FKIE_CVE-2026-19016
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2026-08-07 20:16 - Updated: 2026-08-10 19:17
Severity
Summary
Consul Community Edition and Consul Enterprise 1.19.1 through 2.0.2 did not enforce the {{session:write}} ACL permission for session deletion operations submitted through the transaction API. An authenticated caller with network access to the Consul server RPC port could delete arbitrary sessions without holding the required permission. This vulnerability, CVE-2026-19016, is fixed in Consul 2.0.3 and Consul Enterprise 1.21.17, 1.22.11, and 2.0.3.
References
Impacted products
| Vendor | Product | Version |
|---|
{
"affected": [
{
"affectedData": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"platforms": [
"64 bit",
"32 bit",
"x86",
"ARM",
"MacOS",
"Windows",
"Linux"
],
"product": "Consul",
"repo": "https://github.com/hashicorp/consul",
"vendor": "HashiCorp",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "2.0.3",
"status": "affected",
"version": "1.19.1",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"platforms": [
"64 bit",
"32 bit",
"x86",
"ARM",
"MacOS",
"Windows",
"Linux"
],
"product": "Consul Enterprise",
"repo": "https://github.com/hashicorp/consul",
"vendor": "HashiCorp",
"versions": [
{
"changes": [
{
"at": "1.21.17",
"status": "unaffected"
},
{
"at": "1.22.11",
"status": "unaffected"
}
],
"lessThan": "2.0.3",
"status": "affected",
"version": "1.19.1",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"source": "security@hashicorp.com"
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Consul Community Edition and Consul Enterprise 1.19.1 through 2.0.2 did not enforce the {{session:write}} ACL permission for session deletion operations submitted through the transaction API. An authenticated caller with network access to the Consul server RPC port could delete arbitrary sessions without holding the required permission. This vulnerability, CVE-2026-19016, is fixed in Consul 2.0.3 and Consul Enterprise 1.21.17, 1.22.11, and 2.0.3."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2026-19016",
"lastModified": "2026-08-10T19:17:29.627",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV31": [
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "LOW",
"baseScore": 4.2,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "LOW",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 1.6,
"impactScore": 2.5,
"source": "security@hashicorp.com",
"type": "Secondary"
}
],
"ssvcV203": [
{
"source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"ssvcData": {
"id": "CVE-2026-19016",
"options": [
{
"exploitation": "none"
},
{
"automatable": "no"
},
{
"technicalImpact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-08-10T17:46:04.198541Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
}
}
]
},
"published": "2026-08-07T20:16:50.530",
"references": [
{
"source": "security@hashicorp.com",
"url": "https://discuss.hashicorp.com/t/hcsec-2026-25-multiple-vulnerabilities-impacting-hashicorp-consul/77629"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "security@hashicorp.com",
"vulnStatus": "Received",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-22"
}
],
"source": "security@hashicorp.com",
"type": "Secondary"
}
]
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
The MITRE ATT&CK techniques below are AI-generated suggestions, inferred from the description of the
vulnerability by the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-classification-roberta-base
model, served locally by ML-Gateway.
They have not been verified by an analyst and are provided for guidance only.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Loading…
Loading…