FKIE_CVE-2026-1467
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2026-01-27 10:15 - Updated: 2026-03-25 14:20
Severity ?
5.8 (Medium) - CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:N
5.3 (Medium) - CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
5.3 (Medium) - CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
Summary
A flaw was found in libsoup, an HTTP client library. This vulnerability, known as CRLF (Carriage Return Line Feed) Injection, occurs when an HTTP proxy is configured and the library improperly handles URL-decoded input used to create the Host header. A remote attacker can exploit this by providing a specially crafted URL containing CRLF sequences, allowing them to inject additional HTTP headers or complete HTTP request bodies. This can lead to unintended or unauthorized HTTP requests being forwarded by the proxy, potentially impacting downstream services.
References
| URL | Tags | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| secalert@redhat.com | https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-1467 | Third Party Advisory | |
| secalert@redhat.com | https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2433174 | Issue Tracking, Third Party Advisory | |
| secalert@redhat.com | https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/libsoup/-/issues/488 | Exploit, Issue Tracking, Vendor Advisory |
Impacted products
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| gnome | libsoup | - | |
| redhat | enterprise_linux | 6.0 | |
| redhat | enterprise_linux | 7.0 | |
| redhat | enterprise_linux | 8.0 | |
| redhat | enterprise_linux | 9.0 | |
| redhat | enterprise_linux | 10.0 |
{
"configurations": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:gnome:libsoup:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "C5BAC4F4-3ACD-4F4D-920C-F920FD2C5472",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:redhat:enterprise_linux:6.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "2F6AB192-9D7D-4A9A-8995-E53A9DE9EAFC",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:redhat:enterprise_linux:7.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "142AD0DD-4CF3-4D74-9442-459CE3347E3A",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:redhat:enterprise_linux:8.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "F4CFF558-3C47-480D-A2F0-BABF26042943",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:redhat:enterprise_linux:9.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "7F6FB57C-2BC7-487C-96DD-132683AEB35D",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:redhat:enterprise_linux:10.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "D65C2163-CFC2-4ABB-8F4E-CB09CEBD006C",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "A flaw was found in libsoup, an HTTP client library. This vulnerability, known as CRLF (Carriage Return Line Feed) Injection, occurs when an HTTP proxy is configured and the library improperly handles URL-decoded input used to create the Host header. A remote attacker can exploit this by providing a specially crafted URL containing CRLF sequences, allowing them to inject additional HTTP headers or complete HTTP request bodies. This can lead to unintended or unauthorized HTTP requests being forwarded by the proxy, potentially impacting downstream services."
},
{
"lang": "es",
"value": "Se encontr\u00f3 una falla en libsoup, una biblioteca cliente HTTP. Esta vulnerabilidad, conocida como inyecci\u00f3n CRLF (Carriage Return Line Feed), ocurre cuando se configura un proxy HTTP y la biblioteca maneja incorrectamente la entrada decodificada de URL utilizada para crear el encabezado Host. Un atacante remoto puede explotar esto al proporcionar una URL especialmente dise\u00f1ada que contiene secuencias CRLF, permiti\u00e9ndoles inyectar encabezados HTTP adicionales o cuerpos completos de solicitudes HTTP. Esto puede llevar a que solicitudes HTTP no intencionadas o no autorizadas sean reenviadas por el proxy, afectando potencialmente a los servicios posteriores."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2026-1467",
"lastModified": "2026-03-25T14:20:18.770",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV31": [
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 5.8,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "LOW",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "CHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 3.9,
"impactScore": 1.4,
"source": "secalert@redhat.com",
"type": "Secondary"
},
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 5.3,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "LOW",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 3.9,
"impactScore": 1.4,
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary"
}
]
},
"published": "2026-01-27T10:15:48.597",
"references": [
{
"source": "secalert@redhat.com",
"tags": [
"Third Party Advisory"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-1467"
},
{
"source": "secalert@redhat.com",
"tags": [
"Issue Tracking",
"Third Party Advisory"
],
"url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2433174"
},
{
"source": "secalert@redhat.com",
"tags": [
"Exploit",
"Issue Tracking",
"Vendor Advisory"
],
"url": "https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/libsoup/-/issues/488"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "secalert@redhat.com",
"vulnStatus": "Analyzed",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-93"
}
],
"source": "secalert@redhat.com",
"type": "Secondary"
}
]
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…