FKIE_CVE-2025-20628
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2026-04-07 23:16 - Updated: 2026-07-24 23:10
Severity
Summary
An insufficient granularity of access control vulnerability exists in PingIDM (formerly ForgeRock Identity Management) where administrators cannot properly configure access rules for Remote Connector Servers (RCS) running in client mode. This means attackers can spoof a client-mode RCS (if one exists) to intercept and/or modify an identity’s security-relevant properties, such as passwords and account recovery information. This issue is exploitable only when an RCS is configured to run in client mode.
References
Impacted products
| Vendor | Product | Version |
|---|
{
"affected": [
{
"affectedData": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "PingIDM",
"vendor": "Ping Identity",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "7.5.0",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "7.4.1",
"status": "affected",
"version": "7.4.0",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "7.3.1",
"status": "affected",
"version": "7.3.0",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "7.2.2",
"status": "affected",
"version": "7.2.0",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "7.1.*",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"source": "responsible-disclosure@pingidentity.com"
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "An insufficient granularity of access control vulnerability exists in PingIDM (formerly ForgeRock Identity Management) where administrators cannot properly configure access rules for Remote Connector Servers (RCS) running in client mode. This means attackers can spoof a client-mode RCS (if one exists) to intercept and/or modify an identity\u2019s security-relevant properties, such as passwords and account recovery information. This issue is exploitable only when an RCS is configured to run in client mode."
},
{
"lang": "es",
"value": "Una vulnerabilidad de granularidad insuficiente en el control de acceso existe en PingIDM (anteriormente ForgeRock Identity Management) donde los administradores no pueden configurar correctamente las reglas de acceso para los Servidores de Conector Remoto (RCS) que se ejecutan en modo cliente. Esto significa que los atacantes pueden suplantar un RCS en modo cliente (si existe uno) para interceptar y/o modificar las propiedades relevantes para la seguridad de una identidad, como contrase\u00f1as e informaci\u00f3n de recuperaci\u00f3n de cuenta. Este problema es explotable solo cuando un RCS est\u00e1 configurado para ejecutarse en modo cliente."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2025-20628",
"lastModified": "2026-07-24T23:10:00.563",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV40": [
{
"cvssData": {
"Automatable": "YES",
"Recovery": "USER",
"Safety": "PRESENT",
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackRequirements": "PRESENT",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityRequirement": "NOT_DEFINED",
"baseScore": 6.9,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityRequirement": "NOT_DEFINED",
"exploitMaturity": "UNREPORTED",
"integrityRequirement": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedAttackComplexity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedAttackRequirements": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedAttackVector": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedPrivilegesRequired": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedSubAvailabilityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedSubConfidentialityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedSubIntegrityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedUserInteraction": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedVulnAvailabilityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedVulnConfidentialityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedVulnIntegrityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"providerUrgency": "RED",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"valueDensity": "CONCENTRATED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:P/AU:Y/R:U/V:C/RE:M/U:Red",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "MODERATE"
},
"source": "responsible-disclosure@pingidentity.com",
"type": "Secondary"
}
],
"ssvcV203": [
{
"source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"ssvcData": {
"id": "CVE-2025-20628",
"options": [
{
"exploitation": "none"
},
{
"automatable": "no"
},
{
"technicalImpact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-04-08T15:16:23.302687Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
}
}
]
},
"published": "2026-04-07T23:16:27.040",
"references": [
{
"source": "responsible-disclosure@pingidentity.com",
"url": "https://backstage.forgerock.com/knowledge/advisories/article/a14305629?rev=_newest"
},
{
"source": "responsible-disclosure@pingidentity.com",
"url": "https://backstage.pingidentity.com/downloads/browse/idm/featured"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "responsible-disclosure@pingidentity.com",
"vulnStatus": "Awaiting Analysis",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-1220"
}
],
"source": "responsible-disclosure@pingidentity.com",
"type": "Secondary"
}
]
}
Loading…
Loading…
Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline
Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC
Loading timeline…
Loading…
Loading…
The MITRE ATT&CK techniques below are AI-generated suggestions, inferred from the description of the
vulnerability by the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-classification-roberta-base
model, served locally by ML-Gateway.
They have not been verified by an analyst and are provided for guidance only.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Loading…
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.