CVE-2026-82749 (GCVE-0-2026-82749)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-09-01 03:54 – Updated: 2026-09-01 12:38
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
Ash relationship parent(...) filter degrades to an IS NULL match when the parent field is unresolved, leaking scoped records
Summary
Incorrect Authorization vulnerability in ash-project ash widens a relationship's parent(...) scoping filter to match unintended records when the referenced parent field cannot be resolved.
Loading a relationship whose filter references parent(...) resolves that expression against the parent record. resolve_parent_in_filter/3 (lib/ash/actions/read/relationships.ex) resolved an unresolvable parent reference (for example when the referenced field was not selected on the source query) to nil rather than failing. A scoping predicate such as org_id == parent(org_id) then becomes an IS NULL match, and a guard like is_nil(parent(org_id)) or org_id == parent(org_id) activates its unrestricted branch, so the relationship returns records the scope was meant to exclude. The fix fails the read with an error when a parent(...) reference cannot be resolved, instead of defaulting to nil.
This issue affects ash: from 3.13.2 before 3.32.2.
Severity
SSVC
Exploitation: poc
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator · CISA-ADP (v2.0.3)
Decision recorded 2026-09-01 12:37 UTC
CWE
- CWE-863 - Incorrect Authorization
Assigner
References
4 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/ash-project/ash/security/advis… | vendor-advisoryrelated |
| https://cna.erlef.org/cves/CVE-2026-82749.html | related |
| https://osv.dev/vulnerability/EEF-CVE-2026-82749 | related |
| https://github.com/ash-project/ash/commit/e52dad2… | patch |
Impacted products
2 products
| Vendor | Product | Version | CPE status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ash-project | ash |
Affected:
3.13.2 , < 3.32.2
(semver)
cpe:2.3:a:ash-project:ash:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* |
||
| ash-project | ash |
Affected:
0ddff26e6e6bc6d182e1af2f98b431575e5b4179 , < e52dad2c39a35f6f043f7324d26e4f4e2551dfd2
(git)
cpe:2.3:a:ash-project:ash:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-82749",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "poc"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-09-01T12:37:51.333023Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-01T12:38:27.534Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"exploit"
],
"url": "https://github.com/ash-project/ash/security/advisories/GHSA-j8fx-ff37-4j9c"
}
],
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"collectionURL": "https://repo.hex.pm",
"cpes": [
"cpe:2.3:a:ash-project:ash:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"modules": [
"\u0027Elixir.Ash.Actions.Read.Relationships\u0027"
],
"packageName": "ash",
"packageURL": "pkg:hex/ash",
"product": "ash",
"programFiles": [
"lib/ash/actions/read/relationships.ex"
],
"programRoutines": [
{
"name": "\u0027Elixir.Ash.Actions.Read.Relationships\u0027:resolve_parent_in_filter/3"
},
{
"name": "\u0027Elixir.Ash.Actions.Read.Relationships\u0027:do_per_record_no_attributes_load/5"
}
],
"repo": "https://github.com/ash-project/ash",
"vendor": "ash-project",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "3.32.2",
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.13.2",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
},
{
"collectionURL": "https://github.com",
"cpes": [
"cpe:2.3:a:ash-project:ash:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"modules": [
"\u0027Elixir.Ash.Actions.Read.Relationships\u0027"
],
"packageName": "ash-project/ash",
"packageURL": "pkg:github/ash-project/ash",
"product": "ash",
"programFiles": [
"lib/ash/actions/read/relationships.ex"
],
"programRoutines": [
{
"name": "\u0027Elixir.Ash.Actions.Read.Relationships\u0027:resolve_parent_in_filter/3"
},
{
"name": "\u0027Elixir.Ash.Actions.Read.Relationships\u0027:do_per_record_no_attributes_load/5"
}
],
"repo": "https://github.com/ash-project/ash",
"vendor": "ash-project",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "e52dad2c39a35f6f043f7324d26e4f4e2551dfd2",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0ddff26e6e6bc6d182e1af2f98b431575e5b4179",
"versionType": "git"
}
]
}
],
"cpeApplicability": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:ash-project:ash:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "3.32.2",
"versionStartIncluding": "3.13.2",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
],
"operator": "AND"
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "coordinator",
"value": "Jonatan M\u00e4nnchen / EEF"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "remediation developer",
"value": "Zach Daniel / Ash Project"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "reporter",
"value": "Peter Ullrich"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Peter Ullrich"
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cp\u003eIncorrect Authorization vulnerability in ash-project ash widens a relationship\u0027s \u003ccode\u003eparent(...)\u003c/code\u003e scoping filter to match unintended records when the referenced parent field cannot be resolved.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eLoading a relationship whose filter references \u003ccode\u003eparent(...)\u003c/code\u003e resolves that expression against the parent record. \u003ccode\u003eresolve_parent_in_filter/3\u003c/code\u003e (\u003ccode\u003elib/ash/actions/read/relationships.ex\u003c/code\u003e) resolved an unresolvable parent reference (for example when the referenced field was not selected on the source query) to \u003ccode\u003enil\u003c/code\u003e rather than failing. A scoping predicate such as \u003ccode\u003eorg_id == parent(org_id)\u003c/code\u003e then becomes an \u003ccode\u003eIS NULL\u003c/code\u003e match, and a guard like \u003ccode\u003eis_nil(parent(org_id)) or org_id == parent(org_id)\u003c/code\u003e activates its unrestricted branch, so the relationship returns records the scope was meant to exclude. The fix fails the read with an error when a \u003ccode\u003eparent(...)\u003c/code\u003e reference cannot be resolved, instead of defaulting to nil.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThis issue affects ash: from 3.13.2 before 3.32.2.\u003c/p\u003e"
},
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/markdown",
"value": "Incorrect Authorization vulnerability in ash-project ash widens a relationship\u0027s `parent(...)` scoping filter to match unintended records when the referenced parent field cannot be resolved.\n\nLoading a relationship whose filter references `parent(...)` resolves that expression against the parent record. `resolve_parent_in_filter/3` (`lib/ash/actions/read/relationships.ex`) resolved an unresolvable parent reference (for example when the referenced field was not selected on the source query) to `nil` rather than failing. A scoping predicate such as `org_id == parent(org_id)` then becomes an `IS NULL` match, and a guard like `is_nil(parent(org_id)) or org_id == parent(org_id)` activates its unrestricted branch, so the relationship returns records the scope was meant to exclude. The fix fails the read with an error when a `parent(...)` reference cannot be resolved, instead of defaulting to nil.\n\nThis issue affects ash: from 3.13.2 before 3.32.2."
}
],
"value": "Incorrect Authorization vulnerability in ash-project ash widens a relationship\u0027s parent(...) scoping filter to match unintended records when the referenced parent field cannot be resolved.\n\nLoading a relationship whose filter references parent(...) resolves that expression against the parent record. resolve_parent_in_filter/3 (lib/ash/actions/read/relationships.ex) resolved an unresolvable parent reference (for example when the referenced field was not selected on the source query) to nil rather than failing. A scoping predicate such as org_id == parent(org_id) then becomes an IS NULL match, and a guard like is_nil(parent(org_id)) or org_id == parent(org_id) activates its unrestricted branch, so the relationship returns records the scope was meant to exclude. The fix fails the read with an error when a parent(...) reference cannot be resolved, instead of defaulting to nil.\n\nThis issue affects ash: from 3.13.2 before 3.32.2."
}
],
"impacts": [
{
"capecId": "CAPEC-1",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CAPEC-1 Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLs"
}
]
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "PRESENT",
"attackVector": "LOCAL",
"baseScore": 5.9,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-863",
"description": "CWE-863 Incorrect Authorization",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-01T03:54:12.716Z",
"orgId": "6b3ad84c-e1a6-4bf7-a703-f496b71e49db",
"shortName": "EEF"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"related"
],
"url": "https://github.com/ash-project/ash/security/advisories/GHSA-j8fx-ff37-4j9c"
},
{
"tags": [
"related"
],
"url": "https://cna.erlef.org/cves/CVE-2026-82749.html"
},
{
"tags": [
"related"
],
"url": "https://osv.dev/vulnerability/EEF-CVE-2026-82749"
},
{
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/ash-project/ash/commit/e52dad2c39a35f6f043f7324d26e4f4e2551dfd2"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "EXTERNAL"
},
"title": "Ash relationship parent(...) filter degrades to an IS NULL match when the parent field is unresolved, leaking scoped records"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "6b3ad84c-e1a6-4bf7-a703-f496b71e49db",
"assignerShortName": "EEF",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-82749",
"datePublished": "2026-09-01T03:54:12.716Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-08-31T01:00:09.774Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-01T12:38:27.534Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2",
"vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
"epss": {
"cve": "CVE-2026-82749",
"date": "2026-09-01",
"epss": "0.0012",
"percentile": "0.02013"
},
"nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2026-82749\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"6b3ad84c-e1a6-4bf7-a703-f496b71e49db\",\"published\":\"2026-09-01T04:18:05.340\",\"lastModified\":\"2026-09-01T13:20:04.620\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Received\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"Incorrect Authorization vulnerability in ash-project ash widens a relationship\u0027s parent(...) scoping filter to match unintended records when the referenced parent field cannot be resolved.\\n\\nLoading a relationship whose filter references parent(...) resolves that expression against the parent record. resolve_parent_in_filter/3 (lib/ash/actions/read/relationships.ex) resolved an unresolvable parent reference (for example when the referenced field was not selected on the source query) to nil rather than failing. A scoping predicate such as org_id == parent(org_id) then becomes an IS NULL match, and a guard like is_nil(parent(org_id)) or org_id == parent(org_id) activates its unrestricted branch, so the relationship returns records the scope was meant to exclude. The fix fails the read with an error when a parent(...) reference cannot be resolved, instead of defaulting to nil.\\n\\nThis issue affects ash: from 3.13.2 before 3.32.2.\"}],\"affected\":[{\"source\":\"6b3ad84c-e1a6-4bf7-a703-f496b71e49db\",\"affectedData\":[{\"vendor\":\"ash-project\",\"product\":\"ash\",\"defaultStatus\":\"unaffected\",\"collectionURL\":\"https://repo.hex.pm\",\"packageName\":\"ash\",\"cpes\":[\"cpe:2.3:a:ash-project:ash:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\"],\"modules\":[\"\u0027Elixir.Ash.Actions.Read.Relationships\u0027\"],\"programFiles\":[\"lib/ash/actions/read/relationships.ex\"],\"programRoutines\":[{\"name\":\"\u0027Elixir.Ash.Actions.Read.Relationships\u0027:resolve_parent_in_filter/3\"},{\"name\":\"\u0027Elixir.Ash.Actions.Read.Relationships\u0027:do_per_record_no_attributes_load/5\"}],\"repo\":\"https://github.com/ash-project/ash\",\"packageURL\":\"pkg:hex/ash\",\"versions\":[{\"version\":\"3.13.2\",\"lessThan\":\"3.32.2\",\"versionType\":\"semver\",\"status\":\"affected\"}]},{\"vendor\":\"ash-project\",\"product\":\"ash\",\"defaultStatus\":\"unaffected\",\"collectionURL\":\"https://github.com\",\"packageName\":\"ash-project/ash\",\"cpes\":[\"cpe:2.3:a:ash-project:ash:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\"],\"modules\":[\"\u0027Elixir.Ash.Actions.Read.Relationships\u0027\"],\"programFiles\":[\"lib/ash/actions/read/relationships.ex\"],\"programRoutines\":[{\"name\":\"\u0027Elixir.Ash.Actions.Read.Relationships\u0027:resolve_parent_in_filter/3\"},{\"name\":\"\u0027Elixir.Ash.Actions.Read.Relationships\u0027:do_per_record_no_attributes_load/5\"}],\"repo\":\"https://github.com/ash-project/ash\",\"packageURL\":\"pkg:github/ash-project/ash\",\"versions\":[{\"version\":\"0ddff26e6e6bc6d182e1af2f98b431575e5b4179\",\"lessThan\":\"e52dad2c39a35f6f043f7324d26e4f4e2551dfd2\",\"versionType\":\"git\",\"status\":\"affected\"}]}]}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV40\":[{\"source\":\"6b3ad84c-e1a6-4bf7-a703-f496b71e49db\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"4.0\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X\",\"baseScore\":5.9,\"baseSeverity\":\"MEDIUM\",\"attackVector\":\"LOCAL\",\"attackComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"attackRequirements\":\"PRESENT\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"NONE\",\"userInteraction\":\"NONE\",\"vulnConfidentialityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"vulnIntegrityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"vulnAvailabilityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"subConfidentialityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"subIntegrityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"subAvailabilityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"exploitMaturity\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"confidentialityRequirement\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"integrityRequirement\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"availabilityRequirement\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedAttackVector\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedAttackComplexity\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedAttackRequirements\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedPrivilegesRequired\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedUserInteraction\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedVulnConfidentialityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedVulnIntegrityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedVulnAvailabilityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedSubConfidentialityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedSubIntegrityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedSubAvailabilityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"Safety\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"Automatable\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"Recovery\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"valueDensity\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"vulnerabilityResponseEffort\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"providerUrgency\":\"NOT_DEFINED\"}}],\"ssvcV203\":[{\"source\":\"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0\",\"ssvcData\":{\"timestamp\":\"2026-09-01T12:37:51.333023Z\",\"id\":\"CVE-2026-82749\",\"options\":[{\"exploitation\":\"poc\"},{\"automatable\":\"no\"},{\"technicalImpact\":\"partial\"}],\"role\":\"CISA Coordinator\",\"version\":\"2.0.3\"}}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"6b3ad84c-e1a6-4bf7-a703-f496b71e49db\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-863\"}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"https://cna.erlef.org/cves/CVE-2026-82749.html\",\"source\":\"6b3ad84c-e1a6-4bf7-a703-f496b71e49db\"},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/ash-project/ash/commit/e52dad2c39a35f6f043f7324d26e4f4e2551dfd2\",\"source\":\"6b3ad84c-e1a6-4bf7-a703-f496b71e49db\"},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/ash-project/ash/security/advisories/GHSA-j8fx-ff37-4j9c\",\"source\":\"6b3ad84c-e1a6-4bf7-a703-f496b71e49db\"},{\"url\":\"https://osv.dev/vulnerability/EEF-CVE-2026-82749\",\"source\":\"6b3ad84c-e1a6-4bf7-a703-f496b71e49db\"},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/ash-project/ash/security/advisories/GHSA-j8fx-ff37-4j9c\",\"source\":\"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0\"}]}}"
}
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
The MITRE ATT&CK techniques below are AI-generated suggestions, inferred from the description of the
vulnerability by the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-classification-roberta-base
model, served locally by ML-Gateway.
They have not been verified by an analyst and are provided for guidance only.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Loading…
Loading…