FKIE_CVE-2026-105283

Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2026-10-12 12:17 - Updated: 2026-10-13 14:31
Summary
Generation of Error Message Containing Sensitive Information vulnerability in ash-project ash_typescript allows an unauthenticated attacker to read internal Elixir terms from an RPC error response by provoking an error the error builder has no dedicated clause for. AshTypescript.Rpc.ErrorBuilder.build_error_response/1 in lib/ash_typescript/rpc/error_builder.ex renders a pipeline error term that matches no specific clause with inspect/1 and places the result in details.error of the client-facing error. Ash exceptions take a separate path in AshTypescript.Rpc.Errors where unhandled cases are redacted behind an errorId, but these fallbacks have no redaction, so whatever the term carries reaches the HTTP or channel response. Two request paths hand it such terms: a struct-typed action argument with an invalid nested value, where cast_map_to_struct/2 in lib/ash_typescript/rpc/input_formatter.ex throws the raw Ash.Type cast error into the builder, and field selection on a generic action that returns a primitive, where format_field_type/1 inspects the full Ash.Info.Manifest.Type struct into vars.returnType. Resource module names in vars.resource are not treated as sensitive and are out of scope. This issue affects ash_typescript: from 0.1.0 before 0.19.1.
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "affectedData": [
        {
          "collectionURL": "https://repo.hex.pm",
          "cpes": [
            "cpe:2.3:a:ash-project:ash_typescript:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
          ],
          "defaultStatus": "unaffected",
          "modules": [
            "\u0027Elixir.AshTypescript.Rpc.ErrorBuilder\u0027",
            "\u0027Elixir.AshTypescript.Rpc.InputFormatter\u0027",
            "\u0027Elixir.AshTypescript.Rpc\u0027"
          ],
          "packageName": "ash_typescript",
          "packageURL": "pkg:hex/ash_typescript",
          "product": "ash_typescript",
          "programFiles": [
            "lib/ash_typescript/rpc/error_builder.ex",
            "lib/ash_typescript/rpc/input_formatter.ex",
            "lib/ash_typescript/rpc.ex"
          ],
          "programRoutines": [
            {
              "name": "\u0027Elixir.AshTypescript.Rpc.ErrorBuilder\u0027:build_error_response/1"
            },
            {
              "name": "\u0027Elixir.AshTypescript.Rpc.ErrorBuilder\u0027:format_field_type/1"
            },
            {
              "name": "\u0027Elixir.AshTypescript.Rpc.InputFormatter\u0027:cast_map_to_struct/2"
            },
            {
              "name": "\u0027Elixir.AshTypescript.Rpc\u0027:run_action/3"
            },
            {
              "name": "\u0027Elixir.AshTypescript.Rpc\u0027:validate_action/3"
            }
          ],
          "repo": "https://github.com/ash-project/ash_typescript",
          "vendor": "ash-project",
          "versions": [
            {
              "lessThan": "0.19.1",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "0.1.0",
              "versionType": "semver"
            }
          ]
        },
        {
          "collectionURL": "https://github.com",
          "cpes": [
            "cpe:2.3:a:ash-project:ash_typescript:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
          ],
          "defaultStatus": "unaffected",
          "modules": [
            "\u0027Elixir.AshTypescript.Rpc.ErrorBuilder\u0027",
            "\u0027Elixir.AshTypescript.Rpc.InputFormatter\u0027",
            "\u0027Elixir.AshTypescript.Rpc\u0027"
          ],
          "packageName": "ash-project/ash_typescript",
          "packageURL": "pkg:github/ash-project/ash_typescript",
          "product": "ash_typescript",
          "programFiles": [
            "lib/ash_typescript/rpc/error_builder.ex",
            "lib/ash_typescript/rpc/input_formatter.ex",
            "lib/ash_typescript/rpc.ex"
          ],
          "programRoutines": [
            {
              "name": "\u0027Elixir.AshTypescript.Rpc.ErrorBuilder\u0027:build_error_response/1"
            },
            {
              "name": "\u0027Elixir.AshTypescript.Rpc.ErrorBuilder\u0027:format_field_type/1"
            },
            {
              "name": "\u0027Elixir.AshTypescript.Rpc.InputFormatter\u0027:cast_map_to_struct/2"
            },
            {
              "name": "\u0027Elixir.AshTypescript.Rpc\u0027:run_action/3"
            },
            {
              "name": "\u0027Elixir.AshTypescript.Rpc\u0027:validate_action/3"
            }
          ],
          "repo": "https://github.com/ash-project/ash_typescript",
          "vendor": "ash-project",
          "versions": [
            {
              "lessThan": "4b3c65203ee78dc992d6d2e6559625c5460a01cd",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "8e204ce34e24a158cf22a2dac4d53c44716c9e30",
              "versionType": "git"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "source": "6b3ad84c-e1a6-4bf7-a703-f496b71e49db"
    }
  ],
  "cveTags": [],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "Generation of Error Message Containing Sensitive Information vulnerability in ash-project ash_typescript allows an unauthenticated attacker to read internal Elixir terms from an RPC error response by provoking an error the error builder has no dedicated clause for.\n\nAshTypescript.Rpc.ErrorBuilder.build_error_response/1 in lib/ash_typescript/rpc/error_builder.ex renders a pipeline error term that matches no specific clause with inspect/1 and places the result in details.error of the client-facing error. Ash exceptions take a separate path in AshTypescript.Rpc.Errors where unhandled cases are redacted behind an errorId, but these fallbacks have no redaction, so whatever the term carries reaches the HTTP or channel response. Two request paths hand it such terms: a struct-typed action argument with an invalid nested value, where cast_map_to_struct/2 in lib/ash_typescript/rpc/input_formatter.ex throws the raw Ash.Type cast error into the builder, and field selection on a generic action that returns a primitive, where format_field_type/1 inspects the full Ash.Info.Manifest.Type struct into vars.returnType. Resource module names in vars.resource are not treated as sensitive and are out of scope.\n\nThis issue affects ash_typescript: from 0.1.0 before 0.19.1."
    }
  ],
  "id": "CVE-2026-105283",
  "lastModified": "2026-10-13T14:31:20.750",
  "metrics": {
    "cvssMetricV40": [
      {
        "cvssData": {
          "Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "attackComplexity": "LOW",
          "attackRequirements": "PRESENT",
          "attackVector": "NETWORK",
          "availabilityRequirement": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "baseScore": 6.3,
          "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
          "confidentialityRequirement": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "exploitMaturity": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "integrityRequirement": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "modifiedAttackComplexity": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "modifiedAttackRequirements": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "modifiedAttackVector": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "modifiedPrivilegesRequired": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "modifiedSubAvailabilityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "modifiedSubConfidentialityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "modifiedSubIntegrityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "modifiedUserInteraction": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "modifiedVulnAvailabilityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "modifiedVulnConfidentialityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "modifiedVulnIntegrityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
          "providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
          "subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
          "subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
          "userInteraction": "NONE",
          "valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
          "version": "4.0",
          "vulnAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
          "vulnConfidentialityImpact": "LOW",
          "vulnIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
          "vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
        },
        "source": "6b3ad84c-e1a6-4bf7-a703-f496b71e49db",
        "type": "Secondary"
      }
    ]
  },
  "published": "2026-10-12T12:17:12.447",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "6b3ad84c-e1a6-4bf7-a703-f496b71e49db",
      "url": "https://cna.erlef.org/cves/CVE-2026-105283.html"
    },
    {
      "source": "6b3ad84c-e1a6-4bf7-a703-f496b71e49db",
      "url": "https://github.com/ash-project/ash_typescript/commit/4b3c65203ee78dc992d6d2e6559625c5460a01cd"
    },
    {
      "source": "6b3ad84c-e1a6-4bf7-a703-f496b71e49db",
      "url": "https://github.com/ash-project/ash_typescript/commit/8e204ce34e24a158cf22a2dac4d53c44716c9e30"
    },
    {
      "source": "6b3ad84c-e1a6-4bf7-a703-f496b71e49db",
      "url": "https://github.com/ash-project/ash_typescript/security/advisories/GHSA-7gxc-w225-f7f3"
    },
    {
      "source": "6b3ad84c-e1a6-4bf7-a703-f496b71e49db",
      "url": "https://osv.dev/vulnerability/EEF-CVE-2026-105283"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "6b3ad84c-e1a6-4bf7-a703-f496b71e49db",
  "vulnStatus": "Deferred",
  "weaknesses": [
    {
      "description": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "CWE-209"
        }
      ],
      "source": "6b3ad84c-e1a6-4bf7-a703-f496b71e49db",
      "type": "Secondary"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…