FKIE_CVE-2026-58098

Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2026-10-15 07:18 - Updated: 2026-10-16 15:17
Summary
When semop(2) blocks waiting for a semaphore condition, it releases the per-set lock and sleeps. Upon waking, it checks the sequence number embedded in the semaphore set's IPC identifier to detect whether the set was removed while the caller was asleep. This sequence number is only 15 bits wide. If enough semaphore sets are created and destroyed in the same table slot while a caller is blocked, the counter wraps around, and semop(2) may falsely conclude that the original set still exists. The subsequent access to a semaphore within the set may then be out of bounds. An unprivileged local user can trigger an out-of-bounds access on kernel heap memory, potentially leading to privilege escalation.
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "affectedData": [
        {
          "defaultStatus": "unknown",
          "modules": [
            "sysvsem"
          ],
          "product": "FreeBSD",
          "vendor": "FreeBSD",
          "versions": [
            {
              "lessThan": "p4",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "15.1-RELEASE",
              "versionType": "release"
            },
            {
              "lessThan": "p14",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "15.0-RELEASE",
              "versionType": "release"
            },
            {
              "lessThan": "p1",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "14.5-RELEASE",
              "versionType": "release"
            },
            {
              "lessThan": "p10",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "14.4-RELEASE",
              "versionType": "release"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "source": "secteam@freebsd.org"
    }
  ],
  "cveTags": [],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "When semop(2) blocks waiting for a semaphore condition, it releases the per-set lock and sleeps.  Upon waking, it checks the sequence number embedded in the semaphore set\u0027s IPC identifier to detect whether the set was removed while the caller was asleep.  This sequence number is only 15 bits wide.  If enough semaphore sets are created and destroyed in the same table slot while a caller is blocked, the counter wraps around, and semop(2) may falsely conclude that the original set still exists.  The subsequent access to a semaphore within the set may then be out of bounds.\n\nAn unprivileged local user can trigger an out-of-bounds access on kernel heap memory, potentially leading to privilege escalation."
    }
  ],
  "id": "CVE-2026-58098",
  "lastModified": "2026-10-16T15:17:32.557",
  "metrics": {
    "cvssMetricV31": [
      {
        "cvssData": {
          "attackComplexity": "LOW",
          "attackVector": "LOCAL",
          "availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
          "baseScore": 8.4,
          "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
          "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
          "integrityImpact": "HIGH",
          "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
          "scope": "UNCHANGED",
          "userInteraction": "NONE",
          "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
          "version": "3.1"
        },
        "exploitabilityScore": 2.5,
        "impactScore": 5.9,
        "source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
        "type": "Secondary"
      }
    ],
    "ssvcV203": [
      {
        "source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
        "ssvcData": {
          "id": "CVE-2026-58098",
          "options": [
            {
              "exploitation": "none"
            },
            {
              "automatable": "no"
            },
            {
              "technicalImpact": "total"
            }
          ],
          "role": "CISA Coordinator",
          "timestamp": "2026-10-16T03:56:54.779139Z",
          "version": "2.0.3"
        }
      }
    ]
  },
  "published": "2026-10-15T07:18:02.250",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "secteam@freebsd.org",
      "url": "https://security.freebsd.org/advisories/FreeBSD-SA-26:64.sysvsem.asc"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "secteam@freebsd.org",
  "vulnStatus": "Undergoing Analysis",
  "weaknesses": [
    {
      "description": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "CWE-787"
        }
      ],
      "source": "secteam@freebsd.org",
      "type": "Secondary"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline

Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC

JSON
Events included in the timeline

Loading timeline…


    Loading…

    Loading…

    Loading…

    Related by attack behaviour

    Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.