FKIE_CVE-2026-116238

Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2026-10-30 20:17 - Updated: 2026-10-30 20:17
Severity
8.1 (High) - CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Summary
In server mode pgAdmin 4 locks an internal account after MAX_LOGIN_ATTEMPTS failed logins (3 by default). The limit could be bypassed, giving an unauthenticated attacker an unlimited number of password guesses against any internal account, including the administrator's, in the default configuration: - Flask-Security registers its own views next to pgAdmin's. A login submitted to its /login view was checked and logged in without pgAdmin's failed login count or lock. Its /verify view checked a signed-in user's password without limit, its /change view changed a password without pgAdmin's change password permission or re-encrypting the user's saved server passwords, and its /reset views sent and applied password resets for accounts that are not internal or are locked. - The internal account was looked up by its exact username, while the login form matches the email ignoring case, so a login with the username typed in another case was neither counted nor checked for the lock. - With LDAP or webserver authentication also configured, a wrong internal password was never counted, and with Kerberos or webserver authentication configured a guess could be answered without being counted. In addition, where accounts from different authentication sources share an email address, a password reset could be sent for, or applied to, an account from another source, and the About box showed the server configuration to a user whose email was that of an administrator's account. The fix refuses submissions to Flask-Security's own views, counts every failed internal login however the username is typed and whatever other sources are configured, no longer lets a login that posts a password fall back to an authentication source that does not check it, and locks only internal authentication. Password resets and the About box act only on the user's own internal account. Desktop mode is not affected. This issue affects pgAdmin 4: before 9.19.
References
f86ef6dc-4d3a-42ad-8f28-e6d5547a5007https://github.com/pgadmin-org/pgadmin4/commit/35c9235d17a7d5a99778f01b2f1b9e5e3a3b7fde
f86ef6dc-4d3a-42ad-8f28-e6d5547a5007https://github.com/pgadmin-org/pgadmin4/commit/58c531d831179dc9b0a5bf873ccb80c71c8d387a
f86ef6dc-4d3a-42ad-8f28-e6d5547a5007https://github.com/pgadmin-org/pgadmin4/commit/c6ef41a951012cd877a1992b5dac681eec36e48d
f86ef6dc-4d3a-42ad-8f28-e6d5547a5007https://github.com/pgadmin-org/pgadmin4/issues/10676
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
To clipboard 

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "affectedData": [
        {
          "defaultStatus": "unaffected",
          "modules": [
            "Authentication",
            "Password Recovery",
            "User Management"
          ],
          "product": "pgAdmin 4",
          "programFiles": [
            "https://github.com/pgadmin-org/pgadmin4/blob/master/web/pgadmin/__init__.py",
            "https://github.com/pgadmin-org/pgadmin4/blob/master/web/pgadmin/authenticate/__init__.py",
            "https://github.com/pgadmin-org/pgadmin4/blob/master/web/pgadmin/browser/__init__.py",
            "https://github.com/pgadmin-org/pgadmin4/blob/master/web/pgadmin/about/__init__.py"
          ],
          "repo": "https://github.com/pgadmin-org/pgadmin4",
          "vendor": "pgadmin.org",
          "versions": [
            {
              "lessThan": "9.19",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "0",
              "versionType": "custom"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "source": "f86ef6dc-4d3a-42ad-8f28-e6d5547a5007"
    }
  ],
  "cveTags": [],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "In server mode pgAdmin 4 locks an internal account after MAX_LOGIN_ATTEMPTS failed logins (3 by default). The limit could be bypassed, giving an unauthenticated attacker an unlimited number of password guesses against any internal account, including the administrator\u0027s, in the default configuration:\n\n- Flask-Security registers its own views next to pgAdmin\u0027s. A login submitted to its /login view was checked and logged in without pgAdmin\u0027s failed login count or lock. Its /verify view checked a signed-in user\u0027s password without limit, its /change view changed a password without pgAdmin\u0027s change password permission or re-encrypting the user\u0027s saved server passwords, and its /reset views sent and applied password resets for accounts that are not internal or are locked.\n- The internal account was looked up by its exact username, while the login form matches the email ignoring case, so a login with the username typed in another case was neither counted nor checked for the lock.\n- With LDAP or webserver authentication also configured, a wrong internal password was never counted, and with Kerberos or webserver authentication configured a guess could be answered without being counted.\n\nIn addition, where accounts from different authentication sources share an email address, a password reset could be sent for, or applied to, an account from another source, and the About box showed the server configuration to a user whose email was that of an administrator\u0027s account.\n\nThe fix refuses submissions to Flask-Security\u0027s own views, counts every failed internal login however the username is typed and whatever other sources are configured, no longer lets a login that posts a password fall back to an authentication source that does not check it, and locks only internal authentication. Password resets and the About box act only on the user\u0027s own internal account. Desktop mode is not affected.\n\nThis issue affects pgAdmin 4: before 9.19."
    }
  ],
  "id": "CVE-2026-116238",
  "lastModified": "2026-10-30T20:17:02.433",
  "metrics": {
    "cvssMetricV31": [
      {
        "cvssData": {
          "attackComplexity": "HIGH",
          "attackVector": "NETWORK",
          "availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
          "baseScore": 8.1,
          "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
          "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
          "integrityImpact": "HIGH",
          "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
          "scope": "UNCHANGED",
          "userInteraction": "NONE",
          "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
          "version": "3.1"
        },
        "exploitabilityScore": 2.2,
        "impactScore": 5.9,
        "source": "f86ef6dc-4d3a-42ad-8f28-e6d5547a5007",
        "type": "Secondary"
      }
    ],
    "cvssMetricV40": [
      {
        "cvssData": {
          "Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "attackComplexity": "HIGH",
          "attackRequirements": "PRESENT",
          "attackVector": "NETWORK",
          "availabilityRequirement": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "baseScore": 9.2,
          "baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
          "confidentialityRequirement": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "exploitMaturity": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "integrityRequirement": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "modifiedAttackComplexity": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "modifiedAttackRequirements": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "modifiedAttackVector": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "modifiedPrivilegesRequired": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "modifiedSubAvailabilityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "modifiedSubConfidentialityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "modifiedSubIntegrityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "modifiedUserInteraction": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "modifiedVulnAvailabilityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "modifiedVulnConfidentialityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "modifiedVulnIntegrityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
          "providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
          "subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
          "subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
          "userInteraction": "NONE",
          "valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
          "version": "4.0",
          "vulnAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
          "vulnConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
          "vulnIntegrityImpact": "HIGH",
          "vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
        },
        "source": "f86ef6dc-4d3a-42ad-8f28-e6d5547a5007",
        "type": "Secondary"
      }
    ]
  },
  "published": "2026-10-30T20:17:02.433",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "f86ef6dc-4d3a-42ad-8f28-e6d5547a5007",
      "url": "https://github.com/pgadmin-org/pgadmin4/commit/35c9235d17a7d5a99778f01b2f1b9e5e3a3b7fde"
    },
    {
      "source": "f86ef6dc-4d3a-42ad-8f28-e6d5547a5007",
      "url": "https://github.com/pgadmin-org/pgadmin4/commit/58c531d831179dc9b0a5bf873ccb80c71c8d387a"
    },
    {
      "source": "f86ef6dc-4d3a-42ad-8f28-e6d5547a5007",
      "url": "https://github.com/pgadmin-org/pgadmin4/commit/c6ef41a951012cd877a1992b5dac681eec36e48d"
    },
    {
      "source": "f86ef6dc-4d3a-42ad-8f28-e6d5547a5007",
      "url": "https://github.com/pgadmin-org/pgadmin4/issues/10676"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "f86ef6dc-4d3a-42ad-8f28-e6d5547a5007",
  "vulnStatus": "Received",
  "weaknesses": [
    {
      "description": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "CWE-307"
        },
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "CWE-863"
        }
      ],
      "source": "f86ef6dc-4d3a-42ad-8f28-e6d5547a5007",
      "type": "Secondary"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline

Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC

JSON

Loading timeline…




    Related by attack behaviour

    Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.