FKIE_CVE-2025-31990

Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2026-02-07 04:15 - Updated: 2026-06-17 09:11
Summary
Rate limiting for certain API calls is not being enforced, making HCL Velocity vulnerable to Denial of Service (DoS) attacks. An attacker could flood the system with a large number of requests, overwhelming its resources and causing it to become unresponsive to legitimate users. This vulnerability is fixed in 5.1.7.
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "affectedData": [
        {
          "defaultStatus": "unaffected",
          "product": "HCL DevOps Velocity",
          "vendor": "HCLSoftware",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "\u003c5.1.7"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "source": "psirt@hcl.com"
    }
  ],
  "cveTags": [],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "Rate limiting for certain API calls is not being enforced, making HCL Velocity vulnerable to Denial of Service (DoS) attacks.  An attacker could flood the system with a large number of requests, overwhelming its resources and causing it to become unresponsive to legitimate users.  This vulnerability is fixed in 5.1.7."
    },
    {
      "lang": "es",
      "value": "La limitaci\u00f3n de velocidad para ciertas llamadas a la API no se est\u00e1 aplicando, lo que hace que HCL Velocity sea vulnerable a ataques de denegaci\u00f3n de servicio (DoS). Un atacante podr\u00eda inundar el sistema con un gran n\u00famero de solicitudes, sobrecargando sus recursos y haciendo que deje de responder a usuarios leg\u00edtimos. Esta vulnerabilidad est\u00e1 corregida en 5.1.7."
    }
  ],
  "id": "CVE-2025-31990",
  "lastModified": "2026-06-17T09:11:17.160",
  "metrics": {
    "cvssMetricV31": [
      {
        "cvssData": {
          "attackComplexity": "LOW",
          "attackVector": "NETWORK",
          "availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
          "baseScore": 6.8,
          "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
          "confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
          "integrityImpact": "NONE",
          "privilegesRequired": "HIGH",
          "scope": "CHANGED",
          "userInteraction": "NONE",
          "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:N/A:H",
          "version": "3.1"
        },
        "exploitabilityScore": 2.3,
        "impactScore": 4.0,
        "source": "psirt@hcl.com",
        "type": "Secondary"
      }
    ],
    "ssvcV203": [
      {
        "source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
        "ssvcData": {
          "id": "CVE-2025-31990",
          "options": [
            {
              "exploitation": "none"
            },
            {
              "automatable": "no"
            },
            {
              "technicalImpact": "partial"
            }
          ],
          "role": "CISA Coordinator",
          "timestamp": "2026-02-09T16:51:11.861813Z",
          "version": "2.0.3"
        }
      }
    ]
  },
  "published": "2026-02-07T04:15:52.470",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "psirt@hcl.com",
      "url": "https://support.hcl-software.com/csm?id=kb_article\u0026sysparm_article=KB0128585"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "psirt@hcl.com",
  "vulnStatus": "Deferred",
  "weaknesses": [
    {
      "description": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "CWE-770"
        }
      ],
      "source": "psirt@hcl.com",
      "type": "Secondary"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…