CVE-2026-6045 (GCVE-0-2026-6045)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-06-15 16:22 – Updated: 2026-10-21 09:30| Vendor | Product | Version | CPE status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Document Foundation | LibreOffice |
Affected:
25.8 , < < 25.8.7
(25.8 series)
Affected: 26.2 , < < 26.2.3 (26.2 series) |
guessed |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-6045",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-06-15T18:12:50.303654Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-06-15T18:13:24.274Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "LibreOffice",
"vendor": "The Document Foundation",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "\u003c 25.8.7",
"status": "affected",
"version": "25.8",
"versionType": "25.8 series"
},
{
"lessThan": "\u003c 26.2.3",
"status": "affected",
"version": "26.2",
"versionType": "26.2 series"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Anthropic (automated discovery using Claude)"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "analyst",
"value": "Trail of Bits (triage and validation)"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Anonymous working with TrendAI Zero Day Initiative"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "remediation developer",
"value": "Caol\u00e1n McNamara of Collabora Productivity"
}
],
"datePublic": "2026-06-15T00:00:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cp\u003eLibreOffice can import EMF+ graphics, which may be embedded in documents. A heap buffer overflow existed when importing an EMF+ gradient brush. The number of gradient blend points was read from the file and used to compute an allocation size, but that multiplication could overflow, so a small buffer was allocated and then filled as if it were large, writing past its end. In fixed versions the blend-point count is checked against the data actually available before allocating.\u003c/p\u003e"
}
],
"value": "LibreOffice can import EMF+ graphics, which may be embedded in documents. A heap buffer overflow existed when importing an EMF+ gradient brush. The number of gradient blend points was read from the file and used to compute an allocation size, but that multiplication could overflow, so a small buffer was allocated and then filled as if it were large, writing past its end. In fixed versions the blend-point count is checked against the data actually available before allocating."
}
],
"impacts": [
{
"capecId": "CAPEC-44",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CAPEC-44 Overflow Binary Resource File"
}
]
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "NONE",
"attackVector": "LOCAL",
"baseScore": 5.4,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"exploitMaturity": "PROOF_OF_CONCEPT",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "PASSIVE",
"valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "LOW",
"vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-787",
"description": "CWE-787 Out-of-bounds Write",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
},
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-190",
"description": "CWE-190 Integer Overflow or Wraparound",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-21T09:30:52.886Z",
"orgId": "4fe7d05b-1353-44cc-8b7a-1e416936dff2",
"shortName": "Document Fdn."
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://www.libreoffice.org/about-us/security/advisories/cve-2026-6045"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "EXTERNAL"
},
"title": "Heap buffer overflow in EMF+ gradient brush import",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 1.0.2"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "4fe7d05b-1353-44cc-8b7a-1e416936dff2",
"assignerShortName": "Document Fdn.",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-6045",
"datePublished": "2026-06-15T16:22:16.574Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-04-09T19:07:34.963Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-21T09:30:52.886Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2",
"vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
"epss": {
"cve": "CVE-2026-6045",
"date": "2026-11-14",
"epss": "0.00208",
"percentile": "0.10972"
},
"nvd": {
"cve": {
"affected": [
{
"affectedData": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "LibreOffice",
"vendor": "The Document Foundation",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "\u003c 25.8.7",
"status": "affected",
"version": "25.8",
"versionType": "25.8 series"
},
{
"lessThan": "\u003c 26.2.3",
"status": "affected",
"version": "26.2",
"versionType": "26.2 series"
}
]
}
],
"source": "security@documentfoundation.org"
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "LibreOffice can import EMF+ graphics, which may be embedded in documents. A heap buffer overflow existed when importing an EMF+ gradient brush. The number of gradient blend points was read from the file and used to compute an allocation size, but that multiplication could overflow, so a small buffer was allocated and then filled as if it were large, writing past its end. In fixed versions the blend-point count is checked against the data actually available before allocating."
},
{
"lang": "es",
"value": "LibreOffice puede importar gr\u00e1ficos EMF+, los cuales pueden estar incrustados en documentos. Exist\u00eda un desbordamiento de b\u00fafer en el mont\u00f3n al importar un pincel de degradado EMF+. El n\u00famero de puntos de mezcla de degradado se le\u00eda del archivo y se usaba para calcular un tama\u00f1o de asignaci\u00f3n, pero esa multiplicaci\u00f3n pod\u00eda desbordarse, por lo que se asignaba un b\u00fafer peque\u00f1o y luego se llenaba como si fuera grande, escribiendo m\u00e1s all\u00e1 de su final. En versiones corregidas, el recuento de puntos de mezcla se verifica contra los datos realmente disponibles antes de asignar."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2026-6045",
"lastModified": "2026-10-25T23:10:00.167",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV40": [
{
"cvssData": {
"Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "NONE",
"attackVector": "LOCAL",
"availabilityRequirement": "NOT_DEFINED",
"baseScore": 5.4,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityRequirement": "NOT_DEFINED",
"exploitMaturity": "PROOF_OF_CONCEPT",
"integrityRequirement": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedAttackComplexity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedAttackRequirements": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedAttackVector": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedPrivilegesRequired": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedSubAvailabilityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedSubConfidentialityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedSubIntegrityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedUserInteraction": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedVulnAvailabilityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedVulnConfidentialityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedVulnIntegrityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "PASSIVE",
"valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "LOW",
"vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
},
"source": "security@documentfoundation.org",
"type": "Secondary"
}
],
"ssvcV203": [
{
"source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"ssvcData": {
"id": "CVE-2026-6045",
"options": [
{
"exploitation": "none"
},
{
"automatable": "no"
},
{
"technicalImpact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-06-15T18:12:50.303654Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
}
}
]
},
"published": "2026-06-15T18:16:37.007",
"references": [
{
"source": "security@documentfoundation.org",
"url": "https://www.libreoffice.org/about-us/security/advisories/cve-2026-6045"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "security@documentfoundation.org",
"vulnStatus": "Deferred",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-190"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-787"
}
],
"source": "security@documentfoundation.org",
"type": "Secondary"
}
]
}
},
"redhat_vex": {
"aggregate_severity": "Moderate",
"current_release_date": "2026-11-05T21:50:28+00:00",
"cve": "CVE-2026-6045",
"id": "CVE-2026-6045",
"initial_release_date": "2026-06-15T16:22:16.574000+00:00",
"product_status:known_affected": "671",
"source": "Red Hat CSAF VEX",
"status": "final",
"title": "libreoffice: LibreOffice: Heap buffer overflow via crafted EMF+ graphics import",
"url": "https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/vex/2026/cve-2026-6045.json",
"version": "3"
},
"vulnrichment": {
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-6045",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-06-15T18:12:50.303654Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-06-15T18:12:52.505Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "LibreOffice",
"vendor": "The Document Foundation",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "\u003c 25.8.7",
"status": "affected",
"version": "25.8",
"versionType": "25.8 series"
},
{
"lessThan": "\u003c 26.2.3",
"status": "affected",
"version": "26.2",
"versionType": "26.2 series"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Anthropic (automated discovery using Claude)"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "analyst",
"value": "Trail of Bits (triage and validation)"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Anonymous working with TrendAI Zero Day Initiative"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "remediation developer",
"value": "Caol\u00e1n McNamara of Collabora Productivity"
}
],
"datePublic": "2026-06-15T00:00:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cp\u003eLibreOffice can import EMF+ graphics, which may be embedded in documents. A heap buffer overflow existed when importing an EMF+ gradient brush. The number of gradient blend points was read from the file and used to compute an allocation size, but that multiplication could overflow, so a small buffer was allocated and then filled as if it were large, writing past its end. In fixed versions the blend-point count is checked against the data actually available before allocating.\u003c/p\u003e"
}
],
"value": "LibreOffice can import EMF+ graphics, which may be embedded in documents. A heap buffer overflow existed when importing an EMF+ gradient brush. The number of gradient blend points was read from the file and used to compute an allocation size, but that multiplication could overflow, so a small buffer was allocated and then filled as if it were large, writing past its end. In fixed versions the blend-point count is checked against the data actually available before allocating."
}
],
"impacts": [
{
"capecId": "CAPEC-44",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CAPEC-44 Overflow Binary Resource File"
}
]
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "NONE",
"attackVector": "LOCAL",
"baseScore": 5.4,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"exploitMaturity": "PROOF_OF_CONCEPT",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "PASSIVE",
"valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "LOW",
"vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-787",
"description": "CWE-787 Out-of-bounds Write",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
},
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-190",
"description": "CWE-190 Integer Overflow or Wraparound",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-21T09:30:52.886Z",
"orgId": "4fe7d05b-1353-44cc-8b7a-1e416936dff2",
"shortName": "Document Fdn."
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://www.libreoffice.org/about-us/security/advisories/cve-2026-6045"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "EXTERNAL"
},
"title": "Heap buffer overflow in EMF+ gradient brush import",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 1.0.2"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "4fe7d05b-1353-44cc-8b7a-1e416936dff2",
"assignerShortName": "Document Fdn.",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-6045",
"datePublished": "2026-06-15T16:22:16.574Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-04-09T19:07:34.963Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-21T09:30:52.886Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
}
}
Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline
Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC
How durations are calculated
Following the VTEM framework (Black Hat USA 2015), time to patch starts when the vendor or a coordinator was informed, total time to patch at discovery, and disclosure to patch at public disclosure; vendor response time runs from the report to its acknowledgement. Time to exploit and time unpatched start at the earliest discovery or report, falling back to public disclosure. Unpatched time ends at the first recorded patch, or the calculation time when no patch is recorded. Exploitation to patch shows the interval between those two events; a published proof of concept is a public exploit, not exploitation.
Each result shows its source dates. A negative interval means the end event came first; when date-only inputs leave the order open, the result says so. Date-only inputs are approximate. The earliest evidence wins: KEV report dates and sightings are labelled as such. Records describing another vulnerability are listed but never calculated from, and a PoC alone does not establish exploitation. Missing patch evidence does not prove that no patch exists. Filters below change the event list only.
Loading timeline…
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.