CVE-2026-80223 (GCVE-0-2026-80223)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-08-30 18:27 – Updated: 2026-08-31 15:58
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
Cross-tenant subscription disclosure in AshGraphql authorizes notifications in memory without a tenant-scoped read
Summary
Incorrect Authorization vulnerability in ash-project ash_graphql allows an authenticated subscriber in one tenant to receive another tenant's records over GraphQL subscriptions.
The subscription resolver in AshGraphql.Graphql.Resolver authorizes each notification payload in memory: its fast path calls Ash.can/3 with run_queries?: false, which evaluates the read policy filter against the in-memory record via Ash.Expr.eval/2 and never issues a query. Ash applies multitenancy at query-build and data-layer-prefix time, not inside query.filter, so the evaluated policy carries no tenant condition and a tenant-B notification routed to a tenant-A subscriber is emitted whenever the policy filter is true. The single-notification clause has no tenant guard at all, and the batched clause checks only the head of the notification list, so non-head entries authorize purely in memory. A tenant-scoped read is reached only when filter evaluation fails.
This issue affects ash_graphql: from 1.4.0 before 1.11.0.
Severity
SSVC
Exploitation: poc
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator · CISA-ADP (v2.0.3)
Decision recorded 2026-08-31 15:57 UTC
CWE
- CWE-863 - Incorrect Authorization
Assigner
References
4 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/ash-project/ash_graphql/securi… | vendor-advisoryrelated |
| https://cna.erlef.org/cves/CVE-2026-80223.html | related |
| https://osv.dev/vulnerability/EEF-CVE-2026-80223 | related |
| https://github.com/ash-project/ash_graphql/commit… | patch |
Impacted products
2 products
| Vendor | Product | Version | CPE status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ash-project | ash_graphql |
Affected:
1.4.0 , < 1.11.0
(semver)
cpe:2.3:a:ash-project:ash_graphql:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* |
||
| ash-project | ash_graphql |
Affected:
4c377e541a2adb6befc651f3dccc6a797bc58ba9 , < 6e30b8b5a04bdeaed5d7514caa6b2d056d8d993e
(git)
cpe:2.3:a:ash-project:ash_graphql:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-80223",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "poc"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-08-31T15:57:36.488596Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-31T15:58:00.640Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"exploit"
],
"url": "https://github.com/ash-project/ash_graphql/security/advisories/GHSA-rcqc-59g2-gjg2"
}
],
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"collectionURL": "https://repo.hex.pm",
"cpes": [
"cpe:2.3:a:ash-project:ash_graphql:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"modules": [
"\u0027Elixir.AshGraphql.Graphql.Resolver\u0027"
],
"packageName": "ash_graphql",
"packageURL": "pkg:hex/ash_graphql",
"product": "ash_graphql",
"programFiles": [
"lib/graphql/resolver.ex"
],
"programRoutines": [
{
"name": "\u0027Elixir.AshGraphql.Graphql.Resolver\u0027:resolve/2"
}
],
"repo": "https://github.com/ash-project/ash_graphql",
"vendor": "ash-project",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "1.11.0",
"status": "affected",
"version": "1.4.0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
},
{
"collectionURL": "https://github.com",
"cpes": [
"cpe:2.3:a:ash-project:ash_graphql:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"modules": [
"\u0027Elixir.AshGraphql.Graphql.Resolver\u0027"
],
"packageName": "ash-project/ash_graphql",
"packageURL": "pkg:github/ash-project/ash_graphql",
"product": "ash_graphql",
"programFiles": [
"lib/graphql/resolver.ex"
],
"programRoutines": [
{
"name": "\u0027Elixir.AshGraphql.Graphql.Resolver\u0027:resolve/2"
}
],
"repo": "https://github.com/ash-project/ash_graphql",
"vendor": "ash-project",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "6e30b8b5a04bdeaed5d7514caa6b2d056d8d993e",
"status": "affected",
"version": "4c377e541a2adb6befc651f3dccc6a797bc58ba9",
"versionType": "git"
}
]
}
],
"configurations": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cp\u003eThe application exposes \u003ccode\u003eash_graphql\u003c/code\u003e subscriptions on a multitenant resource whose read policy passes on in-memory filter evaluation alone, and where a notification created in one tenant can reach a subscriber scoped to another tenant.\u003c/p\u003e"
},
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/markdown",
"value": "The application exposes `ash_graphql` subscriptions on a multitenant resource whose read policy passes on in-memory filter evaluation alone, and where a notification created in one tenant can reach a subscriber scoped to another tenant."
}
],
"value": "The application exposes ash_graphql subscriptions on a multitenant resource whose read policy passes on in-memory filter evaluation alone, and where a notification created in one tenant can reach a subscriber scoped to another tenant."
}
],
"cpeApplicability": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:ash-project:ash_graphql:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "1.11.0",
"versionStartIncluding": "1.4.0",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
],
"operator": "AND"
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Peter Ullrich"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "reporter",
"value": "Peter Ullrich"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "remediation developer",
"value": "Zach Daniel / Ash Project"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "coordinator",
"value": "Jonatan M\u00e4nnchen / EEF"
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cp\u003eIncorrect Authorization vulnerability in ash-project ash_graphql allows an authenticated subscriber in one tenant to receive another tenant\u0027s records over GraphQL subscriptions.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe subscription resolver in \u003ccode\u003eAshGraphql.Graphql.Resolver\u003c/code\u003e authorizes each notification payload in memory: its fast path calls \u003ccode\u003eAsh.can/3\u003c/code\u003e with \u003ccode\u003erun_queries?: false\u003c/code\u003e, which evaluates the read policy filter against the in-memory record via \u003ccode\u003eAsh.Expr.eval/2\u003c/code\u003e and never issues a query. Ash applies multitenancy at query-build and data-layer-prefix time, not inside \u003ccode\u003equery.filter\u003c/code\u003e, so the evaluated policy carries no tenant condition and a tenant-B notification routed to a tenant-A subscriber is emitted whenever the policy filter is true. The single-notification clause has no tenant guard at all, and the batched clause checks only the head of the notification list, so non-head entries authorize purely in memory. A tenant-scoped read is reached only when filter evaluation fails.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThis issue affects ash_graphql: from 1.4.0 before 1.11.0.\u003c/p\u003e"
},
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/markdown",
"value": "Incorrect Authorization vulnerability in ash-project ash_graphql allows an authenticated subscriber in one tenant to receive another tenant\u0027s records over GraphQL subscriptions.\n\nThe subscription resolver in `AshGraphql.Graphql.Resolver` authorizes each notification payload in memory: its fast path calls `Ash.can/3` with `run_queries?: false`, which evaluates the read policy filter against the in-memory record via `Ash.Expr.eval/2` and never issues a query. Ash applies multitenancy at query-build and data-layer-prefix time, not inside `query.filter`, so the evaluated policy carries no tenant condition and a tenant-B notification routed to a tenant-A subscriber is emitted whenever the policy filter is true. The single-notification clause has no tenant guard at all, and the batched clause checks only the head of the notification list, so non-head entries authorize purely in memory. A tenant-scoped read is reached only when filter evaluation fails.\n\nThis issue affects ash_graphql: from 1.4.0 before 1.11.0."
}
],
"value": "Incorrect Authorization vulnerability in ash-project ash_graphql allows an authenticated subscriber in one tenant to receive another tenant\u0027s records over GraphQL subscriptions.\n\nThe subscription resolver in AshGraphql.Graphql.Resolver authorizes each notification payload in memory: its fast path calls Ash.can/3 with run_queries?: false, which evaluates the read policy filter against the in-memory record via Ash.Expr.eval/2 and never issues a query. Ash applies multitenancy at query-build and data-layer-prefix time, not inside query.filter, so the evaluated policy carries no tenant condition and a tenant-B notification routed to a tenant-A subscriber is emitted whenever the policy filter is true. The single-notification clause has no tenant guard at all, and the batched clause checks only the head of the notification list, so non-head entries authorize purely in memory. A tenant-scoped read is reached only when filter evaluation fails.\n\nThis issue affects ash_graphql: from 1.4.0 before 1.11.0."
}
],
"impacts": [
{
"capecId": "CAPEC-1",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CAPEC-1 Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLs"
}
]
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "NONE",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 7.1,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-863",
"description": "CWE-863 Incorrect Authorization",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-30T18:27:09.440Z",
"orgId": "6b3ad84c-e1a6-4bf7-a703-f496b71e49db",
"shortName": "EEF"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"related"
],
"url": "https://github.com/ash-project/ash_graphql/security/advisories/GHSA-rcqc-59g2-gjg2"
},
{
"tags": [
"related"
],
"url": "https://cna.erlef.org/cves/CVE-2026-80223.html"
},
{
"tags": [
"related"
],
"url": "https://osv.dev/vulnerability/EEF-CVE-2026-80223"
},
{
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/ash-project/ash_graphql/commit/6e30b8b5a04bdeaed5d7514caa6b2d056d8d993e"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "EXTERNAL"
},
"title": "Cross-tenant subscription disclosure in AshGraphql authorizes notifications in memory without a tenant-scoped read"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "6b3ad84c-e1a6-4bf7-a703-f496b71e49db",
"assignerShortName": "EEF",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-80223",
"datePublished": "2026-08-30T18:27:09.440Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-08-30T15:30:02.097Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-31T15:58:00.640Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2",
"vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
"epss": {
"cve": "CVE-2026-80223",
"date": "2026-10-20",
"epss": "0.00427",
"percentile": "0.35678"
},
"nvd": {
"cve": {
"affected": [
{
"affectedData": [
{
"collectionURL": "https://repo.hex.pm",
"cpes": [
"cpe:2.3:a:ash-project:ash_graphql:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"modules": [
"\u0027Elixir.AshGraphql.Graphql.Resolver\u0027"
],
"packageName": "ash_graphql",
"packageURL": "pkg:hex/ash_graphql",
"product": "ash_graphql",
"programFiles": [
"lib/graphql/resolver.ex"
],
"programRoutines": [
{
"name": "\u0027Elixir.AshGraphql.Graphql.Resolver\u0027:resolve/2"
}
],
"repo": "https://github.com/ash-project/ash_graphql",
"vendor": "ash-project",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "1.11.0",
"status": "affected",
"version": "1.4.0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
},
{
"collectionURL": "https://github.com",
"cpes": [
"cpe:2.3:a:ash-project:ash_graphql:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"modules": [
"\u0027Elixir.AshGraphql.Graphql.Resolver\u0027"
],
"packageName": "ash-project/ash_graphql",
"packageURL": "pkg:github/ash-project/ash_graphql",
"product": "ash_graphql",
"programFiles": [
"lib/graphql/resolver.ex"
],
"programRoutines": [
{
"name": "\u0027Elixir.AshGraphql.Graphql.Resolver\u0027:resolve/2"
}
],
"repo": "https://github.com/ash-project/ash_graphql",
"vendor": "ash-project",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "6e30b8b5a04bdeaed5d7514caa6b2d056d8d993e",
"status": "affected",
"version": "4c377e541a2adb6befc651f3dccc6a797bc58ba9",
"versionType": "git"
}
]
}
],
"source": "6b3ad84c-e1a6-4bf7-a703-f496b71e49db"
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Incorrect Authorization vulnerability in ash-project ash_graphql allows an authenticated subscriber in one tenant to receive another tenant\u0027s records over GraphQL subscriptions.\n\nThe subscription resolver in AshGraphql.Graphql.Resolver authorizes each notification payload in memory: its fast path calls Ash.can/3 with run_queries?: false, which evaluates the read policy filter against the in-memory record via Ash.Expr.eval/2 and never issues a query. Ash applies multitenancy at query-build and data-layer-prefix time, not inside query.filter, so the evaluated policy carries no tenant condition and a tenant-B notification routed to a tenant-A subscriber is emitted whenever the policy filter is true. The single-notification clause has no tenant guard at all, and the batched clause checks only the head of the notification list, so non-head entries authorize purely in memory. A tenant-scoped read is reached only when filter evaluation fails.\n\nThis issue affects ash_graphql: from 1.4.0 before 1.11.0."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2026-80223",
"lastModified": "2026-09-03T05:15:17.610",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV40": [
{
"cvssData": {
"Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "NONE",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityRequirement": "NOT_DEFINED",
"baseScore": 7.1,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityRequirement": "NOT_DEFINED",
"exploitMaturity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"integrityRequirement": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedAttackComplexity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedAttackRequirements": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedAttackVector": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedPrivilegesRequired": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedSubAvailabilityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedSubConfidentialityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedSubIntegrityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedUserInteraction": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedVulnAvailabilityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedVulnConfidentialityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedVulnIntegrityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
},
"source": "6b3ad84c-e1a6-4bf7-a703-f496b71e49db",
"type": "Secondary"
}
],
"ssvcV203": [
{
"source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"ssvcData": {
"id": "CVE-2026-80223",
"options": [
{
"exploitation": "poc"
},
{
"automatable": "no"
},
{
"technicalImpact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-08-31T15:57:36.488596Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
}
}
]
},
"published": "2026-08-30T19:17:29.220",
"references": [
{
"source": "6b3ad84c-e1a6-4bf7-a703-f496b71e49db",
"url": "https://cna.erlef.org/cves/CVE-2026-80223.html"
},
{
"source": "6b3ad84c-e1a6-4bf7-a703-f496b71e49db",
"url": "https://github.com/ash-project/ash_graphql/commit/6e30b8b5a04bdeaed5d7514caa6b2d056d8d993e"
},
{
"source": "6b3ad84c-e1a6-4bf7-a703-f496b71e49db",
"url": "https://github.com/ash-project/ash_graphql/security/advisories/GHSA-rcqc-59g2-gjg2"
},
{
"source": "6b3ad84c-e1a6-4bf7-a703-f496b71e49db",
"url": "https://osv.dev/vulnerability/EEF-CVE-2026-80223"
},
{
"source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"url": "https://github.com/ash-project/ash_graphql/security/advisories/GHSA-rcqc-59g2-gjg2"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "6b3ad84c-e1a6-4bf7-a703-f496b71e49db",
"vulnStatus": "Deferred",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-863"
}
],
"source": "6b3ad84c-e1a6-4bf7-a703-f496b71e49db",
"type": "Secondary"
}
]
}
},
"vulnrichment": {
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-80223",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "poc"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-08-31T15:57:36.488596Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-31T15:57:52.879Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"exploit"
],
"url": "https://github.com/ash-project/ash_graphql/security/advisories/GHSA-rcqc-59g2-gjg2"
}
],
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"collectionURL": "https://repo.hex.pm",
"cpes": [
"cpe:2.3:a:ash-project:ash_graphql:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"modules": [
"\u0027Elixir.AshGraphql.Graphql.Resolver\u0027"
],
"packageName": "ash_graphql",
"packageURL": "pkg:hex/ash_graphql",
"product": "ash_graphql",
"programFiles": [
"lib/graphql/resolver.ex"
],
"programRoutines": [
{
"name": "\u0027Elixir.AshGraphql.Graphql.Resolver\u0027:resolve/2"
}
],
"repo": "https://github.com/ash-project/ash_graphql",
"vendor": "ash-project",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "1.11.0",
"status": "affected",
"version": "1.4.0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
},
{
"collectionURL": "https://github.com",
"cpes": [
"cpe:2.3:a:ash-project:ash_graphql:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"modules": [
"\u0027Elixir.AshGraphql.Graphql.Resolver\u0027"
],
"packageName": "ash-project/ash_graphql",
"packageURL": "pkg:github/ash-project/ash_graphql",
"product": "ash_graphql",
"programFiles": [
"lib/graphql/resolver.ex"
],
"programRoutines": [
{
"name": "\u0027Elixir.AshGraphql.Graphql.Resolver\u0027:resolve/2"
}
],
"repo": "https://github.com/ash-project/ash_graphql",
"vendor": "ash-project",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "6e30b8b5a04bdeaed5d7514caa6b2d056d8d993e",
"status": "affected",
"version": "4c377e541a2adb6befc651f3dccc6a797bc58ba9",
"versionType": "git"
}
]
}
],
"configurations": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cp\u003eThe application exposes \u003ccode\u003eash_graphql\u003c/code\u003e subscriptions on a multitenant resource whose read policy passes on in-memory filter evaluation alone, and where a notification created in one tenant can reach a subscriber scoped to another tenant.\u003c/p\u003e"
},
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/markdown",
"value": "The application exposes `ash_graphql` subscriptions on a multitenant resource whose read policy passes on in-memory filter evaluation alone, and where a notification created in one tenant can reach a subscriber scoped to another tenant."
}
],
"value": "The application exposes ash_graphql subscriptions on a multitenant resource whose read policy passes on in-memory filter evaluation alone, and where a notification created in one tenant can reach a subscriber scoped to another tenant."
}
],
"cpeApplicability": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:ash-project:ash_graphql:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "1.11.0",
"versionStartIncluding": "1.4.0",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
],
"operator": "AND"
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Peter Ullrich"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "reporter",
"value": "Peter Ullrich"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "remediation developer",
"value": "Zach Daniel / Ash Project"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "coordinator",
"value": "Jonatan M\u00e4nnchen / EEF"
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cp\u003eIncorrect Authorization vulnerability in ash-project ash_graphql allows an authenticated subscriber in one tenant to receive another tenant\u0027s records over GraphQL subscriptions.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe subscription resolver in \u003ccode\u003eAshGraphql.Graphql.Resolver\u003c/code\u003e authorizes each notification payload in memory: its fast path calls \u003ccode\u003eAsh.can/3\u003c/code\u003e with \u003ccode\u003erun_queries?: false\u003c/code\u003e, which evaluates the read policy filter against the in-memory record via \u003ccode\u003eAsh.Expr.eval/2\u003c/code\u003e and never issues a query. Ash applies multitenancy at query-build and data-layer-prefix time, not inside \u003ccode\u003equery.filter\u003c/code\u003e, so the evaluated policy carries no tenant condition and a tenant-B notification routed to a tenant-A subscriber is emitted whenever the policy filter is true. The single-notification clause has no tenant guard at all, and the batched clause checks only the head of the notification list, so non-head entries authorize purely in memory. A tenant-scoped read is reached only when filter evaluation fails.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThis issue affects ash_graphql: from 1.4.0 before 1.11.0.\u003c/p\u003e"
},
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/markdown",
"value": "Incorrect Authorization vulnerability in ash-project ash_graphql allows an authenticated subscriber in one tenant to receive another tenant\u0027s records over GraphQL subscriptions.\n\nThe subscription resolver in `AshGraphql.Graphql.Resolver` authorizes each notification payload in memory: its fast path calls `Ash.can/3` with `run_queries?: false`, which evaluates the read policy filter against the in-memory record via `Ash.Expr.eval/2` and never issues a query. Ash applies multitenancy at query-build and data-layer-prefix time, not inside `query.filter`, so the evaluated policy carries no tenant condition and a tenant-B notification routed to a tenant-A subscriber is emitted whenever the policy filter is true. The single-notification clause has no tenant guard at all, and the batched clause checks only the head of the notification list, so non-head entries authorize purely in memory. A tenant-scoped read is reached only when filter evaluation fails.\n\nThis issue affects ash_graphql: from 1.4.0 before 1.11.0."
}
],
"value": "Incorrect Authorization vulnerability in ash-project ash_graphql allows an authenticated subscriber in one tenant to receive another tenant\u0027s records over GraphQL subscriptions.\n\nThe subscription resolver in AshGraphql.Graphql.Resolver authorizes each notification payload in memory: its fast path calls Ash.can/3 with run_queries?: false, which evaluates the read policy filter against the in-memory record via Ash.Expr.eval/2 and never issues a query. Ash applies multitenancy at query-build and data-layer-prefix time, not inside query.filter, so the evaluated policy carries no tenant condition and a tenant-B notification routed to a tenant-A subscriber is emitted whenever the policy filter is true. The single-notification clause has no tenant guard at all, and the batched clause checks only the head of the notification list, so non-head entries authorize purely in memory. A tenant-scoped read is reached only when filter evaluation fails.\n\nThis issue affects ash_graphql: from 1.4.0 before 1.11.0."
}
],
"impacts": [
{
"capecId": "CAPEC-1",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CAPEC-1 Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLs"
}
]
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "NONE",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 7.1,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-863",
"description": "CWE-863 Incorrect Authorization",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-30T18:27:09.440Z",
"orgId": "6b3ad84c-e1a6-4bf7-a703-f496b71e49db",
"shortName": "EEF"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"related"
],
"url": "https://github.com/ash-project/ash_graphql/security/advisories/GHSA-rcqc-59g2-gjg2"
},
{
"tags": [
"related"
],
"url": "https://cna.erlef.org/cves/CVE-2026-80223.html"
},
{
"tags": [
"related"
],
"url": "https://osv.dev/vulnerability/EEF-CVE-2026-80223"
},
{
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/ash-project/ash_graphql/commit/6e30b8b5a04bdeaed5d7514caa6b2d056d8d993e"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "EXTERNAL"
},
"title": "Cross-tenant subscription disclosure in AshGraphql authorizes notifications in memory without a tenant-scoped read"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "6b3ad84c-e1a6-4bf7-a703-f496b71e49db",
"assignerShortName": "EEF",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-80223",
"datePublished": "2026-08-30T18:27:09.440Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-08-30T15:30:02.097Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-31T15:58:00.640Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
}
}
Loading…
Loading…
Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline
Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC
Loading timeline…
Loading…
Loading…
The MITRE ATT&CK techniques below are AI-generated suggestions, inferred from the description of the
vulnerability by the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-classification-roberta-base
model, served locally by ML-Gateway.
They have not been verified by an analyst and are provided for guidance only.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Loading…
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.