FKIE_CVE-2025-0034

Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2025-09-06 19:15 - Updated: 2026-10-18 21:10
Summary
Insufficient parameter sanitization in TEE SOC Driver could allow an attacker to issue a malformed DRV_SOC_CMD_ID_SRIOV_SPATIAL_PART and cause read or write past the end of allocated arrays, potentially resulting in a loss of platform integrity or denial of service.
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "affectedData": [
        {
          "defaultStatus": "affected",
          "product": "AMD Instinct\u2122 MI300X",
          "vendor": "AMD",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "unaffected",
              "version": "ROCm 6.3"
            }
          ]
        },
        {
          "defaultStatus": "affected",
          "product": "AMD Instinct\u2122 MI325X",
          "vendor": "AMD",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "unaffected",
              "version": "ROCm 6.3"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "source": "psirt@amd.com"
    }
  ],
  "cveTags": [],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "Insufficient parameter sanitization in TEE SOC Driver could allow an attacker to issue a malformed DRV_SOC_CMD_ID_SRIOV_SPATIAL_PART and cause read or write past the end of allocated arrays, potentially resulting in a loss of platform integrity or denial of service."
    },
    {
      "lang": "es",
      "value": "Saneamiento insuficiente de par\u00e1metros en el controlador TEE SOC podr\u00eda permitir a un atacante emitir un DRV_SOC_CMD_ID_SRIOV_SPATIAL_PART malformado y causar una lectura o escritura m\u00e1s all\u00e1 del final de los arrays asignados, lo que podr\u00eda resultar en una p\u00e9rdida de integridad de la plataforma o denegaci\u00f3n de servicio."
    }
  ],
  "id": "CVE-2025-0034",
  "lastModified": "2026-10-18T21:10:00.120",
  "metrics": {
    "cvssMetricV31": [
      {
        "cvssData": {
          "attackComplexity": "HIGH",
          "attackVector": "LOCAL",
          "availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
          "baseScore": 4.7,
          "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
          "confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
          "integrityImpact": "LOW",
          "privilegesRequired": "HIGH",
          "scope": "UNCHANGED",
          "userInteraction": "NONE",
          "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:H",
          "version": "3.1"
        },
        "exploitabilityScore": 0.5,
        "impactScore": 4.2,
        "source": "psirt@amd.com",
        "type": "Secondary"
      }
    ],
    "ssvcV203": [
      {
        "source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
        "ssvcData": {
          "id": "CVE-2025-0034",
          "options": [
            {
              "exploitation": "none"
            },
            {
              "automatable": "no"
            },
            {
              "technicalImpact": "partial"
            }
          ],
          "role": "CISA Coordinator",
          "timestamp": "2025-09-08T14:35:24.000031Z",
          "version": "2.0.3"
        }
      }
    ]
  },
  "published": "2025-09-06T19:15:38.373",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "psirt@amd.com",
      "url": "https://www.amd.com/en/resources/product-security/bulletin/AMD-SB-6018.html"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "psirt@amd.com",
  "vulnStatus": "Deferred",
  "weaknesses": [
    {
      "description": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "CWE-787"
        }
      ],
      "source": "psirt@amd.com",
      "type": "Secondary"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline

Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC

JSON
Events included in the timeline

Loading timeline…


    Loading…

    Loading…

    Loading…

    Related by attack behaviour

    Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.