FKIE_CVE-2026-34371

Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2026-04-07 22:16 - Updated: 2026-07-24 22:10
Severity
6.3 (Medium) - CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:H/A:N
Summary
LibreChat is a ChatGPT clone with additional features. Prior to 0.8.4, LibreChat trusts the name field returned by the execute_code sandbox when persisting code-generated artifacts. On deployments using the default local file strategy, a malicious artifact filename containing traversal sequences (for example, ../../../../../app/client/dist/poc.txt) is concatenated into the server-side destination path and written with fs.writeFileSync() without sanitization. This gives any user who can trigger execute_code an arbitrary file write primitive as the LibreChat server user. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.8.4.
References
security-advisories@github.comhttps://github.com/danny-avila/LibreChat/security/advisories/GHSA-qrm5-r67f-6692Exploit, Vendor Advisory
134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0https://github.com/danny-avila/LibreChat/security/advisories/GHSA-qrm5-r67f-6692Exploit, Vendor Advisory
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
librechat librechat *
To clipboard 

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "affectedData": [
        {
          "product": "LibreChat",
          "vendor": "danny-avila",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "\u003c 0.8.4"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "source": "security-advisories@github.com"
    }
  ],
  "configurations": [
    {
      "nodes": [
        {
          "cpeMatch": [
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:librechat:librechat:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "63FE1740-F55B-4D56-92E5-407F97DA3475",
              "versionEndExcluding": "0.8.4",
              "vulnerable": true
            }
          ],
          "negate": false,
          "operator": "OR"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "cveTags": [],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "LibreChat is a ChatGPT clone with additional features. Prior to 0.8.4, LibreChat trusts the name field returned by the execute_code sandbox when persisting code-generated artifacts. On deployments using the default local file strategy, a malicious artifact filename containing traversal sequences (for example, ../../../../../app/client/dist/poc.txt) is concatenated into the server-side destination path and written with fs.writeFileSync() without sanitization. This gives any user who can trigger execute_code an arbitrary file write primitive as the LibreChat server user. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.8.4."
    },
    {
      "lang": "es",
      "value": "LibreChat es un clon de ChatGPT con caracter\u00edsticas adicionales. Antes de la versi\u00f3n 0.8.4, LibreChat conf\u00eda en el campo de nombre devuelto por el sandbox de execute_code al persistir artefactos generados por c\u00f3digo. En implementaciones que utilizan la estrategia predeterminada de archivo local, un nombre de archivo de artefacto malicioso que contiene secuencias de recorrido (por ejemplo, \u0027.. / ../.. / ../../app/client/dist/poc.txt\u0027) se concatena en la ruta de destino del lado del servidor y se escribe con fs.writeFileSync() sin sanitizaci\u00f3n. Esto otorga a cualquier usuario que puede activar execute_code una primitiva de escritura de archivo arbitraria como el usuario del servidor de LibreChat. Esta vulnerabilidad se corrige en la versi\u00f3n 0.8.4."
    }
  ],
  "id": "CVE-2026-34371",
  "lastModified": "2026-07-24T22:10:00.140",
  "metrics": {
    "cvssMetricV31": [
      {
        "cvssData": {
          "attackComplexity": "HIGH",
          "attackVector": "NETWORK",
          "availabilityImpact": "NONE",
          "baseScore": 6.3,
          "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
          "confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
          "integrityImpact": "HIGH",
          "privilegesRequired": "LOW",
          "scope": "CHANGED",
          "userInteraction": "NONE",
          "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:H/A:N",
          "version": "3.1"
        },
        "exploitabilityScore": 1.8,
        "impactScore": 4.0,
        "source": "security-advisories@github.com",
        "type": "Secondary"
      }
    ],
    "ssvcV203": [
      {
        "source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
        "ssvcData": {
          "id": "CVE-2026-34371",
          "options": [
            {
              "exploitation": "poc"
            },
            {
              "automatable": "no"
            },
            {
              "technicalImpact": "partial"
            }
          ],
          "role": "CISA Coordinator",
          "timestamp": "2026-04-08T16:10:31.032341Z",
          "version": "2.0.3"
        }
      }
    ]
  },
  "published": "2026-04-07T22:16:22.227",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "security-advisories@github.com",
      "tags": [
        "Exploit",
        "Vendor Advisory"
      ],
      "url": "https://github.com/danny-avila/LibreChat/security/advisories/GHSA-qrm5-r67f-6692"
    },
    {
      "source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
      "tags": [
        "Exploit",
        "Vendor Advisory"
      ],
      "url": "https://github.com/danny-avila/LibreChat/security/advisories/GHSA-qrm5-r67f-6692"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "security-advisories@github.com",
  "vulnStatus": "Analyzed",
  "weaknesses": [
    {
      "description": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "CWE-22"
        }
      ],
      "source": "security-advisories@github.com",
      "type": "Secondary"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.





Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.