CVE-2026-47407 (GCVE-0-2026-47407)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-07-21 16:42 – Updated: 2026-07-22 14:16| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/MervinPraison/PraisonAI/securi… | x_refsource_CONFIRM |
| https://github.com/MervinPraison/PraisonAI/pull/1686 | x_refsource_MISC |
| https://github.com/MervinPraison/PraisonAI/commit… | x_refsource_MISC |
| Vendor | Product | Version | CPE status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MervinPraison | praisonai-platform |
Affected:
< 0.1.4
|
guessed |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-47407",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "poc"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-07-22T14:15:03.095254Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-07-22T14:16:34.674Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"exploit"
],
"url": "https://github.com/MervinPraison/PraisonAI/security/advisories/GHSA-h8q5-cp56-rr65"
}
],
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "praisonai-platform",
"vendor": "MervinPraison",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003c 0.1.4"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "PraisonAI Platform is the platform layer for the PraisonAI multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 0.1.4, the Platform server exposes resources under `/api/v1/workspaces/{workspace_id}/...` and protects them with a `require_workspace_member(workspace_id)` FastAPI dependency. The dependency only checks that the caller is a member of the workspace_id in the URL prefix. The route handlers then look up the inner resource (`agent_id`, `issue_id`, `project_id`, `label_id`, `comment_id`, `dependency_id`) by primary key alone. The resource\u0027s own `workspace_id` is never compared to the URL\u0027s `workspace_id`. A user can therefore put their own workspace in the URL prefix and any other workspace\u0027s resource ID in the path. The auth check passes, since they really are a member of the prefix workspace. The service then returns the cross-tenant resource for read, update, or delete. There is a second bug in the member-management routes (`add_member`, `update_member_role`, `remove_member`, `update_workspace`, `delete_workspace`). Each one inherits the default `min_role=\"member\"` from `require_workspace_member`. Any basic member can therefore promote themselves to admin or owner, demote or remove other members, and delete the workspace. The role hierarchy exists in the schema but is not enforced. Registration is open at `/api/v1/auth/register` with no email verification. The default server bind is `0.0.0.0:8000` (`python -m praisonai_platform`). One curl from any unauthenticated network position is enough to bootstrap into the system. PraisonAI Platform version 0.1.4 patches the issue."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "NONE",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 9.4,
"baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"subIntegrityImpact": "HIGH",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "HIGH"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-269",
"description": "CWE-269: Improper Privilege Management",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
},
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-639",
"description": "CWE-639: Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
},
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-863",
"description": "CWE-863: Incorrect Authorization",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-07-21T17:21:52.482Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/MervinPraison/PraisonAI/security/advisories/GHSA-h8q5-cp56-rr65",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/MervinPraison/PraisonAI/security/advisories/GHSA-h8q5-cp56-rr65"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/MervinPraison/PraisonAI/pull/1686",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/MervinPraison/PraisonAI/pull/1686"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/MervinPraison/PraisonAI/commit/24385d64876577620f749957bd4814f162f4ca47",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/MervinPraison/PraisonAI/commit/24385d64876577620f749957bd4814f162f4ca47"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-h8q5-cp56-rr65",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "PraisonAI Platform has a cross-workspace IDOR + member-role privilege escalation"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-47407",
"datePublished": "2026-07-21T16:42:33.533Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-05-19T19:37:43.525Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-07-22T14:16:34.674Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2",
"vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
"epss": {
"cve": "CVE-2026-47407",
"date": "2026-11-11",
"epss": "0.00302",
"percentile": "0.23274"
},
"nvd": {
"cve": {
"affected": [
{
"affectedData": [
{
"product": "praisonai-platform",
"vendor": "MervinPraison",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003c 0.1.4"
}
]
}
],
"source": "security-advisories@github.com"
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "PraisonAI Platform is the platform layer for the PraisonAI multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 0.1.4, the Platform server exposes resources under `/api/v1/workspaces/{workspace_id}/...` and protects them with a `require_workspace_member(workspace_id)` FastAPI dependency. The dependency only checks that the caller is a member of the workspace_id in the URL prefix. The route handlers then look up the inner resource (`agent_id`, `issue_id`, `project_id`, `label_id`, `comment_id`, `dependency_id`) by primary key alone. The resource\u0027s own `workspace_id` is never compared to the URL\u0027s `workspace_id`. A user can therefore put their own workspace in the URL prefix and any other workspace\u0027s resource ID in the path. The auth check passes, since they really are a member of the prefix workspace. The service then returns the cross-tenant resource for read, update, or delete. There is a second bug in the member-management routes (`add_member`, `update_member_role`, `remove_member`, `update_workspace`, `delete_workspace`). Each one inherits the default `min_role=\"member\"` from `require_workspace_member`. Any basic member can therefore promote themselves to admin or owner, demote or remove other members, and delete the workspace. The role hierarchy exists in the schema but is not enforced. Registration is open at `/api/v1/auth/register` with no email verification. The default server bind is `0.0.0.0:8000` (`python -m praisonai_platform`). One curl from any unauthenticated network position is enough to bootstrap into the system. PraisonAI Platform version 0.1.4 patches the issue."
},
{
"lang": "es",
"value": "PraisonAI Platform es la capa de plataforma para el sistema de equipos multiagente de PraisonAI. Antes de la versi\u00f3n 0.1.4, el servidor de la Plataforma expone recursos bajo \u201c/api/v1/workspaces/{workspace_id}/...\u201d y los protege con una dependencia de FastAPI \u201crequire_workspace_member(workspace_id)\u201d. La dependencia solo verifica que el llamador es miembro del workspace_id en el prefijo de la URL. Los manejadores de ruta luego buscan el recurso interno (\u201cagent_id\u201d, \u201cissue_id\u201d, \u201cproject_id\u201d, \u201clabel_id\u201d, \u201ccomment_id\u201d, \u201cdependency_id\u201d) solo por clave primaria. El \u201cworkspace_id\u201d propio del recurso nunca se compara con el \u201cworkspace_id\u201d de la URL. Un usuario puede, por lo tanto, poner su propio espacio de trabajo en el prefijo de la URL y el ID de recurso de cualquier otro espacio de trabajo en la ruta. La verificaci\u00f3n de autenticaci\u00f3n pasa, ya que realmente son miembros del espacio de trabajo del prefijo. El servicio luego devuelve el recurso entre inquilinos para lectura, actualizaci\u00f3n o eliminaci\u00f3n. Hay un segundo error en las rutas de gesti\u00f3n de miembros (\u201cadd_member\u201d, \u201cupdate_member_role\u201d, \u201cremove_member\u201d, \u201cupdate_workspace\u201d, \u201cdelete_workspace\u201d). Cada una hereda el valor predeterminado \u201cmin_role=\u201cmember\u201d\u201d de \u201crequire_workspace_member\u201d. Cualquier miembro b\u00e1sico puede, por lo tanto, promoverse a administrador o propietario, degradar o eliminar a otros miembros, y eliminar el espacio de trabajo. La jerarqu\u00eda de roles existe en el esquema pero no se aplica. El registro est\u00e1 abierto en \u201c/api/v1/auth/register\u201d sin verificaci\u00f3n de correo electr\u00f3nico. El enlace de servidor predeterminado es \u201c0.0.0.0:8000\u201d (\u201cpython -m praisonai_platform\u201d). Un solo curl desde cualquier posici\u00f3n de red no autenticada es suficiente para arrancar en el sistema. PraisonAI Platform versi\u00f3n 0.1.4 corrige el problema."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2026-47407",
"lastModified": "2026-10-24T19:10:00.127",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV40": [
{
"cvssData": {
"Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "NONE",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityRequirement": "NOT_DEFINED",
"baseScore": 9.4,
"baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
"confidentialityRequirement": "NOT_DEFINED",
"exploitMaturity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"integrityRequirement": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedAttackComplexity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedAttackRequirements": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedAttackVector": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedPrivilegesRequired": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedSubAvailabilityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedSubConfidentialityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedSubIntegrityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedUserInteraction": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedVulnAvailabilityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedVulnConfidentialityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedVulnIntegrityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"subIntegrityImpact": "HIGH",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
},
"source": "security-advisories@github.com",
"type": "Secondary"
}
],
"ssvcV203": [
{
"source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"ssvcData": {
"id": "CVE-2026-47407",
"options": [
{
"exploitation": "poc"
},
{
"automatable": "no"
},
{
"technicalImpact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-07-22T14:15:03.095254Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
}
}
]
},
"published": "2026-07-21T17:17:09.363",
"references": [
{
"source": "security-advisories@github.com",
"url": "https://github.com/MervinPraison/PraisonAI/commit/24385d64876577620f749957bd4814f162f4ca47"
},
{
"source": "security-advisories@github.com",
"url": "https://github.com/MervinPraison/PraisonAI/pull/1686"
},
{
"source": "security-advisories@github.com",
"url": "https://github.com/MervinPraison/PraisonAI/security/advisories/GHSA-h8q5-cp56-rr65"
},
{
"source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"url": "https://github.com/MervinPraison/PraisonAI/security/advisories/GHSA-h8q5-cp56-rr65"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "security-advisories@github.com",
"vulnStatus": "Deferred",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-269"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-639"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-863"
}
],
"source": "security-advisories@github.com",
"type": "Secondary"
}
]
}
},
"vulnrichment": {
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-47407",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "poc"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-07-22T14:15:03.095254Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-07-22T14:15:47.543Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"exploit"
],
"url": "https://github.com/MervinPraison/PraisonAI/security/advisories/GHSA-h8q5-cp56-rr65"
}
],
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "praisonai-platform",
"vendor": "MervinPraison",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003c 0.1.4"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "PraisonAI Platform is the platform layer for the PraisonAI multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 0.1.4, the Platform server exposes resources under `/api/v1/workspaces/{workspace_id}/...` and protects them with a `require_workspace_member(workspace_id)` FastAPI dependency. The dependency only checks that the caller is a member of the workspace_id in the URL prefix. The route handlers then look up the inner resource (`agent_id`, `issue_id`, `project_id`, `label_id`, `comment_id`, `dependency_id`) by primary key alone. The resource\u0027s own `workspace_id` is never compared to the URL\u0027s `workspace_id`. A user can therefore put their own workspace in the URL prefix and any other workspace\u0027s resource ID in the path. The auth check passes, since they really are a member of the prefix workspace. The service then returns the cross-tenant resource for read, update, or delete. There is a second bug in the member-management routes (`add_member`, `update_member_role`, `remove_member`, `update_workspace`, `delete_workspace`). Each one inherits the default `min_role=\"member\"` from `require_workspace_member`. Any basic member can therefore promote themselves to admin or owner, demote or remove other members, and delete the workspace. The role hierarchy exists in the schema but is not enforced. Registration is open at `/api/v1/auth/register` with no email verification. The default server bind is `0.0.0.0:8000` (`python -m praisonai_platform`). One curl from any unauthenticated network position is enough to bootstrap into the system. PraisonAI Platform version 0.1.4 patches the issue."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "NONE",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 9.4,
"baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"subIntegrityImpact": "HIGH",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "HIGH"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-269",
"description": "CWE-269: Improper Privilege Management",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
},
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-639",
"description": "CWE-639: Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
},
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-863",
"description": "CWE-863: Incorrect Authorization",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-07-21T17:21:52.482Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/MervinPraison/PraisonAI/security/advisories/GHSA-h8q5-cp56-rr65",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/MervinPraison/PraisonAI/security/advisories/GHSA-h8q5-cp56-rr65"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/MervinPraison/PraisonAI/pull/1686",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/MervinPraison/PraisonAI/pull/1686"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/MervinPraison/PraisonAI/commit/24385d64876577620f749957bd4814f162f4ca47",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/MervinPraison/PraisonAI/commit/24385d64876577620f749957bd4814f162f4ca47"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-h8q5-cp56-rr65",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "PraisonAI Platform has a cross-workspace IDOR + member-role privilege escalation"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-47407",
"datePublished": "2026-07-21T16:42:33.533Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-05-19T19:37:43.525Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-07-22T14:16:34.674Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
}
}
Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline
Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC
How durations are calculated
Following the VTEM framework (Black Hat USA 2015), time to patch starts when the vendor or a coordinator was informed, total time to patch at discovery, and disclosure to patch at public disclosure; vendor response time runs from the report to its acknowledgement. Time to exploit and time unpatched start at the earliest discovery or report, falling back to public disclosure. Unpatched time ends at the first recorded patch, or the calculation time when no patch is recorded. Exploitation to patch shows the interval between those two events; a published proof of concept is a public exploit, not exploitation.
Each result shows its source dates. A negative interval means the end event came first; when date-only inputs leave the order open, the result says so. Date-only inputs are approximate. The earliest evidence wins: KEV report dates and sightings are labelled as such. Records describing another vulnerability are listed but never calculated from, and a PoC alone does not establish exploitation. Missing patch evidence does not prove that no patch exists. Filters below change the event list only.
Loading timeline…
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.