CVE-2026-49323 (GCVE-0-2026-49323)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-05-29 12:31 – Updated: 2026-05-29 13:44
VLAI
Title
Indian Scout Bobber 2025 WCM-to-ECM weak authentication
Summary
Weak authentication between the Wireless Control Module (WCM) and the Engine Control Module (ECM) of the Indian Motorcycle Scout Bobber + Tech 2025 model year allows an adjacent-network attacker with read access to the in-vehicle network to recover the per-vehicle ECM immobilizer secret by passively observing a single seed/key exchange. The WCM derives its response using a reversible, non-cryptographic operation rather than a cryptographic challenge-response, so the persistent immobilizer secret can be reconstructed from one captured exchange. With this secret the attacker can authenticate to the ECM independently of the WCM and start the engine, defeating the immobilizer. Specific protocol details have been withheld pending vendor remediation.
Severity
4.3 (Medium)
CWE
Assigner
References
1 reference
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://www.asrg.io/security-advisories/cve-2026-… | third-party-advisory |
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Indian Motorcycle (Polaris Inc.) | Scout Bobber + Tech |
Affected:
2025
(model-year)
|
Date Public
2026-05-29 15:00
Credits
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-49323",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-05-29T13:31:09.706928Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-05-29T13:31:22.823Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"modules": [
"Wireless Control Module (WCM)",
"Engine Control Module (ECM)"
],
"platforms": [
"OEM Motorcycle"
],
"product": "Scout Bobber + Tech",
"vendor": "Indian Motorcycle (Polaris Inc.)",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "2025",
"versionType": "model-year"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Scott Sheahan, Rustic Security LLC"
}
],
"datePublic": "2026-05-29T15:00:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cp\u003eWeak authentication between the Wireless Control Module (WCM) and the Engine Control Module (ECM) of the Indian Motorcycle Scout Bobber + Tech 2025 model year allows an adjacent-network attacker with read access to the in-vehicle network to recover the per-vehicle ECM immobilizer secret by passively observing a single seed/key exchange. The WCM derives its response using a reversible, non-cryptographic operation rather than a cryptographic challenge-response, so the persistent immobilizer secret can be reconstructed from one captured exchange. With this secret the attacker can authenticate to the ECM independently of the WCM and start the engine, defeating the immobilizer. Specific protocol details have been withheld pending vendor remediation.\u003c/p\u003e"
}
],
"value": "Weak authentication between the Wireless Control Module (WCM) and the Engine Control Module (ECM) of the Indian Motorcycle Scout Bobber + Tech 2025 model year allows an adjacent-network attacker with read access to the in-vehicle network to recover the per-vehicle ECM immobilizer secret by passively observing a single seed/key exchange. The WCM derives its response using a reversible, non-cryptographic operation rather than a cryptographic challenge-response, so the persistent immobilizer secret can be reconstructed from one captured exchange. With this secret the attacker can authenticate to the ECM independently of the WCM and start the engine, defeating the immobilizer. Specific protocol details have been withheld pending vendor remediation."
}
],
"impacts": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Cryptanalysis"
}
]
},
{
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Authentication Bypass"
}
]
},
{
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Read Sensitive Constants Within an Executable"
}
]
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "PHYSICAL",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 4.3,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "REQUIRED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
},
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "PRESENT",
"attackVector": "PHYSICAL",
"baseScore": 4.1,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"exploitMaturity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "PASSIVE",
"valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-1390",
"description": "CWE-1390 Weak Authentication",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
},
{
"cweId": "CWE-327",
"description": "CWE-327 Use of a Broken or Risky Cryptographic Algorithm",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
},
{
"cweId": "CWE-798",
"description": "CWE-798 Use of Hard-coded Credentials",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-05-29T13:44:56.770Z",
"orgId": "c15abc07-96a9-4d11-a503-5d621bfe42ba",
"shortName": "ASRG"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"third-party-advisory"
],
"url": "https://www.asrg.io/security-advisories/cve-2026-49323-indian-scout-wcm-ecm-weak-authentication"
}
],
"solutions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cp\u003eReplace the non-cryptographic authentication response with HMAC-SHA-256 or ECDSA over a fresh nonce, ECU identifier, and session counter; provision per-vehicle symmetric keys in tamper-resistant secure elements on both authenticating modules.\u003c/p\u003e"
}
],
"value": "Replace the non-cryptographic authentication response with HMAC-SHA-256 or ECDSA over a fresh nonce, ECU identifier, and session counter; provision per-vehicle symmetric keys in tamper-resistant secure elements on both authenticating modules."
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "EXTERNAL"
},
"timeline": [
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2025-03-26T00:00:00.000Z",
"value": "Reported to Indian Motorcycle by Rustic Security LLC (responsible disclosure)"
}
],
"title": "Indian Scout Bobber 2025 WCM-to-ECM weak authentication",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 1.0.2"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "c15abc07-96a9-4d11-a503-5d621bfe42ba",
"assignerShortName": "ASRG",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-49323",
"datePublished": "2026-05-29T12:31:35.315Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-05-29T07:26:43.199Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-05-29T13:44:56.770Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2",
"vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
"nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2026-49323\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"cve@asrg.io\",\"published\":\"2026-05-29T13:16:23.407\",\"lastModified\":\"2026-05-29T15:16:24.630\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Deferred\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"Weak authentication between the Wireless Control Module (WCM) and the Engine Control Module (ECM) of the Indian Motorcycle Scout Bobber + Tech 2025 model year allows an adjacent-network attacker with read access to the in-vehicle network to recover the per-vehicle ECM immobilizer secret by passively observing a single seed/key exchange. The WCM derives its response using a reversible, non-cryptographic operation rather than a cryptographic challenge-response, so the persistent immobilizer secret can be reconstructed from one captured exchange. With this secret the attacker can authenticate to the ECM independently of the WCM and start the engine, defeating the immobilizer. Specific protocol details have been withheld pending vendor remediation.\"}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV40\":[{\"source\":\"cve@asrg.io\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"4.0\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X\",\"baseScore\":4.1,\"baseSeverity\":\"MEDIUM\",\"attackVector\":\"PHYSICAL\",\"attackComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"attackRequirements\":\"PRESENT\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"NONE\",\"userInteraction\":\"PASSIVE\",\"vulnConfidentialityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"vulnIntegrityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"vulnAvailabilityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"subConfidentialityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"subIntegrityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"subAvailabilityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"exploitMaturity\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"confidentialityRequirement\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"integrityRequirement\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"availabilityRequirement\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedAttackVector\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedAttackComplexity\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedAttackRequirements\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedPrivilegesRequired\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedUserInteraction\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedVulnConfidentialityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedVulnIntegrityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedVulnAvailabilityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedSubConfidentialityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedSubIntegrityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedSubAvailabilityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"Safety\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"Automatable\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"Recovery\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"valueDensity\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"vulnerabilityResponseEffort\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"providerUrgency\":\"NOT_DEFINED\"}}],\"cvssMetricV31\":[{\"source\":\"cve@asrg.io\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"3.1\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N\",\"baseScore\":4.3,\"baseSeverity\":\"MEDIUM\",\"attackVector\":\"PHYSICAL\",\"attackComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"NONE\",\"userInteraction\":\"REQUIRED\",\"scope\":\"UNCHANGED\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"integrityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"NONE\"},\"exploitabilityScore\":0.7,\"impactScore\":3.6}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"cve@asrg.io\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-327\"},{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-798\"},{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-1390\"}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"https://www.asrg.io/security-advisories/cve-2026-49323-indian-scout-wcm-ecm-weak-authentication\",\"source\":\"cve@asrg.io\"}]}}",
"vulnrichment": {
"containers": "{\"adp\": [{\"title\": \"CISA ADP Vulnrichment\", \"metrics\": [{\"other\": {\"type\": \"ssvc\", \"content\": {\"id\": \"CVE-2026-49323\", \"role\": \"CISA Coordinator\", \"options\": [{\"Exploitation\": \"none\"}, {\"Automatable\": \"no\"}, {\"Technical Impact\": \"partial\"}], \"version\": \"2.0.3\", \"timestamp\": \"2026-05-29T13:31:09.706928Z\"}}}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0\", \"shortName\": \"CISA-ADP\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2026-05-29T13:31:14.323Z\"}}], \"cna\": {\"title\": \"Indian Scout Bobber 2025 WCM-to-ECM weak authentication\", \"source\": {\"discovery\": \"EXTERNAL\"}, \"credits\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"finder\", \"value\": \"Scott Sheahan, Rustic Security LLC\"}], \"impacts\": [{\"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"Cryptanalysis\"}]}, {\"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"Authentication Bypass\"}]}, {\"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"Read Sensitive Constants Within an Executable\"}]}], \"metrics\": [{\"format\": \"CVSS\", \"cvssV3_1\": {\"scope\": \"UNCHANGED\", \"version\": \"3.1\", \"baseScore\": 4.3, \"attackVector\": \"PHYSICAL\", \"baseSeverity\": \"MEDIUM\", \"vectorString\": \"CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N\", \"integrityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"userInteraction\": \"REQUIRED\", \"attackComplexity\": \"LOW\", \"availabilityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"privilegesRequired\": \"NONE\", \"confidentialityImpact\": \"HIGH\"}, \"scenarios\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"GENERAL\"}]}, {\"format\": \"CVSS\", \"cvssV4_0\": {\"Safety\": \"NOT_DEFINED\", \"version\": \"4.0\", \"Recovery\": \"NOT_DEFINED\", \"baseScore\": 4.1, \"Automatable\": \"NOT_DEFINED\", \"attackVector\": \"PHYSICAL\", \"baseSeverity\": \"MEDIUM\", \"valueDensity\": \"NOT_DEFINED\", \"vectorString\": \"CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N\", \"exploitMaturity\": \"NOT_DEFINED\", \"providerUrgency\": \"NOT_DEFINED\", \"userInteraction\": \"PASSIVE\", \"attackComplexity\": \"LOW\", \"attackRequirements\": \"PRESENT\", \"privilegesRequired\": \"NONE\", \"subIntegrityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"vulnIntegrityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"subAvailabilityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"vulnAvailabilityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"subConfidentialityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"vulnConfidentialityImpact\": \"HIGH\", \"vulnerabilityResponseEffort\": \"NOT_DEFINED\"}, \"scenarios\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"GENERAL\"}]}], \"affected\": [{\"vendor\": \"Indian Motorcycle (Polaris Inc.)\", \"modules\": [\"Wireless Control Module (WCM)\", \"Engine Control Module (ECM)\"], \"product\": \"Scout Bobber + Tech\", \"versions\": [{\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"2025\", \"versionType\": \"model-year\"}], \"platforms\": [\"OEM Motorcycle\"], \"defaultStatus\": \"unknown\"}], \"timeline\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"time\": \"2025-03-26T00:00:00.000Z\", \"value\": \"Reported to Indian Motorcycle by Rustic Security LLC (responsible disclosure)\"}], \"solutions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"Replace the non-cryptographic authentication response with HMAC-SHA-256 or ECDSA over a fresh nonce, ECU identifier, and session counter; provision per-vehicle symmetric keys in tamper-resistant secure elements on both authenticating modules.\", \"supportingMedia\": [{\"type\": \"text/html\", \"value\": \"\u003cp\u003eReplace the non-cryptographic authentication response with HMAC-SHA-256 or ECDSA over a fresh nonce, ECU identifier, and session counter; provision per-vehicle symmetric keys in tamper-resistant secure elements on both authenticating modules.\u003c/p\u003e\", \"base64\": false}]}], \"datePublic\": \"2026-05-29T15:00:00.000Z\", \"references\": [{\"url\": \"https://www.asrg.io/security-advisories/cve-2026-49323-indian-scout-wcm-ecm-weak-authentication\", \"tags\": [\"third-party-advisory\"]}], \"x_generator\": {\"engine\": \"Vulnogram 1.0.2\"}, \"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"Weak authentication between the Wireless Control Module (WCM) and the Engine Control Module (ECM) of the Indian Motorcycle Scout Bobber + Tech 2025 model year allows an adjacent-network attacker with read access to the in-vehicle network to recover the per-vehicle ECM immobilizer secret by passively observing a single seed/key exchange. The WCM derives its response using a reversible, non-cryptographic operation rather than a cryptographic challenge-response, so the persistent immobilizer secret can be reconstructed from one captured exchange. With this secret the attacker can authenticate to the ECM independently of the WCM and start the engine, defeating the immobilizer. Specific protocol details have been withheld pending vendor remediation.\", \"supportingMedia\": [{\"type\": \"text/html\", \"value\": \"\u003cp\u003eWeak authentication between the Wireless Control Module (WCM) and the Engine Control Module (ECM) of the Indian Motorcycle Scout Bobber + Tech 2025 model year allows an adjacent-network attacker with read access to the in-vehicle network to recover the per-vehicle ECM immobilizer secret by passively observing a single seed/key exchange. The WCM derives its response using a reversible, non-cryptographic operation rather than a cryptographic challenge-response, so the persistent immobilizer secret can be reconstructed from one captured exchange. With this secret the attacker can authenticate to the ECM independently of the WCM and start the engine, defeating the immobilizer. Specific protocol details have been withheld pending vendor remediation.\u003c/p\u003e\", \"base64\": false}]}], \"problemTypes\": [{\"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"CWE\", \"cweId\": \"CWE-1390\", \"description\": \"CWE-1390 Weak Authentication\"}, {\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"CWE\", \"cweId\": \"CWE-327\", \"description\": \"CWE-327 Use of a Broken or Risky Cryptographic Algorithm\"}, {\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"CWE\", \"cweId\": \"CWE-798\", \"description\": \"CWE-798 Use of Hard-coded Credentials\"}]}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"c15abc07-96a9-4d11-a503-5d621bfe42ba\", \"shortName\": \"ASRG\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2026-05-29T13:44:56.770Z\"}}}",
"cveMetadata": "{\"cveId\": \"CVE-2026-49323\", \"state\": \"PUBLISHED\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2026-05-29T13:44:56.770Z\", \"dateReserved\": \"2026-05-29T07:26:43.199Z\", \"assignerOrgId\": \"c15abc07-96a9-4d11-a503-5d621bfe42ba\", \"datePublished\": \"2026-05-29T12:31:35.315Z\", \"assignerShortName\": \"ASRG\"}",
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
}
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…