CVE-2026-82724 (GCVE-0-2026-82724)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-08-31 03:07 – Updated: 2026-08-31 15:54
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
Broken access control in AshPhoenix SubdomainHook via a nil tenant in handle_subdomain
Summary
Incorrect Authorization vulnerability in ash-project ash_phoenix invokes the SubdomainHook authorization callback with a nil tenant, so tenant-scoped access checks never see the tenant they are meant to enforce.
AshPhoenix.LiveView.SubdomainHook.on_mount/4 attached a handle_params hook to assign the tenant and then immediately called handle_subdomain in the same on_mount. The tenant assign is only written when LiveView later runs handle_params, strictly after on_mount returns, so handle_subdomain read an unset assign and ran as apply(m, f, [socket, nil | a]). A consumer gate that halts when the user does not belong to the tenant instead evaluated nil, either crashing or taking a permissive branch, and it was never re-run once the real subdomain was assigned or on later navigations. The fix runs handle_subdomain inside the handle_params hook with the real tenant on every navigation.
This issue affects ash_phoenix: from 2.1.26 before 2.3.25.
Severity
SSVC
Exploitation: poc
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: total
CISA Coordinator · CISA-ADP (v2.0.3)
Decision recorded 2026-08-31 15:53 UTC
CWE
- CWE-863 - Incorrect Authorization
Assigner
References
4 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/ash-project/ash_phoenix/securi… | vendor-advisoryrelated |
| https://cna.erlef.org/cves/CVE-2026-82724.html | related |
| https://osv.dev/vulnerability/EEF-CVE-2026-82724 | related |
| https://github.com/ash-project/ash_phoenix/commit… | patch |
Impacted products
2 products
| Vendor | Product | Version | CPE status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ash-project | ash_phoenix |
Affected:
2.1.26 , < 2.3.25
(semver)
cpe:2.3:a:ash-project:ash_phoenix:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* |
||
| ash-project | ash_phoenix |
Affected:
9a5ea4d377bc263de321d79574872a3dfc4fb541 , < b396e1aa5c6bdec39255f19cf938b539e6d28b71
(git)
cpe:2.3:a:ash-project:ash_phoenix:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-82724",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "poc"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-08-31T15:53:54.952218Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-31T15:54:49.058Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"exploit"
],
"url": "https://github.com/ash-project/ash_phoenix/security/advisories/GHSA-39c8-xcwr-gqff"
}
],
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"collectionURL": "https://repo.hex.pm",
"cpes": [
"cpe:2.3:a:ash-project:ash_phoenix:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"modules": [
"\u0027Elixir.AshPhoenix.LiveView.SubdomainHook\u0027"
],
"packageName": "ash_phoenix",
"packageURL": "pkg:hex/ash_phoenix",
"product": "ash_phoenix",
"programFiles": [
"lib/ash_phoenix/live_view/subdomain_hook.ex"
],
"programRoutines": [
{
"name": "\u0027Elixir.AshPhoenix.LiveView.SubdomainHook\u0027:on_mount/4"
}
],
"repo": "https://github.com/ash-project/ash_phoenix",
"vendor": "ash-project",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "2.3.25",
"status": "affected",
"version": "2.1.26",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
},
{
"collectionURL": "https://github.com",
"cpes": [
"cpe:2.3:a:ash-project:ash_phoenix:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"modules": [
"\u0027Elixir.AshPhoenix.LiveView.SubdomainHook\u0027"
],
"packageName": "ash-project/ash_phoenix",
"packageURL": "pkg:github/ash-project/ash_phoenix",
"product": "ash_phoenix",
"programFiles": [
"lib/ash_phoenix/live_view/subdomain_hook.ex"
],
"programRoutines": [
{
"name": "\u0027Elixir.AshPhoenix.LiveView.SubdomainHook\u0027:on_mount/4"
}
],
"repo": "https://github.com/ash-project/ash_phoenix",
"vendor": "ash-project",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "b396e1aa5c6bdec39255f19cf938b539e6d28b71",
"status": "affected",
"version": "9a5ea4d377bc263de321d79574872a3dfc4fb541",
"versionType": "git"
}
]
}
],
"configurations": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cp\u003eThe application uses \u003ccode\u003eAshPhoenix.LiveView.SubdomainHook\u003c/code\u003e with a \u003ccode\u003ehandle_subdomain\u003c/code\u003e callback as a tenant-scoped authorization gate.\u003c/p\u003e"
},
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/markdown",
"value": "The application uses `AshPhoenix.LiveView.SubdomainHook` with a `handle_subdomain` callback as a tenant-scoped authorization gate."
}
],
"value": "The application uses AshPhoenix.LiveView.SubdomainHook with a handle_subdomain callback as a tenant-scoped authorization gate."
}
],
"cpeApplicability": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:ash-project:ash_phoenix:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "2.3.25",
"versionStartIncluding": "2.1.26",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
],
"operator": "AND"
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Peter Ullrich"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "reporter",
"value": "Peter Ullrich"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "remediation developer",
"value": "Zach Daniel / Ash Project"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "coordinator",
"value": "Jonatan M\u00e4nnchen / EEF"
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cp\u003eIncorrect Authorization vulnerability in ash-project ash_phoenix invokes the \u003ccode\u003eSubdomainHook\u003c/code\u003e authorization callback with a \u003ccode\u003enil\u003c/code\u003e tenant, so tenant-scoped access checks never see the tenant they are meant to enforce.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003ccode\u003eAshPhoenix.LiveView.SubdomainHook.on_mount/4\u003c/code\u003e attached a \u003ccode\u003ehandle_params\u003c/code\u003e hook to assign the tenant and then immediately called \u003ccode\u003ehandle_subdomain\u003c/code\u003e in the same \u003ccode\u003eon_mount\u003c/code\u003e. The tenant assign is only written when LiveView later runs \u003ccode\u003ehandle_params\u003c/code\u003e, strictly after \u003ccode\u003eon_mount\u003c/code\u003e returns, so \u003ccode\u003ehandle_subdomain\u003c/code\u003e read an unset assign and ran as \u003ccode\u003eapply(m, f, [socket, nil | a])\u003c/code\u003e. A consumer gate that halts when the user does not belong to the tenant instead evaluated \u003ccode\u003enil\u003c/code\u003e, either crashing or taking a permissive branch, and it was never re-run once the real subdomain was assigned or on later navigations. The fix runs \u003ccode\u003ehandle_subdomain\u003c/code\u003e inside the \u003ccode\u003ehandle_params\u003c/code\u003e hook with the real tenant on every navigation.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThis issue affects ash_phoenix: from 2.1.26 before 2.3.25.\u003c/p\u003e"
},
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/markdown",
"value": "Incorrect Authorization vulnerability in ash-project ash_phoenix invokes the `SubdomainHook` authorization callback with a `nil` tenant, so tenant-scoped access checks never see the tenant they are meant to enforce.\n\n`AshPhoenix.LiveView.SubdomainHook.on_mount/4` attached a `handle_params` hook to assign the tenant and then immediately called `handle_subdomain` in the same `on_mount`. The tenant assign is only written when LiveView later runs `handle_params`, strictly after `on_mount` returns, so `handle_subdomain` read an unset assign and ran as `apply(m, f, [socket, nil | a])`. A consumer gate that halts when the user does not belong to the tenant instead evaluated `nil`, either crashing or taking a permissive branch, and it was never re-run once the real subdomain was assigned or on later navigations. The fix runs `handle_subdomain` inside the `handle_params` hook with the real tenant on every navigation.\n\nThis issue affects ash_phoenix: from 2.1.26 before 2.3.25."
}
],
"value": "Incorrect Authorization vulnerability in ash-project ash_phoenix invokes the SubdomainHook authorization callback with a nil tenant, so tenant-scoped access checks never see the tenant they are meant to enforce.\n\nAshPhoenix.LiveView.SubdomainHook.on_mount/4 attached a handle_params hook to assign the tenant and then immediately called handle_subdomain in the same on_mount. The tenant assign is only written when LiveView later runs handle_params, strictly after on_mount returns, so handle_subdomain read an unset assign and ran as apply(m, f, [socket, nil | a]). A consumer gate that halts when the user does not belong to the tenant instead evaluated nil, either crashing or taking a permissive branch, and it was never re-run once the real subdomain was assigned or on later navigations. The fix runs handle_subdomain inside the handle_params hook with the real tenant on every navigation.\n\nThis issue affects ash_phoenix: from 2.1.26 before 2.3.25."
}
],
"impacts": [
{
"capecId": "CAPEC-1",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CAPEC-1 Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLs"
}
]
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "PRESENT",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 7.6,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-863",
"description": "CWE-863 Incorrect Authorization",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-31T03:07:57.455Z",
"orgId": "6b3ad84c-e1a6-4bf7-a703-f496b71e49db",
"shortName": "EEF"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"related"
],
"url": "https://github.com/ash-project/ash_phoenix/security/advisories/GHSA-39c8-xcwr-gqff"
},
{
"tags": [
"related"
],
"url": "https://cna.erlef.org/cves/CVE-2026-82724.html"
},
{
"tags": [
"related"
],
"url": "https://osv.dev/vulnerability/EEF-CVE-2026-82724"
},
{
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/ash-project/ash_phoenix/commit/b396e1aa5c6bdec39255f19cf938b539e6d28b71"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "EXTERNAL"
},
"title": "Broken access control in AshPhoenix SubdomainHook via a nil tenant in handle_subdomain"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "6b3ad84c-e1a6-4bf7-a703-f496b71e49db",
"assignerShortName": "EEF",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-82724",
"datePublished": "2026-08-31T03:07:57.455Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-08-31T00:59:08.960Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-31T15:54:49.058Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2",
"vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
"epss": {
"cve": "CVE-2026-82724",
"date": "2026-10-22",
"epss": "0.00427",
"percentile": "0.35949"
},
"nvd": {
"cve": {
"affected": [
{
"affectedData": [
{
"collectionURL": "https://repo.hex.pm",
"cpes": [
"cpe:2.3:a:ash-project:ash_phoenix:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"modules": [
"\u0027Elixir.AshPhoenix.LiveView.SubdomainHook\u0027"
],
"packageName": "ash_phoenix",
"packageURL": "pkg:hex/ash_phoenix",
"product": "ash_phoenix",
"programFiles": [
"lib/ash_phoenix/live_view/subdomain_hook.ex"
],
"programRoutines": [
{
"name": "\u0027Elixir.AshPhoenix.LiveView.SubdomainHook\u0027:on_mount/4"
}
],
"repo": "https://github.com/ash-project/ash_phoenix",
"vendor": "ash-project",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "2.3.25",
"status": "affected",
"version": "2.1.26",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
},
{
"collectionURL": "https://github.com",
"cpes": [
"cpe:2.3:a:ash-project:ash_phoenix:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"modules": [
"\u0027Elixir.AshPhoenix.LiveView.SubdomainHook\u0027"
],
"packageName": "ash-project/ash_phoenix",
"packageURL": "pkg:github/ash-project/ash_phoenix",
"product": "ash_phoenix",
"programFiles": [
"lib/ash_phoenix/live_view/subdomain_hook.ex"
],
"programRoutines": [
{
"name": "\u0027Elixir.AshPhoenix.LiveView.SubdomainHook\u0027:on_mount/4"
}
],
"repo": "https://github.com/ash-project/ash_phoenix",
"vendor": "ash-project",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "b396e1aa5c6bdec39255f19cf938b539e6d28b71",
"status": "affected",
"version": "9a5ea4d377bc263de321d79574872a3dfc4fb541",
"versionType": "git"
}
]
}
],
"source": "6b3ad84c-e1a6-4bf7-a703-f496b71e49db"
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Incorrect Authorization vulnerability in ash-project ash_phoenix invokes the SubdomainHook authorization callback with a nil tenant, so tenant-scoped access checks never see the tenant they are meant to enforce.\n\nAshPhoenix.LiveView.SubdomainHook.on_mount/4 attached a handle_params hook to assign the tenant and then immediately called handle_subdomain in the same on_mount. The tenant assign is only written when LiveView later runs handle_params, strictly after on_mount returns, so handle_subdomain read an unset assign and ran as apply(m, f, [socket, nil | a]). A consumer gate that halts when the user does not belong to the tenant instead evaluated nil, either crashing or taking a permissive branch, and it was never re-run once the real subdomain was assigned or on later navigations. The fix runs handle_subdomain inside the handle_params hook with the real tenant on every navigation.\n\nThis issue affects ash_phoenix: from 2.1.26 before 2.3.25."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2026-82724",
"lastModified": "2026-09-01T21:15:00.147",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV40": [
{
"cvssData": {
"Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "PRESENT",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityRequirement": "NOT_DEFINED",
"baseScore": 7.6,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityRequirement": "NOT_DEFINED",
"exploitMaturity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"integrityRequirement": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedAttackComplexity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedAttackRequirements": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedAttackVector": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedPrivilegesRequired": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedSubAvailabilityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedSubConfidentialityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedSubIntegrityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedUserInteraction": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedVulnAvailabilityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedVulnConfidentialityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedVulnIntegrityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
},
"source": "6b3ad84c-e1a6-4bf7-a703-f496b71e49db",
"type": "Secondary"
}
],
"ssvcV203": [
{
"source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"ssvcData": {
"id": "CVE-2026-82724",
"options": [
{
"exploitation": "poc"
},
{
"automatable": "no"
},
{
"technicalImpact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-08-31T15:53:54.952218Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
}
}
]
},
"published": "2026-08-31T04:17:28.980",
"references": [
{
"source": "6b3ad84c-e1a6-4bf7-a703-f496b71e49db",
"url": "https://cna.erlef.org/cves/CVE-2026-82724.html"
},
{
"source": "6b3ad84c-e1a6-4bf7-a703-f496b71e49db",
"url": "https://github.com/ash-project/ash_phoenix/commit/b396e1aa5c6bdec39255f19cf938b539e6d28b71"
},
{
"source": "6b3ad84c-e1a6-4bf7-a703-f496b71e49db",
"url": "https://github.com/ash-project/ash_phoenix/security/advisories/GHSA-39c8-xcwr-gqff"
},
{
"source": "6b3ad84c-e1a6-4bf7-a703-f496b71e49db",
"url": "https://osv.dev/vulnerability/EEF-CVE-2026-82724"
},
{
"source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"url": "https://github.com/ash-project/ash_phoenix/security/advisories/GHSA-39c8-xcwr-gqff"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "6b3ad84c-e1a6-4bf7-a703-f496b71e49db",
"vulnStatus": "Deferred",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-863"
}
],
"source": "6b3ad84c-e1a6-4bf7-a703-f496b71e49db",
"type": "Secondary"
}
]
}
}
}
}
Loading…
Loading…
Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline
Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC
Loading timeline…
Loading…
Loading…
The MITRE ATT&CK techniques below are AI-generated suggestions, inferred from the description of the
vulnerability by the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-classification-roberta-base
model, served locally by ML-Gateway.
They have not been verified by an analyst and are provided for guidance only.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Loading…
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.