FKIE_CVE-2026-58245

Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2026-08-11 01:17 - Updated: 2026-10-24 16:10
Severity
3.8 (Low) - CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Summary
SAP Advanced Planning and Optimization (Model Mix Planning) contains a hardcoded credential within the source code of the application to perform authorization check to access certain functionalities in the application. An attacker with high privileges could leverage this hardcoded credential to bypass authorization and delete specific planning-related restrictions in the application. Successful exploitation could result in a low impact on confidentiality and integrity, with no impact on availability of the application.
References
cna@sap.comhttps://me.sap.com/notes/3763028
cna@sap.comhttps://url.sap/sapsecuritypatchday
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
To clipboard 

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "affectedData": [
        {
          "defaultStatus": "unaffected",
          "product": "SAP Advanced Planning and Optimization (Model Mix Planning)",
          "vendor": "SAP_SE",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "SCMAPO 713"
            },
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "714"
            },
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "S4CORE 102"
            },
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "103"
            },
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "104"
            },
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "S4COREOP 104"
            },
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "105"
            },
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "106"
            },
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "107"
            },
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "108"
            },
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "109"
            },
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "SCM 700"
            },
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "701"
            },
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "702"
            },
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "712"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "source": "cna@sap.com"
    }
  ],
  "cveTags": [],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "SAP Advanced Planning and Optimization (Model Mix Planning) contains a hardcoded credential within the source code of the application to perform authorization check to access certain functionalities in the application. An attacker with high privileges could leverage this hardcoded credential to bypass authorization and delete specific planning-related restrictions in the application. Successful exploitation could result in a low impact on confidentiality and integrity, with no impact on availability of the application."
    },
    {
      "lang": "es",
      "value": "SAP Advanced Planning y Optimization (Model Mix Planning) contiene una credencial codificada de forma r\u00edgida dentro del c\u00f3digo fuente de la aplicaci\u00f3n para realizar una verificaci\u00f3n de autorizaci\u00f3n para acceder a ciertas funcionalidades en la aplicaci\u00f3n. Un atacante con privilegios elevados podr\u00eda aprovechar esta credencial codificada de forma r\u00edgida para eludir la autorizaci\u00f3n y eliminar restricciones espec\u00edficas relacionadas con la planificaci\u00f3n en la aplicaci\u00f3n. La explotaci\u00f3n exitosa podr\u00eda resultar en un impacto bajo en la confidencialidad y la integridad, sin impacto en la disponibilidad de la aplicaci\u00f3n."
    }
  ],
  "id": "CVE-2026-58245",
  "lastModified": "2026-10-24T16:10:00.153",
  "metrics": {
    "cvssMetricV31": [
      {
        "cvssData": {
          "attackComplexity": "LOW",
          "attackVector": "NETWORK",
          "availabilityImpact": "NONE",
          "baseScore": 3.8,
          "baseSeverity": "LOW",
          "confidentialityImpact": "LOW",
          "integrityImpact": "LOW",
          "privilegesRequired": "HIGH",
          "scope": "UNCHANGED",
          "userInteraction": "NONE",
          "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N",
          "version": "3.1"
        },
        "exploitabilityScore": 1.2,
        "impactScore": 2.5,
        "source": "cna@sap.com",
        "type": "Secondary"
      }
    ],
    "ssvcV203": [
      {
        "source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
        "ssvcData": {
          "id": "CVE-2026-58245",
          "options": [
            {
              "exploitation": "none"
            },
            {
              "automatable": "no"
            },
            {
              "technicalImpact": "partial"
            }
          ],
          "role": "CISA Coordinator",
          "timestamp": "2026-08-11T13:18:01.147615Z",
          "version": "2.0.3"
        }
      }
    ]
  },
  "published": "2026-08-11T01:17:22.397",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "cna@sap.com",
      "url": "https://me.sap.com/notes/3763028"
    },
    {
      "source": "cna@sap.com",
      "url": "https://url.sap/sapsecuritypatchday"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "cna@sap.com",
  "vulnStatus": "Awaiting Analysis",
  "weaknesses": [
    {
      "description": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "CWE-798"
        }
      ],
      "source": "cna@sap.com",
      "type": "Secondary"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline

Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC

JSON
How durations are calculated

Following the VTEM framework (Black Hat USA 2015), time to patch starts when the vendor or a coordinator was informed, total time to patch at discovery, and disclosure to patch at public disclosure; vendor response time runs from the report to its acknowledgement. Time to exploit and time unpatched start at the earliest discovery or report, falling back to public disclosure. Unpatched time ends at the first recorded patch, or the calculation time when no patch is recorded. Exploitation to patch shows the interval between those two events; a published proof of concept is a public exploit, not exploitation.

Each result shows its source dates. A negative interval means the end event came first; when date-only inputs leave the order open, the result says so. Date-only inputs are approximate. The earliest evidence wins: KEV report dates and sightings are labelled as such. Records describing another vulnerability are listed but never calculated from, and a PoC alone does not establish exploitation. Missing patch evidence does not prove that no patch exists. Filters below change the event list only.

Loading timeline…




    Related by attack behaviour

    Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.