSE indicates the device is unreachable and\nrestoration is pointless. This mirrors the guard in\npci_restore_rebar_state().",
  "id": "GHSA-4g8v-7hmf-pf24",
  "modified": "2026-07-27T06:30:39Z",
  "published": "2026-07-25T12:31:36Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-64460"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/55fd485e66d0ad5c762c23dba1461fe9c741cd96"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/b77524621250407386f44c6eea7e5e4619ada1ce"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f34f1712229d71ce4286440fef12526fd4590b37"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…